Search

Introduction We hypothesized that the nephroprotective and diuretic effects of carperitide are effective in patients with pulmonary hypertension. We examined the presence of preoperative pulmonary hypertension and the effects of carperitide. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients aged 20 years or older who received carperitide during cardiovascular surgery and were admitted to the postoperative intensive care unit. We used hospital data from March 2019 to September 2021. The outcomes were the incidence of acute kidney injury, the number of patients using renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit, urine volume in the first 24 hours after surgery, and the difference in serum creatinine concentrations between before and after surgery. After adjusting for confounding factors by multivariate analysis, we compared the difference in outcomes with and without preoperative pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary artery pressure ≥36 mmHg). Results The study included 244 patients, with 72 (29.5%) in the pulmonary hypertension group and 172 (70.5%) in the control group. Acute kidney injury occurred in eight (11.1%) patients in the pulmonary hypertension group and in 18 (10.5%) patients in the control group, with no significant difference by logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 0.54-3.62, p=0.49). Additionally, the use of renal replacement therapy, urine volume at 24 hours postoperatively, and the difference in serum creatinine concentrations were not different between the two groups. Conclusions Our results suggest that the effect of carperitide during cardiovascular surgery is not affected by the presence or absence of pulmonary hypertension.

Background We herein present a case of venous thrombosis that developed more than 20 years after diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), although many reports of GPA have described venous thrombosis within 1 year of diagnosis. Case presentation A 73-year-old man with GPA was admitted for lower extremity swelling and diagnosed with venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. On the second day, catheter-based thrombolysis was unsuccessful, and inferior vena cava filter insertion and anticoagulation were performed. On the third day, respiratory disturbance and loss of consciousness appeared and progressed. The patient died on the fifth day. The autopsy revealed a large thrombus in the inferior vena cava filter, and death of progressive venous thrombosis was suspected. Conclusions We experienced a case of venous thrombosis that developed 20 years after diagnosis of GPA, although GPA is frequently associated with venous thrombosis immediately after diagnosis. The thrombosis progressed rapidly and was resistant to treatment.