Search

Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a leading cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) across the world. Ibuprofen is one of the most commonly used and safest NSAIDs, nevertheless reports on ibuprofen-induced hepatotoxicity are available., Aim: To analyse previously published information on ibuprofen-induced liver injury for a better characterisation of its phenotypic expression., Method: A systematic search was performed and information on ibuprofen-induced liver injury included in case series and case reports, in terms of demographic, clinical, biochemical and outcome data, was analysed., Results: Twenty-two idiosyncratic ibuprofen hepatotoxicity cases were identified in the literature, suggesting a very low prevalence of this type of DILI. These patients had a mean age of 31 years and 55% were females. Mean cumulative dose of ibuprofen and time to onset were 30 g and 12 days, respectively. Hepatocellular injury was the most frequently involved liver injury pattern. Six cases developed vanishing bile duct syndrome. Full recovery occurred in 11 patients after a mean time of 14 weeks, whereas five cases evolved to acute liver failure leading to death/liver transplantation., Conclusions: When assessing potential hepatotoxicity cases, physicians should keep in mind that ibuprofen has been associated with hepatotoxicity in the literature. Ibuprofen-associated DILI presents commonly as hepatocellular damage after a short latency period. Published reports on ibuprofen hepatotoxicity leading to liver failure resulting in liver transplantation or death are available. However, due to the apparent low absolute risk of ibuprofen-induced liver complications, ibuprofen can be regarded as an efficacious and safe NSAID., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To investigate the effects of the interactions between the CYP2E1 and GOT2 gene polymorphisms and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) on liver injury., Methods: A total of 672 DMF-exposed workers were randomly selected from two synthetic leather enterprises in Suzhou, China, for follow-up in a cohort study. Information on exposure to DMF in the air was collected through a fixed-point air sampler in the worker's breathing zone. The subjects were assessed every year during the period of 2010-2015, they underwent occupational health examinations. Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were measured. Peripheral blood was collected and DNA was extracted. The genotypes rs2031920, rs3813867 and rs6413432 of the CYP2E1 gene and rs7204324 of the GOT2 gene were detected by PCR, and analyzed using the Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis., Results: Workers exposed to a high cumulative dose of DMF were significantly more likely than low-exposed workers to develop liver injury. No association was observed between rs2031920, rs3813867 and rs6413432 of the CYP2E1 gene and DMF-induced liver damage. However, the A allele of rs7204324 on the GOT2 gene may be a risk factor for susceptibility to DMF-induced liver injury., Conclusion: Polymorphisms of rs7204324 on GOT2 may play an important role in susceptibility to liver injury following exposure to DMF.

