Search

Background: Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is a bedside prognostic tool for patients with suspected infection outside the intensive care unit (ICU), which is particularly useful when laboratory analyses are not readily available. However, its performance in potentially septic patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) needs to be examined further, especially in relation to early outcomes affecting acute management.Objective: First, to compare the performance of qSOFA and CURB-65 in the prediction of mortality in the emergency department in patients presenting with CAP. Second, to study patients who required critical care support (CCS) and ICU admission.Methods: Between January and December 2017, a 1-year retrospective observational study was carried out of adult (≥18 years old) patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) of our hospital (Rome, Italy) with CAP. The accuracy of qSOFA, qSOFA-65 and CURB-65 was compared in predicting mortality in the ED, CCS requirement and ICU admission. The concordance among scores ≥2 was then assessed for 30-day estimated mortality prediction.Results: 505 patients with CAP were enrolled. Median age was 71.0 years and mortality rate in the ED was 4.7%. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of qSOFA-65, CURB-65 and qSOFA in predicting mortality rate in the ED were 0.949 (95% CI 0.873 to 0.976), 0.923 (0.867 to 0.980) and 0.909 (0.847 to 0.971), respectively. The likelihood ratio of a patient having a qSOFA score ≥2 points was higher than for qSOFA-65 or CURB-65 (11 vs 7 vs 6.7). The AUCs of qSOFA, qSOFA-65 and CURB-65 in predicting CCS requirement were 0.862 (95% CI 0.802 to 0.923), 0.824 (0.758 to 0.890) and 0.821 (0.754 to 0.888), respectively. The AUCs of qSOFA-65, qSOFA and CURB-65 in predicting ICU admission were 0.593 (95% CI 0.511 to 0.676), 0.585 (0.503 to 0.667) and 0.570 (0.488 to 0.653), respectively. The concordance between qSOFA-65 and CURB-65 in 30-day estimated mortality prediction was 93%.Conclusion: qSOFA is a valuable score for predicting mortality in the ED and for the prompt identification of patients with CAP requiring CCS. qSOFA-65 may further improve the performance of this useful score, showing also good concordance with CURB-65 in 30-day estimated mortality prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and durability of treatment switch to two‐drug (2DR) vs. three‐drug (3DR) integrase inhibitor (InSTI)‐based regimens in a real‐life setting. Methods: Within the ODOACRE cohort, we selected adult patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL switching to an InSTI‐based 2DR or 3DR. Survival analyses were performed to estimate the probability of virological failure (VF, defined as one HIV RNA > 1000 copies/mL or two consecutive HIV RNA > 50 copies/mL) and treatment discontinuation (TD, defined as any modification, intensification or interruption of the regimen), and to evaluate their predictors. Results: Overall, 1666 patients were included, of whom 1334 (80%) were treated with a 3DR (19.9%, 25.0% and 55.1% elvitegravir‐, raltegravir‐ and dolutegravir‐based, respectively) and 332 (20%) with a 2DR (79.2% dolutegravir + lamivudine and 20.8% dolutegravir + rilpivirine). Over a median (interquartile range) follow‐up of 100 (52–150) weeks, 52 (3.1%) patients experienced VF with an incidence of 1.5/100 person‐year of follow‐up (PYFU). The estimated 96‐week probability of VF was similar for the 2DR and 3DR groups (2.3% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.53), but it was higher for elvitegravir (4.9%) and raltegravir (5.0%) than for dolutegravir (1.5%) (P = 0.04). Four hundred (24%) patients discontinued their InSTI‐based regimen, with an incidence of 11.3/100 PYFU. At 96 weeks, 3DRs showed a higher probability of TD for any reason (20.6% vs. 11.2%, P < 0.001) and TD for toxicity (9.0% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.02) when compared with 2DRs. A higher risk of TD for central nervous system toxicity was observed for dolutegravir than for elvitegravir and raltegravir (4.0% vs. 2.5% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.005). Conclusions: In virologically suppressed HIV‐infected patients, 2DRs showed an efficacy similar to 3DRs but with better tolerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is a bedside prognostic tool for patients with suspected infection outside the intensive care unit (ICU), which is particularly useful when laboratory analyses are not readily available. However, its performance in potentially septic patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) needs to be examined further, especially in relation to early outcomes affecting acute management., Objective: First, to compare the performance of qSOFA and CURB-65 in the prediction of mortality in the emergency department in patients presenting with CAP. Second, to study patients who required critical care support (CCS) and ICU admission., Methods: Between January and December 2017, a 1-year retrospective observational study was carried out of adult (≥18 years old) patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) of our hospital (Rome, Italy) with CAP. The accuracy of qSOFA, qSOFA-65 and CURB-65 was compared in predicting mortality in the ED, CCS requirement and ICU admission. The concordance among scores ≥2 was then assessed for 30-day estimated mortality prediction., Results: 505 patients with CAP were enrolled. Median age was 71.0 years and mortality rate in the ED was 4.7%. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of qSOFA-65, CURB-65 and qSOFA in predicting mortality rate in the ED were 0.949 (95% CI 0.873 to 0.976), 0.923 (0.867 to 0.980) and 0.909 (0.847 to 0.971), respectively. The likelihood ratio of a patient having a qSOFA score ≥2 points was higher than for qSOFA-65 or CURB-65 (11 vs 7 vs 6.7). The AUCs of qSOFA, qSOFA-65 and CURB-65 in predicting CCS requirement were 0.862 (95% CI 0.802 to 0.923), 0.824 (0.758 to 0.890) and 0.821 (0.754 to 0.888), respectively. The AUCs of qSOFA-65, qSOFA and CURB-65 in predicting ICU admission were 0.593 (95% CI 0.511 to 0.676), 0.585 (0.503 to 0.667) and 0.570 (0.488 to 0.653), respectively. The concordance between qSOFA-65 and CURB-65 in 30-day estimated mortality prediction was 93%., Conclusion: qSOFA is a valuable score for predicting mortality in the ED and for the prompt identification of patients with CAP requiring CCS. qSOFA-65 may further improve the performance of this useful score, showing also good concordance with CURB-65 in 30-day estimated mortality prediction., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

