1. A Survey on Critical Care Resources and Practices in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- Author
-
Marija Vukoja, Neill K. J. Adhikari, Satish Bhagwanjee, Ognjen Gajic, Srdjan Gavrilovic, Oguz Kilickaya, Rahul Kashyap, Certain Investigators, and Elisabeth D. Riviello
- Subjects
Community and Home Care ,Poverty ,Critical Care ,Epidemiology ,business.industry ,Cross-sectional study ,Best practice ,Advanced cardiac life support ,MEDLINE ,medicine.disease ,Intensive Care Units ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Interquartile range ,Intensive care ,Health Care Surveys ,Income ,Medicine ,Health Resources ,Humans ,Medical emergency ,Practice Patterns, Physicians' ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Human resources - Abstract
Background: Timely and appropriate care is the key to achieving good outcomes in acutely ill patients, but the effectiveness of critical care may be limited in resource-limited settings.Objectives: This study sought to understand how to implement best practices in intensive care units (ICU) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and to develop a point-of-care training and decision-support tool.Methods: An internationally representative group of clinicians performed a 22-item capacity-and-needs assessment survey in a convenience sample of 13 ICU in Eastern Europe (4), Asia (4), Latin America (3), and Africa (2), between April and July 2012. Two ICU were from low-income, 2 from low-middle-income, and 9 from upper-middle-income countries. Clinician respondents were asked about bed capacity, patient characteristics, human resources, available medications and equipment, access to education, and processes of care.Results: Thirteen clinicians from each of 13 hospitals (1 per ICU) responded. Surveyed hospitals had median of 560 (interquartile range [IQR]: 232, 1,200) beds. ICU had a median of 9 (IQR: 7, 12) beds and treated 40 (IQR: 20, 67) patients per month. Many ICU had 1 staff member with some formal critical care training (n = 9, 69%) or who completed Fundamental Critical Care Support (n = 7, 54%) or Advanced Cardiac Life Support (n = 9, 69%) courses. Only 2 ICU (15%) used any kind of checklists for acute resuscitation. Ten (77%) ICU listed lack of trained staff as the most important barrier to improving the care and outcomes of critically ill patients.Conclusions: In a convenience sample of 13 ICU from LMIC, specialty-trained staff and standardized processes of care such as checklists are frequently lacking. ICU needs-assessment evaluations should be expanded in LMIC as a global priority, with the goal of creating and evaluating context-appropriate checklists for ICU best practices.HighlightsIn intensive care units from low- and middle-income countries, trained staff and processes of care such as checklists are frequently lacking even as access to intensive care unit resources is reasonable.A better understanding of existing intensive care units' capacity and evaluation of interventions to bring context-appropriate best practices to the bedside of critically ill patients should be a global priority.
- Published
- 2014