Search

BACKGROUND Out-of-network charges during hospital care can result in unexpected or surprise bills for the patient. The aim of this study was to ascertain the frequency of out-of-network (OON) billing by the primary orthopaedic surgeon for commonly performed elective, inpatient procedures: total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF), and posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). METHODS Patients undergoing TKA, THA, one-level ACDF, and one-level PLF from 2010 to 2018 were queried using a commercially insured claims database with Current Procedural Terminology codes. The in-network (IN) versus OON status of the primary surgeon's submitted charges and the payor's reimbursement was recorded for each case. All costs were adjusted for inflation and reported in terms of 2018 real dollars. Bivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS Among the 549,868 elective orthopaedic cases, 6.7% were billed as OON by the primary orthopaedic surgeon: 6.1% TKA cases, 6.5% THA, 9.9% ACDF, and 8.5% PLF. From 2010 to 2018, a declining trend was seen in proportion of cases billed as OON by orthopaedic surgeons (P < 0.001 for each case). Mean reimbursement for claims paid as OON was 2.6 times higher than claims paid at the IN rate (range: 1.5 to 3.1 times higher; P < 0.001). The mean OON payments were higher by $1,284 for TKA, $2,516 for THA, $10,097 for ACDF, and $15,104 for PLF compared with mean IN payments (P < 0.001 for each). Compared with health maintenance organization-type plans, preferred provider organization-type plans reimbursed a greater percentage of the submitted claims at the OON rate (14.3% versus 44.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION OON billing by the orthopaedic surgeon for TKA, THA, ACDF, and PLF is an uncommon and declining phenomenon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to compare surgeon professional fee reimbursement and trends from Medicare versus commercial payors for inpatient orthopaedic surgeries: total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF), and posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). METHODS Patients undergoing TKA, THA, TSA, single-level ACDF, and single-level PLF from 2010 to 2018 were queried in a commercially insured claims database. Medicare reimbursements and the work relative value unit (wRVU) of each procedure were obtained from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. All costs were adjusted for inflation and reported in 2018 real dollars. Compound annual growth rates were calculated to assess the mean growth rate for each procedure. Linear regression was done to assess trends. RESULTS On average, payments from Medicare were 57% less than payments from commercial payors. From 2010 to 2018, both Medicare and commercial payments decreased significantly for each surgery (P < 0.05 for all). Compared with inflation-adjusted commercial payments, Medicare payments decreased 2.1 times faster for TKA (-2.1% versus -1.0%), 2.8 times faster for THA (-1.4% versus -0.5%), 1.3 times faster for TSA (-1.0% versus -0.8%), and 1.9 times faster for ACDF (-1.1% versus -0.6%). PLF was the only procedure for which Medicare payments declined slower than commercial payments (-0.6% versus -1.21%). Medicare payments per wRVU markedly declined for TKA (-0.83%), THA (-0.80%), TSA (-0.75%), and ACDF (-1.10%), whereas commercial payments per wRVU for those surgeries showed no notable change. For PLF, there was a notable decrease in both Medicare (-0.63%) and commercial (-1.21%) payments per wRVU. CONCLUSION Over the past decade, both commercial and Medicare surgeon payments for commonly performed inpatient orthopaedic surgeries decreased markedly, with Medicare payments decreasing an average of 1.5 times faster than commercial payments. The impact of declining reimbursements on access and quality of care merits additional investigation.

Background Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a procedure for effectively relieving radiculopathy. Opioids are commonly overprescribed in postsurgical settings and prescriptions vary widely among providers. We identify trends in opioid dependence before and after ACDF. Methods We used the Truven Health MarketScan data to identify adult patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical spine conditions between 2009 and 2015. Patients were segregated in four cohorts of preoperative and postoperative opioid nondependence (ND) or dependence (D) with 15 months of postoperative follow-up. Results A total of 25,403 patients with median age of 52 years (18–92) who underwent ACDF met the inclusion criteria. Breakdown of the four cohorts was as follows: prior nondependent who remain nondependent (NDND): 62.76% (n = 15,944); prior nondependent who become dependent (NDD): 4.6% (n = 1,168); prior dependent who become nondependent (DND): 14.03% (n = 3,564); and prior dependent who remain dependent (DD): 18.61% (n = 4,727). Opioid dependence decreased 9.43% postoperatively. Overall payments and 30-day readmissions increased 1.96 and 1.79 times for opioid dependent versus nondependent cohorts, respectively. Adjusted payments at 3 to 15 months were significantly increased for dependent cohorts with 3.56-fold increase for the DD cohort when compared with the NDND cohort. Length of stay, complications, medication refills, outpatient measures, and hospital admissions were also higher in those groups with postoperative opioid dependence when compared with those who were not opioid dependent. Conclusions Opioid dependence after ACDF is associated with increased hospital readmissions, complication rates at 30 days, and payments within 3 months and 3 to 15 months postdischarge. Overall opioid dependence was decreased after ACDF procedure, however, a smaller number of opioid-dependent and opioid-naive patients became dependent postoperatively and should be followed carefully.