Introduction and Objectives: Although hepatotoxicity accounts for 10% of adverse drug reactions, it remains poorly understood and underreported. This study aimed to summarize case reports of herb- and drug-induced liver injury in Brazil., Methodology: Systematic review in the following databases: PubMed, SciELO, Science Direct, CAPES, and gray literature., Results: Twenty-seven studies reporting 32 cases were identified. Brazilian cases were primarily detected in hospitals, and occurred mainly in young males suffering from chronic diseases. Drugs (n=29) were a more frequent cause of liver injury than herbs (n=3). Almost a third of these drugs were anticonvulsants, and 15 appear in the Brazilian List of Essential Medicines. In 50% of the cases, clinical manifestations started within 30 days of drug ingestion. Regarding the decline of liver enzymes, 50% of the cases reached normality after drug withdrawal. However, 7 deaths and 2 liver transplantations were reported. Only one study assessed causality using RUCAM., Conclusion: Given the severe outcomes of DILI and HILI, early detection and management of hepatotoxicity to increase drug safety are necessary, as well as pharmacotherapeutic monitoring of patients with chronic diseases. Moreover, the application of the RUCAM algorithm in clinical practice has to be further disseminated., (Copyright © 2019 Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) occurs in a small fraction of individuals exposed to drugs, herbs or dietary supplements and is a relatively rare diagnosis compared with other liver disorders. DILI can be serious, resulting in hospitalization and even life-threatening liver failure, death or need for liver transplantation. Toxic liver damage usually presents as an acute hepatitis viral-like syndrome or as an acute cholestasis that resolves upon drug discontinuation. However, un-resolving chronic outcome after acute DILI can ensue in some subjects, the mechanisms and risk factors for this particular evolution being yet scarcely known. Furthermore, the definition of chronicity after acute DILI is controversial, regarding both the time frame of liver injury persistence and the magnitude of the abnormalities required. Besides this, in some instances the phenotypes and pathological manifestations are those of chronic liver disease at the time of DILI diagnosis. These include non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, vascular lesions, drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis, chronic cholestasis leading to vanishing bile duct syndrome and even cirrhosis, and some drugs such as amiodarone or methotrexate have been frequently implicated in some of these forms of chronic DILI. In addition, all of these DILI phenotypes can be indistinguishable from those related to other etiologies, making the diagnosis particularly challenging. In this manuscript we have critically reviewed the more recent data on chronicity in DILI with a particular focus on the epidemiology, mechanisms and risk factors of atypical chronic DILI phenotypes., (© 2018 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) accounts for approximately 10% of acute hepatitis cases. DILI can arise as idiosyncratic or intrinsic injury from hundreds of drugs, herbals, and nutritional supplements and is essential to recognize as one of the differential diagnoses of hepatitis in a liver biopsy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency and pathological characteristics of DILI related to the variety of hepatotoxic agents. We searched our pathology database for all patients with hepatitis diagnosed on liver biopsy from January 2012 to May 2016, and selected patients with a diagnosis of DILI. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient medication list, history of herbal medicine or supplement use, and pre-biopsy liver function test (LFT) results. Clinical and pathologic correlation was used to determine the causative or related agents for DILI. We then assessed histopathologic features of liver injury and categorized biopsy findings as primarily bile duct injury, lobular/portal hepatitis, or mixed changes. Six hundred four total liver biopsies for hepatitis or liver injury were identified, of which 70 cases (11.6%) carried the diagnosis of DILI confirmed by clinical correlation. The most common etiologies associated with DILI were supplements and herbal products (31.4%), antimicrobials (14.3%), chemotherapeutics (11.4%), antilipidemics (7.1%) and immunomodulatory agents (7.1%). LFT results positively correlated with histological findings. Nutritional/herbal supplements have emerged as one of the major hepatotoxicity agents. DILI can manifest as predominantly hepatitis, bile duct injury or combination. Histological pattern recognition in the liver biopsy may help identify specific hepatotoxic agents causing DILI., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare but potentially serious liver disorder and a major cause of significant liver injury. Limited data exist on racial differences in DILI incidence, presentation, and course., Methods: We compared the causative agents, clinical features, and outcomes of DILI among self-described African-Americans and non-Hispanic whites (Caucasians) enrolled in the DILIN Prospective Study. Individuals with definite, highly likely, or probable DILI enrolled between September 2004 and February 2016 were included in this analysis., Results: 144 African-Americans and 841 Caucasian patients met the eligibility criteria. Causal medications varied by race: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole being the most common cause among African-Americans (7.6 vs. 3.6%) followed by methyldopa (4 vs. <1%), phenytoin (5 vs. <1%), isoniazid (4 vs. 4%), and amoxicillin/clavulanate (4.1 vs. 13.4%). The severity of illness, however, tended to be greater in African-Americans than Caucasians as determined by peak mean bilirubin (14.3 vs. 12.8 mg/dl), INR (1.9 vs. 1.6), and DILIN severity score (3.0 vs. 2.6). The frequency of severe cutaneous reactions was significantly higher in African-Americans (2.1 vs. 0.36% in Caucasians, P=0.048). African-Americans also had higher rates of hospitalization (76.7 vs. 57.6%, P<0.001), liver transplantation or liver related death by 6 months (10.2 vs. 5.8%, P=0.02 after controlling for selected covariates), and chronic DILI (24 vs. 16%, P=0.06)., Conclusions: The most common DILI causative agents differ between African-Americans and Caucasians. African-Americans are more likely to have severe cutaneous reactions and more severe liver injury leading to worse outcomes, including death and liver transplant.

