Search

Omphalocele and gastroschisis are the most common types of abdominal wall defects. Comprehensive local experience helps parents to make decisions on the pregnancy and foresee the disease journey. A retrospective review of abdominal wall defect patients in all three pediatric surgical centers in Hong Kong between January 2003 and February 2023 was conducted. All patients consecutively diagnosed with omphalocele and gastroschisis were included, excluding other forms. Data of demographics and short- and long-term outcome parameters were collected. A total of 99 cases were reviewed and 85 patients met the inclusion criteria. Diagnoses include omphalocele major (n = 49, 57.6%), omphalocele minor (n = 22, 25.9%) and gastroschisis (n = 14, 16.5%), with mean gestational age 37 weeks (SD 2.2) and birth weight 2.7 kg (SD 0.6). Omphalocele is most commonly associated with cardiovascular (n = 28, 39.4%) and chromosomal defects (n = 11, 15.5%). Surgical procedures including primary repair (n = 38, 53.5%), staged closure (n = 30, 42.3%) with average 8.6 days (SD 4.7) of silo reduction, and conservative management (n = 3, 4.2%) were performed. The mortality rate was 14.1% (n = 10) and the complication rate was 36.6% (n = 26). The majority of patients had normal intellectual development (92.5%) and growth (79.2%) on the latest follow-up. For gastroschisis, one patient (7.1%) had intestinal atresia. Surgical procedures included primary repair (n = 9, 64.3%) and staged closure (n = 5, 35.7%) with average 8 days (SD 3.5) of silo reduction. Complication rate was 21.4% (n = 3), with one mortality (7.1%). All patients had normal intellectual development and growth. The mean follow-up time of this series is 76.9 months (SD 62.9). Most abdominal wall defects in our series were managed surgically with a good overall survival rate and long-term outcome. This information is essential during antenatal and postnatal counseling for parents., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Varicocele is a common condition in adolescence and the most common correctable cause of infertility. This study aimed to analyze and compare the outcomes of scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy and laparoscopic Palomo surgery in a tertiary referral center., Materials and Methods: Patients with left grade 3 varicocele indicated for surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomly allocated to the scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy and laparoscopic Palomo surgery groups, with their respective contralateral normal testes taken as controls. The primary outcome measures were clinical varicocele recurrence, testicular catch-up growth, and postoperative hydrocele. All patients were evaluated clinically and using Doppler ultrasound by radiologists., Results: From 2015 to 2020, 113 patients completed the study and were statistically analyzed (scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy, n = 57; laparoscopic Palomo surgery, n = 56). All patients had significantly smaller testes preoperatively; the testicular volume differences with control testes were -23% in scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy and -19% in laparoscopic Palomo surgery. At 12-month follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in clinical recurrences between the 2 groups (scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy = 5.3% vs laparoscopic Palomo surgery = 5.4%, P > .05, noninferiority test). Testicular catch-up growths were observed in both groups; the mean testicular volume difference between the treatment and control testes decreased from -23% to -8.1% in scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy ( P < .001) and from -19% to -9.3% in laparoscopic Palomo surgery ( P < .001) at 12-month follow-up. There was no postoperative hydrocele in the scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy group compared to 7 cases in the laparoscopic Palomo surgery group (0% vs 13%, P = .006)., Conclusions: Both scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy and laparoscopic Palomo surgery are safe and effective procedures for treatment of adolescent varicocele with significant positive effect on testicular catch-up growth. Scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy is not inferior to laparoscopic Palomo surgery in terms of clinical recurrence rate and has significantly less postoperative hydrocele.

Introduction/objective: Varicocele is a common condition seen in adolescence and associated with adult subfertility. Numerous types of intervention have been described with differences in success and complication rates. This study aims to review and compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic Palomo surgery and scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy at our center., Study Design: A retrospective analysis was done of all patients younger than 18 years old with idiopathic varicocele treated operatively between February 2001 and December 2016. Demographics such as age at operation, side, varicocele grade, operative date, and types of operation were collected. Primary outcomes were clinical recurrence, defined as any grading noted on follow-up within 1 year post-op and post-operative hydrocele. Secondary outcomes were operative time, length of stay, and other surgical complications. Mann-Whitney U test, independent t test and chi-square tests were used for analysis. All p-values were two-sided and considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05., Results: A total of 119 patients fit the criteria, of whom 117 patients were included in data analysis (Table). Sixty-two patients had laparoscopic Palomo surgery (LPS) and 55 had scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy (SAS). Clinical recurrence (grade 2-3) within 1 year was similar between the two groups, with four out of 48 patients in the SAS group and six out of 62 patients in the LPS group (8.4% in SAS vs. 9.7% in LPS, p = 1.00). Of the 11 patients who had recurrence in the SAS group, seven had grade 1 recurrence (14.5%), two (4.2%) had grade 2 recurrence, and two (4.2%) had grade 3 recurrence. For the LPS group, 17 out of 62 patients had clinical recurrence within 1 year, of whom 11 (17.7%) had grade 1 recurrence, one (1.6%) had grade 2, and five (8.1%) had grade 3 recurrence. Post-operative hydrocele was significantly higher in the LPS group; there was none in the SAS group but 11 patients in the LPS group (0% in SAS vs. 17.7%, p = 0.002). Three patients had clinically significant hydrocele requiring Jaboulays' procedure. Complications other than hydrocele were noted in three patients in the SAS group and one patient in the LPS group (5.5% in SAS vs. 1.6% in LPS, p = 0.158). None required operative intervention. No conversion to open procedure was seen in the LPS group and there were no perioperative complications. Mean operative time was 62.9 min in the SAS group and 60.7 min in the LPS group (p = 0.624). Mean length of stay was 17.5 h in the SAS group and 31.7 h in the LPS group (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Both SAS and LPS are safe procedures for treatment of adolescent varicocele with similar clinical recurrence rate within 1 year. SAS has a significantly lower rate of post-operative hydrocele., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background/purpose: Short segment Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR) carries a better prognosis than long segment disease, but the definition of short is controversial. The objective of this study is to determine anatomically the extent of disease involvement that would be associated with a better functional outcome., Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter (n = 3) study with patients (≥ 3 years) who had transanal pullthrough operation done for aganglionosis limited to the recto-sigmoid colon were reviewed. The extent of disease involvement and bowel resection was retrieved by reviewing the operative records as well as histopathological reports of the resected specimens. Clinical assessment was performed according to the criteria of a seven-itemed bowel function score (BFS) (maximum score = 20). Manometric assessment was performed with anorectal manometry., Results: The study period started from 2003 to 45 patients were studied with median age at assessment = 52.0 months and operation = 3.0 months. The disease involvement was categorized into upper sigmoid-descending colon (DC) (n = 8), sigmoid colon (SC) (n = 12), upper rectum (UR) (n = 14) and lower rectum (LR) (n = 11) according to the level of normal biopsy result. There was no significant difference in the age of assessment between the four groups. The median BFSs in the DC, SC, UR and LR were 13, 15, 17 and 17, respectively (p = 0.01). Nine patients from the DC and SC groups reported soiling for more than twice per week. Sub-group analysis comparing patients with and without the entire sigmoid colon resected revealed worse functional outcomes in terms of the incidence of soiling (40.7 vs 22.2%, p = 0.05) and the BFS (14 vs 18, p = 0.04) in the former group. Anorectal manometry did not reveal any significant difference between the four groups, but a higher proportion of patients in the UR and LR groups appeared to have a normal sphincter resting pressure (DC vs SC vs UR vs LR = 62.5 vs 75.0 vs 85.7 vs 80.0%, p = 0.10)., Conclusion: Patients with short segment HSCR are not equal at all. HSCR patients with aganglionosis limited to the rectum without the need of removing the entire sigmoid colon have a better bowel control and overall functional score. Less bowel loss and colonic dissection maybe the underlying reasons. Although future studies with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period are required to validate the results of this study, it has provided a new insight to the current understanding of short segment disease in HSCR.