11 results on '"Cervical disorders"'
Search Results
2. Pupillometric parameters of alertness during unpredictable but not predictable smooth pursuit neck torsion test are altered in patients with neck pain disorders: a cross-sectional study.
- Author
-
Majcen Rosker, Ziva, Mocnik, Grega, Kristjansson, Eythor, Vodicar, Miha, and Rosker, Jernej
- Subjects
- *
NECK pain , *WAKEFULNESS , *TORSION , *ASYMPTOMATIC patients , *CROSS-sectional method - Abstract
Despite commonly investigated predictable smooth-pursuit neck-torsion tasks (SPNT) in neck pain patients, unpredictable conditions have been seldom investigated but are indicative of preserved oculomotor functions during neck torsion. Although not previously studied, some speculations about compensatory cognitive mechanisms such as increased phasic alertness during unpredictable tasks were suggested. The aim of this study was to investigate eye movement accuracy and pupillometric responses during predictable and unpredictable SPNT test in neck pain patients and asymptomatic controls. Eye movements (gain and SPNT-difference) and pupillometry indicative of tonic (average and relative pupil diameter) and phasic (index of cognitive activity-ICA) alertness were measured in 28 idiopathic neck pain patients and 30 asymptomatic individuals using infrared video-oculography during predictable and unpredictable SPNT test. Gain in unpredictable SPNT test was lower as compared to predictable tasks and presented with similar levels in neutral and neck torsion positions, but not in the predictable SPNT test. ICA was lower during neutral position in all tasks in patients as compared to control group but increased during neck torsion positions in unpredictable tasks. Relative pupil diameters presented with no differences between the groups or neck positions, but the opposite was observed for average pupil diameter. Higher ICA indicates an increase in phasic alertness in neck pain patients despite no alterations in oculomotor control during SPNT test. This is the first study to indicate cognitive deficits in oculomotor task in neck pain patients. The latter could negatively affect other tasks where additional cognitive resources must be involved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
- Author
-
Hanxiang Sun, Xiujuan Su, Yang Liu, Shijia Huang, Xiaosong Liu, Guohua Li, and Qiaoling Du
- Subjects
cervical disorders ,low-grade abnormal cervical cytology ,high-grade abnormal cervical cytology ,singleton pregnancy ,premature delivery ,premature rupture of membranes ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to explore the association of cervical disorders on obstetric outcomes of singleton pregnancies in China.MethodsThis hospital-based retrospective cohort study of women with live singleton births included 71,097 Chinese women. We compared the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in different types of pregnancies with cervical disorders with those with normal cervix. Logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes.ResultsWomen with cervical disorders had a higher risk of premature delivery (10.98 vs. 4.41%), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (3.48 vs. 1.62%), low birth weight (LBW) (7.62 vs. 2.92%) and very low birth weight (VLBW) (2.01 vs. 0.28%) than women with normal cervix. After adjusting for confounding factors, compared with women with normal cervix, women with high-grade abnormal cervical cytology are at greater risk of premature birth (adjusted OR 1.971, 95% CI: 1.302–2.983), premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (adjusted OR 1.379, 95% CI: 1.047–1.815), LBW (adjusted OR 1.790, 95% CI: 1.059–3.025), and VLBW (adjusted OR 4.519, 95% CI: 1.662–12.292) than women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology, and women with abnormal cervical cytology after treatment had a higher risk of premature birth (adjusted OR 2.060, 95% CI: 1.348–3.147), PROM (adjusted OR 1.381, 95% CI: 1.038–1.839), PPROM (adjusted OR 1.995, 95% CI: 1.022–3.892), LBW (adjusted OR 1.801, 95% CI: 1.046–3.102), and VLBW (adjusted OR 4.868, 95% CI: 1.788–13.255) than untreated women.ConclusionsOur research showed that pregnant women with cervical disorders were more likely to have premature delivery, PPROM, LBW, and VLBW. Moreover, pregnant women with high-grade abnormal cervical cytology and abnormal cervical cytology after treatment had a higher risk of premature birth, PROM, LBW, and VLBW.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The impact of environmental and behavioural cofactors on the development of cervical disorders in HR-HPV-infected women in Serbia.
- Author
-
Tasic, D., Lazarevic, I., Knezevic, A., Tasic, L., Pikula, A., Perisic, Z., Jovanovic, T., and Cupic, M.
