Search

The FDA has an accelerated approval program for drugs that have been identified as promising treatments for serious conditions when the available data suggest that the benefits outweigh the foreseeable risks. All of the currently available treatment options for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) initially went through the accelerated approval program. Here, a group of academic CML experts, patient panelists, and members from the FDA convened to discuss the utility of the accelerated approval program as it pertains to CML, and the utility of this program in future drug development in this disease. The results of that discussion are summarized here.

Treatment-free remission (TFR) is a goal for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Functional outcomes after discontinuing tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment have not been described. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of social, physical, cognitive, and sexual function were assessed over 36 months in 172 adult patients with chronic phase CML from 14 sites at baseline (on TKI) and after discontinuation. Linear mixed-effects models described the average trajectories for each patient-reported outcome measure after discontinuation and in those who restarted TKI. Of 112 patients in TFR at 12 months, 103 (92.0%) had a 3-point or greater improvement in social function, 80 (71.4%) in social isolation, 11 (9.8%) in satisfaction with sex life, 4 (3.6%) in physical function, and no patients had a 3-point or greater improvement in cognitive function or interest in sexual activity. Patients’ scores worsened after restarting TKI. This novel information on functional outcomes in TFR can help guide patient and clinician decision making.

The classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias was last updated in 2016 within a collaboration between the World Health Organization (WHO), the Society for Hematopathology, and the European Association for Haematopathology. This collaboration was primarily based on input from a clinical advisory committees (CACs) composed of pathologists, hematologists, oncologists, geneticists, and bioinformaticians from around the world. The recent advances in our understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, the experience with the use of the 2016 WHO classification in clinical practice, and the results of clinical trials have indicated the need for further revising and updating the classification. As a continuation of this CAC-based process, the authors, a group with expertise in the clinical, pathologic, and genetic aspects of these disorders, developed the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias. Using a multiparameter approach, the main objective of the consensus process was the definition of real disease entities, including the introduction of new entities and refined criteria for existing diagnostic categories, based on accumulated data. The ICC is aimed at facilitating diagnosis and prognostication of these neoplasms, improving treatment of affected patients, and allowing the design of innovative clinical trials.

Chronic myeloid leukemia is now a highly treatable leukemia due to the availability of multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) inhibiting the BCR-ABL1 oncogene. Some patients with CML can display resistance or intolerance to multiple TKIs, oftentimes due to the presence of mutations in BCR-ABL1, such as T315I, which limits effective treatment options. Ponatinib is a third-generation, rationally-designed TKI with clinically meaningful activity in this difficult-to-treat population. Ponatinib is associated with an increased risk of arterial occlusive events (AOEs) which has required a reexamination of its dosing in order to limit the risk of these events.This review will provide an overview of the mechanism of action of ponatinib and the safety and efficacy data from clinical trials in chronic myeloid leukemia.Ponatinib is a potent pan-BCR-ABL1 TKI with substantial activity in patients with more resistant or advanced CML. Its efficacy needs to be balanced with the increased risk of vascular events, which seems to be at least partially diminished by the implementation of mitigation strategies aimed at modifying cardiovascular risk factors and adaptive dosing of the drug.

RUNX1 associated familial platelet disorder (FPD) is a rare autosomal dominant hematologic disorder characterized by thrombocytopenia and/or altered platelet function. There is an increased propensity to develop myeloid malignancy (MM) - acute myeloid leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasms or myelodysplastic syndrome often in association with secondary somatic variants in other genes. To date, 23 FPD-MM pediatric cases have been reported worldwide. Here, we present two new kindreds with novel RUNX1 pathogenic variants in which children are probands. The first family is a daughter/mother diad, sharing a heterozygous frameshift variant in RUNX1 gene (c.501delT p.Ser167Argfs*9). The daughter, age 13 years, presented with features resembling juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia - severe anemia, thrombocytopenia, high white cell count with blast cells, monocytosis, increased nucleated red cells and had somatic mutations with high allele burden in CUX1, PHF6, and SH2B3 genes. She also had increased fetal hemoglobin and increased LIN28B expression. The mother, who had a long history of hypoplastic anemia, had different somatic mutations- a non-coding mutation in CUX1 but none in PHF6 or SH2B3. Her fetal hemoglobin and LIN28B expression were normal. In the second kindred, the proband, now 4 years old with thrombocytopenia alone, was investigated at 3 months of age for persistent neonatal thrombocytopenia with large platelets. Molecular testing identified a heterozygous intragenic deletion in RUNX1 encompassing exon 5. His father is known to have increased bruising for several years but is unavailable for testing. These two cases illustrate the significance of secondary mutations in the development and progression of RUNX1-FPD to MM.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent the standard of care for several diseases and drug targets in hematologic malignancies. Infectious complications vary by disease status and prior therapy, but overall incidence of infections generally is low. In chronic diseases, such as chronic myeloid leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, patients can remain on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for many years, with few infectious complications from therapy. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors overall are well tolerated in lymphoproliferative disorders, with long-term follow-up of many years in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Although opportunistic infections have been reported, they are uncommon and routine prophylaxis is not recommended.

For patients with optimally treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy can lead to treatment-free remission. In previous trials, TKI discontinuation has been associated with increased musculoskeletal pain in some patients (“withdrawal syndrome”), based on physician-reported adverse events (AE). Patient-reported pain has not been described. The Life After Stopping TKI study was a 14-site prospective, non-randomized clinical trial of TKI discontinuation. We defined increased pain after discontinuation as: (i) a physician-reported pain AE, (ii) a 2-level increase in self-reported musculoskeletal pain (4-level single item), or (iii) initiation of a medication for pain. We plotted the trajectory of patient-reported pain over time using a piecewise mixed-effects ordinal logistic model. Within 3 months of discontinuation, 35 of 172 patients (20.3%) had a physician-reported pain AE, 22 of 172 (12.8%) had an increase in self-reported pain, and 18 of 154 (11.7%) initiated a pain medication. Agreement among these measures was limited; overall, 60 of 172 patients (34.9%) had increased pain. Three patients (1.7%) restarted a TKI because of pain. The modelpredicted trajectory showed an increase in pain in the first 3 months followed by a decrease, returning to baseline levels by 6 months and further decreasing after that. This trajectory was similar among patients who did and did not restart TKI, suggesting that resuming a TKI for withdrawal syndrome may be necessary for some, but other approaches to manage pain should be tried so that patients can remain in treatment-free remission when possible.

PURPOSE: High-cost drugs impose a financial burden on patients with cancer. Karmanos Specialty Pharmacy (KSP) developed a process to automate financial assistance (FA) applications to decrease patient drug cost. We evaluate the outcomes of this program on cost to patients and payers. METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective study of the KSP claims data set from January to December 2019, accessed by 13 statewide cancer centers within Michigan. Drug cost of patients, payers, FA (funds to lower patient drug cost), and types of FA were obtained. A subset analysis was performed to determine drug delivery times. RESULTS: In 2019, 869 prescriptions and 1,722 prescription fills were provided to 463 patients through KSP. The total cost of drug claims was approximately $10 million US dollars (USD) among Medicare patients (58%), approximately $3.4 million USD for privately insured patients (20%), and approximately $3.7 million USD for Medicaid patients (22%). Twenty-seven percent of patients (22% of all prescription fills) required additional FA with initial total co-payment claims of $335,216 USD. $280,988 USD of FA was obtained, which substantially lowered total patient costs by 81%. $250,818 USD of FA obtained was from foundation grants (327 fills), and $21,441 USD from manufacturer co-pay cards (47 fills). An additional $12,260 USD (12 fills) from a Karmanos Patient Assistance Fund was used. There was high dependence on foundation grant assistance among Medicare patients (33% of claims). In a subset analysis, the median time from prescription written to delivery to the patient was < 7 days (0-56 days). CONCLUSION: Twenty-seven percent of patients (22% of prescriptions fills) in 2019 required additional FA for high-cost drugs. KSP substantially reduced patient cost by implementing an efficient process using additional pharmacy assistants to obtain FA.