Background & Aims: The Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network is conducting a prospective study of patients with DILI in the United States. We present characteristics and subgroup analyses from the first 1257 patients enrolled in the study., Methods: In an observational longitudinal study, we began collecting data on eligible individuals with suspected DILI in 2004, following them for 6 months or longer. Subjects were evaluated systematically for other etiologies, causes, and severity of DILI., Results: Among 1257 enrolled subjects with suspected DILI, the causality was assessed in 1091 patients, and 899 were considered to have definite, highly likely, or probable DILI. Ten percent of patients died or underwent liver transplantation, and 17% had chronic liver injury. In the 89 patients (10%) with pre-existing liver disease, DILI appeared to be more severe than in those without (difference not statistically significant; P = .09) and mortality was significantly higher (16% vs 5.2%; P < .001). Azithromycin was the implicated agent in a higher proportion of patients with pre-existing liver disease compared with those without liver disease (6.7% vs 1.5%; P = .006). Forty-one cases with latency ≤7 days were caused predominantly by antimicrobial agents (71%). Two most common causes for 60 DILI cases with latency >365 days were nitrofurantoin (25%) or minocycline (17%). There were no differences in outcomes of patients with short vs long latency of DILI. Compared with individuals younger than 65 years, individuals 65 years or older (n = 149) were more likely to have cholestatic injury, although mortality and rate of liver transplantation did not differ. Nine patients (1%) had concomitant severe skin reactions; implicated agents were lamotrigine, azithromycin, carbamazepine, moxifloxacin, cephalexin, diclofenac, and nitrofurantoin. Four of these patients died., Conclusions: Mortality from DILI is significantly higher in individuals with pre-existing liver disease or concomitant severe skin reactions compared with patients without. Additional studies are needed to confirm the association between azithromycin and increased DILI in patients with chronic liver disease. Older age and short or long latencies are not associated with DILI mortality., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The spectrum and severity of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in children are not well established., Patients and Methods: The DILIN (Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network) Prospective Study is a longitudinal multicenter study designed to determine the etiologies, risk factors, and outcomes of suspected DILI. Between September 2004 and September 2009, 30 children ages 2 to 18 years with suspected DILI who met eligibility criteria were enrolled and studied for at least 6 months., Results: Mean age was 14 years; 70% were girls. Antimicrobial (50%) and central nervous system agents (40%) were the most commonly implicated drug classes, with minocycline (4), isoniazid (3), azithromycin (3), atomoxetine (3), and lamotrigine (3) the leading agents. Median time from drug initiation to symptom onset was 32 days. Peak (median) liver chemistries were aspartate aminotransferase 503  U/L, alanine aminotransferase 727  U/L, alkaline phosphatase 331  U/L, and total bilirubin 3.9  mg/dL. Autoantibodies were common (64%). Liver injury pattern was hepatocellular 78%, cholestatic 13%, and mixed 9%. The DILI episode was scored: mild 32%, moderate 44%, severe 20%, and fatal (within 6 months) 4%. Causality assessment was definite 36%, very likely 36%, probable 16%, possible 8%, and unlikely 4%. Seven percent had persistent liver test abnormalities at 6-month follow-up suggesting chronic DILI. Liver biopsies from 12 children most frequently demonstrated chronic hepatitis or bile duct injury., Conclusions: Idiosyncratic DILI in children is most commonly caused by antimicrobial or central nervous system agents and usually presents with a hepatocellular injury pattern. The majority of patients recover, but morbidity and infrequent mortality are seen.

