1. Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy vs. flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of urinary calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Guangda Lv, Wenqiang Qi, Han Gao, Yongheng Zhou, Minglei Zhong, Kai Wang, Yunxing Liu, Qiang Zhang, Changkuo Zhou, Yan Li, Lingling Zhang, and Dongqing Zhang
- Subjects
extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy ,flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) ,urinary calculi ,systematic review ,meta-analysis ,Surgery ,RD1-811 - Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (f-URS) in treating urinary tract stones.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for literature comparing SWL with f-URS. The primary outcomes we focused on were stone-free rate (SFR) and complications; the secondary outcomes were operation time, hospital stay, retreatment rate, number of sessions, and auxiliary procedures rate. We used ReviewManager version 5.4.1 and STATA version 14.2 for meta-analysis.ResultsSeventeen studies with a total of 2,265 patients were included in the meta-analysis, including 1,038 patients in the SWL group and 1,227 patients in the f-URS group. The meta-analysis indicated that patients in the f-URS group had higher SFR than those in the SWL group [odds ratio (OR): 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29–3.12, p = 0.002]. In addition, we found no significant difference in complications (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.85–1.37) between the two treatments. Also, we found that the retreatment rate and the auxiliary procedure rate in the f-URS group were significantly lower than those in the SWL group (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.02–0.24, p
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF