Search

Objectives To test the hypothesis that observation with early salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is not inferior to ‘standard’ treatment with adjuvant RT (ART) with respect to biochemical failure in patients with pT3 disease and/or positive surgical margins (SMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP). To compare the following secondary endpoints between the two arms: patient-reported outcomes, adverse events, biochemical failure-free survival, overall survival, disease-specific survival, time to distant failure, time to local failure, cost utility analysis, quality adjusted life years and time to androgen deprivation. Patients and Methods The Radiotherapy – Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage (RAVES) trial is a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial led by the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), in collaboration with the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ), and the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP). In all, 470 patients are planned to be randomised 1:1 to either ART commenced at ≤4 months of RP (standard of care) or close observation with early SRT triggered by a PSA level of >0.20 ng/mL (experimental arm). Eligible patients have had a RP for adenocarcinoma of the prostate with at least one of the following risk factors: positive SMs ± extraprostatic extension ± seminal vesicle involvement. The postoperative PSA level must be ≤0.10 ng/mL. Rigorous investigator credentialing and a quality assurance programme are designed to promote consistent RT delivery among patients. Results Trial is currently underway, with 258 patients randomised as of 31 October 2013. International collaborations have developed, including a planned meta-analysis to be undertaken with the UK Medical Research Council/National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group RADICALS (Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation In Combination with Local Surgery) trial and an innovative psycho-oncology sub-study to investigate a patient decision aid resource. Conclusion On the current evidence available, it remains unclear if ART is equivalent or superior to observation with early SRT.

Summary Background In men with localised prostate cancer, conformal radiotherapy (CFRT) could deliver higher doses of radiation than does standard-dose conventional radical external-beam radiotherapy, and could improve long-term efficacy, potentially at the cost of increased toxicity. We aimed to present the first analyses of effectiveness from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Methods The MRC RT01 trial included 843 men with localised prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to standard-dose CFRT or escalated-dose CFRT, both administered with neoadjuvant androgen suppression. Primary endpoints were biochemical-progression-free survival (bPFS), freedom from local progression, metastases-free survival, overall survival, and late toxicity scores. The toxicity scores were measured with questionnaires for physicians and patients that included the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), the Late Effects on Normal Tissue: Subjective/Objective/Management (LENT/SOM) scales, and the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA PCI) scales. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered at the Current Controlled Trials website http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN47772397. Findings Between January, 1998, and December, 2002, 843 men were randomly assigned to escalated-dose CFRT (n=422) or standard-dose CFRT (n=421). In the escalated group, the hazard ratio (HR) for bPFS was 0·67 (95% CI 0·53–0·85, p=0·0007). We noted 71% bPFS (108 cumulative events) and 60% bPFS (149 cumulative events) by 5 years in the escalated and standard groups, respectively. HR for clinical progression-free survival was 0·69 (0·47–1·02; p=0·064); local control was 0·65 (0·36–1·18; p=0·16); freedom from salvage androgen suppression was 0·78 (0·57–1·07; p=0·12); and metastases-free survival was 0·74 (0·47–1·18; p=0·21). HR for late bowel toxicity in the escalated group was 1·47 (1·12–1·92) according to the RTOG (grade ≥2) scale; 1·44 (1·16–1·80) according to the LENT/SOM (grade ≥2) scales; and 1·28 (1·03–1·60) according to the UCLA PCI (score ≥30) scale. 33% of the escalated and 24% of the standard group reported late bowel toxicity within 5 years of starting treatment. HR for late bladder toxicity according to the RTOG (grade ≥2) scale was 1·36 (0·90–2·06), but this finding was not supported by the LENT/SOM (grade ≥2) scales (HR 1·07 [0·90–1·29]), nor the UCLA PCI (score ≥30) scale (HR 1·05 [0·81–1·36]). Interpretation Escalated-dose CFRT with neoadjuvant androgen suppression seems clinically worthwhile in terms of bPFS, progression-free survival, and decreased use of salvage androgen suppression. This additional efficacy is offset by an increased incidence of longer term adverse events.