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is an uncommon cause of acute and chronic liver injury of increasing importance to patients, clinicians, and regulators. The incidence of DILI due to an individual agent is not well defined but population-based studies suggest that the overall incidence of DILI may be as high as 10 to 15 cases per 100000 patient years. Bona fide risk factors for DILI are also not well established, but ongoing multicenter registry studies such as the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network are attempting to identify the role of genetic, environmental, and immunological factors in DILI pathogenesis and outcomes. Acute hepatocellular injury (~50%) is more common than mixed or cholestatic liver injury but jaundiced DILI subjects with either type of liver injury have a ~10% risk of short-term mortality. Antibiotics are the most commonly implicated agents associated with DILI, but there are emerging reports of liver injury associated with the use of a multitude of herbal and dietary supplements. Despite their widespread use, the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors or statins are an uncommon cause of idiosyncratic DILI. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that statins are actually safe and efficacious to use in hyperlipidemic patients with chronic liver disease. Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity remains a leading cause of severe acute liver injury. Limiting the amount of acetaminophen in prescription narcotic products may help reduce the incidence of future non-intentional overdoses but educating patients and providers of the multitude of over the counter products that contain acetaminophen is also recommended.

Background: Repeated supratherapeutic ingestion (RSTI) of acetaminophen (APAP) is recognized as an important cause of APAP-related morbidity and mortality. This study describes the characteristics and clinical course of patients with RSTI, and identifies the risk factors for developing hepatotoxicity and death., Methods: This secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective chart review studied patients treated with IV and/or oral N-acetylcysteine for acetaminophen poisoning. For this analysis, we included all subjects coded as RSTIs, defined as ingestions of greater than 4 g of APAP per 24 h over a period longer than 8 h. Data collected include demographics, coingestants, comorbidities, presenting laboratory data, and outcomes. The analysis includes descriptive statistics and associations of demographic and clinical factors with patient outcome., Results: Of the 503 patients enrolled, 119 (23.7%) were RSTI. The mean age was 39.6 years (SD ± 15); 63.9% of the patients were females, 60.5% Caucasians, 27.7% alcoholics, 5% malnourished, 10.9% had viral hepatitis, and 3.4% had other liver diseases. Coingestants included ethanol, opioids, and antihistamines (17.6, 48.7, and 19.3%, respectively). Among this group, 44 patients developed hepatotoxicity, two received liver transplants, and four died (37.0, 1.7, and 3.4%, respectively). The risk for hepatotoxicity increased with a history of alcoholism, viral hepatitis, and other liver diseases. A history of alcoholism and an elevated presenting serum creatinine were associated with increased risk for death/transplant. The lowest presenting ALT levels in a subject who developed hepatotoxicity and who died were 252 and 426 IU/l, respectively., Conclusion: RSTI-induced hepatotoxicity and poor outcomes can be predicted at the patient's presentation. All patients with RSTI who developed hepatotoxicity presented with an abnormal ALT. A history of alcoholism and an elevated creatinine at presentation are markers of increased risk for hepatotoxicity and death.

Background: Chronic liver diseases are common in the general population. Drug treatment in this group may be challenging, as many drugs are hepatically metabolised and hepatotoxic., Objectives: We aimed to assess the mortality of patients with chronic liver disease according to specific drug exposures and the three laboratory parameters creatinine, bilirubin and International Normalised Ratio (INR)., Methods: We conducted a multicentre, 5-year retrospective cohort study in two tertiary university referral hospitals and a secondary referral hospital, using a research database to evaluate the crude and adjusted mortality., Results: Of 1159362 individual patients 1.7% (n = 20158) had chronic liver disease and in this group 36.8% had unspecified chronic non-alcoholic liver disease, 30.1% chronic hepatitis C and 11.9% cirrhosis of the liver. 8.4% of patients presented a diagnosis associated with alcohol. The 4-year survival rates were significantly higher in the group with the most normal laboratory values (94.3%) versus 34.5% in the group with elevated parameters (p <0.001). Overall, drug exposure was not associated with higher mortality; in adjusted multivariate analysis the hazard ratio for anti-cancer drugs was 2.69 (95% CI 1.32-5.46). Of individual drugs, mortality hazard ratios for amiodarone, morphine oral, acetazolamide, sirolimus and lamivudine were 2.46 (95% CI 1.68-3.61), 2.26 (95% CI 1.78-2.86), 2.10 (95% CI 1.19-3.70), 1.81 (95% CI 1.02-3.21) and 1.72 (95% CI 1.17-2.53) respectively., Conclusions: Drug exposure in general was not associated with higher mortality except for a few categories. Mortality in patients with chronic liver disease was high and is associated with simple laboratory values.