We investigated the effectiveness and safety of a dual therapy (DT) with lamivudine plus dolutegravir versus a single tablet regimen (STR) with abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir. We performed a retrospective analysis in a cohort of virologically suppressed HIV+ patients switching to lamivudine-dolutegravir or abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir. We evaluated the incidence of virological failure and treatment discontinuation, as well as their predictors. Non-parametric tests were applied to assess changes in immunological and metabolic parameters. In all, 616 patients were analyzed: 380 began STR and 236 DT. In the STR group three patients experienced VF; in the DT group seven patients experienced VF. No differences in cause of treatment discontinuation were found. The estimated probability of continuing therapy at 48 weeks were 88.5 % in DT and 90.3% in STR, without a statistically significant difference (Log-rank 0.338). Regarding the metabolic profile, in the STR group there was a reduction in LDL cholesterol levels at week 48 (p=0.008), whereas in the lamivudine group there was a significant reduction in total cholesterol level at week 48 (p=0.044). Regarding the renal function, in both groups we registered a reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with a median reduction of 8.4 ml/min in the STR group (p<0.001) and 10.2 mL/min in DT (p<0.001). We found a difference in strategy option: in a context of side effect and comorbidities, dual therapy strategy was preferred. Conversely, simplification and compliance improvement more frequently translated into a DTG-STR strategy.

Background: Viremia copy-years (VCY) is associated with mortality and disease outcome prediction. This study evaluated the association of VCY with virological failure (VF), defined as a plasma viral load (pVL) >400 copies/mL, and with single levels of viremia., Methods: Eight hundred and fifty antiretroviral therapy (ART)-treated patients with pVL < 37 copies/mL [target not detected or target detected (TD)] or >37, but less than 200 copies/mL (low-level viremia), and at least 6-pVL measures during 54 months of follow-up were selected. VCY was calculated individually over the follow-up as the area under pVL curve. Pearson's χ test was used to analyze differences in VCY quartiles distribution between groups., Results: Higher VCY values were detected in patients with low-level viremia {294 copy-years [interquartile range (IQR): 99-1870]} than in TD [52 copy-years (IQR: 53-153)] and target not detected groups [19 copy-years (IQR: 8-54)]. VCY was also significantly different between patients with undetectable viremia and patients with basal pVL TD (P < 0.001). Pearson's χ test revealed a significant association between VCY and basal levels of viremia (P < 0.0001). In addition, the risk of VF rose with increasing VCY (Hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.02)., Conclusions: This study revealed the association of VCY with VF and with single levels of viremia suggesting that, despite the success of ART, minimal residual viremia may cause the cumulative viral burden to rise. Full viral load suppression during ART is crucial to limit the increase in VCY.