The aim of this trial was to compare dose-escalated conformal radiotherapy with control-dose conformal radiotherapy in patients with localised prostate cancer. Preliminary findings reported after 5 years of follow-up showed that escalated-dose conformal radiotherapy improved biochemical progression-free survival. Based on the sample size calculation, we planned to analyse overall survival when 190 deaths occurred; this target has now been reached, after a median 10 years of follow-up.RT01 was a phase 3, open-label, international, randomised controlled trial enrolling men with histologically confirmed T1b-T3a, N0, M0 prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen of less than 50 ng/mL. Patients were randomly assigned centrally in a 1:1 ratio, using a computer-based minimisation algorithm stratifying by risk of seminal vesicle invasion and centre to either the control group (64 Gy in 32 fractions, the standard dose at the time the trial was designed) or the escalated-dose group (74 Gy in 37 fractions). Neither patients nor investigators were masked to assignment. All patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for 3-6 months before the start of conformal radiotherapy, which continued until the end of conformal radiotherapy. The coprimary outcome measures were biochemical progression-free survival and overall survival. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. Treatment-related side-effects have been reported previously. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN47772397.Between Jan 7, 1998, and Dec 20, 2001, 862 men were registered and 843 subsequently randomly assigned: 422 to the escalated-dose group and 421 to the control group. As of Aug 2, 2011, 236 deaths had occurred: 118 in each group. Median follow-up was 10·0 years (IQR 9·1-10·8). Overall survival at 10 years was 71% (95% CI 66-75) in each group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·99, 95% CI 0·77-1·28; p=0·96). Biochemical progression or progressive disease occurred in 391 patients (221 [57%] in the control group and 170 [43%] in the escalated-dose group). At 10 years, biochemical progression-free survival was 43% (95% CI 38-48) in the control group and 55% (50-61) in the escalated-dose group (HR 0·69, 95% CI 0·56-0·84; p=0·0003).At a median follow-up of 10 years, escalated-dose conformal radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy showed an advantage in biochemical progression-free survival, but this advantage did not translate into an improvement in overall survival. These efficacy data for escalated-dose treatment must be weighed against the increase in acute and late toxicities associated with the escalated dose and emphasise the importance of use of appropriate modern radiotherapy methods to reduce side-effects.UK Medical Research Council.

Purpose To assess whether online adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer is feasible across multiple Radiation Oncology departments using different imaging, delivery and recording technology. Materials and methods A multi-centre feasibility study of online adaptive radiotherapy, using a choice of three “plan of the day”, was conducted at 12 departments. Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer were included. Departments were activated if part of the pilot study or after a site-credentialing visit. There was real time review of the first two cases from each department. Results 54 patients were recruited, with 50 proceeding to radiotherapy. There were 43 males and 7 females with a mean age of 78 years. The tumour stages treated included T1 (1 patient), T2 (35), T3 (10) and T4 (4). One patient died of an unrelated cause during radiotherapy. The three adaptive plans were created before the 10th fraction in all cases. In 8 (16%) of the patients, a conventional plan using a ‘standard’ CTV to PTV margin of 1.5 cm was used for one or more fractions where the pre-treatment bladder CTV was larger than any of the three adaptive plans. The bladder CTV extended beyond the PTV on post treatment imaging in 9 (18%) of the 49 patients. Conclusions From a technical perspective an online adaptive radiotherapy technique can be instituted in a multi-centre setting. However, without further bladder filling control or imaging, a CTV to PTV margin of 7 mm is insufficient.

Malaria Sporozoite Vaccine Each year, hundreds of millions of people are infected with Plasmodium falciparum, the mosquito-borne parasite that causes malaria. A preventative vaccine is greatly needed. Seder et al. (p. 1359, published online 8 August; see the Perspective by Good) now report the results from a phase I clinical trial where subjects were immunized intravenously with a whole, attenuated sporozoite vaccine. Three of 9 subjects who received four doses and zero of 6 subjects who received five doses of the vaccine went on to develop malaria after controlled malaria infection. Both antibody titers and cellular immune responses correlated positively with the dose of vaccine received, suggesting that both arms of the adaptive immune response may have participated in the observed protection. Consistent, high-level, vaccine-induced protection against human malaria has only been achieved by inoculation of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) sporozoites (SPZ) by mosquito bites. We report that the PfSPZ Vaccine—composed of attenuated, aseptic, purified, cryopreserved PfSPZ—was safe and wel-tolerated when administered four to six times intravenously (IV) to 40 adults. Zero of six subjects receiving five doses and three of nine subjects receiving four doses of 1.35 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine and five of six nonvaccinated controls developed malaria after controlled human malaria infection (P = 0.015 in the five-dose group and P = 0.028 for overall, both versus controls). PfSPZ-specific antibody and T cell responses were dose-dependent. These data indicate that there is a dose-dependent immunological threshold for establishing high-level protection against malaria that can be achieved with IV administration of a vaccine that is safe and meets regulatory standards. Intravenous immunization with an attenuated whole malaria sporozoite vaccine protected volunteers in a phase I clinical trial. [Also see Perspective by Good] Intravenous immunization with an attenuated whole malaria sporozoite vaccine protected volunteers in a phase I clinical trial. [Also see Perspective by Good]

