Search

Objectives We aimed to analyse the interplay between impaired iron uptake and β-lactamases on cefiderocol resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods Thirty-one transferable β-lactamases and 16 intrinsic P. aeruginosa AmpC (PDC) variants were cloned and expressed in wild-type (PAO1) and iron uptake-deficient (PAO Δ piuC) P. aeruginosa backgrounds. MICs of cefiderocol and antipseudomonal β-lactams were determined by reference broth microdilution. Results Relative to PAO1, deletion of piuC caused a specific 16-fold decrease in cefiderocol activity but negligible effects on the activity of other β-lactams. Among transferable β-lactamases, SHV-12, KPC Ω-loop mutants, NDMs and OXA-15 showed cefiderocol MIC values above the clinical breakpoint (2 mg/L) when expressed in PAO1. When expressed in PAO Δ piuC , these and the transformants harbouring PER-1, VEB-1, KPC-2, KPC-3, VIM-1, CMY-2, OXA-2 and OXA-14 showed increased MIC values from 16 to >256 mg/L. The PDC variants carrying the Ω-loop changes ΔP215-G222 (PDC-577), E219K (PDC-221 and PDC-558) and the H10 helix change L293P (PDC-219) had the greatest impact on cefiderocol resistance, with MICs of 2–4 mg/L in PAO1 and of up to 32–64 mg/L in PAO Δ piuC. Widespread enzymes such as GES, CTX-M-9, CTX-M-15, VIM-2-like enzymes, IMPs, DHA-1, FOX-4, OXA-10, OXA-48 and the other PDC variants tested had weaker effects on cefiderocol resistance. Conclusion We add evidence about the effect of the interplay between iron uptake and β-lactamases on the acquisition of cefiderocol resistance in P. aeruginosa. These findings may help to anticipate the emergence of resistance and optimize the use of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The spread of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative pathogens, especially those producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), has become a major health concern. MBLs are molecularly the most diverse carbapenemases, produced by a wide spectrum of gram-negative organisms, including the Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and can hydrolyze most β-lactams using metal ion cofactors in their active sites. Over the years, the prevalence of MBL-carrying isolates has increased globally, particularly in Asia. MBL infections are associated with adverse clinical outcomes including longer length of hospital stay, ICU admission, and increased mortality across the globe. The optimal treatment for MBL infections not only depends on the pathogen but also on the underlying resistance mechanisms. Currently, there are only few drugs or drug combinations that can efficiently offset MBL-mediated resistance, which makes the treatment of MBL infections challenging. The rising concern of MBLs along with the limited treatment options has led to the need and development of drugs that are specifically targeted towards MBLs. This review discusses the prevalence of MBLs, their clinical impact, and the current treatment options for MBL infections and their limitations. Furthermore, this review will discuss agents currently in the pipeline for treatment of MBL infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The rise of multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria necessitates the development of new antimicrobial agents. Cefiderocol shows promising activity by exploiting bacterial iron transport systems to penetrate the outer membranes of resistant pathogens. Objectives: This study evaluates the efficacy of cefiderocol testing methods and trailing effect impact using a ComASP® Cefiderocol panel, disk diffusion (DD), and MIC test strips (MTS) compared to iron-depleted broth microdilution (ID-BMD). Methods: A total of 131 Gram-negative strains from clinical samples was tested by commercial methods and the gold standard. Results were interpreted as per 2024 and 2023 EUCAST guidelines. Results: ID-BMD revealed high cefiderocol susceptibility among Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with one Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate being resistant. Acinetobacter baumannii exhibited higher MIC values, particularly considering trailing effects that complicated MIC readings. ComASP® showed 97% categorical agreement (CA) and 66% essential agreement (EA) with ID-BMD for Enterobacterales but failed to detect the resistant K. pneumoniae. DD tests demonstrated variable CA (72% or 93%), and 38% or 34% of strains within the ATU according to EUCAST Breakpoint Tables v13.0 and 14.0, respectively, with major errors only. MTS for P. aeruginosa had 100% CA but 44% EA, and often underestimated MIC values. Conclusions: The study emphasizes the need for standardized criteria to address trailing effects and ATU and highlights the discrepancies between testing methods. While cefiderocol resistance remains rare, accurate susceptibility testing is crucial for its effective clinical use. The findings suggest that current commercial tests have limitations, necessitating careful interpretation and potential supplementary testing