Search

Condensed abstractNo large-scale, well-designed randomized study with a long-term follow-up has evaluated the survival effect of pretreatment 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (18FDG-PET–CT) on patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer receiving image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT). This is the first head-to-head propensity score–matched, nationwide population-based cohort study evaluating this survival effect. The results revealed that pretreatment 18FDG-PET–CT might be associated with longer survival in patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, especially in the IG-IMRT era.PurposeNo large-scale, well-designed randomized study with a long-term follow-up has evaluated the survival effect of pretreatment 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (18FDG-PET–CT) on patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer receiving image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT). Therefore, in this propensity score–matched, population-based cohort study, we investigated these survival effects.Patients and methodsWe included 4167 patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) through the IG-IMRT technique. The patients were categorized into two 1:2 propensity score–matched groups depending on whether they underwent pretreatment 18FDG-PET–CT, and their outcomes were compared.ResultsWe included 2778 and 1389 patients with cervical cancer in the nonpretreatment and pretreatment PET–CT groups, respectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed an association between pretreatment PET–CT and improved survival in the patients (in the adjusted model, the adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] was 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–0.97: P = 0.010). Regardless of the cancer stage (early or advanced), pretreatment PET–CT was significantly superior to nonpretreatment PET–CT in terms of all-cause death (aHR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60–0.92; P = 0.013 and aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81–0.99; P = 0.039 for the early [IB–IIA] and advanced stages [IIB–IVA], respectively).ConclusionsPretreatment 18FDG-PET–CT might be associated with longer survival in patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer receiving RT or CCRT, especially in the era of IG-IMRT.

Purpose: The relationship between the onset of sarcopenia prior to cancer diagnosis and survival outcomes in various types of cancer is not well understood. To address this gap in knowledge, we conducted a propensity score-matched population-based cohort study to compare the overall survival of cancer patients with and without sarcopenia. Patients and Methods: In our study, we included patients with cancer and divided them into two groups based on the presence or absence of sarcopenia. To ensure comparability between the groups, we matched patients in both groups at a ratio of 1:1. Results: After the matching process, our final cohort included 20,416 patients with cancer (10,208 in each group) who were eligible for further analysis. There were no significant differences between the sarcopenia and nonsarcopenia groups in terms of confounding factors such as age (mean 61.05 years versus 62.17 years), gender (52.56% versus 52.16% male, 47.44% versus 47.84% female), comorbidities, and cancer stages. In our multivariate Cox regression analysis, we found that the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) of all-cause death for the sarcopenia group compared to the nonsarcopenia group was 1.49 (1.43–1.55; p < 0.001). Additionally, the aHRs (95% CIs) of all-cause death for those aged 66–75, 76–85, and >85 years (compared to those aged ≤65 years) were 1.29 (1.23–1.36), 2.00 (1.89–2.12), and 3.26 (2.97–3.59), respectively. The aHR (95% CI) of all-cause death for those with a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 1 compared to those with a CCI of 0 was 1.34 (1.28–1.40). The aHR (95% CI) of all-cause death for men compared to women was 1.56 (1.50–1.62). When comparing the sarcopenia and nonsarcopenia groups, the aHRs (95% CIs) for lung, liver, colorectal, breast, prostate, oral, pancreatic, stomach, ovarian, and other cancers were significantly higher. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the onset of sarcopenia prior to cancer diagnosis may be linked to reduced survival outcomes in cancer patients.

Although credit score models have been widely applied, one of the important variables-Merchant Category Code (MCC)-is sometimes misused. MCC misuse may cause errors in credit scoring systems. The present study aimed to develop and deploy an MCC misuse detection system with ensemble models, gives insights into the development process and compares different machine learning methods. XGBoost exhibited the best performance, with overall error, sensitivity, specificity, F_1 score, AUC and PRAUC of 0.1095, 0.7777, 0.9672, 0.8518, 0.9095 and 0.9090, respectively. MCC misuse by merchants can be predicted with satisfactory accuracy by using our ensemble-based detection system. The paper can thus not only suggest the MCC misuse cannot be overlooked but also help researchers and practitioners to apply new ensemble machine learning based detection system or similar problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]