PURPOSE Impaired response to erythropoietin underlies ineffective erythropoiesis and anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We investigated whether treatment with lenalidomide (LEN), which augments erythropoietin receptor signaling in vitro, can restore and improve hemoglobin response to epoetin (EPO) alfa in patients with lower-risk, non-del(5q) MDS who have anemia that is refractory to or have low probability of benefit from treatment with recombinant erythropoietin. METHODS In a phase III, US intergroup trial, we randomly assigned patients to receive either LEN and EPO alfa or LEN alone following stratification by serum erythropoietin concentration and prior erythropoietin treatment. RESULTS A total of 195 evaluable patients were randomly assigned: 99 patients to the LEN-EPO alfa cohort and 96 to LEN alone. After four cycles of treatment, the primary end point of major erythroid response (MER) was significantly higher (28.3%) with the combination compared with LEN alone (11.5%) ( P = .004). Among 136 patients who completed 16 weeks of study treatment, 38.9% and 15.6% achieved MER, respectively ( P = .004). Additionally, minor erythroid response was achieved in 18.2% and 20.8% of patients, for an overall erythroid response rate of 46.5% versus 32.3%. Among LEN nonresponders, 38 crossed over to the addition of EPO alfa with 10 patients (26.3%) achieving a MER. Responses to the combined treatment were highly durable with a median MER duration of 23.8 months compared with 13 months with LEN alone. CONCLUSION LEN restores sensitivity to recombinant erythropoietin in growth factor–insensitive, lower-risk, non-del(5q) MDS, to yield a significantly higher rate and duration of MER compared with LEN alone (funded by the National Cancer Institute; E2905 ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02048813 ).

In PACE (Ponatinib Ph+ ALL and CML Evaluation), a phase 2 trial of ponatinib that included patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) resistant to multiple prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), ponatinib showed deep and durable responses, but arterial occlusive events (AOEs) emerged as notable adverse events. Post hoc analyses indicated that AOEs are dose dependent. We assessed the benefit/risk ratio across 3 ponatinib starting doses in the first prospective study to evaluate a novel, response-based, dose-reduction strategy for TKI treatment. Adults with CP-CML resistant to or intolerant of at least 2 prior BCR-ABL1 TKIs or with a BCR-ABL1 T315I mutation were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to 3 cohorts receiving ponatinib 45, 30, or 15 mg once daily. In patients who received 45 or 30 mg daily the dose was reduced to 15 mg upon response (BCR-ABL1IS transcript levels ≤1%). The primary end point was response at 12 months. From August 2015 through May 2019, 283 patients were randomly assigned to the cohorts: 282 (94 per dose group) received treatment (data cutoff, 31 May 2020). The primary end point (98.3% confidence interval) was achieved in 44.1% (31.7-57.0) in the 45-mg cohort, 29.0% (18.4-41.6) in the 30-mg cohort, and 23.1% (13.4-35.3) in the 15-mg cohort. Independently confirmed grade 3 or above treatment-emergent AOEs occurred in 5, 5, and 3 patients in the 45-, 30-, and 15-mg cohorts, respectively. All cohorts showed benefit in this highly resistant CP-CML population. Optimal benefit/risk outcomes occurred with the 45-mg starting dose, which was decreased to 15 mg upon achievement of a response. This trial is registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02467270.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been associated with improved survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but are also associated with adverse effects, especially fatigue and diarrhea. Discontinuation of TKIs is safe and is associated with the successful achievement of treatment-free remission (TFR) for some patients.To evaluate molecular recurrence (MRec) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after TKI discontinuation for US patients with CML.The Life After Stopping TKIs (LAST) study was a prospective single-group nonrandomized clinical trial that enrolled 172 patients from 14 US academic medical centers from December 18, 2014, to December 12, 2016, with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Participants were adults with chronic-phase CML whose disease was well controlled with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib. Statistical analysis was performed from August 13, 2019, to March 23, 2020.Discontinuation of TKIs.Molecular recurrence, defined as loss of major molecular response (BCR-ABL1 International Scale ratio0.1%) by central laboratory testing, and PROs (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computerized adaptive tests) were monitored. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was performed on samples with undetectable BCR-ABL1 by standard real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR).Of 172 patients, 89 were women (51.7%), and the median age was 60 years (range, 21-86 years). Of 171 patients evaluable for molecular analysis, 112 (65.5%) stayed in major molecular response, and 104 (60.8%) achieved TFR. Undetectable BCR-ABL1 by either ddPCR or RQ-PCR at the time of TKI discontinuation (hazard ratio, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.99-6.50; P .001) and at 3 months (hazard ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 3.07-11.1; P .001) was independently associated with MRec. Molecular recurrence for patients with detectable BCR-ABL1 by RQ-PCR was 50.0% (14 of 28), undetectable BCR-ABL1 by RQ-PCR but detectable by ddPCR was 64.3% (36 of 56), and undetectable BCR-ABL1 by both ddPCR and RQ-PCR was 10.3% (9 of 87) (P ≤ .001). Of the 112 patients in TFR at 12 months, 90 (80.4%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue, 39 (34.8%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in depression, 98 (87.5%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in diarrhea, 24 (21.4%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in sleep disturbance, and 5 (4.5%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in pain interference. Restarting a TKI resulted in worsening of PROs.In this study, TKI discontinuation was safe, and 60.8% of patients remained in TFR. Discontinuation of TKIs was associated with improvements in PROs. These findings should assist patients and physicians in their decision-making regarding discontinuation of TKIs. Detectable BCR-ABL1 by RQ-PCR or ddPCR at the time of TKI discontinuation was associated with higher risk of MRec; clinical application of this finding should be confirmed in other studies.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02269267.

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare B-cell malignancy, and there is a need for novel treatments for patients who do not benefit from purine analogs. Ibrutinib, an oral agent targeting Bruton tyrosine kinase in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway, is highly effective in several malignancies. Its activity in HCL was unknown, so we conducted a multisite phase 2 study of oral ibrutinib in patients with either relapsed classic or variant hairy cell leukemia. The primary outcome measure was the overall response rate (ORR) at 32 weeks, and we also assessed response at 48 weeks and best response during treatment. Key secondary objectives were characterization of toxicity and determination of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-seven patients were enrolled at 2 different doses (24 at 420 mg, 13 at 840 mg). The median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years (range, 0-5.9 years). The ORR at 32 weeks was 24%, which increased to 36% at 48 weeks. The best ORR was 54%. The estimated 36-month PFS was 73% and OS was 85%. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea (59%), fatigue (54%), myalgia (54%), and nausea (51%). Hematologic adverse events were common: anemia (43%), thrombocytopenia (41%), and neutropenia (35%). Ibrutinib can be safely administered to patients with HCL with objective responses and results in prolonged disease control. Although the initial primary outcome objective of the study was not met, the observation of objective responses in heavily pretreated patients coupled with a favorable PFS suggests that ibrutinib may be beneficial in these patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01841723.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a molecularly heterogeneous disorder characterized by symptoms related to pancytopenia and by an accumulation of immature myeloid precursors that is a consequence of...

Background Patients with high cost-sharing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) experience delays in treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). To the authors' knowledge, the clinical outcomes among and costs for patients not receiving TKIs are not well defined. Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, the authors evaluated differences in TKI initiation, health care use, cost, and survival among patients with CML with continuous Medicare Parts A and B and Part D coverage who were diagnosed between 2007 and 2015. Results A total of 941 patients were included. Approximately 29% of all patients did not initiate treatment with TKIs within 6 months (non-TKI users), and had lower rates of BCR-ABL testing and more hospitalizations compared with TKI users. Approximately 21% were not found to have any TKI claims at any time. TKI initiation rates within 6 months of diagnosis increased for all patients over time (61% to 85%), with greater improvements observed in patients receiving subsidies (55% to 90%). Total Medicare costs were greater in patients treated with TKIs, with approximately 50% because of TKI costs. Non-TKI users had more inpatient costs compared with TKI users. Trends in cost remained significant when adjusting for age and comorbidities. The median overall survival was 40 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 34-48 months) compared with 86 months (95% CI, 73 months to not reached), respectively, for non-TKI users versus TKI users, a finding that remained consistent when adjusting for age, comorbidities, and subsidy status (hazard ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.77-2.81). Conclusions Approximately 21% of all patients with CML did not receive TKIs at any time. Cost-sharing subsidies consistently are found to be associated with higher initiation rates. Non-TKI users had higher inpatient costs and poorer survival outcomes. Interventions to lower TKI costs for all patients are desirable.

The therapeutic landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has profoundly changed over the past 7 years. Most patients with chronic phase (CP) now have a normal life expectancy. Another goal is achieving a stable deep molecular response (DMR) and discontinuing medication for treatment-free remission (TFR). The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically evaluate and update the evidence to achieve these goals since its previous recommendations. First-line treatment is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; imatinib brand or generic, dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib are available first-line). Generic imatinib is the cost-effective initial treatment in CP. Various contraindications and side-effects of all TKIs should be considered. Patient risk status at diagnosis should be assessed with the new EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS)-score. Monitoring of response should be done by quantitative polymerase chain reaction whenever possible. A change of treatment is recommended when intolerance cannot be ameliorated or when molecular milestones are not reached. Greater than 10% BCR-ABL1 at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed. Allogeneic transplantation continues to be a therapeutic option particularly for advanced phase CML. TKI treatment should be withheld during pregnancy. Treatment discontinuation may be considered in patients with durable DMR with the goal of achieving TFR. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Background Laboratory testing and treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have changed dramatically within the last decade. The authors evaluated changes in patterns of real-world testing and treatment over time by comparing 2 population-based cohorts. Methods The National Cancer Institute-sponsored Patterns of Care study was conducted among patients with CLL who were sampled from 14 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program registries. Demographics, testing, and treatment data were abstracted from medical records within 24 months of diagnosis. Results A total of 1008 patients diagnosed in 2008 and 1367 patients diagnosed in 2014 were included. There was a significant increase in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing, immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region gene (IgVH ) mutation analyses, and lymph node biopsies between 2008 and 2014. FISH testing was performed in the majority of, but not all, treated patients (53% in 2008, which increased to 62% in 2014). Some differences in the receipt of FISH testing by age and insurance status were observed over time (older patients and Medicare patients without private insurance were less likely to be tested in 2014). There were contrasting testing patterns noted by practice type and year, with nonteaching hospitals more likely to perform bone marrow biopsies in 2008, and teaching hospitals more likely to perform FISH and IgVH testing in 2014. There also were differences in treatments over time, with the use of bendamustine and rituximab being more common in 2014, at the expense of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. Conclusions There have been rapidly changing practices in the testing and treatment patterns of patients with CLL within the last decade.

Purpose To provide evidence-based guidance on the use of platelet transfusion in people with cancer. This guideline updates and replaces the previous ASCO platelet transfusion guideline published initially in 2001. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the medical literature published from September 1, 2014, through October 26, 2016. This review builds on two 2015 systematic reviews that were conducted by the AABB and the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines. For clinical questions that were not addressed by the AABB and the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines (the use of leukoreduction and platelet transfusion in solid tumors or chronic, stable severe thrombocytopenia) or that were addressed partially (invasive procedures), the ASCO search extended back to January 2000. Results The updated ASCO review included 24 more recent publications: three clinical practice guidelines, eight systematic reviews, and 13 observational studies. Recommendations The most substantial change to a previous recommendation involved platelet transfusion in the setting of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Based on data from randomized controlled trials, adult patients who undergo autologous stem-cell transplantation at experienced centers may receive a platelet transfusion at the first sign of bleeding, rather than prophylactically. Prophylactic platelet transfusion at defined platelet count thresholds is still recommended for pediatric patients undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation and for adult and pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Other recommendations address platelet transfusion in patients with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors or in those who undergo invasive procedures. Guidance is also provided regarding the production of platelet products, prevention of Rh alloimmunization, and management of refractoriness to platelet transfusion ( www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki ).

Purpose: The ASCO Value Framework calculates the value of cancer therapies. Given costly novel therapeutics for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, we used the framework to compare net health benefit (NHB) and cost within Medicare of all regimens listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Methods: The current NCCN guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia were reviewed. All referenced studies were screened, and only randomized controlled prospective trials were included. The revised ASCO Value Framework was used to calculate NHB. Medicare drug pricing was used to calculate the cost of therapies. Results: Forty-nine studies were screened. The following observations were made: only 10 studies (20%) could be evaluated; when comparing regimens studied against the same control arm, ranking NHB scores were comparable to their preference in guidelines; NHB scores varied depending on which variables were used, and there were no clinically validated thresholds for low or high values; treatment-related deaths were not weighted in the toxicity scores; and six of the 10 studies used less potent control arms, ranked as the least-preferred NCCN-recommended regimens. Conclusion: The ASCO Value Framework is an important initial step to quantify value of therapies. Essential limitations include the lack of clinically relevant validated thresholds for NHB scores and lack of incorporation of grade 5 toxicities/treatment-related mortality into its methodology. To optimize its application for clinical practice, we urge investigators/sponsors to incorporate and report the required variables to calculate the NHB of regimens and encourage trials with stronger comparator arms to properly quantify the relative value of therapies.

