Search

Objective  Pituitary adenomas are historically classified into microadenoma or macroadenomas based on size less than or greater than/equal to 1c m. "Giant" adenomas describe tumors ≥4 cm. The aim of this study is to present an evidence-based approach to size classification based on national trends. Design  The design involved is multi-institutional retrospective study. Participants  A total of 29,651 patients were studied from National Cancer Institute's SEER program from 2004 to 2016 across the United States. Main Outcome Measures  The main outcome measures include demographics, treatment characteristics, and overall survival in the population. Results  At the 20-mm threshold, the likelihood of operation exceeds the likelihood of nonoperative management. Patients with adenoma size 1 to 19 mm had significantly longer overall survival compared with 20 to 50 mm (Log rank: p  < 0.0001). No survival difference was found between size 20 to 29 mm and larger. There was no significant difference in the rate of surgery between 30 to 39 mm and 40 to 50 mm tumors(p  = 0.5035). Surgery group had a higher overall survival compared with nonsurgically managed patients (Log rank: p  < 0.0001). Conclusion  Microadenoma has classically been used to describe pituitary tumors less than 1 cm, though no clinical significance of this threshold has been demonstrated. The current study suggests a size cut-off of 20 or 30 mm as more clinically relevant. Still, future studies are warranted to examine the significance of this classification by specific tumor type, and subclassified as appropriate. There is no difference in the rate of surgery or survival for adenomas between 30 and 50 mm, challenging the 4-mm cutoff threshold for "giant" adenoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background SEGA is a rare, slow-growing CNS neoplasm that has historically been treated by surgical resection. However, the advent of a mammalian target of rapamycin complex-1 inhibitor, everolimus, has shown promising results in recent clinical trials. We sought to provide an analysis of epidemiological and survival risk factors in this rare tumor entity, while comparing trends in surgical management before and after introduction of everolimus in SEGAs. Methods Patients with SEGA were queried from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015. Standard statistical analysis was conducted to assess variables associated with the odds of performing surgery and survival, while controlling for confounding variables. Results A total of 460 patients were diagnosed with SEGA. Multivariable analysis of survival demonstrated that increased age was associated with decreased survival (HR, 1.05; P  < .0001). Multivariable analysis of surgery showed increased age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02, P  = .04) and tumor size 20 mm or larger (OR, 9.52-16.75, P  < .0001 for all) to be associated with higher odds of performing surgery. The use of radiotherapy (OR, 0.12, P  = .008) or chemotherapy (OR, 0.21, P  = .008) was associated with lower odds of surgery. A comparison of surgical rates between 2004 and 2010 and 2011 and 2015 was found to be significantly different, with a lower rate of surgery seen after 2011 (60.63% vs 48.06%, P  = .007). Conclusion Our analysis of SEGAs demonstrated that age was the only variable affecting overall survival. Surgical resection was performed in older patients with larger tumors (> 20 mm) as a primary mode of treatment, without chemoradiotherapy. Expectedly, rates of surgical resection were found to have decreased since 2011, after FDA approval of everolimus for SEGA treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives  Neoplasms involving the pineal gland are rare. When they do occur, tumor resection is anatomically challenging and is traditionally addressed by either a supratentorial or an infratentorial approach. To date, no large, multicenter studies have been performed that systematically analyze outcomes comparing these two approaches. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients undergoing pineal neoplasm resection, comparing supratentorial and infratentorial approaches. Design  Retrospective database review. Setting  Multi-institutional database. Participants  From 2005 to 2016, 60 patients were identified, with 13 undergoing a supratentorial approach and 47 undergoing an infratentorial approach. Main Outcome Measures  Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were investigated using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Demographics, readmission, reoperation, and complication rates were analyzed and compared with previous studies. Results  Patient demographics were similar between these two groups. The overall complication rates for the supratentorial and infratentorial approaches were 30.8 and 17%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. The most common medical complications encountered were respiratory and hematological. Conclusion  As the first multi-institutional database analysis of approaches to the pineal gland, this study provides an analysis of patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. After controlling for preoperative risk factors and demographic characteristics, no statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes were found between infratentorial and supratentorial approaches. The mean readmission, reoperation, and complication rates were found to be 2.1, 8.3, and 20%, respectively. The lack of significant difference between approaches suggests that clinical decision-making should depend upon anatomical considerations and physician preference, although the complications illustrated here may provide some preoperative guidance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]