Five-year disease-free survival rates for localised prostate cancer following standard doses of conventional radical external beam radiotherapy are around 80%. Conformal radiotherapy (CFRT) raises the possibility that radiotherapy doses can be increased and long-term efficacy outcomes improved, with safety an important consideration.MRC RT01 is a randomised controlled trial of 862 men with localised prostate cancer comparing Standard CFRT (64Gy/32f) versus Escalated CFRT (74Gy/37f), both administered with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression. Early toxicity was measured using physician-reported instruments (RTOG, LENT/SOM, Royal Marsden Scales) and patient-reported questionnaires (MOS SF-36, UCLA Prostate Cancer Index, FACT-P).Overall early radiotherapy toxicity was similar, apart from increased bladder, bowel and sexual toxicity, in the Escalated Group during a short immediate post-radiotherapy period. Toxicity in both groups had abated by week 12. Using RTOG Acute Toxicity scores, cumulative Grade 2 bladder and bowel toxicity was 38% and 30% for Standard Group and 39% and 33% in Escalated Group, respectively. Urinary frequency (Royal Marsden Scale) improved in both groups from pre-androgen suppression to 6 months post-radiotherapy (p0.001), but bowel and sexual functioning deteriorated. This pattern was supported by patient-completed assessments. Six months after starting radiotherapy the incidence of RTOG Gradeor = 2 side-effects was low (1%); but there were six reports of rectal ulceration (6 Escalated Group), six haematuria (5 Escalated Group) and eight urethral stricture (6 Escalated Group).The two CFRT schedules with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression have broadly similar early toxicity profiles except for the immediate post-RT period. At 6 months and compared to before hormone therapy, bladder symptoms improved, whereas bowel and sexual symptoms worsened. These assessments of early treatment safety will be complemented by further follow-up to document late side-effects and efficacy.

A short-term assay method able to estimate the radiation response of human cancer tissue samples would be of great advantage to the individualization of radiotherapy in cancer patients. However, the effect of radiation on [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation by proliferating cells reflects a composite of cell cycle arrest and induced cell death pathways. Here we consider whether it is feasible to correct for cell cycle effects based on comparison of the effects of radiation and the mitotic inhibitor paclitaxel on [ 3 H]thymidine incorporation. Sixty-two short-term (7-day) cultures of human tumor tissue from 61 patients with melanoma, gynecological cancer, brain cancer, and head and neck cancer, as well as 18 5-day cultures of low passage human tumor cell lines, were irradiated at doses from 2 to 9 Gy, or exposed to paclitaxel (200 nM). [ 3 H]Thymidine incorporation was measured at the end of the incubation. Cell cycle times could be estimated from the paclitaxel data and were 2.7 to 18.6 days for melanomas, 2.5 to >40 days for carcinomas, 3.9 to 39 days for brain tumors, and 1.1 to 3.8 days for cell lines. The effects of radiation on ['H]thymidine incorporation varied widely (0-97% and 0-99% inhibition for 2 and 9 Gy, respectively), and in 23 of the clinical samples, but in none of the cell lines, radiation caused significantly greater inhibition of 3 H]thymidine incorporation than paclitaxel (p < 0.05). We argue that that these differences reflect radiation-induced cell loss from G 1 phase and/or S phase. Responses of short-term cultures of clinical tumor material to radiation, with appropriate correction for cell cycle effects, might have the potential to provide information on radiation-induced cell death in individual patients.

TPS4690 Background: Three randomised trials have demonstrated a significant benefit of adjuvant post prostatectomy radiotherapy in patients with positive margins, extra capsular extension or seminal vesicle involvement, and it should be regarded as current standard of care. However, adopting this approach will expose nearly half of such patients to unnecessary radiotherapy and potential treatment morbidity. Salvage radiotherapy, if given early, is recognised to be effective. The RAVES trial is designed to compare these two approaches, and was developed in collaboration with the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Trials Group (ANZUP) and the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ). It aims to test the hypothesis that active surveillance with early salvage radiotherapy is non-inferior to adjuvant radiotherapy with respect to risk of biochemical failure (defined as PSA level ≥ 0.40 ng/mL and rising). Methods: Patients must have at least one of the following risk factors: positive margins, extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle involvement. They must start radiotherapy within 4 months of radical prostatectomy (RP) and have an undetectable PSA (≤ 0.10 ng/ml) prior to randomisation. Patients receiving androgen deprivation or who have an artificial hip are excluded. Eligible patients are randomised to either: Arm 1: Adjuvant RT (64Gy in 32#) commenced within 4 months of RP, or Arm 2: Active surveillance with 3 monthly PSA tests and commencement of early salvage RT (64Gy in 32#) if PSA rises ≥ 0.20 ng/ml. Stratification is by seminal vesicle invasion, Gleason Score, pre-operative PSA, margin positivity (no/yes) and radiotherapy institution. A sample size of 470 patients is required to detect a 10% non-inferiority margin in the 5-year biochemical failure-free rate between the adjuvant and active surveillance arms. As of 31 Jan 2012, 186 patients have been recruited across 26 centres in Australia and New Zealand. A meta analysis with the MRC RADICALS and GETUG-17 trials will be prospectively designed to detect a survival difference between the two approaches.