Search

Background: Lymphocele is the principal post-operative morbidity following axillary node dissection. According to the literature, the incidence can vary from 4% to 89%. Encouraging results in terms of reducing postoperative lymphoceles as well as the volume and duration of drainage using octreotide LAR has been recently reported. Pasireotide LAR, a long acting drug designed to target multiple somatostatin receptors, was evaluated in this trial. Trial design: A phase II, two centers, randomized, double-blind, non-comparative pilot study was carried out in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of a single injection of pasireotide LAR 60 mg administered 7-10 days before scheduled mastectomy with axillary dissection surgery. This study included a parallel placebo arm to assess the natural course of the disease. Eligibility criteria: Adult female breast cancer patients planned to undergo a mastectomy (without reconstruction at the same time) and axillary node dissection. Specific aims: To assess the efficacy and safety of a single injection of pasireotide LAR 60 mg or placebo prior to mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection surgery in reducing symptomatic lymphocele development. Symptomatic lymphocele was evaluated and was defined as: 1. total lymphocele drainage/aspiration volume (unique or iterative) >60 cc inclusive within the 28 days after surgery (excluding post-surgery drain) or; 2. a systematic aspiration volume at day 28 > 120 cc. Statistical methods: The statistical analysis was carried out sequentially after observing the absence of symptomatic lymphocele for each patient. It involves estimating the probability of a response in each group using a Bayesian design based on a beta-binomial model. The probability of response was considered random and its prior distribution was centered on 80% in the pasireotide group and 60% in the placebo group according to the investigators initial guesses. The distribution of the probability of response was updated after the observation of the patients included in the trial. Results: A total of 90 patients were included over 18 months: 42 in the treatment group and 48 in the placebo group. In the treatment group, the posterior mean estimation of the response rate (i.e. patients who did not experience a symptomatic lymphocele) was 62.4% (95% CI: 48.6%-75.3%) and 50.2% in the placebo group (95% CI: 37.6%-62.8%%). In the treatment group, one serious adverse event occurred in a patient with known insulin dependent diabetes requiring hospitalization for hyperglycaemia. Conclusion: A one time injection of pasireotide LAR to prevent symptomatic lymphocele development in women undergoing mastectomy with axillary dissection is promising. Further clinical studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In two randomized trials, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) did not significantly affect overall or disease-free survival of patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN). These two trials closed early without the targeted enrollment questioning a lack of sufficient power. In retrospective observational studies, patients receive treatment according to tumor and patient (age, health status) factors and thus biasing the comparisons. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis has been proposed as an alternative method to adjust for confounding factors with a statistical advantage over the standard methods of confounder adjustment. The method involves generation of a propensity score for each subject which is an estimate of the conditional probability of receiving a treatment given a set of known covariates. Propensity scores are used to reduce selection bias by equating groups based on these covariates. Objective: To evaluate whether patients with SLN metastasis of breast cancer who underwent complete ALND demonstrate improved survival in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database using a propensity score matching. Methods: The study population comprised 21073 patients. The 5-year cause-specific survival was tested, in order to examine the survival impact of complete lymphadenectomy by using propensity score matching analysis. The propensity scores to determine the conditional probability of receiving ALND were generated using logistic regression model. Patients were then matched using the propensity score by an optimal matching algorithm. Results: The PSM was based on age, race, region of diagnosis, tumor type and grade, tumor size, nodal status (micrometastasis vs macrometastasis) and hormone receptor status. It generated a balanced, matched cohort (3229 patients in each group) in which baseline characteristics were not significantly different. Five-year overall survival was 96.9% (95% CI 96.1-97.6%) in the ALND group and 94.0 (95% CI 92.6-95.4%) in the SLN biopsy alone group. The benefit of complete lymphadenectomy was significant: p = 0.028. Conclusion: Using PSM analysis, our results show evidence of benefit for ALND in case of metastatic sentinel lymph node. The results of randomized trials demonstrating no benefit for ALND may not been generalizable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We demonstrate the selective area growth of InGaAs nanowires (NWs) on GaAs (111)B substrates using hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE). A high growth rate of more than 50 μ m h -1 and high aspect ratio NWs were obtained. Composition along the NWs was investigated by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy giving an average indium composition of 84%. This is consistent with the composition of 78% estimated from the photoluminescence spectrum of the NWs. Crystal structure analysis of the NWs by transmission electron microscopy indicated random stacking faults related to zinc-blende/wurtzite polytypism. This work demonstrates the ability of HVPE for growing high aspect ratio InGaAs NW arrays., (© 2024 IOP Publishing Ltd.)