Objective The surgical approach for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is controversial. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the combined anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and uncovertebrectomy for treatment of CSR. Methods This is a retrospective case control study. One hundred and forty-six patients with CSR who underwent two different procedures (ACDF alone [group A]) and a combination of ACDF and uncovertebrectomy [group B]) from March 2008 to April 2013 were included. The operation time, blood loss, Visual Analog Scale scores of the neck (VAS-neck) and arm (VAS-arm), Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, fusion segment curvature, global cervical curvature, and the rate of surgical complication were evaluated. Results There were no significant differences in the basic demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05). No significant differences were noticed in the fusion segment curvature and global cervical curvature between the two groups (p > 0.05). Whereas the operation time and blood loss in group B were greater than those in group A (p 0.05). Conclusions Clinical efficacy of ACDF plus uncovertebrectomy for the treatment of patients with CSR may be better than that of ACDF alone, but at the expense of more operation time and blood loss.

Background CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 bioactive glass ceramic (BGC) is known to chemically bond with bones by forming a hydroxyapatite layer and inducing osteoblastic differentiation. This study was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and safety of a CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 BGC cage in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) with those of an allograft interbody spacer. Methods A total of 63 patients who underwent 2-level ACDF to treat degenerative cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy were reviewed. Results from 26 patients who were recruited prospectively using CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 BGC as a cage material (BGC group) were compared with a historical control group of 37 patients who underwent surgery using an allograft (allograft group). Fusion rates, subsidence, and adjacent segment degeneration were compared between the groups. Demographic data, fusion rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck or arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, and complications were also compared. Results Fusion rates were 88.5% when assessed by interspinous motion and 92.3% when assessed by intragraft bone bridging in the BGC group at 12-month follow-up. The neck pain or arm pain VAS scores and NDI scores significantly improved in both groups. No material-related complications were observed in the BGC group, such as graft resorption and breakage. Fusion rates, subsidence, neck pain or arm pain VAS scores, and NDI scores did not significantly differ between the BGC and allograft groups. Conclusions CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 BGC cage was effective and safe when used in ACDF, conferring a high fusion rate and favorable clinical outcomes similar to those of the allograft.

We sought to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes after anterior cervical surgery between zero-profile (Zero-P) cage and plate-cage construct (PCC).One-hundred and sixteen patients with single-level cervical disk herniation who underwent anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion between May 2015 and March 2017 were enrolled. They were divided into a Zero-P group (61 cases) and a PCC group (55 cases). At 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after the operation, routine follow-up evaluation was recommended including visual analog scale score and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. The lateral x-ray film was performed at 1 and 24 months postoperatively.All 116 patients successfully completed the operation and achieved bone fusion. While there was no significant difference in the amount of bleeding between the 2 groups, the operation time of the Zero-P group was significantly shorter than that of the PCC group with statistically difference. The visual analog scale score and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score of the 2 groups at each follow-up interval postoperatively were significantly improved compared with that before operation; the difference was statistically significant (P0.05, respectively). While all the C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and height of adjacent vertebral body were lost at the 24-month follow-up, the significant difference was observed in the Zero-P group (P0.05, respectively).Compared with the Zero-P system, the PCC system provides a comparable clinical outcome. Although it showed the disadvantages in controlling the operation time and surgical bleeding, the radiologic outcome was better at the 2-year follow-up.

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare differences in the outcomes of patients who undergo anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) with and without a history of shoulder arthroscopy. Methods The PearlDiver Patient Records Database ( www.peardiverinc.com ) from 2007 to 2017 was used to query patients by Current Procedural Terminology, isolating those who underwent ACDF with and without prior shoulder arthroscopy. Postoperative complications within 30 days of the index procedure, opioid use, and revision procedures were assessed for each cohort using ICD-9/10 and Current Procedural Terminology coding. Results A total of 39,969 ACDF patients were queried, of which 38,859 (97.2%) underwent ACDF alone and 1110 (2.8%) underwent ACDF with prior shoulder arthroscopy. ACDF revision rates were significantly greater in patients with prior shoulder arthroscopy compared with ACDF alone (5.8% vs. 3.6%, aOR = 1.64, P = 0.0002). Patients with prior shoulder arthroscopy were also significantly more likely to fill opioid prescriptions at 3 months (aOR 1.19, P = 0.02), 6 months (aOR 1.22, P = 0.01), and 12 months (aOR 1.18, P = 0.04). Conclusions Patients who undergo ACDF with a prior shoulder arthroscopy have significantly greater revision rates, respiratory complications, and prolonged opioid use compared with patients without prior shoulder arthroscopy. With efforts to limit narcotic use and the importance of maximizing patient satisfaction, this analysis improves on the surgeon's ability to set expectations and postoperative plans for patients undergoing ACDF who have a history of shoulder arthroscopy.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare patients with degenerative cervical disc herniation (CDH) who had undergone three-level anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) and fusion with a peek cage supported by synthetic bone graft in all levels to the cases with CDH with hybrid surgery (HS) regarding their radiological findings and surgical results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients who had undergone three-level ACD were evaluated retrospectively. The cases who were followed up for 2 years and longer were evaluated regarding gender, age, radiological findings, and patient satisfaction. A radiological assessment was made by calculating the Cobb angle on lateral cervical radiographs. Clinical assessment was performed by the Neck Disability Index (NDI). RESULTS: In the first group, 13 patients had undergone ACD and fusion with peek cage and bone graft, and in the hybrid group, there were 11 patients in whom fusion with peek cage and bone graft were made in two levels, and cervical disc arthroplasty was performed throughout the distance in-between. In the hybrid group, the 1-month and 24-month changes in cervical range of motion in hyperflexion were statistically significant (p

INTRODUCTION Outcomes after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical total disk arthroplasty (TDA) are satisfactory, but related morbidity and revision surgery rates are notable. This study sought to determine complication variations among ACDF, TDA, and combined ACDF-TDA as well as predictors of postoperative complications. METHODS Patients undergoing 1- to 2-level ACDF and/or TDA with at least a 2-year follow-up from 2009 to 2011 were identified from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Patient demographics, hospital-related parameters, mortality, and postoperative outcomes were compared, and their predictors were identified using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 16,510 and 449 individuals underwent ACDF and cervical TDA, respectively, and 201 underwent ACDF-TDA. ACDF-TDA patients had the highest rates of cardiac complications and pulmonary embolism (PE) (P ≤ 0.006), whereas TDA patients had higher individual surgical and device/implant/internal fixation complications (P ≤ 0.025). ACDF-TDA patients experienced the lowest rate of revisions. Cervical TDA increased the odds of any surgical complications (OR = 2.5, P = 0.002), overall complications (OR = 1.57, P = 0.034), and revisions (OR = 2.29, P < 0.001). Deyo index predicted any medical/surgical complications (OR = 1.43 and 1.19, respectively). Female sex was associated with increased odds of readmission (OR 1.30, P < 0.001) but was protective against medical complications (OR = 0.81, P = 0.013). DISCUSSION Combined ACDF-TDA procedures were not associated with increases in 2-year individual or overall complications, readmissions, or revisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3-Therapeutic study.

Introduction This study directly compares the economical and clinical effectiveness of the use of cervical epidural injections and continued physical therapy versus surgical management in cases of cervical radiculopathy that have failed 6 weeks of conservative management. Methods A theoretical cohort of patients with cervical radiculopathy resistant to 6 weeks of noninvasive conservative management were simulated to treatment with either anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical epidural injections and continued physical therapy and analyzed with Markov chain decision tree Monte Carlo simulation. Results The average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with ACDF was $6,768 per quality-adjusted life year over the lifetime of the patient, whereas the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with cervical injections ranged from $9,033 to $4,044 per quality-adjusted life year based on the success rate. Discussion Our study suggests that for the management of recalcitrant cervical radiculopathy, ACDF remains the dominant strategy compared with cervical epidural injections if the surgical avoidance rate of such injections is less than 50%. If there is a greater than 50% surgery avoidance rate with injections, then cervical epidural injections would be considered a cost-effective strategy with a role in the management of cervical radiculopathy before surgery.

