1. Comparison of the safety, effectiveness, and usability of swab robot vs. manual nasopharyngeal specimen collection
- Author
-
Jiun-Hao Yu, Sung-huai Hsieh, Chieh‐Hsiao Chen, and Wen-Kuan Huang
- Subjects
Swab robot ,Nasopharyngeal sampling ,Respiratory tract infection ,COVID-19 pandemic ,SARS-CoV-2 testing ,Specimen collection ,Science (General) ,Q1-390 ,Social sciences (General) ,H1-99 - Abstract
Background: Healthcare workers face a risk of infection during aerosol-generating procedures, such as nasal swabbing. Robot-assisted nasopharyngeal sampling aims to minimize this risk and reduce stress for healthcare providers. However, its effectiveness and safety require validation. Methods: We conducted a controlled trial with 80 subjects at two teaching hospitals and compared robot-collected vs manually-collected nasopharyngeal swabs. The primary outcomes included specimen quality and success rate of nasopharyngeal swab collection. We also recorded the pain index, duration of the collection, and psychological stress using a post-collection questionnaire. Results: During the study period, from September 23 to October 27, 2020, 40 subjects were enrolled in both the robotic and manual groups. The cycle threshold (Ct) value for nasopharyngeal specimens was statistically higher in the robotic group compared to the manual group (30.9 vs 28.0, p
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF