Search

Clinical supervisors are known to assess trainee performance idiosyncratically, causing concern about the validity of their ratings. The literature on this issue relies heavily on retrospective collection of decisions, resulting in the risk of inaccurate information regarding what actually drives raters' perceptions. Capturing in-the-moment information about supervisors' impressions could yield better insight into how to intervene. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to gather "real-time" judgments to explore what drives preceptors' judgments of student performance. We performed a prospective study in which physicians were asked to adjust a rating scale in real-time while watching two video-recordings of trainee clinical performances. Scores were captured in 1-s increments, examined for frequency, direction, and magnitude of adjustments, and compared to assessors' final entrustability judgment as measured by the modified Ottawa Clinic Assessment Tool. The standard deviation in raters' judgment was examined as a function of time to determine how long it takes impressions to begin to vary. 20 participants viewed 2 clinical vignettes. Considerable variability in ratings was observed with different behaviours triggering scale adjustments for different raters. That idiosyncrasy occurred very quickly, with the standard deviation in raters' judgments rapidly increasing within 30 s of case onset. Particular moments appeared to generally be influential, but their degree of influence still varied. Correlations between the final assessment and (a) score assigned upon first adjustment of the scale, (b) upon last adjustment, and (c) the mean score, were r = 0.13, 0.32, and 0.57 for one video and r = 0.30, 0.50, and 0.52 for the other, indicating the degree to which overall impressions reflected accumulation of raters' idiosyncratic moment-by-moment observations. Our results demonstrated that variability in raters' impressions begins very early in a case presentation and is associated with different behaviours having different influence on different raters. More generally, this study outlines a novel methodology that offers a new path for gaining insight into factors influencing assessor judgments.

Objective: Three‐dimensional (3D) endoscopy has been developed to provide depth perception to allow for improved visualisation during otolaryngology surgery. We conducted a systematic review to determine the surgical safety and efficacy of 3D endoscopy in comparison to two‐dimensional (2D) endoscopy in performing otolaryngology procedures, and the role of 3D endoscopy as a training tool for novice otolaryngology surgeons. Methods: Primary studies were identified through MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases, which were searched for articles published through June 2022 that compared the outcomes of 2D and 3D endoscopy in otolaryngology surgical procedures or otolaryngology‐relevant simulations. Candidate articles were independently reviewed by two authors. Results: A total of 18 full‐text articles met inclusion criteria for this study. In clinical trials (n = 8 studies, 362 subjects), there were no significant differences in performance time, intraoperative or postoperative complications with 3D endoscopes when compared to 2D. In simulation studies (n = 10 studies, 336 participants), 3D endoscopes demonstrated a decreased error rate (n = 5 studies) and shorter performance time (n = 3 studies). Studies also reported improved depth perception (n = 14 studies) and visualisation preference (n = 5 studies) with 3D over 2D systems. The 3D systems were found to have a shorter learning curve and better manoeuvrability among novice surgeons. Conclusion: 3D endoscopy showed equivalent safety and efficacy compared to 2D endoscopy in otolaryngology surgery. The improved depth perception and performance for novices using 3D endoscopes suggests the technology may be superior to 2D endoscopes as a training tool for otolaryngology surgeons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In rare situations, neonates may present with respiratory distress and neck swelling from a piriform fossa sinus tract (PFST) lesion. Open surgical excision of PFST may be associated with higher complication rates, especially in neonates. Endoscopic treatment has been shown to have high success rates in older children, but neonatal outcomes appear to be less promising. The objective of this study was to review the existing literature on endoscopic treatment of PFST in neonates. Review Methods: PRISMA‐ScR guidelines for scoping reviews were employed. Medline and Embase databases were searched in accordance with a detailed search strategy. Nine studies met criteria for inclusion. Results: A total of 21 neonates with PFST treated endoscopically were reviewed. Mean age at onset of symptoms was 11.6 days. Neck swelling was the most common presenting symptom (20/21, 95%), followed by respiratory distress (6/9, 66.6%). Success rate after initial endoscopic treatment was 57% (12/21); among those, seven patients required additional concurrent treatments such as neck/pharyngeal swelling decompression or sclerotherapy. Nine patients underwent a second intervention (43%) and three patients (14%) required three interventions. Notably, 90% of patients (19/21) achieved success with only minimally invasive approaches. Two patients underwent open salvage surgical excision after recurrence following initial endoscopic treatment. Conclusion: Neonates with PFST and cystic neck masses are prone to recurrence after initial minimally invasive endoscopic treatment; however, high success rate may be achieved after repeat interventions. Adjunctive measures to optimize outcome may include swelling decompression w/wo sclerotherapy to cause fibrosis and postoperative nasogastric tube feeding. Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 134:2585–2591, 2024 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Olfactory disorders are well‐studied in the adult population, however, there is a paucity of literature characterizing olfactory dysfunction in pediatric patients. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify known causes of olfactory loss in pediatric populations, clarify the extent of use and validity of smell tests, and summarize current therapies for olfactory loss. Data Sources: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Review Methods: Databases were systematically searched in September 2020. Two independent reviewers conducted the title and abstract screen, followed by review of full‐texts for inclusion based on preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data included study type, age/age‐range of participants, gender, radiological evidence of olfactory dysfunction, types and results of smell tests used, etiology of olfactory loss, and therapies employed for olfactory loss. Results: A total of 103 articles (n = 1654) were eligible for final data extraction. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test was used most frequently for smell testing (21% of studies). In total, 45 causes of olfactory dysfunction have been elucidated by this study: 22 congenital and 23 acquired. Few therapies were described, and all were specific to the etiology of olfactory loss. Conclusion: Olfactory dysfunction has a wide range of etiologies in the pediatric population, and clinicians should have a diagnostic algorithm for how to identify a cause should they encounter it in practice. If no etiology can be identified, education around safety should be provided to both the patient and their caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]