To examine the effects of anterior transcorporeal percutaneous endoscopic cervical diskectomy (ATPECD) for the treatment of single-level cervical intervertebral disk herniation (CIDH) with a focus on its safety, feasibility, clinical efficacy, and specific possible complications.A series of 35 patients with symptomatic single-level CIDH were enrolled to be treated with ATPECD. Neck and arm pain was measured using the visual analog scale. Quality of life was measured using the bodily pain and physical function on the SF-36. The average disk height and vertical vertebral body height were recorded. Bone healing was evaluated on the basis of postoperative computed tomography.Successful removal of the herniated disk was confirmed in all 35 cases. At 2 years, the patients showed a significant treatment effect in the visual analog scale and body pain and physical function portions of the SF-36 (1.14 ± 0.60 vs. 7.62 ± 0.61, 63.92 ± 6.74 vs. 32.55 ± 6.80, and 82.14 ± 6.22 vs. 34.43 ± 4.50, respectively, P0.01). Mean preoperative disk height was 6.79 ± 0.37 mm, which decreased to 6.34 ± 0.46 mm 2 years post operation (6.6% decrease). Preoperative surgical vertebral body height also decreased from preoperation (15.79 ± 0.52 mm) to 2 years post operation (15.12 ± 0.38 mm) (4.2% decrease). Three surgery-related complications were observed (8.6%).Preliminary clinical experience with ATPECD shows that it is safe, effective, feasible, and minimally invasive. Although it has some disadvantages, such as the need for repeated fluoroscopy, some minor complications, and nonsymptomatic disk height decreases, ATPECD can supplement minimally invasive surgeries in selected cases of CIDH.

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion has been and remains the benchmark surgical management of cervical degenerative disk disease. However, an increased use of cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) has been found in the past few years. The purported benefits of CDA included preserved motion, less adjacent-level degeneration, and less morbidity. Short-term results from randomized control trials clearly showed noninferiority of CDA compared with fusion. With long-term comparison data becoming available, results are equivalent and superior in many metrics compared, favoring CDA. Concerns remain regarding the best way to manage CDA failures. Nonetheless, appropriate patient selection and adherence to strict surgical technique make CDA a viable treatment.

Background Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been providing good surgical, clinical, and radiologic outcomes in patients suffering from cervical degenerative disk disease (DDD). However, the role of anterior plating is still debated, especially in three-level procedures. This study aimed to investigate long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes and complications after three-level contiguous ACDF without plating for cervical DDD. Methods Two institutional databases were retrieved (January 2009–December 2014) for patients treated with three-level contiguous ACDF without plating. Minimum follow-up (FU) was 5 years. Demographical data, smoking status, implant types, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain, complications, fusion rate, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), cervical lordosis (CL), and residual segmental mobility were evaluated. Results We enrolled 21 patients. Tantalum and carbon fiber cages were implanted, respectively, in 13 and 8 patients. The mean FU length was 5.76 ± 0.87 years. Mean NDI score was 78.29 ± 9.98% preoperatively and 8.29 ± 1.67% at last FU (p Conclusions Three-level contiguous ACDF without plating seems to be an effective treatment for cervical DDD. Properly designed comparative clinical trials are needed to further investigate this topic.

We sought to predict surgical volumes for 2 common cervical spine procedures from 2020 to 2040.Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2003-2016, nationwide estimates of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) volumes were calculated using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD-9, ICD-10) procedure codes. With data from the U.S. Census Bureau, estimates of the U.S. population were used to create Poisson models controlling for age and sex. Age was categorized into ranges (25 years old, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and85), and estimates of surgical volume for each age group were created.From 2020-2040, increases in surgical volume from 13.3% (153,288-173,699) and 19.3% (29,620-35,335) are expected for ACDF and PCDF, respectively. For ACDF, the largest increases are expected in the 45-54 (42,077-49,827) and 75-84 (8065-14,862) age groups, whereas for PCDF, the largest increases will be seen in the 75-84 (3710-6836) age group. In accordance with an aging population, modest increases will be seen for ACDF (858-1847) and PCDF (730-1573) in the85-year-old cohort.As expected, large growth in cervical spine surgical volumes is likely to be seen, which could indicate a need for increased numbers of spinal neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Further studies are needed to investigate the needs of the field in light of these expected increases in volume.

