Search

Purpose: To evaluate oncological outcomes and toxicities in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy at two Italian centres., Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 122 patients with LACC treated between 2010 and 2022. Primary endpoints were local control (LC), pelvic control (PC), and nodal control (NC). Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicity. Correlations between patient characteristics and oncological outcomes were conducted., Results: Brachytherapy planning was CT and MRI-based in 88 (72.1%) and 34 patients (27.9%), respectively. The mean total dose (EQD2) delivered to high-risk clinical target volume was 82 Gy. Overall treatment time was ≤ 50 days and > 50 days in 48 (39.3%) and 74 patients (60.7%), respectively. At a mean follow up of 101 months, 3 and 5-year LC rates were 87% and 85%, respectively. Five-year PC and NC rates were 77% and 85.1%. Five-year DFS and OS were 61% and 65.4%, respectively, with significant correlations between these outcomes and FIGO stage and nodal status at diagnosis. Gastrointestinal, genitourinary and vaginal adverse effects were the most reported late toxicities and 8 (6.5%) grade 3-5 events were observed. 32 patients (26.2%) had vaginal stenosis and it was significantly related to 3D imaging used for brachytherapy planning., Conclusions: The study confirmed the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy and IGABT for LACC. Full implementation of MRI treatment planning and interstitial techniques could further enhance personalized treatment and outcomes., (© 2024. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.)

The last version of the FIGO classification recommended imaging tools to complete the clinical assessment of patients with cervical cancer. However, the preferable imaging approach is still unclear. We aimed to explore the prognostic power of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (ceCT), and [ 18 F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ([ 18 F]FDG-PET)/CT in patients staged for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC, FIGO stages IB3-IVA). Thirty-six LACC patients (mean age 55.47 ± 14.01, range 31-82) were retrospectively enrolled. All of them underwent MRI, ceCT and [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT before receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. A median dose of 45 Gy (range 42-50.4; 25-28 fractions, 5 fractions per week, 1 per day) was delivered through the external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) on the pelvic area, while a median dose of 57.5 Gy (range 16-61.1; 25-28 fractions, 5 fractions per week, 1 per day) was administered on metastatic nodes. The median doses for brachytherapy treatment were 28 Gy (range 28-30; 4-5 fractions, 1 every other day). Six cycles of cisplatin or carboplatin were administered weekly. The study endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes at MRI independently predicted RFS (HR 13.271, 95% CI 1.730-101.805; P = 0.027), while metastatic paraaortic lymph nodes at [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT independently predicted both RFS (HR 11.734, 95% CI 3.200-43.026; P = .005) and OS (HR 13.799, 95% CI 3.378-56.361; P < 0.001). MRI and [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT findings were incorporated with clinical evidences into the FIGO classification. With respect to the combination of clinical, MRI and ceCT data, the use of next-generation imaging (NGI) determined a stage migration in 10/36 (27.7%) of patients. Different NGI-based FIGO classes showed remarkably different median RFS (stage IIB: not reached; stage IIIC1: 44 months; stage IIIC2: 3 months; P < 0.001) and OS (stage IIB: not reached; stage IIIC1: not reached; stage IIIC2: 14 months; P < 0.001). A FIGO classification based on the combination of MRI and [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT might predict RFS and OS of LACC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)