Search

Background: Patients who require a switch in their antidepressant therapy may have different clinical profiles and treatment needs compared with patients initiating or maintaining a first-line antidepressant therapy. Methods: The Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major depressive disorder (MDD) (PERFORM) study was a 2-year observational cohort study in outpatients with MDD in five European countries. Enrolled patients were either initiating or undergoing the first switch to an antidepressant monotherapy. Baseline data on patients' clinical status, functioning, productivity, quality of life and medical-resource use were compared in a cross-sectional baseline analysis. Results: A total of 1402 patients were enrolled, of whom 1159 (82.7%) provided analysable baseline data. The majority (78.7%) of the analysable population were initiating antidepressant treatment and most (83.6%) were enrolled and followed up by general practitioners. Compared with patients initiating antidepressants, those switching antidepressants (21.3%) tended to have more severe depressive symptoms, greater anxiety, worse health-related quality of life, greater functional impairment, greater medical-resource use and had a different medical history. Limitations included an over-representation of switches due to lack of efficacy among patients who were switching treatment, as patients were selected based on presence of depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Patients with MDD who are switching treatment for the first time have a different profile and different depression-associated health needs compared with those initiating treatment. Therapeutic management should therefore be adapted for patients who switch. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In France, the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as the first-choice treatment varies greatly between districts, as it is already known to do between countries. Baseline clinical factors associated with choice of first modality were analyzed in 10 815 new end-stage renal disease patients in 59 districts. To describe practices at the district level, we used an agglomerative hierarchical classification, with proximity defined by a likelihood-ratio test that compared multivariate logistic regressions of the following factors: age, gender, diabetes, congestive heart failure, severe behavioral disorders, mobility, and employment. To propose a typology, each cluster of districts was described by a multivariate logistic regression. While populations starting PD in France, as elsewhere, are more likely to be young or employed, they are also more likely to be elderly or have congestive heart failure or severe behavioral disorders. Overall, 14% of patients start with PD, but this rate varies significantly across districts, from 0% to 45%. A specific combination of factors was associated with the first-choice modality in each group of districts. This study highlights the lack of consensual medical criteria for this choice and the likelihood that nonmedical factors may explain the observed differences. The high variability suggests that PD can be used in almost all clinical conditions. Accordingly, patient preference should play a more important role in the decision-making process.

Aim: This study evaluated regional differences in registration on the waiting list and access to liver transplantation in France., Methods: The annual incidence of registration on the waiting list was calculated with the number of transplantation candidates registered in each region between 1996 and 1998 and was used as an indicator for access to the waiting list. The median waiting time before receiving a graft was estimated for patients registered between 1992 and 1998 by the Kaplan Meier method using transplantation as the event. This was used as an indicator for access to transplantation. Shortage of liver grafts was based on the ratio between the number of registered patients and the number of transplantations., Results: The national incidence rate on the liver transplantation waiting list was 11.5 candidates per million inhabitants (pmi). There were no significant statistical differences among regions but it was high for the Rhône-Alpes region (18.6 pmi) and low for the French West Indies (3.6 pmi). The median waiting time before a graft is 2.2 months, and varied from 0.5 month to 3.8 months in French regions (p<0.001). Lack of a graft was strongly correlated with the median waiting time but not with the harvested liver rate., Conclusion: Although there is no statistical significant difference in access to the waiting list for liver transplantations, access to grafts differs among the regions in France.