Search

Simple Summary: Primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSLs) in children and young adults are not common. In this study, we studied immunophenotype, gene rearrangement, homozygous deletion of CDKN2A and HLA, and mutation profiling of 34 PCNSL patients aged between 7 and 39 years and correlated the findings with clinical features and outcome. We found that the PCNSLs of the pediatric and young adult patients were immunophenotypically different from the PCNSLs of the older patients. They were also molecularly different from the latter group, as many of the common molecular findings identified in the latter were not present or common in the PCNSLs of the pediatric and young adult patients. Pediatric brain tumors are often noted to be different from their adult counterparts in terms of molecular features. Primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSLs) are mostly found in elderly adults and are uncommon in children and teenagers. There has only been scanty information about the molecular features of PCNSLs at a young age. We examined PCNSLs in 34 young patients aged between 7 and 39 years for gene rearrangements of BCl2, BCL6, CCND1, IRF4, IGH, IGL, IGK, and MYC, homozygous deletions (HD) of CDKN2A, and HLA by FISH. Sequencing was performed using WES, panel target sequencing, or Sanger sequencing due to the small amount of available tissues. The median OS was 97.5 months and longer than that for older patients with PCNSLs. Overall, only 14 instances of gene rearrangement were found (5%), and patients with any gene rearrangement were significantly older (p = 0.029). CDKN2A HD was associated with a shorter OS (p < 0.001). Only 10/31 (32%) showed MYD88 mutations, which were not prognostically significant, and only three of them were L265P mutations. CARD11 mutations were found in 8/24 (33%) cases only. Immunophenotypically, the cases were predominantly GCB, in contrast to older adults (61%). In summary, we showed that molecular findings identified in the PCNSLs of the older patients were only sparingly present in pediatric and young adult patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrates clear advantages over other imaging modalities in neurosurgery with its ability to delineate critical neurovascular structures and cancerous tissue in high‐resolution 3D anatomical roadmaps. However, its application has been limited to interventions performed based on static pre/post‐operative imaging, where errors accrue from stereotactic frame setup, image registration, and brain shift. To leverage the powerful intra‐operative functions of MRI, e.g., instrument tracking, monitoring of physiological changes and tissue temperature in MRI‐guided bilateral stereotactic neurosurgery, a multi‐stage robotic positioner is proposed. The system positions cannula/needle instruments using a lightweight (203 g) and compact (Ø97 × 81 mm) skull‐mounted structure that fits within most standard imaging head coils. With optimized design in soft robotics, the system operates in two stages: i) manual coarse adjustment performed interactively by the surgeon (workspace of ±30°), ii) automatic fine adjustment with precise (<0.2° orientation error), responsive (1.4 Hz bandwidth), and high‐resolution (0.058°) soft robotic positioning. Orientation locking provides sufficient transmission stiffness (4.07 N/mm) for instrument advancement. The system's clinical workflow and accuracy is validated with lab‐based (<0.8 mm) and MRI‐based testing on skull phantoms (<1.7 mm) and a cadaver subject (<2.2 mm). Custom‐made wireless omni‐directional tracking markers facilitated robot registration under MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The diagnostic accuracy of frameless stereotactic brain biopsy has been reported, but there is limited literature focusing on the reasons for nondiagnostic cases. In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of frameless stereotactic brain biopsy, compare it with the current international standard, and review the field for improvement. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive, prospectively collected frameless stereotactic brain biopsies from 2007 to 2020. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the frameless stereotactic brain biopsies using defined criteria. The biopsy result was classified as conclusive, inconclusive, or negative, based on the pathologic, radiologic, and clinical diagnosis concordance. For inconclusive or negative results, we further evaluated the preoperative planning and postoperative imaging to review the errors. A literature review for the diagnostic accuracy of frameless stereotactic biopsy was performed for the validity of our results. Results There were 106 patients with 109 biopsies performed from 2007 to 2020. The conclusive diagnosis was reached in 103 (94.5%) procedures. An inconclusive diagnosis was noted in four (3.7%) procedures and the biopsy was negative in two (1.9%) procedures. Symptomatic hemorrhage occurred in one patient (0.9%). There was no mortality in our series. Registration error (RE) and inaccurate targeting occurred in three trigonal lesions (2.8%), sampling of the nonrepresentative part of the lesion occurred in two cases (1.8%), and one biopsy (0.9%) for lymphoma was negative due to steroid treatment. The literature review suggested that our diagnostic accuracy was comparable with the published literature. Conclusion The frameless stereotactic biopsy is a safe procedure with high diagnostic accuracy only if meticulous preoperative planning and careful intraoperative registration is performed. The common pitfalls precluding a conclusive diagnosis are RE and biopsies at nonrepresentative sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recurrence is a major complication of some meningiomas. Although there were many studies on biomarkers associated with higher grades or increased aggressiveness, few studies specifically examined longitudinal samples of primary meningiomas and recurrences from the same patients for molecular life history. We studied 99 primary and recurrent meningiomas from 42 patients by FISH for 22q, 1q, 1p, 3p, 5q, 6q, 10p, 10q, 14q, 18q, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, ALT (Alternative Lengthening of Telomere), TERT re‐arrangement, targeted sequencing and TERTp sequencing. Although NF2 mutation and 22q were well known to be aetiological events in meningiomas, we found that in these paired meningiomas, combining the two events resulted in an NF2/22q group (57 tumors from 25 patients) which were almost mutually exclusive with those cases without these two changes (42 tumors from 17 patients) for NF2/22q. No other molecular changes were totally unique to NF2/22q or non‐NF2/22q tumors. For molecular evolution, NF2/22q meningiomas had higher cytogenetic abnormalities than non‐NF2/22q meningiomas (p = 0.003). Most of the cytogenetic changes in NF2/22q meningiomas were present from the outset whereas for non‐NF2/22q meningiomas, cytogenetic events were uncommon in the primary tumors and most were acquired in recurrences. For non‐NF2/22q tumors, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, 1q gain, 18p loss, 3p loss, and ALT were preferentially found in recurrences. Mutations were largely conserved between primary and recurrent tumors. Phylogenetic trees showed 11/11 patients with multiple recurrent tumors had a conserved evolutionary pattern. We conclude that for molecular life history, NF2 and 22q should be regarded as a group. NF2/22q recurring meningiomas showed more cytogenetic abnormalities in the primary tumors, whereas non‐NF2/22q meningiomas showed CDKN2A/B deletion and other cytogenetic abnormalities and ALT at recurrences. Although chromosome 1p loss is a known poor prognostic marker in meningiomas, it was also associated with a shorter TBR (time between resection) in this cohort (p = 0.002). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aimed to characterise glioblastomas of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) that were isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type (wt) and H3wt. Materials and Methods: Fifty such patients (aged 16–32) were studied by methylation profiling, targeted sequencing and targeted RNA‐seq. Results: Tumours predominantly clustered into three methylation classes according to the terminology of Capper et al. (2018): (anaplastic) pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) (21 cases), GBM_midline (15 cases) and glioblastoma RTK/mesenchymal (seven cases). Two cases clustered with ANA_PA, four cases with LGG classes and one with GBM_MYCN. Only fifteen cases reached a calibrated score >0.84 when the cases were uploaded to DKFZ Classifier. GBM_midline‐clustered tumours had a poorer overall survival (OS) compared with the PXA‐clustered tumours (p = 0.030). LGG‐clustered cases had a significantly better survival than GBM_midline‐clustered tumours and glioblastoma RTK/mesenchymal‐clustered tumours. Only 13/21 (62%) of PXA‐clustered cases were BRAF V600E mutated. Most GBM_midline‐clustered cases were not located in the midline. GBM_midline‐clustered cases were characterised by PDGFRA amplification/mutation (73.3%), mutations of mismatch repair genes (40.0%), and all showed H3K27me3 and EZH1P loss, and an unmethylated MGMT promoter. Across the whole cohort, MGMT promoter methylation and wt TERT promoter were favourable prognosticators. Mismatch repair gene mutations were poor prognosticators and together with methylation class and MGMT methylation, maintained their significance in multivariate analyses. BRAF mutation was a good prognosticator in the PXA‐clustered tumours. Conclusion: Methylation profiling is a useful tool in the diagnosis and prognostication of AYA glioblastomas, and the methylation classes have distinct molecular characteristics. The usual molecular diagnostic criteria for adult IDHwt glioblastoma should be applied with caution within the AYA age group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]