Search

Background: Survival prediction for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is crucial for making proper management plans and counseling patients. Prognostic models in this patient domain have been limited, and existing models often include predictors that are not available in resource-limited settings. Our aim was to develop a practical, individualized survival prediction model for patients diagnosed with LM., Methods: We collected a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with LM from cerebrospinal fluid at Chiang Mai University Hospital from January 2015 to July 2021. Nine candidate predictors included male gender, age > 60 years, presence of extracranial involvement, types of primary cancer, the time between primary cancer and LM diagnosis, presence of cerebral symptoms, cranial symptoms, spinal symptoms, and abnormal CSF profiles. Flexible parametric survival analysis was used to develop the survival prognostic model for predicting survival at 3, 6, and 12 months after diagnosis. The model was evaluated for discrimination and calibration., Results: 161 patients with 133 events were included. The derived individual survival prediction model for patients with LM, or the LMsurv model, consists of three final predictors: types of primary cancer, presence of cerebral symptoms, and presence of spinal symptoms. The model showed acceptable discrimination (Harrell's C-statistics: 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.76) and was well calibrated at 3, 6, and 12 months., Conclusions: The LMsurv model, incorporating three practical predictors, demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration for predicting survival in LM patients. This model could serve as an assisting tool during clinical decision-making. External validation is suggested to confirm the generalizability of the model., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the seroconversion rate and percent inhibition of neutralizing antibodies against the wild-type and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with solid cancer who received two COVID-19 vaccine doses by comparing chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy groups., Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 115 cancer patients from Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Sriphat Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, and Chiang Mai Klaimor Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand, between August 2021 and February 2022, with data from 91 patients who received two COVID-19 vaccine doses analyzed. Participants received vaccines as part of their personal vaccination programs, including various mRNA and non-mRNA vaccine combinations. Blood samples were collected at baseline, on day 28, and at 6 months post-second dose to assess neutralizing antibodies. The primary outcome was the seroconversion rate against the wild-type and Omicron variants on day 28. Secondary outcomes included seroconversion at 6 months, factors associated with seroconversion, and safety., Results: Among the participants, 45% were receiving chemotherapy. On day 28, seroconversion rates were 77% and 62% for the wild-type and Omicron variants, respectively. Chemotherapy did not significantly affect seroconversion rates (p = 0.789 for wild type, p = 0.597 for Omicron). The vaccine type administered was positively correlated with seroconversion, with an adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 25.86 (1.39-478.06) for the wild type and 17.38 (3.65-82.66) for the Omicron variant with the primary heterologous vaccine regimen. Grades 1 and 2 adverse events were observed in 34.0% and 19.7% of participants, respectively., Conclusions: Despite the lower seroconversion rate against the Omicron variant, no significant difference was observed between the chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy groups. COVID-19 vaccinations demonstrated good tolerability in this cohort. These findings highlight the importance of vaccine safety and immunogenicity in cancer patients and can inform tailored vaccination strategies for this vulnerable population., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Chewaskulyong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background/Objectives : The prolonged time to reach investigation and management decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients can negatively impact long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study aims to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary team conference (MDT) on NSCLC care quality and outcomes. Methods : This retrospective study included resectable NSCLC patients who underwent pulmonary resection at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand, from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: non-MDT and MDT groups, based on the initiation of MDT on 1 March 2018. The study compared overall survival, disease-free survival, and waiting times for investigation and surgery between the two groups. The effect of MDT on these outcomes was analyzed using multivariable analysis with inverse-probability weighting propensity scores. Results : The study included 859 patients, with 583 in the non-MDT group and 276 in the MDT group. MDT groups had a higher proportion of stage I and II NSCLC patients undergoing pulmonary resection (78.6% vs. 59.69%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, patients in the MDT group had a significantly higher likelihood of longer survival compared to the non-MDT group (adjusted HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.55). Median waiting times for bronchoscopy (3 days vs. 12 days, p = 0.012), pathologic report (7 days vs. 13 days, p < 0.001), and surgery scheduling (18 days vs. 25 days, p = 0.001) were significantly shorter in the MDT group. Conclusions : An MDT has a survival benefit in NSCLC care and improves waiting times for investigation and treatment steps. Further studies are needed to validate these results.