The incidence (rate per 100 000) of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) increases progressively with age, starting at 15-19 years and peaking at around 4.5 cases per 100 000 at an age of 55-59 years (LE3) with a median age of 46 years. The five year survival for FIGO stages I, II, III and IV is 99.7 % (95 % CI: 96.2-100 %), 99.6 % (95 % CI: 92.6-100 %), 95.3 % (95 % CI: 91.8-97.4 %) and 77.1 % (95 % CI: 58.0-88.3 %), respectively (LE3). An epidemiological association exists between the individual risk of BOT and family history of BOT and certain other cancers (pancreatic, lung, bone, leukemia) (LE3), a personal history of benign ovarian cyst (LE2), a personal history of tubo-ovarian infection (LE3), the use of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LE3), oral contraceptive use (LE3), multiparity (LE3), Hormonal replacement therapy (LE3), high consumption of Coumestrol (LE4), medical treatment for infertility with progesterone (LE3) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (LE3). Screening for BOTs is not recommended for patients (Grade C). The overall risk of recurrence of BOTs varies between 2% and 24 %, with an overall survival greater than 94 % at 10 years, and the risk of an invasive recurrence of a BOT ranges from 0.5 % to 3.8 %. The use of scores and nomograms can be useful in assessing the risk of recurrence, and providing patients with information (Grade C). The WHO classification is recommended for classifying BOTs. It is recommended that the presence of a microinvasive focus (<5 mm) and microinvasive carcinoma (<5 mm with an atypical nuclei and a desmoplastic stroma reaction) within a BOT be reported. In cases of serous BOT, it is recommended to specify the classic histological subtype or micropapillary / cribriform type (Grade C). When confronted with a BOT, it is recommended that the invasive or non-invasive nature of peritoneal implants can be investigated based solely on the invasion and destruction of underlying adipose or peritoneal tissue which has a desmoplastic stromal reaction where in contact with the invasive clusters (Grade B). For bilateral mucinous BOTs and / or in cases with peritoneal implants or peritoneal pseudomyxoma, it is recommended to also look for a primitive digestive or pancreato-biliary cancer (Grade C). It is recommended to sample ovarian tumors suspected of being BOTs by focusing samples on vegetations and solid components, with at least 1 sample per cm in tumors with a size less than 10 cm and 2 samples per cm in tumors with a size greater than 10 cm (Grade C). In cases of BOTs and in the absence of macroscopic omental involvement after careful macroscopic examination, it is recommended to perform at least 4-6 systematic sampling blocks and to include all peritoneal implants (Grade C). It is recommended to consult an expert pathologist in gynecology when a BOT suspicion requires intraoperative extemporaneous histology (grade C). Endo-vaginal and suprapubic ultrasonography are recommended for the analysis of an ovarian mass (Grade A). In case of an undetermined ovarian lesion on ultrasonography, it is recommended that a pelvic MRI be performed (Grade A). To analyze an adnexal mass with MRI, it is recommended to use an MRI protocol with T2, T1, T1 Fat Sat, dynamic and diffusion sequences as well as gadolinium injection (Grade B). To characterize an adnexal mass with MRI, it is recommended to include a score system for malignancy (ADNEX MR/O-RADS) (Grade C) in the report and to formulate a histological hypothesis (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended to characterize a tumor suspected of being a BOT (Grade C). Macroscopic MRI features should be analyzed to differentiate BOT subtypes (Grade C). Pelvic ultrasound is the first-line examination for the detection and characterization of adnexal masses during pregnancy (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended from 12 weeks of gestation in case of an indeterminate adnexal mass and should provide a diagnostic score (Grade C). Gadolinium injection must be minimized as fetal impairment has been proven (Grade C). It is recommended that serum levels of HE4 and CA125 be evaluated and that the ROMA score for the diagnosis of an indeterminate ovarian mass on imaging be used (grade A). In case of suspicion of a mucinous BOT on imaging, dosage of serum levels of CA 19-9 can be considered (Grade C). If the determination of tumor markers is normal preoperatively, routine dosage of tumor markers in BOT follow-up is not recommended (Grade C). In case of preoperative elevation in tumor markers, the determination of serum CA 125 levels is recommended in the follow-up of BOT (Grade B). When conservative treatment of a BOT has been adopted, the use of endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography is recommended during follow-up (Grade B)., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

