Search

A case study of a 77-year-old man suffering from renal failure with a voluminous right hemiscrotum is presented. There were no signs of intestinal obstruction. Abdominal ultrasonography showed bilateral hydronephrosis with significant parenchymatous atrophy and an enlarged prostate. Opacification of the bilateral nephrostomy showed inguinoscrotal herniation of the whole bladder, with evidence of bilateral ureteric displacement and dilatation.

Objectives: Urosepsis currently accounts for half of all post flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) complications, with an incidence of up to 4.3%. It represents a quarter of all septic episodes in adults and 2% of hospital spendings. The primary objective of this study was to define the predictive clinical parameters that increase the risk of urosepsis after F-URS., Subjects/patients (or Materials) and Methods: This prospective multicentric study evaluated patients who underwent F-URS for calculus between June 2016 and June 2018 in eleven French centers. Clinical, bacteriological, morpho-constitutional stone data, intraoperative information and complications were compared. Risk factors for postoperative urosepsis were identified and analyzed., Results: We included 486 F-URS in 432 patients. The ureter was prepared using a double J stent in 51% of cases, a digital endoscope was used in 56% of patients with a median operative time of 120 min IQR (90-125) and using a sheath in 90% of cases. Postoperative urosepsis was observed in 18 patients (4%) with a median time to onset of 2 days IQR (1-5). The presence of coronary insufficiency: 3 (17%) vs 14 (3%) p = 0.005, a larger stone diameter: 11 cm [9-17] vs 10 cm [8-13] p = 0.02, a positive preoperative urine culture even when treated: 3 (17%) vs 56 (12%) p = 0.04, as well as the final composition of the type IV calculus (carbapatite or struvite) 5 (28%) vs 20 (4%) p < 0.001, were significantly associated with the occurrence of urosepsis. In multivariate analysis, only the presence of a type IV stone (OR = 14.0; p = 0.025) remained significant., Conclusion: Ureteroscopic treatment of a type IV stone (carbapatite or struvite) in a patient should raise concerns about the risk of post-operative urosepsis. When recognized intraoperatively, they should lead to a pyelic urinary sample and prolonged clinical surveillance., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To evaluate four predictive scores for stone-free rate (SFR) after flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) with holmium-YAG laser fragmentation of renal and ureteral lithiasis., Methods: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 800 f-URS procedures performed in our institution between January 2009 and December 2016. For each procedure, a single surgeon calculated the following scores: S.T.O.N.E score; Resorlu Unsal Stone Score (RUSS); modified Seoul National University Renal Complexity (S-ReSC) score; and Ito's score., Results: Overall SFR was 74.1%. Univariate analysis demonstrated that stone size (p<0.0001), stone volume (p<0.0001), stone number (p = 0.004), narrow lower pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) (p = 0.003) and lower pole location + IPA <45° (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with SFR. All scores differed between the stone-free and non-stone-free groups. Area under the curve of the receiving operator characteristics curve was calculated for each score: 0.617 [95%CI: 0.575-0.660] for the S.T.O.N.E score; 0.644 [95%CI: 0.609-0.680] for the RUSS; 0.651 [95%CI: 0.606-0.697] for the S-ReSC score; and 0.735 [95%CI: 0.692-0.777] for Ito's nomogram., Conclusion: All four scores were predictive of SFR after f-URS. Ito's score was the most sensitive. However, the performance of all scores in this analysis was lower than in developmental studies., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Objective: To analyze results (stone-free rate [SFR]) and complications after flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) for renal or lumbar ureteral lithiasis in patients with a previous ureteral stenting (US)., Patients and Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study, including all f-URS procedures achieved in our department, between January 2004 and December 2010, for renal or lumbar ureteral urinary lithiasis. In total, 497 procedures were performed: 316 procedures in patients with a ureteral stent placed before the surgery for renal colic, sepsis, or renal failure (group 1) and 181 procedures in patients without US (group 2). Success was defined as a complete SFR at 6-month follow-up. Surgical morbidity was defined using the Clavien-Dindo grading system., Results: Groups 1 and 2 were well balanced in terms of demographic data, number, and size of stones. Ureteral location was significantly higher in group 1 (30.2% vs 16.3%, p = 0.0006). Surgery characteristics were similar in both groups. By univariate analysis, SFR tended to be slightly higher in the group with prior ureteral stenting (72% vs 63%, p = 0.05). SFR for ureteral location was also higher after previous ureteral stenting (81.5% vs 59.4%, p = 0.023). By multivariate analysis, only stone size and number were correlated with f-URS failure. Complication rate was comparable in both groups (10.7% vs 11.8%, p = 0.7)., Conclusion: Technical aspects of the f-URS procedure were not modified by ureteral stenting. We found that f-URS in patients with ureteral stenting was not associated with a better SFR, except in case of ureteral location in univariate analysis. Ureteral stenting was not independently related to f-URS outcome by multivariate analysis.