Background: Malnutrition harms treatment outcomes, QoL, and survival in lung cancer patients. Effective dietary counseling can improve nutrition, but few randomized controlled trials have focused on lung cancer patients. The objective of this study was to determine if dietary counseling improves nutritional and treatment outcomes when compared to routine care. Methods : This open-label parallel RCT was conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital in Thailand. The investigators used computer-generated blocked randomization to assign patients to dietary counseling by a nutritionist or routine care. The nutritionist sessions occurred before treatment, with follow-ups at 3-4 weeks and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the mean percentage change in the body weight of patients at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in the BMI, nutrition score, QoL, serum albumin level, lymphocyte count, energy and protein intake, treatment response, PFS, and OS. Results : Between April 2020 and May 2022, after completing recruitment, 80 lung cancer patients were randomized: 43 to dietary counseling and 37 to routine care. The dietary counseling group showed significant benefits, with smaller decreases in body weight at 3-4 weeks (-0.8% vs. -2.6%, p = 0.05) and 12 weeks (-1.1% vs. -4.3%, p = 0.05). They also had higher energy and protein intake levels and better treatment response rates. The secondary outcomes and significant adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions : Dietary counseling helps to maintain body weight, maintain dietary intake, and enhance treatment responses in lung cancer patients. Although not all nutritional markers or survival outcomes were affected, these findings highlight the importance of early nutritional interventions.

Purpose: In the phase III HIMALAYA study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03298451) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), the Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab (STRIDE) regimen significantly improved overall survival versus sorafenib, and durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), a secondary outcome from HIMALAYA, are reported here., Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to receive STRIDE, durvalumab, or sorafenib. PROs were assessed (preplanned secondary outcome) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire and the 18-item HCC module. Time to deterioration (TTD), change from baseline and improvement rate in global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), functioning, and disease-related symptoms were analyzed., Results: In total, 1,171 participants were randomly assigned to STRIDE (n = 393), durvalumab (n = 389), or sorafenib (n = 389) and were evaluable for PRO assessments. Across treatment arms, compliance rates for PROs were >77% at baseline and >70% overall. Baseline scores were comparable across treatment arms. TTD in GHS/QoL, physical functioning, fatigue, appetite loss, and abdominal pain was numerically longer for both STRIDE and durvalumab versus sorafenib. Clinically meaningful deterioration in PROs was not observed in any treatment arm. However, TTD in nausea and abdominal swelling was numerically longer for STRIDE versus sorafenib, and the likelihood of clinically meaningful improvement in GHS/QoL, role, emotional and social functioning, and disease-related symptoms was greater with STRIDE and durvalumab versus sorafenib. PROs with STRIDE and durvalumab were generally similar., Conclusion: Compared with sorafenib, STRIDE and durvalumab were associated with clinically meaningful, patient-centered GHS/QoL, functioning, and symptom benefits in people with uHCC. These findings support the benefits of the STRIDE regimen compared with sorafenib for a diverse population reflective of the global uHCC population.

Background: Programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibodies are approved to treat metastatic or locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) cases ineligible for curative surgery or radiation. Notwithstanding, some patients experience inadequate responses or severe immune-related adverse events (AEs), indicating the need for improved therapies. Cosibelimab is a high-affinity programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-blocking antibody that activates innate and adaptive immunity by blocking PD-L1 interaction with PD-1 and B7-1 receptors. It is an unmodified immunoglobulin G1 subtype with a functional Fc domain capable of inducing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Here, we present results of the pivotal study of patients with metastatic CSCC from an open-label, multicenter, multiregional, multicohort, phase 1 trial of cosibelimab., Methods: In this trial, participants with metastatic CSCC received cosibelimab 800 mg intravenously every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, V.1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR) and safety., Results: Objective response was observed in 37 of 78 participants (47.4% (95% CI: 36.0% to 59.1%)), with median follow-up of 15.4 months (range: 0.4 to 40.5) as of data cut-off. Median DOR was not reached (range: 1.4+ to 34.1+ months), with response ongoing in 73.0% of participants. Common treatment-emergent AEs (≥15%) were fatigue (26.9%), rash (16.7%), and anemia (15.4%). Eighteen participants (23.1%) experienced immune-related AEs (grade 3: n=2 (2.6%); no grade 4/5). No treatment-related deaths were reported., Conclusions: Cosibelimab demonstrated clinically meaningful ORR and DOR and was associated with a manageable safety profile., Trial Registration Number: NCT03212404., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PC has nothing to disclose. RL has received honoraria from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation, MSD, and Sanofi; has served as a consultant and/or scientific advisor for AstraZeneca/MedImmune and Roche; and has received compensation for travel, accommodations, and other expenses from MSD. DB