In the Early Stages (ES) of Borderline Ovarian Tumor (BOT), if surgery without risk of tumor rupture is possible, then laparoscopy with protected extraction is recommended over laparotomy (Grade C). In case of bilateral serous ES BOT treatment with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, bilateral cystectomy is recommended if possible (Grade B). In case of mucinous BOT treatment with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, unilateral adnexectomy is recommended (grade C). In the case of a mucinous BOT in a patient who has had an initial cystectomy, unilateral adnexectomy is recommended (grade C). In the case of treatment of a serous ES BOT in a patient who has had an initial cystectomy, with a strategy to preserve fertility and/or endocrine function, restaging surgery for adnexectomy is not recommended in the absence of suspicious residual lesions at the time of surgery and/or postoperative imaging (reference ultrasonography or pelvic MRI) (grade C). For serous or mucinous ES BOTs, routine hysterectomy is not recommended (Grade C). In cases of ES BOTs, lymphadenectomy is not recommended (Grade C). For ES BOTs, appendectomy is recommended only if there is a macroscopically pathological aspect to the appendix (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in case of a serous BOT with a micropapillary aspect and an unsatisfactory inspection of the abdominal cavity during initial surgery (Grade C). Restaging surgery is recommended in cases of mucinous BOT if only a cystectomy has been performed or if the appendix has not been evaluated (Grade C). If restaging surgery is decided for an ES BOT, the following procedures should be performed: peritoneal cytology (grade C), omentectomy (there is no data in literature to recommend which type of omentectomy should be performed) (grade B), complete exploration of the abdominal cavity with peritoneal biopsies (grade C), visualization of the appendix +/- appendectomy in case of pathological macroscopic appearance (grade C) and unilateral adnexectomy in case of a mucinous BOT (grade C). In advanced stages of BOT it is not recommended to perform a lymphadenectomy as a routine procedure (Grade C). In cases of an advanced stage BOT, in a patient with a desire to fall pregnant, conservative treatment involving preservation of the uterus and all or part of the ovary may be proposed after a multidisciplinary meeting (Grade C). Second surgery aimed at removing all lesions, if not performed initially, is recommended in cases of advanced stage BOT (Grade C). It is not recommended to perform completion surgery after conservative treatment (preservation of the ovaries and the uterus) and after the achievement of fertility desire for a serous BOT (Grade B). After treatment for a BOT, follow-up beyond 5 years is recommended due to the median time to recurrence (Grade B). It is recommended that a systematic clinical examination be carried out during follow-up of a treated BOT (Grade B). In the particular case of an initial elevation of CA 125 levels, it is recommended to monitor CA 125 during follow up (Grade B). In cases treated conservatively (ovarian and uterine conservation), it is recommended to use endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography during the follow up period (Grade B). In the event of a recurrence of a BOT, in a woman of childbearing age, a conservative treatment strategy can again be proposed (Grade C). In the presence of non-invasive BOT implants, conservative treatment may be considered after a first non-invasive recurrence in women who wish to preserve their fertility (Grade C). Pelvic MRI is recommended after 12 weeks of amenorrhea in case of an undetermined adnexal mass and should be concluded with a diagnostic score (Grade C). The injection of gadolinium, in case of pregnancy, should be discussed on a case-by-case basis due to the proven risks for the foetus (Grade C). If feasible, a laparoscopic approach should be preferred during pregnancy (Grade C). A consultation with a specialist reproductive physician should be offered to patients with a BOT and of childbearing age (Grade C). It is recommended that patients be provided with full information on the risk of decreased ovarian reserve following to surgical treatment. It is recommended that the ovarian reserve be evaluated prior to surgical management of a suspected BOT (Grade C). When possible, a conservative surgical strategy is recommended to preserve fertility in women of childbearing age (Grade C). There is no specific data on the management of infertility following to conservative treatment of BOT. In case of durable infertility following to conservative treatment of BOT, a consultation with a specialist reproductive physician is required (Grade C). In the case of optimally treated BOT, there is no evidence in literature to contraindicate the use of Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART). The use of hormonal contraception after serous or mucinous BOT is not contraindicated (Grade C). After treatment of a mucinous BOT, for women aged under 45 years, given the benefit of hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular and bone risks, and the lack of hormone-sensitivity of mucinous BOTs, it is recommended to offer HRT (Grade C). After treatment of a mucinous BOT, for women over 45 years of age, there is no argument to contraindicate the use of HRT. HRT can be prescribed in case of a climacteric syndrome, as part of an individual benefit to risk assessment (Grade C)., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To provide clinical practice guidelines from the French college of obstetrics and gynecology (CNGOF) based on the best evidence available, concerning epidemiology of recurrence, the risk or relapse and the follow-up in case of borderline ovarian tumor after primary management, and evaluation of completion surgery after fertility sparing surgery., Material and Methods: English and French review of literature from 2000 to 2019 based on publications from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, with keywords borderline ovarian tumor, low malignant potential, recurrence, relapse, follow-up, completion surgery. From 2000 up to this day, 448 references have been found, from which only 175 were screened for this work., Results and Conclusion: Overall risk of recurrence with Borderline Ovarian Tumour (BOT) may vary from 2 to 24% with a 10-years overall survival>94% and risk of invasive recurrence between 0.5 to 3.8%. Age<40 years (level of evidence 3), advanced initial FIGO stage (LE3), fertility sparing surgery (LE2), residual disease after initial surgery for serous BOT (LE2), implants (invasive or not) (LE2) are risk factors of recurrence. In case of conservative treatment, serous BOT had a higher risk of relapse than mucinous BOT (LE2). Lymphatic involvement (LE3) and use of mini invasive surgery (LE2) are not associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Scores or Nomograms could be useful to assess the risk of recurrence and then to inform patients about this risk (gradeC). In case of serous BOT, completion surgery is not recommended, after conservative treatment and fulfillment of parental project (grade B). It isn't possible to suggest a recommendation about completion surgery for mucinous BOT. There is not any data to advise a frequency of follow-up and use of paraclinic tools in general case of BOT. Follow-up of treated BOT must be achieved beyond 5 years (grade B). A systematic clinical examination is recommended during follow-up (grade B), after treatment of BOT. In case of elevation of CA-125 at diagnosis use of CA-125 serum level is recommended during follow-up of treated BOT (grade B). When a conservative treatment (preservation of ovarian pieces and uterus) of BOT is performed, endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography is recommended during follow-up (grade B). There isn't any sufficient data to advise a frequency of these examinations (clinical examination, ultrasound and CA-125) in case of treated BOT., Conclusion: Risk of relapse after surgical treatment of BOT depends on patients' characteristics, type of BOT (histological features) and modalities of initial treatment. Scores and nomogram are useful tools to assess risk of relapse. Follow-up must be performed beyond 5 years and in case of peculiar situations, use of paraclinic evaluations is recommended., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to assess the value of diaphragmatic surgery to achieve optimal debulking in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)., Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective review of the medical records of 182 patients. Diaphragmatic surgery was performed during interval debulking surgery (IDS) in 74 patients between January 2002 and December 2014. The patients were divided in 2 groups: with or without histological residual diaphragmatic disease. The time-course of serum CA125 levels, cytoreductive outcome, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were analyzed. Patients without diaphragmatic peritonectomy (DP) during IDS were included in the survival analysis., Results: One hundred thirty-two (72.5%) patients had FIGO stage III disease and 43 (23.6%) patients had stage IV disease. Histological examination of DP was positive in 45 patients and negative in 29 patients. CA125 normalization after the 3rd cycle of NAC was significantly associated with negative DP. OS tended to be higher in the DP-negative group (37.8 months vs 19 months, p=0.1). Median OS was 40.7 months in the case of IDS without DP and 22 months in the case of IDS with DP (p=0.048)., Conclusion: Evaluation of residual diaphragmatic disease can be difficult after NAC. The CA125 tumor marker appears to be a useful tool to define the indications for DP. Diaphragmatic surgery after NAC may be of limited value., (Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The management of endometrial carcinoma is constantly evolving. The SFOG and the CNGOF decided to jointly update the previous French recommendations (Institut national du cancer 2011) and to adapt to the French practice the 2015 recommendations elaborated at the time of joint European consensus conference with the participation of the three concerned European societies (ESGO, ESTRO, ESMO)., Material and Methods: A strict methodology was used. A steering committee was put together. A systematic review of the literature since 2011 has been carried out. A first draft of the recommendations has been elaborated, with emphasis on high level of evidence. An external review by users representing all the concerned discipines and all kinds of practice was completed. Three hundred and four comments were sent by 54 reviewers., Results: The management of endometrial carcinoma requires a precise preoperative workup. A provisional estimate of the final stage is provided. This estimation impact the level of surgical staging. Surgery should use a minimal invasive approach. The final pathology is the key of the decision concerning adjuvant therapy, which involves surveillance, radiation therapy, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy., Conclusion: The management algorithms allow a fast, state of the art based, answer to the clinical questions raised by the management of endometrial cancer. They must be used only in the setting of a multidisciplinary team at all stages of the management., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate 36 quality indicators (QIs) for monitoring the quality of care of uterine cancer to be implemented in the EFFECT (effectiveness of endometrial cancer treatment) project., Methods: The 36 QIs were evaluated in the first 10 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and managed in 14 French hospitals in 2011. To assess the status of each QI, a questionnaire detailing the 36 QIs was sent to each hospital, and the information was cross-checked with information from the multidisciplinary staff meeting, surgical reports, and pathological reports. The QIs were evaluated in terms of measurability and improvability. The remaining QIs were evaluated with a multiple correspondence analysis to highlight the interrelationships between qualitative variables describing a population., Results: Thirteen of the 14 institutions responded to the survey for a total of 130 patients. Twenty-five of the 36 QIs affected less than 80% of the patients. Thirteen QIs were found not to be improvable because they reached more than 95% of the theoretical target. Finally, 5 QIs concerning more than 80% of the patients were found to be improvable. The multiple correspondence analysis finally identified 3 dimensions-outcome, safety, and perioperative management-that included the 5 QIs., Conclusions: In the present study, 5 of the 36 QIs suggested by the EFFECT project seem to be sufficient to report on the quality of endometrial cancer management. Further studies are needed to correlate the information provided by those 5 questions and the relevant outcomes reflecting quality of care in endometrial cancer.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess patterns in the use of social media (SM) platforms and to identify the training needs among European gynecologic oncology trainees., Methods: In 2014, a web-based survey was sent to 633 trainees from the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO) database. The 14-item questionnaire (partially using a 1- to 5-point Likert scale) assessed respondents' use of SM and preference for workshop content and organization. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the mean scores reported for different items, and the internal reliability of the questionnaire was assessed by Cronbach α., Results: In total, 170 ENYGO members (27%) responded to the survey. Of those, 91% said that they use SM platforms, mostly for private purposes. Twenty-three percent used SM professionally and 43% indicated that they would consider SM to be a clinical discussion forum. The respondents said that they would like updates on conferences and professional activities to be shared on SM platforms. Complication management, surgical anatomy, and state of the art in gynecologic oncology were identified as preferred workshops topics. The most frequently indicated hands-on workshops were laparoscopic techniques and surgical anatomy. Consultants attached a higher level of importance to palliative care education and communication training than trainees. The mean duration of the workshop preferred was 2 days., Conclusions: This report highlights the significance of ENYGO trainees' attachment to SM platforms. Most respondents expect ENYGO to use these online channels for promoting educational activities and other updates. Using SM for clinical discussion will require specific guidelines to secure professional and also consumer integrity. This survey confirms surgical management and the state of the art as important knowledge gaps, and ENYGO has tailored its activities according to these results. Future activities will further direct attention and resources to education in palliative care and molecular tumor biology.

