Search

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an algorithm for identifying Veterans with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic health record using VA Million Veteran Program (MVP) data. Manual chart review (n = 200) was first used to establish 'gold standard' diagnosis labels for TBI ('Yes TBI' vs. 'No TBI'). To develop our algorithm, we used PheCAP, a semi-supervised pipeline that relied on the chart review diagnosis labels to train and create a prediction model for TBI. Cross-validation was used to train and evaluate the proposed algorithm, 'TBI-PheCAP.' TBI-PheCAP performance was compared to existing TBI algorithms and phenotyping methods, and the final algorithm was run on all MVP participants (n = 702,740) to assign a predicted probability for TBI and a binary classification status choosing specificity = 90%. The TBI-PheCAP algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92, sensitivity of 84%, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 98% at specificity = 90%. TBI-PheCAP generally performed better than other classification methods, with equivalent or higher sensitivity and PPV than existing rules-based TBI algorithms and MVP TBI-related survey data. Given its strong classification metrics, the TBI-PheCAP algorithm is recommended for use in future population-based TBI research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post-COVID-19 condition (colloquially known as "long COVID-19") characterized as postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 has no universal clinical case definition. Recent efforts have focused on understanding long COVID-19 symptoms, and electronic health record (EHR) data provide a unique resource for understanding this condition. The introduction of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code U09.9 for "Post COVID-19 condition, unspecified" to identify patients with long COVID-19 has provided a method of evaluating this condition in EHRs; however, the accuracy of this code is unclear., Objective: This study aimed to characterize the utility and accuracy of the U09.9 code across 3 health care systems-the Veterans Health Administration, the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-against patients identified with long COVID-19 via a chart review by operationalizing the World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions., Methods: Patients who were COVID-19 positive with either a U07.1 ICD-10 code or positive polymerase chain reaction test within these health care systems were identified for chart review. Among this cohort, we sampled patients based on two approaches: (1) with a U09.9 code and (2) without a U09.9 code but with a new onset long COVID-19-related ICD-10 code, which allows us to assess the sensitivity of the U09.9 code. To operationalize the long COVID-19 definition based on health agency guidelines, symptoms were grouped into a "core" cluster of 11 commonly reported symptoms among patients with long COVID-19 and an extended cluster that captured all other symptoms by disease domain. Patients having ≥2 symptoms persisting for ≥60 days that were new onset after their COVID-19 infection, with ≥1 symptom in the core cluster, were labeled as having long COVID-19 per chart review. The code's performance was compared across 3 health care systems and across different time periods of the pandemic., Results: Overall, 900 patient charts were reviewed across 3 health care systems. The prevalence of long COVID-19 among the cohort with the U09.9 ICD-10 code based on the operationalized WHO definition was between 23.2% and 62.4% across these health care systems. We also evaluated a less stringent version of the WHO definition and the CDC definition and observed an increase in the prevalence of long COVID-19 at all 3 health care systems., Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to evaluate the U09.9 code against a clinical case definition for long COVID-19, as well as the first to apply this definition to EHR data using a chart review approach on a nationwide cohort across multiple health care systems. This chart review approach can be implemented at other EHR systems to further evaluate the utility and performance of the U09.9 code., (©Monika Maripuri, Andrew Dey, Jacqueline Honerlaw, Chuan Hong, Yuk-Lam Ho, Vidisha Tanukonda, Alicia W Chen, Vidul Ayakulangara Panickan, Xuan Wang, Harrison G Zhang, Doris Yang, Malarkodi Jebathilagam Samayamuthu, Michele Morris, Shyam Visweswaran, Brendin Beaulieu-Jones, Rachel Ramoni, Sumitra Muralidhar, J Michael Gaziano, Katherine Liao, Zongqi Xia, Gabriel A Brat, Tianxi Cai, Kelly Cho. Originally published in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics (https://ojphi.jmir.org/), 03.05.2024.)