has nothing to disclose. DLH has served as a consultant and/or scientific advisor for Checkpoint Therapeutics. MM has nothing to disclose. SA has nothing to disclose. JC has nothing to disclose. SF has nothing to disclose. AK has nothing to disclose. DRM has nothing to disclose. AM has nothing to disclose. VSh has served as a speaker for Elekta. HS has nothing to disclose. AT has nothing to disclose. M-AB-G has served as a consultant and/or scientific advisor for BMS, Eisai, MSD, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre and has received research funding from Novartis. CC has received grant/research support from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Roche. SD has received institutional research grants from BMS and MSD; has served as a consultant and/or scientific advisor for BMS, MSD, and Pierre Fabre; and has received compensation for congress attendance from BMS and MSD. AD has nothing to disclose. OD has nothing to disclose. PK has nothing to disclose. IL has financial or non-financial interests in Agenus, BMS, Janssen, MacroGenics, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche. HM has received honoraria from BMS, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; has received institutional support from BMS, Canceropole PACA, and Société Française de Dermatologie; has served as a consultant for BMS, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; has served on a data safety monitoring board/advisory board for Novartis and Pierre Fabre; and has received travel grants from Novartis and Pierre Fabre. EM-C has served as a consultant and/or scientific advisor for MBS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi; has received honoraria from MBS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi; and has received compensation for travel, accommodations, and other expenses from MSD. VSr has nothing to disclose. JO is an employee of Checkpoint Therapeutics and holds stocks and other ownership interests in the company; has served in leadership roles at Checkpoint Therapeutics; and has received compensation for travel, accommodations, and other expenses from Checkpoint Therapeutics. JD has served as a consultant and/or scientific advisor for Amgen, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Novotech, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche/Genentech; has served on a data safety monitoring board/advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer; has served as a board director for Cancer Trials Australia and ANZSA; and has received institutional grant/research support from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, BeiGene, BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Novartis, and Roche., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

This study aimed to assess survival outcomes, prognostic factors, and adverse events following chemotherapy treatment for osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma. This retrospective observational study was conducted to collect the data of the patients with osteosarcoma or Ewing's sarcoma who received chemotherapy treatment between 2008 and 2019. The flexible parametric survival model was performed to explore the adjusted survival probability and the prognostic factors. A total of 102 patients (79 with osteosarcoma and 23 with Ewing's sarcoma) were included. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) probabilities in patients with resectable disease were 60.9% and 63.3% for osteosarcoma, and 54.4% and 88.3% for Ewing's sarcoma, respectively, whereas the 5-year DFS and 5-year OS for those with unresectable/metastatic disease remained below 25%. Two prognostic factors for osteosarcoma included a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and female gender. Ewing's sarcoma patients aged 25 years and older were significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes. Of 181 chemotherapy treatment cycles, common self-reported adverse symptoms included tumor pain ( n = 32, 17.7%), fever ( n = 21, 11.6%), and fatigue ( n = 16, 8.8%), while common grade III adverse events included febrile neutropenia ( n = 13, 7.3%) and neutropenia ( n = 9, 5.1%). There was no chemotherapy-related mortality (grade V) or anaphylaxis events.

The outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have been significantly improved with novel therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, in resource-limited countries, platinum-doublet chemotherapy is mainly used as a first-line treatment. We investigate clinical parameters to predict the response after chemotherapy, which may be useful for patient selection. A clinical prediction score (CPS) was developed, based on data from a retrospective cohort study of unresectable stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients who were treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in the first-line setting with at least two cycles and an evaluated response by RECIST 1.1 at Surin Hospital Cancer Center, Thailand, between July 2014 and December 2018. The clinical parameters in the prediction model were derived by risk regression analysis. There were 117 responders (CR or PR) and 90 non-responders (SD or PD). The clinical prediction score was developed by six clinical parameters including gender, age, smoking status, ECOG, pre-treatment albumin, and histologic subtype. The AuROC of the model was 0.71 (95% CI 0.63-0.78). The internal validation was performed using a bootstrap technique and showed a consistent AuROC of 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.72). The prediction score ranged from 0-13, with a score of 0-8 meaning a low probability (PPV = 50%) and a score of 8.5-13 meaning a high probability (PPV = 83.7%) for chemotherapy response. Advanced NSCLC patients who cannot access novel therapies and have a CPS of 8.5-13 have a high probability for chemotherapy response in the first-line setting. This CPS could be used for risk communication and making decisions with patients, especially in regard to chemotherapy.