- Abstract
Persistent infection with one or more highly oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPVs) or high-risk-HPV (HR-HPV) is necessary but not a sufficient aetiological agent for the development of cervical neoplasia. A number of viral, host, environmental and behavioural factors are suggested to be associated with the progression of cervical disorder. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of environmental and behavioural cofactors on the development of cervical disorders in HR-HPV-infected women in Serbia. A total of 541 women have been tested by PCR for the presence of HPV on the cervix. HPV genotypes were determined by direct DNA sequencing. Women identified as HR-HPV-positive were further classified into four subgroups according to their cytological status. All relevant information about demographical and behavioural factors was obtained by interviewer-based questionnaire. A number of analytical and descriptive statistical methods were used for processing the data. The cofactors found to be of significance for the progression of cervical disease were older age, body mass index >25, lower educational level, long-term smoking, previous genital infections and cervical interventions. On the other hand, condom use was found to have a protective role. Information about these cofactors might be very important for the development of more efficient cancer prevention programmes and promotion of anti-HPV vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.
- Author
-
Sun H, Su X, Liu Y, Huang S, Liu X, Li G, and Du Q
- Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the association of cervical disorders on obstetric outcomes of singleton pregnancies in China., Methods: This hospital-based retrospective cohort study of women with live singleton births included 71,097 Chinese women. We compared the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in different types of pregnancies with cervical disorders with those with normal cervix. Logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between cervical disorders and adverse obstetric outcomes., Results: Women with cervical disorders had a higher risk of premature delivery (10.98 vs. 4.41%), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (3.48 vs. 1.62%), low birth weight (LBW) (7.62 vs. 2.92%) and very low birth weight (VLBW) (2.01 vs. 0.28%) than women with normal cervix. After adjusting for confounding factors, compared with women with normal cervix, women with high-grade abnormal cervical cytology are at greater risk of premature birth (adjusted OR 1.971, 95% CI: 1.302-2.983), premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (adjusted OR 1.379, 95% CI: 1.047-1.815), LBW (adjusted OR 1.790, 95% CI: 1.059-3.025), and VLBW (adjusted OR 4.519, 95% CI: 1.662-12.292) than women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology, and women with abnormal cervical cytology after treatment had a higher risk of premature birth (adjusted OR 2.060, 95% CI: 1.348-3.147), PROM (adjusted OR 1.381, 95% CI: 1.038-1.839), PPROM (adjusted OR 1.995, 95% CI: 1.022-3.892), LBW (adjusted OR 1.801, 95% CI: 1.046-3.102), and VLBW (adjusted OR 4.868, 95% CI: 1.788-13.255) than untreated women., Conclusions: Our research showed that pregnant women with cervical disorders were more likely to have premature delivery, PPROM, LBW, and VLBW. Moreover, pregnant women with high-grade abnormal cervical cytology and abnormal cervical cytology after treatment had a higher risk of premature birth, PROM, LBW, and VLBW., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Sun, Su, Liu, Huang, Liu, Li and Du.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Neck disability is associated with masticatory myofascial pain and regional muscle sensitivity
- Author
-
Yuri Martins Costa, Dayse Regina Alves da Costa, Paulo César Rodrigues Conti, Thaís Pereira, Ana Paula de Lima Ferreira, André Luís Porporatti, and Leonardo Rigoldi Bonjardim
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Pain Threshold ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,DOR FACIAL ,Visual analogue scale ,Temporomandibular disorders ,Asymptomatic ,Disability Evaluation ,Neck disability ,Neck Muscles ,Statistical significance ,medicine ,Humans ,Myofascial Pain Syndromes ,General Dentistry ,Pain Measurement ,Pressure pain threshold ,Achilles tendon ,Cervical disorders ,Dentistry(all) ,business.industry ,Cell Biology ,General Medicine ,Confidence interval ,Temporomandibular joint ,Masticatory force ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Otorhinolaryngology ,Myofascial pain ,Case-Control Studies ,Masticatory Muscles ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Pain, Referred ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Sternocleidomastoid muscle ,Brazil - Abstract
a b s t r a c t Objective: The primary aims of this study are to compare neck disability in masticatory myofascial pain subjects versus asymptomatic controls, and to evaluate the correlation between neck disability and muscle pain. Design: Two groups composed this case–control study: a symptomatic group comprised of 27 subjects diagnosed with masticatory myofascial pain, as determined by the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), and a control group comprised of 28 asymptomatic subjects. The collected variables were pain intensity (visual analogue scale), pressure pain threshold of the temporomandibular joint, anterior temporalis, masseter, sternocleidomastoid muscle, upper trapezius and Achilles tendon (digital dynamometer, kgf/cm 2 ), and neck disability (Neck Disability Index). Statistical analysis included Student’s t-test and the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (5% significance level and 95% confidence interval). Results: The symptomatic group showed greater neck disability with a mean (SD) of 11.8 (7), as compared with 2.8 (2.4) for the asymptomatic group ( p < 0.05). A negative correlation was found between neck disability and pressure pain threshold of the anterior temporalis (r = 0.4, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.15, p = 0.002), the sternocleidomastoid (r = 0.35, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.09, p = 0.007) and the upper trapezius (r = 0.37, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.12, p = 0.005). Conclusion: Our results reinforced the clinical interconnection between masticatory and cervical structures, insofar as subjects with masticatory myofascial pain reported greater neck disability, which, in turn, was correlated with regional muscle sensitivity.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Physical risk factors for neck pain