to guide appropriate antibiotic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report identification of 5 patients with infections caused by NDM-5-producing Escherichia coli harboring PBP3 mutations that showed reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam and cefiderocol. Durlobactam, a novel diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitor, demonstrated minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 2 µg/mL supporting future investigations into a potential role in clinical management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii / calcoaceticus complex (CRAB) presents significant treatment challenges. Methods We report the case of a 42-year-old woman with CRAB meningitis who experienced persistently positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures for 13 days despite treatment with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam and cefiderocol. On day 13, she was transitioned to sulbactam-durlobactam and meropenem; 4 subsequent CSF cultures remained negative. After 14 days of sulbactam-durlobactam, she was cured of infection. Whole genome sequencing investigations identified putative mechanisms that contributed to the reduced cefiderocol susceptibility observed during cefiderocol therapy. Blood and CSF samples were collected pre-dose and 3-hours post initiation of a sulbactam-durlobactam infusion. Results The CRAB isolate belonged to sequence type 2. An acquired bla OXA-23 and an intrinsic bla OXA-51-like (ie, bla OXA-66) carbapenemase gene were identified. The paradoxical effect (ie, no growth at lower cefiderocol dilutions but growth at higher dilutions) was observed by broth microdilution after 8 days of cefiderocol exposure but not by disk diffusion. Potential markers of resistance to cefiderocol included mutations in the start codon of piuA and piuC iron transport genes and an A515V substitution in PBP3, the primary target of cefiderocol. Sulbactam and durlobactam were detected in CSF at both timepoints, indicating CSF penetration. Conclusions This case describes successful treatment of refractory CRAB meningitis with the administration of sulbactam-durlobactam and meropenem and highlights the need to be cognizant of the paradoxical effect that can be observed with broth microdilution testing of CRAB isolates with cefiderocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cefiderocol is the first antibiotic with effluent flow rate–based dosing recommendations outlined in the product label for patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We aimed to investigate the population pharmacokinetics of cefiderocol among patients receiving CRRT and validate these dosing recommendations. Methods A multicenter, prospective cefiderocol pharmacokinetic study among intensive care unit patients receiving CRRT was conducted (2022–2023). Blood sampling was performed at steady-state and cefiderocol concentrations were assayed by validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Population pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted in Pmetrics using R software. The free time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (f T > MIC) and total daily area under the concentration time curve (AUCdaily) were calculated. Results Fourteen patients with effluent flow rates ranging from 2.1 to 5.1 L/h were enrolled. Cefiderocol concentrations best fitted a 2-compartment model. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) parameter estimates for clearance, central compartment volume, and intercompartment transfer constants (k12 and k21) were 3.5 ± 1.5 L/hour, 10.7 ± 8.4 L, 3.9 ± 1.8 hours−1, and 2.2 ± 2.2 hours−1, respectively. With simulations based on product label dosing recommendations, all patients achieved 100% f T > MIC up to MIC 8 mg/L with an AUCdaily (mean ± SD) of 1444 ± 423 mg × hour/L. Cefiderocol was well tolerated among the 14 patients. Conclusions The current package insert dosing recommendations resulted in pharmacodynamically optimized cefiderocol exposures. Cefiderocol concentrations exceeded relevant MIC breakpoints in all patients at each effluent flow rate, and AUCdaily was within the range observed in patients in the phase 3 clinical trials, suggestive of a safe and therapeutic drug profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When planning pediatric clinical trials, optimizing the sample size of neonates/infants is essential because it is difficult to enroll these subjects. In this simulation study, we evaluated the sample size of neonates/infants using a model‐based optimal approach for identifying their pharmacokinetics for cefiderocol. We assessed the usefulness of data for estimation performance (accuracy and variance of parameter estimation) from adults and the impact of data from very young subjects, including preterm neonates. Stochastic simulation and estimation were utilized to assess the impact of sample size allocation for age categories in estimation performance for population pharmacokinetic parameters in pediatrics. The