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the frontline treatment option for patients with various advanced cancers due to improved survival, they can be associated with a spectrum of cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs). However, little is known regarding the occurrence and patterns of cirAE-related ICI therapy in patients of different races other than white populations. Therefore, we investigated the incidence and associated factors of cirAEs among cancer patients in northern Thailand., Methods: A referral-center-based ambispective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2017, to March 31, 2021. Based on a linked database and merged patient-level data, adult patients with pathologically confirmed cancer who were diagnosed and received ICI therapy regardless of cancer type and followed up through August 31, 2021, were included. All cirAE-related ICI therapy was based on clinical evaluation and ascertainment by a board-certified dermatologist. The incidence of cirAE-related ICI therapy with confidence intervals (CIs) across cancer- and ICI therapy-specific groups was estimated. Factors associated with cirAEs were evaluated using multivariable modified Poisson regression to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs., Results: The study included 112 patients (67 men [59.8%]; mean age, 65.0 [range, 31.0-88.0] years), who were mainly diagnosed with lung cancer (56.3%), followed by liver cancer (19.6%). The overall incidence of cirAE-related ICI therapy was 32.1% (95% CI, 24.1-41.4); however, there was no substantial difference in sex, cancer type, or individual ICI therapy. The two identified prognostic risk factors of cirAE-related ICI therapy were age >75 years (adjusted RR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.09-4.15; P =0.027) and pre-existing chronic kidney disease stages 3-4 (adjusted RR, 3.52; 95% CI, 2.33-5.31; P <0.001)., Conclusions: The incidence of cirAE-related ICI therapy among Thai cancer patients was comparable to that in white populations. Early identification, particularly in elderly patients and those with CKD, should be implemented in clinical practice to help optimize therapeutic decision-making and patient health outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Luangnara, Kiratikanon, Ketpueak, Suksombooncharoen, Charoentum, Chewaskulyong, Tovanabutra, Chiewchanvit, Nochaiwong and Chuamanochan.)

Background: Breast cancer incidence in Northern Thailand has shown a continuous increase since records began in 1983. In 2002 the urgency of the situation prompted Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital to initiate the Suandok Breast Cancer Network (SBCN)., Methods: The SBCN is a not-for-profit organization in the university hospital which serves as a training and education center and provides highly specialized medical care for patients in Chiang Mai and in 5 provinces of northern Thailand, with the key mission of improving breast cancer care. The short-term goal was to overcome the barriers to engagement with breast cancer and its treatment and the long-term goal was to increase the overall survival rate of breast cancer patients in our region., Results: We enrolled breast cancer patients treated at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between January 2006 and December 2015 and divided into 2 cohorts: 1485 patients who were diagnosed from 2006 to 2009 (cohort 1: early implementation of SBCN) and 2383 patients who were diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 (cohort 2: full implementation of SBCN). Criteria to measure improved cancer waiting time (CWT) would include: time to diagnosis, time to surgery, and time to radiotherapy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the cohort 2 was higher than that in cohort 1, at 73.8 (72.0-75.5) compared to 71.5 (69.2-73.7) (p-value = 0.03)., Conclusions: Reasons behind the success of project include the uniformity of care encouragement, service network development and timely access to each step of breast cancer management. The model used in SBCN could be adopted as a learning guide to improve healthcare access and outcome for breast cancer patients in low- to middle-income countries., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: MB02 (bevacizumab biosimilar) showed similar structural, functional, and pharmacokinetic properties to reference bevacizumab (Avastin ® ; EU-bevacizumab)., Objectives: To confirm clinical similarity between MB02 and EU-bevacizumab, a comparability study was undertaken in the first-line treatment of stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: This multinational, double-blind, randomized, phase III study (STELLA) compared MB02 or EU-bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) administered with chemotherapy (paclitaxel 200 mg/m 2 and carboplatin AUC6) on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for 6 cycles (Week 18), followed by MB02/EU-bevacizumab in blinded monotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, withdrawal of consent or end of study (Week 52). The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) evaluated by an independent radiological review committee (IRC) at Week 18 (intent-to-treat population). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and immunogenicity., Results: A total of 627 subjects were randomized 1:1 to MB02 (n = 315) or EU-bevacizumab (n = 312). ORR, assessed by the IRC at Week 18, was comparable in MB02 (40.3%) and EU-bevacizumab (44.6%) groups. ORR risk ratio of 0.910 (90% CI 0.780 to 1.060; 95% CI 0.758 to 1.092) and ORR risk difference of -4.02 (90% CI -10.51 to 2.47; 95% CI -11.76 to 3.71) were within the similarity predefined margins. There were no significant differences between MB02 and EU-bevacizumab groups in median PFS (36.0 vs 37.3 weeks, respectively; HR 1.187; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.44) and median OS (not achieved; HR 1.108; 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.49) at the end of study. The safety profile of MB02 and EU-bevacizumab regarding nature, frequency and severity of the adverse events (AE) was comparable. The most frequent grade ≥3 investigational-product-related AEs were hypertension and anemia, with a difference between treatment groups of <5%. Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and neutralizing ADA (NAb) incidence were similar in both treatment groups., Conclusion: MB02 demonstrated similar efficacy to EU-bevacizumab, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, in subjects with advanced non-squamous NSCLC, with comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles., Clinical Trial Registration: EudraCT No. 2017-001769-26; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03296163., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: HER2/neu is overexpressed in up to 30% of gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA) and linked to poor prognosis. Recombinant mAbs to treat HER2/neu-overexpressing cancers are effective with limitations, including resistance and toxicity. Therefore, we developed a therapeutic B-cell epitope vaccine (IMU-131/HER-Vaxx) consisting of three fused B-cell epitopes from the HER2/neu extracellular domain coupled to CRM197 and adjuvanted with Montanide. This phase Ib study aimed to evaluate the optimal/safe dose leading to immunogenicity and clinical responses (https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02795988)., Patients and Methods: A total of 14 patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing GEA were enrolled, and dose escalation (10, 30, 50 μg) was performed in three cohorts (C). Immunogenicity was evaluated by HER2-specific Abs and cellular responses, clinical responses by CT scans according to RECIST version 1.1., Results: IMU-131 was safe without vaccine-related significant local/systemic reactions or serious adverse events. A total of 11 of 14 patients were evaluable for changes in tumor size and vaccine-specific immune responses. One patient showed complete, 5 partial responses, and 4 stable diseases as their best response. HER2-specific IgG levels were dose dependent. In contrast to patients in C1 and C2, all patients in C3 mounted substantial HER2-specific Ab levels. In addition, cellular vaccine responses, such as Th1-biased cytokine ratios and reduced regulatory T cell numbers, were generated. Progression-free survival was prolonged in C3, correlating with the vaccine-specific humoral and cellular responses., Conclusions: IMU-131 was well tolerated and safe. The induced HER2-specific Abs and cellular responses were dose dependent and correlated with clinical responses. The highest dose (50 μg) was recommended for further evaluation in a phase II trial, with chemotherapy + IMU-131 or chemotherapy alone, which is currently ongoing., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Clinical outcomes of patients with osteosarcoma remain unsatisfactory, with little improvement in a 5-year overall survival over the past three decades. There is a substantial need for further research and development to identify and develop more efficacious agents/regimens in order to improve clinical outcomes of patients for whom the prognosis is unfavorable. Recently, mycophenolate mofetil, a prodrug of mycophenolic acid, has been found to have anticancer activity against osteosarcoma in both in vitro and animal experiments, so that further investigation in humans is warranted., Methods: A total of 27 patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma will be enrolled into this phase II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm, two-stage clinical trial. The main objectives of this study are to determine the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the patients. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 16 weeks; the secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, safety parameters, pharmacokinetic parameters, biomarkers, pain score, and quality of life. Mycophenolate mofetil at the initial dose of 5 g/day or lower will be administered for 4 cycles (28 days/cycle) or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dose of mycophenolate mofetil may be reduced by 1-2 g/day or withheld for some Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicities whenever clinically needed. The duration of study participation is approximately 4-5 months, with a minimum of 12 study visits. If mycophenolate mofetil proves beneficial to some patients, as evidenced by stable disease or partial response at 16 weeks, administration of mycophenolate mofetil will continue in the extension period., Discussion: This trial is the first step in the translation of therapeutic potential of mycophenolate mofetil emerging from in vitro and animal studies into the clinical domain. It is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma. The results will provide important information about whether or not mycophenolate mofetil is worth further development., Trial Registration: This trial was prospectively registered on Thai Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: TCTR20190701001). The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