Introduction: As healthcare costs continue to increase in the United States, it is important to understand the trends in the allocation of healthcare spending for common orthopaedic surgical procedures. We investigated the recent trends in (1) total net payments (for episode of care), (2) payments to hospitals, (3) payments to physicians, (4) payments to physicians as a percentage of total net payments, and (5) regional variation in hospital and physician payments for four common orthopaedic procedures. Methods: Using a private insurance claims database, we analyzed the payments to US hospitals and physicians from 2010 to 2016 for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) (n = 128,269), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n = 223,319), 1-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) (n = 51,477), and 1-level lumbar-instrumented posterior spinal fusion (PSF) (n = 45,680). Regional variations in payments were also assessed. Trends were analyzed using linear regression models adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, duration of hospital stay, and inflation (alpha = 0.05). Results: Inflation-adjusted total net payments for the episode of care increased by the following percentages per year: 5.2% for ACDF, 3.2% for PSF, 2.9% for TKA, and 2.6% for THA. Annual inflation-adjusted hospital payments increased significantly for all 4 procedures, whereas annual inflation-adjusted physician payments decreased by −2.2%/year for PSF, −1.5%/year for TKA, −1.1%/year for THA, and −0.4%/year for ACDF (all, P < 0.001). As a percentage of total net payments, physician payments decreased markedly for ACDF (−4.6%), PSF (−3.1%), TKA (−2.1%), and THA (−1.8%). Hospital and physician payments varied significantly by region and were both highest in the West (P < 0.001). Conclusions: From 2010 to 2016, inflation-adjusted total net payments for 4 common orthopaedic surgical procedures increased markedly, as did payments to the US hospitals for these procedures. Payments to orthopaedic surgeons for these procedures decreased markedly during the same period.

Background Posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and diskectomy has remarkably evolved with successful results. Although percutaneous endoscopic cervical diskectomy (PECD) has gained popularity, the risk of surgical failure may be a major obstacle to performing PECD. We analyzed unsuccessful cases requiring reoperation. The objective of this article was to find common causes of surgical failure and elucidate the limitations of the conventional PECD technique. Methods Surgery-related complications were reviewed from the initial 252 cases of a single surgeon. The patients had cervical disk herniation or radiculopathy and underwent percutaneous endoscopic surgical management. We investigated clinical outcomes and complications. A retrospective review was performed on all patients who had undergone PECD between April 2013 and April 2016. Unsuccessful PECD was defined as a case requiring reoperation within 6 weeks after primary surgery. Chart review was done, and pre-, intra-, and postoperative radiographic reviews were performed. All unsuccessful PECD cases were classified according to the type of herniated disc, location of herniation, extruded disk migration, working channel position, and intra- and postoperative findings. Results The mean operative time was 89.4 minutes (range, 60–180 minutes). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 20.3 mL (range, 10–800 mL). Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 1 patient and healed well. The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 60 months. The mean score on the visual analog scale improved from 8.67 ± 1.30 preoperatively to 7.83 ± 1.40 at 1 month postoperatively to 1.67 ± 1.30 at the final follow-up (P Conclusions Surgeons should be aware of the specific complications for the PECD approach.

Background Patients who undergo surgery for cervical radiculopathy are at risk for developing adjacent segment disease (ASD). Identifying patients who will develop ASD remains challenging for clinicians. Purpose To develop and validate a deep learning algorithm capable of predicting ASD by using only preoperative cervical MRI in patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Materials and Methods In this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study, retrospective chart review was performed for 1244 patients undergoing single-level ACDF in two tertiary care centers. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 344 patients were included, of whom 60% (

Background Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion with plate-screw construct has been gradually applied for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy in recent years. However, long cervical plate was associated with complications including breakage or loosening of plate and screws, trachea-esophageal injury, neurovascular injury, and postoperative dysphagia. To reduce these complications, the zero-profile spacer has been introduced. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, Springer, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies that compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of zero-profile spacer versus cage and plate for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Risk of bias in included studies was assessed. Pooled estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results On the basis of predefined inclusion criteria, 7 studies with a total of 409 patients were included in this analysis. The pooled data revealed that zero-profile spacer was associated with a decreased dysphagia rate at 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively when compared with the cage-plate group. Both techniques had similar perioperative outcomes, functional outcome, radiologic outcome, and dysphagia rate immediately and at >1-year after operation. Conclusions On the basis of available evidence, zero-profile spacer was more effective in reducing postoperative dysphagia rate for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Both devices were safe in anterior cervical surgeries, and they had similar efficacy in improving the functional and radiologic outcomes. More randomized controlled trials are needed to compare these 2 devices.

Background In anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF), misaligned plates are concerning because of the risk of screw-and-plate failure; however, these plates also hypothetically have the potential for asymmetric micromotion on the facet and uncovertebral joint. The aim of this study was to determine whether misaligned plate placement during ACDF had clinical benefits compared with straight plate placement. Methods Postoperative AP radiographs of 128 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF with anterior cervical plate (ACP) fixation were reviewed, and plate alignment was assessed. Patients were separated into control group 1 (straight plates) or group 2 (misaligned plates). Results The mean age of patients was 51.5 ± 0.9 years, and women represented 51% of the total population. There was no significant difference between groups with regard to the preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores (P = 0.744 and P = 0.943, respectively). At 6 weeks postoperatively, the VAS scores for group 1 decreased from 7.6 ± 0.2 to 4.0 ± 0.2 compared with the scores in group 2, which decreased from 7.7 ± 0.2 to 2.1 ± 0.1, which demonstrated statistical significance (P = 0.019). At 2-year follow-up, no significant difference was demonstrated between the groups' VAS and NDI scores (P = 0.670 and P = 0.266). Conclusion Misaligned plates have increased torsional strength and are associated with better clinical outcomes compared with those of straight plates in the early postoperative period. After fusion, no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups was noted, which may reduce the concerns regarding misaligned plates. Level of evidence Retrospective comparative study.

Background The insertion of available cervical retractor systems is relatively complex for the limited exposure required for single-level anterior cervical diskectomy. Objective To introduce a novel cervical retractor system and report the initial experience of its application. Methods A simple retractor system was designed that is fixed to the vertebral body through Caspar pins. The design allows the retractor to move with the vertebrae during distraction via the traditional Caspar distractor system. The advantages and limitations of the device based on the initial experience are discussed. Results The author has used the current version of the retractor on 32 single-level anterior cervical diskectomies. The insertion of the retractor is easy, and its application provides safe and satisfactory anterior cervical exposure. There have not been related complications, although transient dysphagia has not been prevented. Conclusion This newly designed retractor system is simple and efficient for a single-level anterior cervical diskectomy, and its insertion is relatively easy.

Background Cervical disk arthroplasty is now a widely accepted alternative to anterior cervical interbody fusion, which is known to reduce normal cervical motion and increase the incidence of adjacent segment disease. Although multiple studies report the use of cervical disk arthroplasty to treat multilevel cervical disease, this is the first report in the literature detailing the placement of multiple, noncontiguous artificial disks. Case Description We describe a 41-year-old male who presented with myelopathy and left upper extremity radiculopathy resulting from 2 cervical disk herniations separated by a normal intervening level. He underwent an anterior cervical diskectomy and placement of an artificial disk prosthesis at cervical (C) 4-5 and C6-7 while leaving C5-6 intact. Conclusions This approach serves to preserve cervical motion, spinal stability, and lordosis across all 3 levels, thus demonstrating that it is a viable alternative to a multilevel anterior cervical interbody fusion.

Background Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard surgical procedure used widely in the treatment of degenerative cervical spine conditions. Although the safety and effectiveness of single-level ACDF is well supported in the literature, reports of multilevel ACDF are sparse and present mixed results. There is concern for greater complications with increasing levels of fusion given the increased complexity, procedure duration, and invasiveness of multilevel ACDF. Methods In this retrospective review, we report complications data for 105 adult neurosurgical patients who underwent elective multilevel ACDF at a single institution by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2016. Results Fifty-four patients underwent 3-level ACDF and 51 patients underwent 4-level ACDF with a mean follow-up of 2.7 ± 1.9 years. Although patients with 4-level fusion were more likely than those with 3-level fusion to have estimated blood loss ≥100 mL (P = 0.04), we found no significant differences in other peri- and postoperative complications, need for revision, and presence of symptoms at the time of last follow-up between groups. Conclusions This study suggests that 4-level ACDF is not necessarily associated with a greater number of or more severe complications than 3-level ACDF.

