1. The effect of deep convolutional neural networks on radiologists' performance in the detection of hip fractures on digital pelvic radiographs
- Author
-
Yuta Yoshimatsu, Takashi Terasawa, Yoshiko Hayashida, Toshihiko Hamamura, Yukunori Korogi, Issei Ueda, Tomoyuki Miyagi, Kenta Anai, Takatoshi Aoki, Akitaka Fujisaki, Shigehiko Katsuragawa, Tsubasa Mawatari, Midori Ueno, Satoru Yamaga, and Chihiro Chihara
- Subjects
Male ,Radiography, Abdominal ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Radiography ,Convolutional neural network ,Pelvis ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,Deep Learning ,0302 clinical medicine ,Observer performance ,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Reference standards ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Hip Fractures ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Gold standard (test) ,Middle Aged ,Control subjects ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Radiographic Image Enhancement ,ROC Curve ,Area Under Curve ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Neural Networks, Computer ,Radiology ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business - Abstract
The purpose of our study is to develop deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for detecting hip fractures using CT and MRI as a gold standard, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 7 readers with and without DCNN.The study population consisted of 327 patients who underwent pelvic CT or MRI and were diagnosed with proximal femoral fractures. All radiographs were manually checked and annotated by radiologists referring to CT and MRI for selecting ROI. At first, a DCNN with the GoogLeNet model was trained by 302 cases. The remaining 25 cases and 25 control subjects were used for the observer performance study and for the testing of DCNN. Seven readers took part in this study. A continuous rating scale was used to record each observer's confidence level. Subsequently, each observer interpreted with the DCNN outputs and rated them again. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the fracture detection.The average AUC of the 7 readers was 0.832. The AUC of DCNN alone was 0.905. The average AUC of the 7 readers with DCNN outputs was 0.876. The AUC of readers with DCNN output were higher than those without(p 0.05). The AUC of the 2 experienced readers with DCNN output exceeded the AUC of DCNN alone.For detecting the hip fractures on radiographs, DCNN developed using CT and MRI as a gold standard by radiologists improved the diagnostic performance including the experienced readers.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF