Search

Immune complexes (IC) containing predominantly malondialdehyde-LDL and the corresponding autoantibodies (MDA-LDL IC) predict acute cardiovascular events, while IC rich in oxidized LDL (oxLDL IC) predict cardiovascular disease progression. Our objective was to determine mechanisms that could explain these prognostic differences. We compared the effects of the interaction of oxLDL, MDA-LDL and the corresponding IC with human macrophages focusing on apoptosis, metalloproteinases, and proinflammatory cytokines. MDA-LDL IC induced higher degrees of apoptosis, higher levels of caspase-3 expression, and increased expression and release of MMP-1 and TNF compared to MDA-LDL, oxLDL, and oxLDL IC. The pro-apoptotic effects of MDA-LDL IC were inhibited by blocking TNFR 1 or FcγRI. Blocking FcγRI abrogated the induction and expression of MMPs and proinflammatory cytokines by MDA-LDL IC. In conclusion, the interaction of MDA-LDL IC with FcγRI triggers macrophage apoptosis and increased expression and release of TNF and MMP-1, which can lead to the rupture of unstable plaques.

Modified lipoproteins are able to induce inflammatory reactions through innate immunity pathways and are immunogenic, leading to an autoimmune response that results in the formation of proinflammatory immune complexes. The measurement of circulating oxidized lipoproteins and corresponding antibodies has, therefore, been proposed as an approach to assess the risk for complications in patients with diabetes and for the risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population. However, the majority of modified low density lipoprotein (LDL) in the peripheral circulation exists in the form of immune complexes, and this is a significant obstacle for the measurement of modified LDL and the corresponding antibodies. In this manuscript, we describe in detail the methodology developed by our group for isolation and fractionation of circulating immune complexes (IC), allowing the accurate assay of different LDL modifications. This approach has resulted in several studies showing that the levels of modified LDL are risk factors with a stronger association to diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, and macrovascular disease. Ongoing research is focused on evaluating the predictive power of modified LDL levels for the development or progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in other patient populations and on the simplification of the assay to make it more applicable to diagnostic laboratories.

Oxidized low density lipoprotein (OxLDL) is immunogenic and induces autoimmune responses in humans. OxLDL antibodies are predominantly of the proinflammatory IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes. We tested the capacity of immune complexes prepared with copper-oxidized human LDL and affinity chromatography-purified human OxLDL antibodies [OxLDL-immune complexes (ICs)] to activate complement and to induce cytokine release by MonoMac 6 (MM6) cells and by primary human macrophages. The levels of C4d and C3a were significantly higher in human serum incubated with OxLDL-ICs than after incubation with OxLDL or OxLDL antibody, indicating complement activation by the classical pathway. MM6 cells and primary human macrophages were incubated with OxLDL-ICs, with or without prior conditioning with interferon-gamma. After 18 h of incubation, both MM6 cells and primary human macrophages released significantly higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines after incubation with OxLDL-ICs than after incubation with OxLDL or with OxLDL antibody, both in primed and unprimed cells. OxLDL-ICs were more potent activators of MM6 cells than keyhole limpet hemocyanin-ICs. Blocking Fc gamma receptor I (FcgammaRI) with monomeric IgG1 significantly depressed the response of MM6 cells to OxLDL-ICs. In conclusion, human OxLDL-ICs have proinflammatory properties, as reflected by their capacity to activate the classical pathway of complement and to induce proinflammatory cytokine release from MM6 cells and primary human macrophages.

The immunogenicity of modified low-density lipoprotein (mLDL) has been demonstrated both in laboratory animals and humans. Circulating human mLDL antibodies, purified by affinity chromatography, are predominantly of the IgG isotype, subclasses 1 and 3. The purified antibodies react with malondialdehyde-lysine and carboxymethyl-lysine epitopes, but also recognize minimally modified forms of LDL that do not contain significant amounts of those two epitopes. The quantitative assays of mLDL and mLDL antibodies in serum samples by enzymoimmunoassay (EIA) are unreliable owing to the interference of preformed circulating immune complexes (CICs). Isolation of CICs by precipitation with low concentrations of polyethylene glycol followed by analysis of antigens and antibodies contained in the precipitates is a technically complex approach, but one that yields valuable data. With this approach we have confirmed that the IgG antibodies involved in IC formation belong to the proinflammatory IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes, have a higher avidity than those that remain unbound in the supernatant after CIC precipitation, and are of higher avidity in diabetic patients with macroalbuminuria than in those with normal albuminuria. We have also developed capture assays for different forms of mLDL. These assays have shown a significant enrichment in mLDL of the precipitated ICs. The enrichment is also more pronounced in the CICs obtained from diabetic patients with macroalbuminuria. In conclusion, isolation and characterization of LDL-ICs appears to yield information of significant value that is not derived from other approaches to measure LDL modifications and their corresponding antibodies in humans.

Antibodies to malondialdehyde (MDA)-modified low-density lipoprotein (LDL), copper-oxidized LDL (oxLDL), N ε (carboxymethyl) lysine (CML)-modified LDL, and advanced glycosylation end product (AGE)-modified LDL were obtained by immunization of rabbits with in vitro-modified human LDL preparations. After absorption of apolipoprotein B (ApoB) antibodies, we obtained antibodies specific for each modified lipoprotein with unique patterns of reactivity. MDA-LDL antibodies reacted strongly with MDA-LDL and also with oxLDL. CML-LDL antibodies reacted strongly with CML-LDL and also AGE-LDL. oxLDL antibodies reacted with oxLDL but not with MDA-LDL, and AGE-LDL antibodies reacted with AGE-LDL but not with CML-LDL. Capture assays were set with each antiserum, and we tested their ability to capture ApoB-containing lipoproteins isolated from precipitated immune complexes (IC) and from the supernatants remaining after IC precipitation (free lipoproteins). All antibodies captured lipoproteins contained in IC more effectively than free lipoproteins. Analysis of lipoproteins in IC by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry showed that they contained MDA-LDL and CML-LDL in significantly higher concentrations than free lipoproteins. A significant correlation ( r = 0.706, P < 0.019) was obtained between the MDA concentrations determined by chemical analysis and by the capture assay of lipoproteins present in IC. In conclusion, we have developed capture assays for different LDL modifications in human ApoB/E lipoprotein-rich fractions isolated from precipitated IC. This approach obviates the interference of IC in previously reported modified LDL assays and allows determination of the degree of modification of LDL with greater accuracy.

It has been suggested that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) modified by glycation may be more susceptible to oxidation and thus, enhance its atherogenicity. Using affinity chromatography, LDL glycated in vivo (G-LDL) and relatively nonglycated. (N-LDL) subfractions can be isolated from the same individual. The extent of and susceptibility to oxidation of N-LDL compared with G-LDL was determined in 15 type 1 diabetic patients. Total LDL was isolated and separated by boronate affinity chromatography into relatively glycated (G-) and nonglycated (N-) subfractions. The extent of glycation, glycoxidation, and lipoxidation, lipid soluble antioxidant content, susceptibility to in vitro oxidation, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-determined particle size and subclass distribution were determined for each subfraction. Glycation, (fructose-lysine) was higher in G-LDL versus N-LDL, (0.28 +/- 0.08 v 0.13 +/- 0.04 mmol/mol lysine, P < .0001). However, levels of glycoxidation/lipoxidation products and of antioxidants were similar or lower in G-LDL compared with N-LDL and were inversely correlated with fructose-lysine (FL) concentrations in G-LDL, but positively correlated in N-LDL. In vitro LDL (CuCl2) oxidation demonstrated a longer lag time for oxidation of G-LDL than N-LDL (50 +/- 0.16 v 37 +/- 0.15 min, P < .01), but there was no difference in the rate or extent of lipid oxidation, nor in any aspect of protein oxidation. Mean LDL particle size and subclass distribution did not differ between G-LDL and N-LDL. Thus, G-LDL from well-controlled type 1 diabetic patients is not more modified by oxidation, more susceptible to oxidation, or smaller than relatively N-LDL, suggesting alternative factors may contribute to the atherogenicity of LDL from type 1 diabetic patients.

Humans and laboratory animals recognize human modified LDL as immunogenic. Immune complexes (ICs) isolated from human sera contain malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL) and N (epsilon)(carboxymethyl)lysine-modified LDL (CML-LDL) as well as antibodies reacting with MDA-LDL, copper-oxidized LDL (OxLDL), CML-LDL, and advanced glycosylation end product (AGE)-modified LDL. OxLDL and AGE-LDL antibodies isolated from human sera recognize the same LDL modifications and do not react with modified non-LDL proteins. Rabbit antibodies have different reactivity patterns: MDA-LDL antibodies react strongly with MDA-LDL and MDA-BSA but weakly with OxLDL; OxLDL antibodies react strongly with OxLDL and weakly with MDA-LDL; CML-LDL antibodies react with CML-LDL > CML-BSA > AGE-LDL > OxLDL; AGE-LDL antibodies react strongly with AGE-LDL, react weakly with OxLDL, and do not react with CML-LDL. Thus, human and rabbit antibodies seem to recognize different epitopes. Capture assays carried out with all rabbit antibodies showed binding of apolipoprotein B-rich lipoproteins isolated from ICs, suggesting that laboratory-generated epitopes are expressed by in vivo-modified LDL, although they are not necessarily recognized by the human immune system. Thus, the definition of immunogenic forms of modified LDL eliciting human autoimmune responses requires the isolation and characterization of autoantibodies and modified LDL from human samples, whereas rabbit antibodies can be used to detect in vivo-modified human LDL.

In the present study we try to define the optimal conditions for preparation of copper-oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) to be used for the assay of oxLDL antibodies by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Oxidation of LDL was monitored by measuring the formation of conjugated dienes at 234 nm and the generation of fluorescent products with emission at 430 nm when excitation is performed at 360 nm. The generation of immunogenic epitopes was evaluated by testing the reactivity of aliquots collected at different times during the oxidation process with human sera with high oxLDL antibody levels and with a purified human oxLDL antibody. The values of fluorescence emission at 430 nm correlated best with reactivity with oxLDL antibodies; strong reactivity was usually associated with values greater than 1.1 U. The time needed for fluorescence emission to reach maximum levels varied between 6 and 14 h for most LDL, but it was considerably longer in a few LDL preparations. The maximal reactivity of oxLDL with oxLDL antibodies was observed when the LDL oxidation reaction was stopped 4 or more hours after the fluorescence readings reached their peak. At this stage of the oxidation reaction, apolipoprotein B fragmentation and aggregation were observed as shown by Western blot analysis. The CV for 13 EIA runs of two reference oxLDL antibodies reacting with four different pools of standardized oxLDL prepared according to the stated guidelines was 14.5 and 3.9%, confirming the reproducibility of our oxidation conditions.

Increased susceptibility of LDL to oxidation has been shown to be associated with the presence of coronary heart disease and may account for the accelerated vascular disease seen in diabetes. The response of LDL to in vitro oxidative stress has been proposed as a measure of the predisposition of LDL to the in vivo subendothelial oxidative stress. Increased susceptibility to oxidation has been demonstrated recently in diabetic patients with poorly controlled IDDM. Thus, we conducted studies to determine whether the increased susceptibility of LDL to oxidation was secondary to diabetes per se or to the level of glycemic control. Fifteen IDDM patients with good glycemic control and with no evidence of macrovascular disease or proteinuria were compared with healthy age-, sex-, race-, and BMI-matched nondiabetic subjects. Fasting blood glucose levels averaged 12.1 +/- 1.1 (mean +/- SE) vs. 4.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l in the diabetic versus the control groups, respectively. HbA1c levels averaged 7.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.2%, reflecting well-controlled diabetes (P < 0.0001). Total, LDL, VLDL, and HDL cholesterol, triglyceride, and lipoprotein(a) levels did not differ between the groups. The particle size, lipid composition, fatty acid content, antioxidant content, and glycation were similar for LDL isolated from both groups. A rapid LDL preparation technique was used to compare LDL susceptibility to oxidation under the following conditions: final LDL cholesterol concentration of 100 microg/ml, 5 micromol/l of CuCl2 at 25 degrees C. There was no difference in the susceptibility to in vitro oxidation of LDL isolated from IDDM patients compared with control subjects. There was no correlation of glycemic control with any of the parameters of the in vitro oxidation of LDL. LDL from patients with well-controlled IDDM does not differ in composition or in susceptibility to in vitro oxidative stress compared with LDL from nondiabetic subjects.