inclusion of adult pharmacokinetic information improved the estimation performance of population pharmacokinetic parameters as the coefficient of variation (CV) range of parameter estimation decreased from 4.9%–593.7% to 2.3%–17.3%. When sample size allocation was based on the age groups of gestational age and postnatal age, the data showed 15 neonates/infants would be necessary to appropriately estimate pediatric pharmacokinetic parameters (<20%CV). By using the postmenstrual age (PMA), which is theoretically considered to be associated with the maturation of organs, the number of neonates/infants required for appropriate parameter estimation could be reduced to seven (one and six with <32 and >32 weeks PMA, respectively) to nine (three and six with <37 and >37 weeks PMA, respectively) subjects. The model‐based optimal design approach allowed efficient evaluation of the sample size of neonates/infants for estimation of pediatric pharmacokinetic parameters. This approach to assessment should be useful when designing pediatric clinical trials, especially those including young children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives We aimed to compare the stability of the newly developed β-lactams (cefiderocol) and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/nacubactam and meropenem/xeruborbactam) against the most clinically relevant mechanisms of mutational and transferable β-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods We screened a collection of 61 P. aeruginosa PAO1 derivatives. Eighteen isolates displayed the most relevant mechanisms of mutational resistance to β-lactams. The other 43 constructs expressed transferable β-lactamases from genes cloned in pUCP-24. MICs were determined by reference broth microdilution. Results Cefiderocol and imipenem/relebactam exhibited excellent in vitro activity against all of the mutational resistance mechanisms studied. Aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/nacubactam and meropenem/xeruborbactam proved to be more vulnerable to mutational events, especially to overexpression of efflux operons. The agents exhibiting the widest spectrum of activity against transferable β-lactamases were aztreonam/avibactam and cefepime/zidebactam, followed by cefepime/taniborbactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/xeruborbactam and meropenem/nacubactam. However, some MBLs, particularly NDM enzymes, may affect their activity. Combined production of certain enzymes (e.g. NDM-1) with increased MexAB-OprM-mediated efflux and OprD deficiency results in resistance to almost all agents tested, including last options such as aztreonam/avibactam and cefiderocol. Conclusions Cefiderocol and new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations show promising and complementary in vitro activity against mutational and transferable P. aeruginosa β-lactam resistance. However, the combined effects of efflux pumps, OprD deficiency and efficient β-lactamases could still result in the loss of all therapeutic options. Resistance surveillance, judicious use of new agents and continued drug development efforts are encouraged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are multiple antibiotic regimens for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) in clinical practice. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections. Methods: Two authors independently searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their establishment to April 15, 2024, to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies, and compared the clinical efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of the site of infection and the risk of bias in the studies. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was then conducted. Results: Six observational studies were included, with 251 cases in the cefiderocol-based group and 372 cases in the colistin-based group. Compared to the colistin-based group, the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54–0.92, P = 0.01) and 30-day mortality (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43–0.95, P = 0.03). However, for the 14-day and 28-day mortality rates, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups. According to the subgroup analysis, among patients with bloodstream infection (BSI), the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality, but it did not reduce the mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients. The result of TSA showed that our conclusions are reliable. There was no significant statistical difference in the microbiological cure rate, clinical cure rate, or duration of hospitalization. In addition, the cefiderocol-based group did not have an increased incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Conclusions: Compared with the colistin-based regimens, the cefiderocol-based regimens were significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality in CRAB-infected patients, especially for patients with BSI. However, they did not show any advantages in terms of the clinical cure rate or microbiological cure rate, nor did they reduce the incidence of AKI. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023487213. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An overlooked factor in the efficacy of topical antibiotics to treat bacterial keratitis is the state of the corneal epithelium. Recently, we evaluated topical cefiderocol for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) keratitis in eyes with the corneal epithelium abraded. The goal of this study was to use the same model with the corneal epithelium left intact to evaluate the efficacy of cefiderocol and other antibiotics and compare the results to those of the previous study. Methods: NZW rabbit corneas with intact epithelium were inoculated with XDRPA. After 16 h, the rabbits were topically treated with cefiderocol 50 mg/mL, ciprofloxacin 0.3%, tobramycin 14 mg/mL, or saline. Following 8 h of treatment, the corneas were harvested for CFU determinations and cefiderocol concentrations. Results: Only cefiderocol significantly decreased CFU of the XDRPA strain compared with saline. The CFU in the cefiderocol and tobramycin-treated corneas for the XDRPA strain with initially intact epithelium were 1.83–1.4 Log10 greater than those produced in corneas with the abraded epithelium (p < 0.05). Cefiderocol concentrations were 5.02× less in corneas with initially intact epithelium. Conclusions: The efficacy of cefiderocol and tobramycin to treat experimental XDRPA keratitis is dependent on the state of the corneal epithelium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cefiderocol is a novel cephalosporin–siderophore conjugate antibiotic that holds promise to thwart infections caused by multi-drug-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Its antibacterial activity against normally susceptible species is not affected by most β-lactamases, including metallo-β-lactamases. Due to the siderophore-mediated entry into the cell, the activity of cefiderocol is less affected by porin loss or active efflux resistance than many other β-lactam antibiotics. The aim of this study was to assess in vitro susceptibility to the cefiderocol of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli from clinical samples of hospitalized patients. We analyzed 102 clinical strains of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and non-fermentives from hospital centers in Łódź, Poland. Antimicrobial susceptibility to cefiderocol was tested by the minimum inhibitory concentration test strips and disc diffusion methods. The obtained results turned out to be ambiguous, and the area of technical uncertainty made their interpretation very difficult. The cost of therapy with this antibiotic, and difficulties in interpreting the drug susceptibility are the limitations to the use of cefiderocol. Intensive work should be carried out to finally standardize an easily accessible and reliable method for the determination of susceptibility to cefiderocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) is escalating worldwide and leaves clinicians few therapeutic options in recent years, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infection and have shown potent activity against isolates defined as carbapenem resistant. The aim of this study was to determine the phenotypic profile of these agents against CR-PA in the emerging setting of carbapenemases. Methods: CR-PA clinical isolates were collected from three teaching hospitals in different geographical regions between January 2017-December 2021. All isolates were subjected to phenotypic carbapenemase testing using modified carbapenem inactivation method. MICs were determined by reference broth microdilution and evaluated according to EUCAST standards, while genotypic profiling was determined using PCR methods. Results: 244 CR-PA sourced most frequently from the respiratory tract (32.2%), blood (20.4%) and urine (17.5%) were evaluated. Of all isolates, 32 (13.1%) were phenotypically and 38 (15.6%) were genotypically defined as carbapenemase-positive. The most common carbapenemase was GES (63.1%), followed by VIM (15.8%). The MIC50/90(S%) of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and cefiderocol in all CR-PA isolates were 4 and 32 (80%), 1 and > 64 (69%) and 0.25 and 1 mg/L (96%), respectively. Cefiderocol was also the most active agent in carbapenemase-positive isolates (90%). Conslusion: While ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam remained highly active against CR-PA devoid of carbapenemases, cefiderocol provided potent in vitro activity irrespective of carbapenemase production. When considering the potential clinical utility of newer agents against CR-PA, regional variations in carbapenemase prevalence must be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics. Results: Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01–6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05–72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16–0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively. Conclusions: Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with