Introduction: In PACE (NCT01207440), patients with refractory chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) with substantial prior second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment demonstrated deep, lasting responses to ponatinib. However, long-term follow-up identified rates of arterial occlusive events (AOEs) as a risk. OPTIC (NCT02467270) is a randomized Phase 2 trial evaluating ponatinib at 3 starting doses: 45 mg, 30 mg, and 15 mg daily in patients with CP-CML resistant/intolerant to ≥2 TKIs or with a T315I mutation. The interim analysis showed that the 45-mg (vs 30 mg or 15 mg) starting dose (with reduction to 15 mg upon response) provided the best clinical outcomes and responses were maintained in >75% of patients who dose reduced. Here, we present efficacy and safety outcomes by baseline mutation status and line of treatment for the 3 dose cohorts. Methods: Patients with CP-CML resistant/intolerant to ≥2 TKIs or with T315I mutation were randomized to ponatinib starting doses of 45 mg (Cohort A; 45 mg → 15 mg), 30 mg (B; 30 mg → 15 mg), and 15 mg (C) once daily (qd). Doses were reduced to 15 mg on achievement of ≤1% BCR-ABL1ISin Cohorts A and B. Doses also could be reduced for safety. The primary endpoint is ≤1% BCR-ABL1IS at 12 months. In this analysis, the outcome was analyzed by baseline mutation status (none, any, T315I, and non-T315I) and number of prior TKIs (≤2 or ≥3) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and AOEs by adjudication were summarized by number of prior TKIs (≤2 or ≥3). Interim analysis results are descriptive. Results: Patients (N=283) were randomized: A/B/C n=94/95/94; median age was 48 y (18‒81 y). Seven patients were excluded from the intent-to-treat population (N=276) because they had atypical transcripts. Mutation status was well balanced between cohorts; 59% had no mutation, 41% had ≥1 baseline mutation, 24% had T315I, and 17% had a non-T315I mutation. In all categories of mutation status, the rate of ≤1% BCR-ABL1IS by 12 months was highest in Cohort A, with the most notable differences seen in patients with T315I (A: 60%, B: 25%, C: 6%) (Table 1). Patients with no mutations or other mutations had smaller differences but the outcomes all still favored 45 mg. Patients in all cohorts were treated with multiple TKIs, with 54% (A), 60% (B), and 53% (C) having 3 or more prior TKIs. The rate of ≤1% BCR-ABL1IS by 12 months was highest in Cohort A, both in patients treated with ≤2 or ≥3 prior TKIs (43% and 49%, respectively) (Table 1). Table 2 shows rates of TEAEs and TE-AOEs by cohort and number or prior TKIs. There was a trend toward higher event rates in Cohort A and for patients treated with ≥3 TKIs. Rates of adjudicated AOEs were low (≤6%) in all 3 cohorts irrespective of the number of prior TKIs. Conclusions: At this interim analysis with a median follow-up of ~21 months, the maximum benefit:risk, regardless of mutation status or number of prior TKIs, was observed in patients treated with a 45-mg starting dose, with a reduction to 15 mg upon achievement of response. Patients with the T315I mutation who initiated ponatinib at 45 mg experienced better response rates than those who initiated ponatinib at 30-mg or 15-mg starting doses. Primary analysis will provide a refined understanding of the benefit:risk profile of 3 different starting doses of ponatinib. Disclosures Cortes: BioPath Holdings: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Telios: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding. Apperley:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hochhaus:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; MSD: Research Funding. Mauro:Sun Pharma/SPARC: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding. Rousselot:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sacha:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Adamed: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Talpaz:Novartis: Research Funding; IMAGO: Consultancy; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding. Chuah:Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Travel, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lipton:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Deininger:SPARC: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other, Research Funding; Sangamo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: part of a study management committee, Research Funding; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medscape: Consultancy; DisperSol: Consultancy; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding. Schiffer:BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding. García Gutiérrez:Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding; Novartis Pharma AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding. de Lavallade:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Etienne:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Lu:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Current Employment. Srivastava:Takeda: Current Employment. Rosti:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

This letter to the editor comments on the recently published article by Flynn et al. about shared decision making as related to discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Background The standard treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is lifelong oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated that some patients with a sustained deep molecular response to TKI therapy can safely stop therapy and remain in a treatment-free remission. TKI discontinuation is now offered to select patients in routine clinical care. In order to better support patient decision making, we explored patients’ views on TKI discontinuation and the factors patients consider when making this decision. Materials and Methods Patients were recruited from three U.S. academic cancer centers. Qualitative interviews were recorded, transcribed, and content analyzed. Results We interviewed 22 patients, half of whom wanted to try TKI discontinuation. Eleven factors relevant to the decision emerged, and patients weighed these factors differently. Commonly mentioned factors included perceived risk of relapse, TKI side effects, financial considerations, polypharmacy, and willingness to change something that was working (status quo). There were notable differences in patients’ understanding of the likelihood of achieving a treatment-free remission, with patients who did not want to stop TKIs more accurately reporting the risk of relapse than patients who wanted to stop. Conclusion This is a novel decision that will become more common as the prevalence of patients with well-controlled CML continues to increase. These results highlight the need for patient education and decision support so that patients and providers can make shared decisions that are informed and values based. Implications for Practice The standard treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is lifelong oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Clinical trials have shown that some patients with a sustained deep molecular response to TKI therapy can safely stop therapy and remain in a treatment-free remission. TKI discontinuation is now being offered to patients outside of clinical trials. This study explored factors that patients who are eligible to try TKI discontinuation considered when making this decision. Factors relevant to the decision included risk of relapse, side effects, financial considerations, polypharmacy, and willingness to change something that was working. This is a novel decision that will become more common as the prevalence of patients with well-controlled CML continues to increase. These results highlight the need for decision support and outline the factors that should be included so that patients and providers can make shared decisions that are informed and values based.