- Author
-
Lex M. Bouter, G.A.M. Ariëns, G. van der Wal, W. van Mechelen, Paulien M. Bongers, and VU University medical center
- Subjects
Male ,Occupational hazard ,Work environment ,Lichaamsbeweging ,Review ,Sport injury ,Occupational safety and health ,Physical load ,Neck pain ,Risk Factors ,Body posture ,Muscle force ,Prospective cohort study ,Workplace ,Neck trouble ,Extensor muscle ,Priority journal ,Lichaamshouding ,Evidence-Based Medicine ,Neck Pain ,Flexor muscle ,Neck muscle ,Occupational Diseases ,Statistical analysis ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Cohort analysis ,Cohort study ,Human ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Rotation ,Literatuuronderzoek ,Medical information ,Occupational disease ,Workload ,Sitting ,Vibration ,Motor vehicle ,Critical literature overview ,medicine ,Humans ,Risk factor ,Exercise ,Leisure ,Cervical disorders ,business.industry ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Quality control ,Evidence-based medicine ,Trunk ,Fysieke arbeidsbelasting ,Arm muscle ,Evidence based medicine ,Physical therapy ,Bewegingsstoornissen ,business - Abstract
To identify physical risk factors for neck pain, a systematic review of the literature was carried out. Based on methodological quality and study design, 4 levels of evidence were defined to establish the strength of evidence for the relationship between risk factors and neck pain. Altogether, 22 cross-sectional studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 1 case-referent study were eligible for determining the level of evidence. The results showed some evidence for a positive relationship between neck pain and the duration of sitting and twisting or bending of the trunk. A sensitivity analysis was carried out excluding 3 items of the quality list, the importance of which seemed doubtful. On the basis of this sensitivity analysis, it was concluded that there is some evidence for a positive relationship between neck pain and the following work-related risk factors: neck flexion, arm force, arm posture, duration of sitting, twisting or bending of the trunk, hand-arm vibration, and workplace design.
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Physical risk factors for neck pain
- Author
-
Ariëns, Geertje A M, Van Mechelen, Willem, Bongers, Paulien M., Bouter, Lex M., Van Der Wal, Gerrit, Moral and Political Philosophy, and CLUE+
- Subjects
Cervical disorders ,Physical load ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Critical literature overview ,Neck trouble - Abstract
To identify physical risk factors for neck pain, a systematic review of the literature was carried out. Based on methodological quality and study design, 4 levels of evidence were defined to establish the strength of evidence for the relationship between risk factors and neck pain. Altogether, 22 cross-sectional studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 1 case-referent study were eligible for determining the level of evidence. The results showed some evidence for a positive relationship between neck pain and the duration of sitting and twisting or bending of the trunk. A sensitivity analysis was carried out excluding 3 items of the quality list, the importance of which seemed doubtful. On the basis of this sensitivity analysis, it was concluded that there is some evidence for a positive relationship between neck pain and the following work-related risk factors: neck flexion, arm force, arm posture, duration of sitting, twisting or bending of the trunk, hand-arm vibration, and workplace design.
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Physical risk factors for neck pain
- Subjects
Male ,Occupational hazard ,Rotation ,Literatuuronderzoek ,Work environment ,Medical information ,Lichaamsbeweging ,Occupational disease ,Review ,Workload ,Sport injury ,Vibration ,Motor vehicle ,Physical load ,Neck pain ,Risk Factors ,Critical literature overview ,Body posture ,Humans ,Muscle force ,Workplace ,Neck trouble ,Exercise ,Extensor muscle ,Leisure ,Priority journal ,Lichaamshouding ,Evidence-Based Medicine ,Cervical disorders ,Flexor muscle ,Neck muscle ,Quality control ,Occupational Diseases ,Fysieke arbeidsbelasting ,Statistical analysis ,Arm muscle ,Evidence based medicine ,Bewegingsstoornissen ,Female ,Risk factor ,Cohort analysis ,Sitting ,Human - Abstract
To identify physical risk factors for neck pain, a systematic review of the literature was carried out. Based on methodological quality and study design, 4 levels of evidence were defined to establish the strength of evidence for the relationship between risk factors and neck pain. Altogether, 22 cross-sectional studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 1 case-referent study were eligible for determining the level of evidence. The results showed some evidence for a positive relationship between neck pain and the duration of sitting and twisting or bending of the trunk. A sensitivity analysis was carried out excluding 3 items of the quality list, the importance of which seemed doubtful. On the basis of this sensitivity analysis, it was concluded that there is some evidence for a positive relationship between neck pain and the following work-related risk factors: neck flexion, arm force, arm posture, duration of sitting, twisting or bending of the trunk, hand-arm vibration, and workplace design.