Currently there are three major problems in understanding drug-induced liver injury (DILI): (1) reliably establishing whether the liver disease was caused by the drug, or by another process; (2) determining the true incidence of and clinical risk factors for drug-induced hepatotoxicity; and(3) elaborating the mechanisms by which injury occurs to hepatocytes and other liver cells. We have focused here on the first two problems, as issues that may be amenable to actions in the near future, but the third may take substantially longer to work out. The first problem requires sufficient information for medical differential diagnosis. There are no pathognomonic indicators of DILI; even liver biopsy is not diagnostic. Making the correct attribution of causality requires analyzing the temporal relationship of drug exposure to illness and excluding all other possible causes. The second problem, determining incidence, cannot be done entirely adequately using currently available methods, whether by clinical trials, by spontaneous adverse event reports, or by retrospective epidemiologic studies. There is need for prospective safety studies to establish the true incidence of DILI caused by a drug, to identify risk factors for it, and to collect biologic materials for analytic studies toward better understanding mechanisms of DILI.

Hepatotoxicity is a relevant adverse effect derived from the use of antiretrovirals that may increase the morbidity and mortality among treated HIV-infected patients and challenges the treatment of HIV infection. Although several antiretrovirals have been reported to cause fatal acute hepatitis, they most often cause an asymptomatic elevation of transaminase levels. In addition to ruling out a variety of processes not related to the use of antiretrovirals or to the HIV infection, for appropriate management of the complication it is necessary to deduce the possible pathogenic mechanisms of the hepatotoxicity. Among these mechanisms, direct drug toxicity, immune reconstitution in the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infections, hypersensitivity reactions with liver involvement and mitochondrial toxicity play a major role, although several other pathogenic pathways may be involved. Liver toxicity is more frequent among subjects with chronic HCV and/or HCB co-infections and alcohol users. Complex immune changes that alter the response against hepatitis virus antigens might be involved in the elevation of transaminase levels after suppression of the HIV replication by highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in patients co-infected with HCV/HBV. The contribution of each particular drug to the development of hepatotoxicity in a HAART regimen is difficult to determine. The incidence of liver toxicity is not well known for most of the antiretrovirals. Although it is most often mild, fatal cases of acute hepatitis linked to the use of HAART have been reported across all families of antiretrovirals. Acute hepatitis is related to hypersensitivity reactions in the case of non-nucleosides and to mitochondrial toxicity in the case of nucleoside analogues. Alcohol intake and use of other drugs are other co-factors that increase the incidence of transaminase level elevation among HIV-infected patients. The management of liver toxicity is based mainly on its clinical impact, severity and pathogenic mechanism. Although low-grade HAART-related hepatotoxicity most often spontaneously resolves, severe grades may require discontinuation of the antiretrovirals, for example when there is liver decompensation, hypersensitivity reaction or lactic acidosis.

A population-based retrospective chart review of the biochemical liver tests of 844 patients with multiple sclerosis prescribed a beta-interferon (IFNbeta) product in British Columbia, Canada was performed between 1995 and 2001. Overall, 36.9% (243/659) of patients developed new elevations of alanine aminotransferase. All the IFNbetas caused elevated aminotransferase levels compared with pretreatment levels (p < 0.005) and were higher than reported in clinical trials. Their relative effect on aminotransferases can be approximated as IFNbeta-1b(subcutaneous [SC]) = IFNbeta-1a(SC) > IFNbeta-1a(IM).