7000 Background: PON, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), demonstrated deep and long-lasting responses and survival in patients (pts) with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) resistant/intolerant to second-generation TKI therapy (PACE; NCT01207440); post hoc analysis suggested a relationship between dose and both adverse events and response. Here we present the primary analysis of OPTIC (NCT02467270), an ongoing, randomized, phase 2 trial with a novel response-based dosing regimen of PON in pts with resistant/intolerant CP-CML. Methods: Pts with CP-CML resistant/intolerant to ≥2 TKIs or with the BCR-ABL1 T315I mutation were randomized to PON starting doses of 45 mg (cohort A; 45 mg → 15 mg), 30 mg (B; 30 mg →15 mg), and 15 mg (C) once daily. Doses were reduced to 15 mg with achievement of ≤1% BCR-ABL1IS in cohorts A and B. The primary endpoint is ≤1% BCR-ABL1IS at 12 mo; secondary endpoints include cytogenetic and molecular responses and safety outcomes. AOEs were adjudicated prospectively by an independent review committee. Results: 283 pts were randomized (A/B/C: n=94/95/94) and had the following baseline characteristics: median age 48 y (18‒81 y); 98% received ≥2 (55% ≥3) TKIs; 99% had resistant disease; 40% had ≥1 baseline mutations (23% T315I). At the primary analysis with 32 mo median follow-up, 134 pts (47%; n=50/41/43) remained on treatment and 204 pts (72%) had PON exposure ≥12 mo. At 12 mo, 44% (41/93) in A, 29% (27/93) in B, and 23% (21/91) in C achieved ≤1% BCR-ABL1IS (Table); primary endpoint was met by cohort A. Dose reductions to 15 mg after achieving response (A/B) were 48/29%. Most common grades ≥3 TEAEs were thrombocytopenia, 27%; neutropenia, 17%; and anemia, 7%. AOEs/serious AOEs were reported in cohorts A (10%/4%), B (5%/4%), and C (3%/3%). Dose reductions or discontinuations for TEAEs (A/B/C) were 46/35/32% and 19/16/14%, respectively. Conclusions: The OPTIC primary analysis demonstrates the optimal benefit:risk profile for PON was achieved with a response-based dosing regimen starting with 45 mg/d, followed by dose reduction to 15 mg/d upon achieving ≤ 1% BCR-ABL1IS; 30 mg→15 mg and 15 mg cohorts may provide benefit, especially in pts without T315I mutation (Table). The observed ≤1% BCR-ABL1IS responses are supported by robust survival outcomes in pts with CP-CML resistant to second-generation BCR-ABL1 TKI therapy, both with and without BCR-ABL1 mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT02467270. [Table: see text]