- Published
- 2000
10. EFFECTIVENESS OF A MOTOR CONTROL THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE PROGRAM COMBINED WITH MOTOR IMAGERY ON THE SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
- Author
-
Hidalgo-Peréz A, Fernández-García Á, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, Gil-Martínez A, Paris-Alemany A, Fernández-Carnero J, and La Touche R
- Abstract
Background: Motor control therapeutic exercise (MCTE) for the neck is a motor relearning program that emphasizes the coordination and contraction of specific neck flexor, extensor, and shoulder girdle muscles. Because motor imagery (MI) improves sensorimotor function and it improves several motor aspects, such as motor learning, neuromotor control, and acquisition of motor skills, the authors hypothesized that a combination of MCTE and MI would improve the sensorimotor function of the cervical spine more effectively than a MCTE program alone., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of MI combined with a MCTE program on sensorimotor function of the craniocervical region in asymptomatic subjects., Study Design: This study was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial., Methods: Forty asymptomatic subjects were assigned to a MCTE group or a MCTE+MI group. Both groups received the same MCTE program for the cervical region (60 minutes), but the MCTE+MI group received an additional intervention based on MI (15 minutes). The primary outcomes assessed were craniocervical neuromotor control (activation pressure value and highest pressure value), cervical kinesthetic sense (joint position error [JPE]), and the subjective perception of fatigue after effort., Results: Intra-group significant differences were obtained between pre- and post interventions for all evaluated variables (p<0.01) in the MCTE+MI and MCTE groups, except for craniocervical neuromotor control and the subjective perception of fatigue after effort in the MCTE group. In the MCTE+MI group a large effect size was found for craniocervical neuromotor control (d between -0.94 and -1.41), cervical kinesthetic sense (d between 0.97 and 2.14), neck flexor muscle endurance test (d = -1.50), and subjective perception of fatigue after effort (d = 0.79). There were significant inter-group differences for the highest pressure value, joint position error (JPE) extension, JPE left rotation, and subjective perception of fatigue after effort., Conclusion: The combined MI and MCTE intervention produced statistically significant changes in sensorimotor function variables of the craniocervical region (highest pressure value, JPE extension and JPE left rotation) and the perception of subjective fatigue compared to MCTE alone. Both groups showed statistically significant changes in all variables measured, except for craniocervical neuromotor control and the subjective perception of fatigue after effort in the MCTE group., Level of Evidence: 1b.
- Published
- 2015
11. Neck disability is associated with masticatory myofascial pain and regional muscle sensitivity.
- Author
-
da Costa DR, de Lima Ferreira AP, Pereira TA, Porporatti AL, Conti PC, Costa YM, and Bonjardim LR
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Brazil, Case-Control Studies, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Pain Threshold physiology, Masticatory Muscles physiopathology, Myofascial Pain Syndromes physiopathology, Neck Muscles physiopathology, Pain, Referred physiopathology
- Abstract
Objective: The primary aims of this study are to compare neck disability in masticatory myofascial pain subjects versus asymptomatic controls, and to evaluate the correlation between neck disability and muscle pain., Design: Two groups composed this case-control study: a symptomatic group comprised of 27 subjects diagnosed with masticatory myofascial pain, as determined by the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), and a control group comprised of 28 asymptomatic subjects. The collected variables were pain intensity (visual analogue scale), pressure pain threshold of the temporomandibular joint, anterior temporalis, masseter, sternocleidomastoid muscle, upper trapezius and Achilles tendon (digital dynamometer, kgf/cm(2)), and neck disability (Neck Disability Index). Statistical analysis included Student's t-test and the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (5% significance level and 95% confidence interval)., Results: The symptomatic group showed greater neck disability with a mean (SD) of 11.8 (7), as compared with 2.8 (2.4) for the asymptomatic group (p<0.05). A negative correlation was found between neck disability and pressure pain threshold of the anterior temporalis (r=-0.4, 95% CI -0.6 to -0.15, p=0.002), the sternocleidomastoid (r=-0.35, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.09, p=0.007) and the upper trapezius (r=-0.37, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.12, p=0.005)., Conclusion: Our results reinforced the clinical interconnection between masticatory and cervical structures, insofar as subjects with masticatory myofascial pain reported greater neck disability, which, in turn, was correlated with regional muscle sensitivity., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.