Objective: This study was attempted to investigate overall survival by stage at diagnosis in female breast cancer patients in Northern Thailand by using 2 different staging systems; namely, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor (T), Nodal (N) and Metastatic (M) staging system and Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) summary staging system. Methods: We studies female breast cancer patients whose data were registered in Chiang Mai cancer registries between January 2006 and December 2015. Data were recorded in SEER summary staging system. The TNM AJCC staging was searched in the medical records. Results: A total of 3,873 female breast cancer patients were diagnosed from 2006-2015. All data sets were recorded in SEER summary stage 2000. Early stage was the most prevalent stage at the time of diagnosis (58%), followed by loco-regional advanced stage (32%), and metastatic breast cancer (10%). The 5-year overall survival rate of early, loco-regional advanced, and metastatic stages were 85.3%, 66.4%, and 26.2%, respectively. After examining the medical records, we excluded patients who had no data on T, N, and M in their records. Finally, only 3,251 patients were analyzed for AJCC stage-specific survival. The 5-year overall survival rate in stages I, II, III, and IV were 94.4%, 85.0%, 56.6%, and 28.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Comparing to more stable economic countries, the 5-year overall survival rate for a specific stage of breast cancer in Northern Thailand was slightly lower in early stage and stage I-II in accordance with AJCC, but much lower in loco-regional stage and stage III with respect to AJCC. Nevertheless, it was similar in metastatic stage and stage IV according to AJCC.

BGJ398, a potent and selective pan-FGFR antagonist, was prospectively evaluated in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma bearing a diverse array of FGFR3 alterations. Patients ( N = 67) who were unable to receive platinum chemotherapy were enrolled. The majority (70.1%) had received two or more prior antineoplastic therapies. BGJ398 was administered orally at 125 mg/day on a 3 weeks on, 1 week off schedule until unacceptable toxicity or progression. The primary endpoint was the response rate. Among 67 patients treated, an overall response rate of 25.4% was observed and an additional 38.8% of patients had disease stabilization, translating to a disease control rate of 64.2%. The most common treatment-emergent toxicities were hyperphosphatemia, elevated creatinine, fatigue, constipation, and decreased appetite. Further examination of BGJ398 in this disease setting is warranted. Significance: BJG398 is active in patients with alterations in FGFR3 , resulting in both reductions in tumor volume and stabilization of disease. Our data highlight putative mechanisms of resistance to the agent, which may be useful in following disease status. Cancer Discov; 8(7); 812-21. ©2018 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 781 ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objective: To describe the pattern of disease progression and to describe locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, and death rates in breast cancer patients after complete treatment., Material and Method: Medical records of women diagnosed with breast cancer at two university affiliated tertiary care hospitals in the Northern Thailand that had complete treatments between 2006 and 2010 were traced. Extracted key information included patient clinical profiles and documented recurrence of cancer The causes of death were verified from breast cancer case registration database, death certificates through The Ministry of Internal Affairs'civil registration, by direct telephone contact, or by distributed prepaid postcards., Results: Medical records of 829 women diagnosed with breast cancer without prior evidence ofdistant metastasis, and had complete recommended treatment were included. Six hundred thirty seven women had not experienced any events up to the end of the follow-up (76.8%). The first occurring events were focused and categorized into three distinct types, locoregional recurrence (n = 83, median follow-up time = 34.2 months), distant recurrence (n = 78, median follow-up time = 35.4 months), and death without any evidences of locoregional or distant recurrences (n = 12, median follow-up time = 36.7 months). Distant recurrence after locoregional recurrence was reported (n = 33). There were 109 patient who had died (breast cancer related death) up to the end of the follow-up (13.2%). The three types of consecutively occurring deaths were death after locoregional recurrence without any distant recurrences (n = 15), death after distant recurrence with locoregional recurrence (n = 21), and death after documenited distant recurrence without any locoregional recurrences (n = 61)., Conclusion: The trend was that the rate of the first occurring locoregional recurrence was slightly higher than that of distant recurrence, The death rate in patients without any recurrences was much lower than in those experiencing prior recurrences. The rates of disease progression from local recurrence to distant recurrence and to death were approximately 5 to 7 times faster in patients who had experienced earlierprogressions.