Search

Objective: We aim to report the learning curve and experience performing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) from a resident standpoint trained at a tertiary high-volume center. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to 10 surveyees that included recently graduated chief residents trained at Indiana University in the past 3 years i.e., between 2020 and 2022 with a 100% response rate. The questionnaire focused on HoLEP training experience based on a recently established mentorship curriculum in training the residents through each individual step of the surgery. Results: The average learning curve for performing HoLEP was reported to be greater than 25 cases with 50% of the residents reporting >50 cases to master the technique. The surgical difficulty of steps of the HoLEP were rated on a subjective scale of 1–5: 1 = very easy, 2 = easy, 3 = neutral, 4 = hard, and 5 = very hard. The common challenging steps in decreasing the order of difficulty as reported are performing apical enucleation, joining anterior and posterior planes, and dividing anterior commissure with a mean rating of 3.5, 3.1, and 3.1, respectively. The most difficult aspect of the surgery to master was performing apical dissection (60%). Comparing operative parameters for HoLEP with transurethral resection of the prostate in aspects of resection volume and times, 70% of candidates reported it better for HoLEP whereas 20% had similar times for both procedures. A total of 90% of the residents felt confident to offer HoLEP as part of their practice without the need for any further training. Regarding the initial challenge of including HoLEP surgery in practice, the majority (60%) reported difficulty with equipment set up in their practice while 20% reported difficulty maintaining efficient operating room (OR) times and turnover. Conclusion: We believe HoLEP can be performed immediately after residency training and incorporated into practice with high volume, repeated exposure to HoLEP surgery throughout residency based on study results. The average learning curve reported for performing HoLEP was greater than 25 cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in urology is an ever progressing field, and boundaries are constantly broken with the aid of new technology. Advancements in instrumentation have given birth to the era of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site technique (R-LESS). R-LESS however, has not gained widespread acceptance due to technical hurdles such as adequate triangulation, robotic arm clashing, decreased access for the bedside assistant, lack of wrist articulation, continued need for an axillary/accessory port, lack of robust retraction, and ergonomic discomfort. Many innovations have been explored to counter such limitations. We aim to give a brief overview of a history and development of R-LESS urologic surgery and outline the latest advancements in the realm of urologic R-LESS. By searching PubMed selectively for relevant articles, we concluded a literature review. We searched using the keywords: robotic laparoscopic single incision, robotic laparoendoscopic single-site, single incision robotic surgery, and R-LESS. We selected all relevant articles in that pertained to single-site robotic surgery in urology. We selected all relevant articles that pertained to single-site robotic surgery in urology in a table encompassed within this article. The development of the R-LESS procedures, instrumentations, and platforms has been an evolution in progress. Our results showed the history and evolution toward a purpose-built single-port robotic platform that addresses previous limitations to R-LESS. Even though previous studies have shown feasibility with R-LESS, the future of R-LESS depends on the availability of purpose-built robotic platforms. The larger concern is the demonstration of the definitive advantage of single-site over the conventional multiport surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]