Background Anterior cervical diskectomy (ACD) is an established therapy for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Controversy remains regarding the dynamic or rigid stabilization of the segment. Methods We studied our first 31 patients treated with ACD plus the Dynamic Cervical Implant (DCI) as an alternative to fusion or to arthroplasty, treated between February 2009 and 2011. Radiologic data were collected before and 12 months after surgery. Clinical results were documented 12 months after surgery. The radiologic analysis focused on the mobility of the segment, position of the implant, amount of preoperative osteochondrosis, and the development of heterotopic ossifications (HOs) after 1 year. Results At the 1-year follow-up after DCI implantation, there was quite a high fusion rate (23%); however, the formation of HOs was comparable with that of arthroplasty. Fusion could not be predicted by viewing the degree of disk degeneration on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies and had no negative impact on the clinical outcome. Conclusion As an alternative to arthroplasty, DCI does maintain some flexion-extension mobility after 1 year in 77% of our cases.

To investigate the relationships between sagittal alignment parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores after adjacent 2-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and to study the impact of the T1 slope (T1s) minus C2-7 lordosis (T1s-CL).In total, 76 patients after adjacent 2-level ACDF were retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic measurements included T1s, C2-7 lordosis, T1s-CL, segment angle (SA), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). NDI scores were used to evaluate clinical prognosis. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between radiographic measures. Linear regression analysis was used to analyze the relationships between follow-up cervical sagittal parameters and NDI.ΔT1s was positively correlated with ΔC2-7 lordosis (r = 0.466, P0.001), ΔT1s-CL (r = 0.337, P = 0.003), ΔC2-7 SVA (r = 0.238, P0.05), and ΔSA (r = 0.654, P 0.001). ΔC2-7 lordosis was positively correlated with ΔSA (r = 0.692, P 0.001) and negatively correlated with ΔT1s-CL (r = -0.676, P 0.001) and ΔC2-7 SVA (r = -0.418, P0.001). ΔT1s-CL was positively correlated with ΔC2-7 SVA (r = 0.644, P 0.001). The pre- and postoperative SAs were significantly different (P 0.05), increasing from 3.71° ± 8.92° to 9.63 ± 4.20°. Preoperative NDI was positively correlated with preoperative C2-7 SVA (r = 0.325, P = 0.004) and T1s-CL (r = 0.498, P 0.001). Follow-up NDI was positively correlated with follow-up T1s (r = 0.359, P = 0.001), C2-7 SVA (r = 0.613, P 0.001), and T1s-CL (r = 0.696, P 0.001) and negatively correlated with C2-7 lordosis (r = -0.491, P 0.001). The linear regression model showed that when preoperative T1s-CL was greater than 21.43°, the NDI score was greater than 25 (RChanges in cervical sagittal parameters after 2-level ACDF were associated with quality of life. A greater T1S-CL mismatch was related to a greater degree of cervical malalignment. T1s-CL may be a more important predictor of cervical malalignment than C2-7 SVA. Specifically, a mismatch greater than 28.07 corresponded to positive cervical sagittal malalignment, defined as an NDI score greater than 25.

Background Nonlethal cervical spine injuries in skydiving are rare due to the associated high mortality. Here, we report an unusual pathomechanism leading to a Hangman fracture in a semiprofessional parachute athlete. Case Description The moment of injury was captured on a first-person video and identified as a rough parachute opening deceleration during canopy deployment, caused by failure of the parachute inflation control device. Fractures of the C2 pars interarticularis with C2/C3 instability were treated by anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion, and the patient reached full recovery. Conclusions Excessive deceleration during canopy deployment may pose a risk for life-threatening cervical spine injuries in skydiving.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the superiority of total disk replacement (TDR) using a cervical disk prosthesis vs anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Ninety-six patients with a diagnosis of degenerative disk disease with radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy at 2 contiguous levels from C-3 to C-7 were randomly allocated to the TDR group (n=48) or the ACDF group (n=48). Outcome measures were recorded preoperatively and 1 week and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 81 months postoperatively. A total of 80 patients completed the follow-up, including 38 in the TDR group and 42 in the ACDF group. Japanese Orthopaedic Association, visual analog scale, and Neck Disability Index scores showed statistically significant improvement from baseline in both groups. Moreover, compared with the TDR group, the ACDF group had statistically greater visual analog scale scores from 12 months and Neck Disability Index scores from 3 months. Compared with the ACDF group, the TDR group had statistically greater range of motion at both the superior and the inferior treated levels at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 81 months postoperatively. Compared with the TDR group, the ACDF group had statistically greater range of motion at the superior adjacent levels at 6, 12, 24, and 81 months and at the inferior adjacent levels at 24 and 81 months postoperatively. The occurrence of adjacent-segment degeneration at both the superior and the inferior adjacent levels was greater in the ACDF group than in the TDR group. Total disk replacement was safe and effective and a statistically superior alternative to ACDF for degenerative disk disease at 2 contiguous levels. It could reduce the occurrence of adjacent-segment degeneration at the superior and the inferior adjacent segments by reducing the range of motion. [ Orthopedics . 2018; 41(6):344–350.]

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy. However, the use of ACDF for patients with cervical radiculopathy can result in several disadvantages, such as limitation of motion and accelerating degeneration of adjacent segment. An alternative, less invasive endoscopic technique, posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical diskectomy (PPECD), was applied to address the above problems associated with ACDF. The patient presented with pain and weakness of the left arm for 2 years. P-PECD was applied and complete decompression of the nerve root was achieved. The symptoms were relieved after surgery. Postoperative MR showed the ruptured disk fragment was successful removed. No spinal instability or symptom relapse was observed in follow-up. PPECD may be an option for patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Study Design Prospective study. Objective Because single-level disk arthroplasty or arthrodesis in the lower subaxial spine improves headaches after surgery, we studied whether this effect may be better appreciated after two-level arthroplasty. Methods We performed an independent post hoc analysis of two concurrent prospective randomized investigational device exemption trials for cervical spondylosis, one for single-level treatment and the other for two adjacent-level treatments. Results For the one-level study, baseline mean headache scores significantly improved at 60 months for both the cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) groups ( p Conclusion Both CDA and ACDF at either one or two levels are associated with sustained headache relief from baseline. Patients undergoing two-level arthroplasty had significantly greater improvement in headache at all points except for at 18 and 60 months. This difference in improvement was not observed in patients undergoing single-level arthroplasty. The mechanism of greater headache relief after two-level arthroplasty remains unclear.

Study Design Retrospective case series. Objective To assess the utility of postoperative computed tomography (CT) following anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and to determine the clinical circumstances most likely to lead to an abnormal CT scan. Methods Patients who underwent ACDF at a tertiary center over a span of 5 years were investigated. Only patients who had a minimum of 6 months’ postoperative follow-up and a CT within 2 years after the surgery were included in the study group. All the postoperative notes were reviewed to determine indications for the CT, abnormalities identified, and whether the scan led to an alteration in the treatment course. Results The charts of 690 patients who underwent ACDF were reviewed. Of the 690 patients, 45 (7%) had postoperative CTs. These patients accounted for 53 postoperative CT scans, 45 (85%) of which were taken for patients who expressed persistent postoperative symptoms and/or had abnormal imaging. There were no indications for 8 (15%) of the CTs. Patients who had a CT for persistent symptoms and/or abnormal preliminary imaging were significantly more likely to have an abnormal CT ( p = 0.03) and/or an alteration in treatment course ( p = 0.04) compared with those with no symptomatic or radiologic indication for CT. Conclusions CT is associated with minimal utility regarding the alteration of treatment course when employed in asymptomatic patients. Postoperative CT should be ordered solely for symptomatic patients or those with other abnormal preliminary imaging. Judicious use of postoperative CT will limit the radiation exposure and cost.

Study Design Case report and review of literature. Objective To report the case of a 67-year-old woman who developed delayed onset (6 months) of symptomatic shingles after cervical nerve root decompression in a previously symptomatic dermatome. Methods The patient's clinic course and outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. The study required no outside funding. The study authors have no financial interest in any of the products or techniques discussed. Results The patient received definitive treatment for shingles once the zoster form rash manifested. The patient, however, developed postherpetic neuralgia and remained symptomatic at her 2-year postoperative visit. Conclusions Although shingles is a common disease state affecting patients in the fifth and sixth decades of life, it is rarely seen in the setting of cervical nerve root decompression. This case demonstrates the need to include shingles on the differential diagnosis of recurrent neurogenic pain after anterior cervical decompression and fusion.