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common cancers worldwide, but marked epidemiological differences exist between Asian and non-Asian populations. Hence, a consensus meeting was held in Hong Kong in December 2012 to develop Asia-specific guidelines for the management of metastatic CRC (mCRC). A multidisciplinary expert panel, consisting of 23 participants from 10 Asian and 2 European countries, discussed current guidelines for colon or rectal cancer and developed recommendations for adapting these guidelines to Asian clinical practice. Participants agreed that mCRC management in Asia largely follows international guidelines, but they proposed a number of recommendations based on regional 'real-world' experience. In general, participants agreed that 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion regimens in doublets can be substituted with UFT (capecitabine, tegafur-uracil) and S1 (tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine and oxonic acid), and that the monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab are recommended for KRAS wild type tumors. For KRAS mutant tumors, bevacizumab is the preferred biological therapy. FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin) is preferred for initial therapy in Asian patients. The management of mCRC is evolving, and it must be emphasized that the recommendations presented here reflect current treatment practices and thus might change as more data become available., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Carboplatin plus paclitaxel is a more costly chemotherapy regimen than cisplatin plus etoposide; however there have been reports of higher efficacy and less toxicity of this regimen. Thus, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of these two chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Using the perspective of Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand, direct medical costs, including chemotherapy, drugs, medical service charges, costs of adverse events, concomitant medication and survival time were directly gathered from 65 patients enrolled from August 2005 to November 2008. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was also calculated., Results: Of these 65 patients, 30 received cisplatin plus etoposide (Arm I) and 35 received carboplatin plus paclitaxel (Arm II). The median survival time was not statistically significant (8.23 months vs 8.80 months in Arm I and II, respectively; P = 0.99). The total cost per patient in Arm II was about three times that in Arm I (95,548 Baht vs 29,692 Baht) while quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) in Arm II were slightly above those in Arm I (0.587 vs 0.412). The ICER was equal to 375,958 Baht per QALY., Conclusion: With a cost-effectiveness threshold of 100,000 Baht in Thailand, carboplatin plus paclitaxel was still not cost-effective. While the selection of a suitable regimen for individual patients should not rely on drug and hospital costs alone, the overall cost, including the burden on patients, should be taken into consideration., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Objective: To assess the activity and toxicity of cisplatin and irinotecan alternating with docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Material and Method: Eligibility included chemo-naïve stage IIIB with malignant effusion and stage IV NSCLC patients with measurable disease and a good performance status. Twenty-four patients were enrolled into the present study. There were 19 males and 5 females with a median age of 58.5 years and the median performance status was 1. Ninety-six percent had stage IV disease. These patients received cisplatin at 80 mg/ m2 and irinotecan at 200 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 on day 22, in 6-week cycle for a maximum of 3 cycles., Results: Eight out of twenty-two evaluable patients obtained a partial response (36%). The median time to tumor progression was 6 months. The median survival time and 1-year survival rate were 10.4 months and 45% respectively. The most frequent severe toxicities were neutropenia, anemia, and diarrhea. Febrile neutropenia occurred in four patients (16%), and was the cause of treatment-related deaths in two (8%). Other nonhematologic toxicities were mild including nausea, vomiting, and skin rash., Conclusion: Alternating cisplatin and irinotecan with docetaxel, as used in the present study was feasible and demonstrated encouraging efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer However, this approach appears to be more toxic, especially in myelosuppression, than in previous reports of the sequential use of the similar agents.

