Search

Introduction: The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to synthesise quality of life (QOL) of family caregivers of children and young adults with Down syndrome (DS) and determine factors affecting their QOL. Method: This review was conducted as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Key search terms were “quality of life”, “down syndrome” and “trisomy 21”. Meta-analysis using random effect model was conducted where feasible. All studies underwent qualitative synthesis. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023413532). Results: Eighteen studies with 1956 caregivers were included. Of the 10 studies utilising the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Brief Version, 5 were included in the meta-analysis. Psychosocial domain had the highest score with mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 63.18 (39.10–87.25). Scores were poorer in physical, environmental and social domains: 59.36 (28.24–90.48), 59.82 (19.57–100.07) and 59.83 (44.24–75.41), respectively. Studies were heterogenous with I² values ranging from 99–100% (P<0.01). The remaining 8 studies used 6 other instruments. Qualitative synthesis revealed that caregivers’ QOL was adversely affected by child-related factors, such as level of functional independence, developmental delay, presence of multiple comorbidities, impaired activities of daily living and poor sleep quality. Environmental factors that adversely affected caregivers’ QOL included number of children, housing and support from the family. Personal factors that affected caregivers’ QOL included age, being a single mother, low education and low income. Conclusions: QOL of caregivers of children with DS was lower than population reference data. Understanding the factors that influence family caregivers’ QOL is an essential step towards improving the QOL of caregivers and their children with DS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Down syndrome (DS) negatively impacts the well-being of affected individuals. This study aimed to summarise the evidence on quality of life (QOL) of children and young adults with DS using quantitative measures from caregivers’ perspective and identify factors that affected their QOL. Method: Database search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL on 24 April 2024. Meta-analysis using random effects model was conducted where feasible. All studies underwent qualitative synthesis. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023413532). Results: Seventeen studies involving 3038 children with DS using various QOL measures were included: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) (8 studies), KIDSCREEN (4 studies), KidsLife (2 studies), The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research Academic Medical Center Children’s QOL (2 studies) and Personal Outcome Scale (1 study). Meta-analysis on PedsQL studies compared scores between children with DS and typically developing (TD) children. Total scale score was lower in children with DS (mean 70.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 64.31–76.24) compared to TD children (mean 88.17, 95% CI 80.50–95.83). All subdomains of PedsQL were also lower in children with DS. Within the domain of psychosocial health, children with DS had statistically significant lower social functioning (standardised mean difference -1.40, 95% CI -2.27 to -0.53) and school functioning (standardised mean difference -1.09, 95% CI -1.55 to -0.62) scores, but similar emotional functioning scores. Qualitative synthesis revealed poorer subdomain QOL compared to TD children, especially in social functioning and cognitive functioning. QOL worsened during adolescent years. Family variables (parental education and occupation) did not affect parental perception of children’s QOL. Children with DS who had higher intelligent quotient had better QOL. Conclusion: Children with DS have lower caregiver-reported QOL than TD children, especially in social functioning and school functioning subdomains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Down syndrome (DS) negatively impacts the well-being of affected individuals. This study aimed to summarise the evidence on quality of life (QOL) of children and young adults with DS using quantitative measures from caregivers' perspective and identify factors that affected their QOL., Method: Database search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL on 24 April 2024. Meta-analysis using random effects model was conducted where feasible. All studies underwent qualitative synthesis. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023413532)., Results: Seventeen studies involving 3038 children with DS using various QOL measures were included: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) (8 studies), KIDSCREEN (4 studies), KidsLife (2 studies), The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research Academic Medical Center Children's QOL (2 studies) and Personal Outcome Scale (1 study). Meta-analysis on PedsQL studies compared scores between children with DS and typically developing (TD) children. Total scale score was lower in children with DS (mean 70.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 64.31-76.24) compared to TD children (mean 88.17, 95% CI 80.50-95.83). All subdomains of PedsQL were also lower in children with DS. Within the domain of psychosocial health, children with DS had statistically significant lower social functioning (standardised mean difference -1.40, 95% CI -2.27 to -0.53) and school functioning (standardised mean difference -1.09, 95% CI -1.55 to -0.62) scores, but similar emotional functioning scores. Qualitative synthesis revealed poorer subdomain QOL compared to TD children, especially in social functioning and cognitive functioning. QOL worsened during adolescent years. Family variables (parental education and occupation) did not affect parental perception of children's QOL. Children with DS who had higher intelligent quotient had better QOL., Conclusion: Children with DS have lower caregiver-reported QOL than TD children, especially in social functioning and school functioning subdomains.