We retrospectively examined the summaries of all admission records of patients from 1979 to 1999 in our department, and selected for further study all liver injuries suspected of being related to Kampo medicines. Among 2,496 summaries, 30 summaries described liver disorders suspected of being related to Kampo medicines. Whether there was a causal relationship between the use of Kampo medication and the occurrence of liver injury was assessed according to the criteria described by Haller and Benowitz (2000), independently of the results of the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT). Among 30 events, we concluded that 9 were definitely unrelated, and 6 were probably unrelated to the use of Kampo medicines. Nine events (0.36% of 2,496 patient admissions and 0.06% of 14,616 outpatients) were considered possibly related, and only 6 events (0.24% of 2,496 patient admissions and 0.04% of 14,616 outpatients) were judged to be definitely or probably related to Kampo medicines. Low-grade eosinophilia was observed in a few patients of these "related" groups, and no fever or rash was observed in these "related" groups. Other clinical features, including type of liver injury, duration of Kampo medicine-use, recovery period and laboratory data, were not different from liver injuries associated with western drugs. Most patients in the definitely "unrelated" group were positive in the LTT for the suspect Kampo medicine, suggesting that the LTT may be unreliable for the diagnosis of Kampo-medicine-induced liver injury. From 1979 to 1999, our use of Kampo medicines to treat patients resulted in a low rate of liver injury and no fatalities.

To evaluate the occurrence of hepatotoxicity in patients during antiretroviral therapy (ART) that contains protease inhibitors and the role of hepatitis viruses in its development, we performed a retrospective study including 1325 HIV-infected patients treated with ART for at least 6 months. Presence or absence of hepatitis viruses, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, CD4 cell count, and plasma HIV RNA levels were evaluated. Hepatotoxicity developed in a few study subjects without coinfection, whereas it was significantly higher in coinfected patients. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that viral hepatitis coinfections are independent risk factors for hepatotoxicity. After 6 months of treatment, ritonavir was associated with higher rates of severe hepatotoxicity in the coinfected group; in fact, ritonavir seems to be the most strongly hepatotoxic agent among coinfected patients. After 12 months of therapy, hepatotoxicity occurred more frequently in patients with hepatitis C virus who did not respond to antiretroviral therapy (ART), whereas patients who did respond to ART showed decreased ALT levels. Hepatotoxicity is not exclusively an effect of drug toxicity, and the presence of hepatitis coinfection is an independent risk factor. Moreover, chronic hepatotoxicity mainly occurs in patients who did not respond to therapy. Conversely, patients who did respond to ART seemed to show improvement of chronic liver infection.

Background: Minocycline is an antibiotic commonly used in the treatment of adolescent acne., Objectives: To describe the clinical, laboratory, and histological features in 3 cases of minocycline-related autoimmune hepatitis and to review the literature of similar cases in the adolescent population., Design: Case series., Setting: Patients were cared for in the Division of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass., Results: Three adolescents (age, 15-16 years), while being treated with therapeutic doses of minocycline for periods of 12 to 20 months, met the 1993 International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group criteria for autoimmune hepatitis. All had a positive antinuclear antibody titer. Other features included hypergammaglobulinemia and a positive anti-smooth muscle antibody titer. Two patients underwent liver biopsy that revealed severe chronic lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, necrosis, and fibrosis. All other causes of liver disease were excluded. One patient had resolution of symptoms with withdrawal of the drug, while 2 required immunosuppression therapy. A review of the literature yielded only 18 similar cases, none in the pediatric literature, the majority of which contained incomplete pertinent data., Conclusions: Minocycline is related to the development of autoimmune hepatitis in some adolescents. Pediatricians who use this drug for treatment of acne should be aware of this serious potential relation and stop the drug immediately when suspicion is raised.