Search

Background/Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop a novel quantitative disability assessment tool for patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD). Methods: A total of 47 patients with IPD were recruited from two hospitals. A specialist in Rehabilitation Medicine utilized the modified Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale (mSEADL) as a reference, conducting a comprehensive medical chart review and an in-depth interview. The novel-developed disability measurement was calculated as ((mSEADL during the on-state) × (time of on-state)) + ((mSEADL during the off-state) × (time of off-state))/(waking time). Additionally, the degree of disability was assessed using the Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index during the on-state. Results: Twenty-four participants (51.1%) exhibited the off-state during waking hours. In patients exhibiting an off-state, the mSEADL score was significantly lower during the off-state than during the on-state (p < 0.05). The novel-developed disability measurement demonstrated a higher correlation coefficient with the reference mSEADL (0.960) than with the K-MBI (0.808), with statistical significance (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The results demonstrated that larger IPD patients exhibited an on–off phenomenon with greater dependency during the off-state. Therefore, the on–off phenomenon should be considered when evaluating disability in patients with IPD, with methods such as the novel-developed disability measurement tool in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Estimating the risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) is important for the proper management of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). We investigated the short-term and long-term risks of DM among patients with SCI, according to the presence or severity of post-SCI disability and the level of injury. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service (2010–2018) database. After matching by age and sex, 6129 SCI patients and 22,979 controls were included. The primary outcome was incident DM, and risk was evaluated for both the short term (within 1 year after SCI) and the long term (after 1 year of SCI diagnosis). Results: The risk of DM was higher among patients with cervical- and thoracic-level SCI accompanied by disability compared to the controls during follow-up (4.6 ± 2.6 years). The short-term risk of DM was higher among patients with SCI (odds ratio [OR] 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.91–3.27) than among the controls and it was even higher among patients with severe disability (OR 5.38, 95% CI 2.91–9.27). According to the level of injury, patients with cervical SCI had the highest short-term risk of DM (with disability, OR 4.93, 95% CI 3.07–7.63). There was no significant increase of DM risk in the long term, after 1 year of SCI diagnosis. Conclusions: Patients with SCI accompanied by severe disability and cervical-level injury had higher risks of pronounced DM in the short term. The findings of this study emphasize the need for active surveillance of DM among patients with high-level SCI and disability, especially in the short term, in addition to continuous monitoring and proper management of DM in the long term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stroke-caused synergies may result from the preferential use of the reticulospinal tract (RST) due to damage to the corticospinal tract. The RST branches multiple motoneuron pools across the arm together resulting in gross motor control or abnormal synergies, and accordingly, the controllability of individual muscles decreases. However, it is not clear whether muscles involuntarily activated by abnormal synergy vary depending on the muscles voluntarily activated when motor commands descend through the RST. Studies showed that abnormal synergies may originate from the merging and reweighting of synergies in individuals without neurological deficits. This leads to a hypothesis that those abnormal synergies are still selectively excited depending on the context. In this study, we test this hypothesis, leveraging the Fugl-Meyer assessment that could characterize the neuroanatomical architecture in individuals with a wide range of impairments. We examine the ability to perform an out-of-synergy movement with the flexion synergy caused by either shoulder or elbow loading. The results reveal that about 14% [8/57, 95% confidence interval (5.0%, 23.1%)] of the participants with severe impairment (total Fugl-Meyer score <29) in the chronic phase (6 months after stroke) are able to keep the elbow extended during shoulder loading and keep the shoulder at neutral during elbow loading. Those participants underwent a different course of neural reorganization, which enhanced abnormal synergies in comparison with individuals with mild impairment (P < 0.05). These results provide evidence that separate routes and synergy modules to motoneuron pools across the arm might exist even if the motor command is mediated possibly via the RST. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: We demonstrate that abnormal synergies are still selectively excited depending on the context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to investigate the additional effects of cerebellar rTMS on the motor recovery of facilitatory rTMS over affected primary motor cortex (M1) in subacute stroke patients. Twenty-eight subacute stroke patients were recruited in this single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. The Cr-Cbll group received Cr-Cbll rTMS stimulation consisting of high-frequency rTMS over affected M1 (10 min), motor training (10 min), and high-frequency rTMS over contralesional Cbll (10 min). The Cr-sham group received sham rTMS instead of high-frequency rTMS over the cerebellum. Ten daily sessions were performed for 2 weeks. A Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) was measured before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 2 months after the intervention (T2). A total of 20 participants (10 in the Cr-Cbll group and 10 in the Cr-sham group) completed the intervention. There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics between the two groups at T0. FMA was significantly improved after the intervention in both Cr-Cbll and Cr-sham groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant interaction in FMA between time and group. In conclusion, these results could not demonstrate that rTMS over the contralesional cerebellum has additional effects to facilitatory rTMS over the affected M1 for improving motor function in subacute stroke patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]