Search

In 1994, at a meeting known as the Third Forum on Tibet Work, the Chinese authorities announced a series of restrictions on religious practice in the Tibetan Autonomous Region. Described by many outsiders in terms of abuses of rights, in fact those measures differed in important ways. By analysing the target, rationale and procedure of these restrictions, it becomes clear that some were relatively routine, while others were anomalous — their purpose was not explained by officials, the source of their authority was not clear, or the restrictions were simply not admitted to at all. These anomalous orders can be linked to major changes in underlying discourses of modernization and development among officials in Tibet at the time. They reflected undeclared shifts in attitudes to religion and cultural difference, and seeded the dramatic worsening in state-society relations that has taken place in Tibetan areas since that time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reports on the doctorate honoris causa awarded to Chen Kuiyuan, a prominent Chinese scholar, by the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) for his outstanding role in developing the theory and practice of ethnic relations in multi-ethnic countries. Personal background of Chen Kuiyuan; His contributions to the ties between the academic communities in China and Russia; Career background of Chen Kuiyuan.