Purpose: To determine the activity and toxicity of combined 24-hour infusion of paclitaxel with carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer., Patients and Methods: Eligibility required measurable disease; stage III B with malignant pleural effusion or stage IV disease, with a performance status (PS) of ECOG 0-2. Chemotherapy consisted of 24 hours continuous infusion of paclitaxel at 135 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by carboplatin (AUC=6) on day 2. Treatment was repeated at 3-week intervals for a total of 6 cycles., Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. Twenty six patients were male and 13 female, with a median age of 57 years (range, 38 to 72). Six patients (15%) had stage III B and 33 (85%) had stage IV. PS 0-1/2 was 67%/33%. A total of 131 cycles was administered and the median number of cycles was 4 (range, 2-6). Grade 3-4 neutropenia, grade 3-4 leukopenia and grade 3 anemia occurred in 3%, 3% and 23%, respectively. One patient (3%) developed febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 3 patients (8%). Other non-hematologic toxicities were mild including mucositis and skin rash. The overall response rate was 15%. Median survival was 8 months (range 6-9.5 months) and 1-year survival rate was 20%., Conclusions: The combined 24-hour infusion of paclitaxel (Intaxel) with carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients.

Aim: To study the activity of gemcitabine and cisplatin in a cohort of patients with inoperable or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma., Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with pathologically proven cholangiocarcinoma, receiving treatment that consisted of gemcitabine at 1250 mg/m(2) in a 30-min infusion on d 1 and 8, and cisplatin at 75 mg/m(2) at every 21-d cycle, were retrospectively analyzed., Results: From June 2003 to December 2005, 42 patients were evaluated. Twelve patients (28%) had unresectable disease and 30 (72%) had metastatic disease. There were 28 males and 14 females with a median age of 51 years (range 33-67) and median ECOG PS of 1 (range 0-2). A total of 171 cycles were given with a median number of cycles of 4 (range 1-6). There were 0 CR, 9 PR, 11 SD and 13 PD (response rate 21%). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities were: anemia in 33%, neutropenia in 22% and thrombocytopenia in 5%. Non-hematologic toxicity was generally mild. No cases of febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death were noted. The median survival was 10.8 mo (range 8.4-13 mo) and progression free survival was 8.5 mo. One-year survival rate was 40%., Conclusion: Our results indicate that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin had consistent efficacy in patients with unresectable or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.

A 53-year old non-smoking Thai female was diagnosed with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer to bone. The initial biopsy from the bone lesion showed metastatic adenocarcinoma. She achieved partial response after treatments with radiation therapy to the bones, followed by 6 cycles of combination chemotherapy. About 4 months later, recurrence of the pulmonary and osseous disease was apparent. She has ECOG performance status of 3. Gefitinib 250 mg/day was administered until disease progression for about 14 months. After 6 weeks on this therapy, she had dramatic improvement of all symptoms including her performance status and had nearly complete resolution of all pulmonary lesions. Tolerability was good, with only mild fatigue. The overall survival was 28 months. This illustrates that gefitinib could produce significant clinical benefits in selected Thai patients even with poor performance status. This result is consistent with previous reports that the clinical characteristics of female, non-smoker and adenocarcinoma histology seem to predict response to gefitinib.

Objective: This phase II study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the docetaxel plus carboplatin combination in chemotherapy-naive Thai patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Material and Method: Forty patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-1, stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were enrolled in a phase H study between August 2001 and April 2003. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and Carboplatin AUC = 6 were given every 3 weeks. Response to treatment and toxicity were graded using standard WHO criteria. The Thai Functional Living Index Cancer (T-FLIC) scale was used to assess the Quality of Life (QoL) of all treated patients., Results: Forty patients (median age: 55 years, range, 39-68 years; PS:0-1) were enrolled: one had stage IIIB disease with effusion, while thirty-nine had stage IV disease. Five patients were non-evaluable due to death within the first cycle; two dying of febrile neutropenia and sepsis, two of pulmonary infection, and one of unknown etiology. Partial response (PR) was seen in 28.6% patients, stable disease (SD) in 25.7%, and progressive disease (PD) in 45.7%. The median survival time was 32 weeks and the 1-year survival rate was 30.7%. Body mass index (BMI) was the only factor associated with survival time (univariate analysis: p = 0.006; multivariate analysis: p = 0.004). Other factors (gender, age, histology, ECOG PS, and glomerular filtration rate) were not predict for survival. The major treatment-related toxicities were neutropenia (from 152 treatment cycles there were grade 4: 19.7%; grade 3: 23.7%), febrile neutropenia (from 152 treatment cycles there was 3.95%), and diarrhea (grades 3/4: 0.66%). The QoL scores improved significantly throughout the treatment period., Conclusion: The regimen of docetaxel and carboplatin is active in advanced NSCLC and may be considered for first-line therapy.