Dasatinib was approved at 100 mg once daily for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, based on results of the phase 3 CA180-034 (NCT00123474) study. Here we present the final 7-year analysis of this pivotal study, the longest follow-up to date of any second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Patients (n = 670) with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML in chronic phase received dasatinib. Nineteen percent of patients continued on study treatment, with a greater proportion in the 100 mg once daily arm remaining on therapy. Seven-year rates for major molecular response (MMR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were similar across doses; MMR, PFS, and OS results were 46, 42, and 65% at 100 mg once daily, respectively. Improved PFS and OS rates were reported in patients who achieved BCR-ABL1 ≤10% at 3 and 6 months. No new safety signals were identified. The incidence of drug-related pleural effusion was 28% at 100 mg once daily and 35% at the other three dose groups. Incidence of drug-related pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary arterial hypertension remained low (≤3% across all doses). Arterial ischemic events occurred in ≤4% of patients across all doses. These data support the long-term efficacy and well-established safety profile of dasatinib for patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML in chronic phase. Am. J. Hematol. 91:869-874, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Acute myeloid leukemia in older patients has historically had a dismal 10–15% long-term survival rate. Although patient frailty plays a role in this disappointing outcome, the primary driver of poor results remains the resistance of disease to current therapies. The optimal management of this difficult-to-treat disease should include a careful consideration of disease, patient and treatment factors. Disease factors include cytogenetic and molecular features and the history of an antecedent hematological disorder. Patient factors include age, performance status, comorbid conditions and individual patient preference. We favor intensive induction in most fit older patients but alternatives such as hypomethylating agents and low-dose cytarabine may be considered in patients with other comorbidities. Enrollment of patients into well designed clinical trials addressing important questions remains of utmost importance in order to advance the understanding and treatment of this disease although the best means of drug development remains a challenging dilemma.

There has been an increased interest in the use of therapeutic granulocyte transfusion in recent years because premedication of donors with granulocyte colony stimulating factors produces much higher doses of granulocytes for transfusion. Other factors which influence the outcome of transfusion include the types of infection being treated, the likelihood of recipient marrow recovery and recipient alloimmunization. This review provides a historical perspective on these issues.

Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) offers significant improvements over previous treatments in terms of survival and toxicity yet nevertheless is associated with reduced health-related quality of life and very high cost. Several small studies from Europe and Australia suggested that discontinuing TKIs with regular monitoring was safe. The Life After Stopping TKIs (LAST) study is a large, U.S.-based study that aims to improve the evidence for clinical decision making regarding TKI discontinuation with monitoring in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who have a deep molecular response to TKI therapy. The LAST study is a non-randomized, prospective, single-group longitudinal study of 173 patients. The co-primary objectives are to determine the proportion of patients who develop molecular recurrence (> 0.1% BCR-ABLIS) after discontinuing one of four TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib) and to compare the patient-reported health status of patients before and after stopping TKIs. Outcomes are assessed at baseline and throughout the 36-month study follow-up period with a central laboratory used for blood samples. All samples with undetectable BCR-ABL are also examined using digital polymerase chain reaction, which is a more sensitive nanofluidic polymerase chain reaction system. Because of their high cost and side effects, discontinuation of TKIs for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who have a deep molecular response to TKI therapy is a promising approach to treatment. The LAST study is the largest U.S.-based TKI discontinuation study. It is the first to allow participation from patients on any of 4 first- and second-generation TKIs, includes a robust approach to measurement of clinical and patient-reported outcomes, and is using digital polymerase chain reaction to explore better prediction of safe discontinuation. This study was registered prospectively on October 21, 2014 and assigned trial number NCT02269267 .

Background Prophylactic platelet (PLT) transfusions are often administered to patients before bronchoscopy or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to prevent bleeding. There is a paucity of data to validate this approach, with a commonly suggested PLT transfusion threshold of fewer than 50 × 10(9) /L, largely based on expert opinion. We conducted a retrospective study on the incidence of bleeding complications in patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing bronchoscopy. Study design and methods We identified 150 consecutive patients with PLT counts of not more than 100 × 10(9) /L who underwent bronchoscopy and/or BAL from January 2009 to May 2014 at our institution. The British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines were used to categorize bleeding associated with bronchoscopy. Results Infection (40%) was the primary indication for bronchoscopy with BAL. Fifty-eight of 89 (65%) patients with baseline PLT counts of not more than 50 × 10(9) /L received prophylactic transfusions compared to 8% of those with PLT counts of more than 50 × 10(9) /L. The PLT count did not increase to more than 50 × 10(9) /L in many patients who received transfusions. Seventy-two patients had counts of less than 50 × 10(9) /L at the time of bronchoscopy, with 15 patients having counts of less than 20 × 10(9) /L. Only one patient with a PLT count of 61 × 10(9) /L had bleeding that required continuous suctioning but then resolved spontaneously (termed "mild bleeding" by BTS criteria). Bloody lavage that resolved spontaneously without continuous suctioning (termed "no bleeding" by the BTS criteria) was observed in nine (6%) patients. Conclusion The very low incidence of bleeding complications from bronchoscopy with or without BAL even in patients with PLT counts of not more than 30 × 10(9) /L (no episodes of clinically significant bleeding in 35 patients) demonstrates that bronchoscopy can be done safely in patients with severe thrombocytopenia.