Aim: To investigate whether adding bevacizumab to neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) helps achieve optimal debulking, measured by complete resection rate (CRR) at interval debulking surgery (IDS), in patients with initially unresectable International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC/IV ovarian, tubal or peritoneal adenocarcinoma., Methods: Multicentre, open-label, non-comparative phase II study. Ninety-five patients randomised (2:1) to receive four cycles of neoadjuvant CP ±3 concomitant cycles of bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (BCP) followed by IDS. Primary objective is to evaluate the CRR at IDS in the BCP group (reference CRR rate defined as 45% CRR). A stopping rule based on bevacizumab-related adverse events (AEs) of special interest was implemented., Results: In the BCP group (N = 58), IDS was performed in 40 (69%) patients, of whom 85% had a complete resection. The CRR of this group was therefore 58.6% (34 patients), statistically over pre-defined 45%. The CRR in the CP group was 51.4%: 22 (60%) patients underwent IDS (85% had a complete resection). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 62% of the BCP-treated patients and 63% of the CP-treated patients: mainly blood and lymphatic, gastrointestinal and vascular disorders, without more toxicity with BCP. Postoperative complications (mainly wound, infectious and gastrointestinal complications) occurred in 28% and 36% of the patients, respectively. The pre-specified safety stopping rule was not reached., Conclusion: The primary objective was met as the CRR with BCP was significantly higher than the reference rate. Bevacizumab may be safely added to a preoperative program in patients deemed non-optimally resectable, whatever the final surgical decision. Bevacizumab's role in this setting should be further investigated., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Carry out a preliminary study comparing postoperative pain and intraoperative and postoperative complications between micro-laparoscopy and laparoscopic monotrocart non-oncological adnexal surgery., Methods: All patients should benefit from a benign adnexal surgery were included prospectively from February to May 2014. The insufflation pressure, infiltration of trocar holes with a local anesthetic, postoperative analgesics were prescribed standardized. Operative and postoperative complications, type and length of hospital stay as well as EVA and analgesic consumption were recorded., Results: Nine patients were included in monotrocart group versus 7 in the micro-laparoscopy group. There were no differences in operative and postoperative complications, the type and length of hospital stay, as well as cosmetics satisfaction. However, there was a significant difference in the VAS to D2 (2.15 vs. 4.08, P=0.04) and analgesic consumption at D0 (P=0.04), D1 (P=0.04), D2 (P=0.02) and D3 (P=0.01), for the benefit of micro-laparoscopy., Discussion and Conclusion: Despite an enrollment of patients low, micro-laparoscopy appears to have a significant advantage over the monotrocart laparoscopy for postoperative pain in benign adnexal surgery., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Invasive ductal carcinoma with predominant intraductal component (IDCPIC) represents almost 5% of breast cancers. Nevertheless few data exist concerning their characteristics and prognostic behaviour. Our objective was to describe IDCPIC's clinicopathological and prognostic features and compare them to that of invasive ductal carcinoma without predominant intraductal component (IDC)., Methods: Retrospective single centre study including all the localized invasive ductal carcinoma listed in our institutional database. Clinical, radiological and pathological criteria were collected as well as disease-free survival (DFS) data., Results: From 1995 to 2008, 4109 invasive ductal breast cancers treated were included. Out of them 192 (4.7%) were IDCPIC. Most of IDCPIC (63%) were discovered by radiological screening whereas IDC suspicion was more often clinical (82.7% vs 49.5%, p < 0.001). Pathological lymph node involvement was less frequent in IDCPIC (35.8 vs 44.3%, p = 0.04). Invasive tumour median size was 2-fold smaller in IDCPIC (10 mm vs 20 mm, p<0.001). Hormone receptors expression was similar between both groups whereas HER2 overexpression was more frequent in IDCPIC (32% vs 14.3%, p<0.001). Mastectomy was more frequently performed for IDCPIC (67.7% vs 30.3%, p < 0.001) whereas chemotherapy and radiation therapy were less frequent (55.5% vs 68%, and 82.8% vs 95.5%, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). After matching for discriminant clinicopathological features (tumour size, lymph node involvement, vascular invasion, HER2), DFS was similar in both groups (5-year DFS of 87.4% vs 84.4%, p = 0.47)., Conclusion: IDCPIC and other IDC with invasive components showing similar clinicopathological features display a similar prognosis., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)