poor outcomes especially when effective antimicrobial therapy and control of infection source are delayed. As the frequency of Enterobacterales producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) and/or OXA-48–like carbapenemases is increasing in some United States (US) medical centres, effective antimicrobials to treat the infections caused by these organisms are urgently needed. Aztreonam-avibactam is under clinical development for treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, including MBL producers. Objectives To evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacterales causing BSI in US medical centres and compare the activity of aztreonam-avibactam with ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and other antimicrobials used to treat BSI. Methods 4,802 Enterobacterales were consecutively collected (1/patient) from 72 US medical centres in 2020–2022 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. Aztreonam-avibactam was tested with avibactam at a fixed concentration of 4 mg/L. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic susceptible breakpoint of ≤ 8 mg/L was applied for aztreonam-avibactam for comparison. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates were tested for β-lactamase–encoding genes using Next-generation sequencing. Results Aztreonam-avibactam was highly active against Enterobacterales; only 2 isolates showed aztreonam-avibactam MICs > 8 mg/L: 1 meropenem-susceptible E. coli and 1 K. aerogenes (CRE). All carbapenemase producers and 98.0% of CRE were inhibited at an aztreonam-avibactam MIC of ≤ 8 mg/L. CRE susceptibility rates were 81.6% for ceftazidime-avibactam, 65.3% for meropenem-vaborbactam, 61.2% for imipenem-relebactam, and 87.8% for cefiderocol. Aztreonam-avibactam retained activity (MIC, ≤ 8 mg/L) against all (100.0%) meropenem-vaborbactam nonsusceptible (n = 17), 99.5% of imipenem-relebactam nonsusceptible (n = 206), and 90.0% of ceftazidime-avibactam nonsusceptible (n = 10) isolates. The most common carbapenemases were KPC-2/3 (57.1% of CREs), OXA-48–like (16.3%), and NDM (14.3%). A carbapenemase gene was not observed in 12.3% of CREs. Ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam were active against 100.0% of KPC producers, but ceftazidime-avibactam showed limited activity against MBL producers and meropenem-vaborbactam showed limited activity against OXA-48–like and MBL producers. The most active non–β-lactam comparators against CRE were gentamicin (49.0% susceptible) and amikacin (44.9% susceptible). Conclusions Aztreonam-avibactam demonstrated potent activity against a large collection of Enterobacterales isolated from patients with BSI in US hospitals, including CRE, MBL producers, and isolates resistant to recently approved β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Abstract The spread of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative pathogens, especially those producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), has become a major health concern. MBLs are molecularly the most diverse carbapenemases, produced by a wide spectrum of gram-negative organisms, including the Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and can hydrolyze most β-lactams using metal ion cofactors in their active sites. Over the years, the prevalence of MBL-carrying isolates has increased globally, particularly in Asia. MBL infections are associated with adverse clinical outcomes including longer length of hospital stay, ICU admission, and increased mortality across the globe. The optimal treatment for MBL infections not only depends on the pathogen but also on the underlying resistance mechanisms. Currently, there are only few drugs or drug combinations that can efficiently offset MBL-mediated resistance, which makes the treatment of MBL infections challenging. The rising concern of MBLs along with the limited treatment options has led to the need and development of drugs that are specifically targeted towards MBLs. This review discusses the prevalence of MBLs, their clinical impact, and the current treatment options for MBL infections and their limitations. Furthermore, this review will discuss agents currently in the pipeline for treatment of MBL infections.

Cornelius J Clancy,1 Oliver A Cornely,2– 4 Stephen W Marcella,5 Sean T Nguyen,6 Laurence Gozalo,7 Bin Cai8 1Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 2Institute of Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 3Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 4German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 5Global Epidemiology and Real-World Evidence, Shionogi Inc, Florham Park, NJ, USA; 6Medical Affairs, Shionogi Inc, Florham Park, NJ, USA; 7Advanced Analytics, Genesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA; 8Center of Real-World Data and Analytics, Shionogi Inc, Florham Park, NJ, USACorrespondence: Bin Cai, Center of Real-World Data and Analytics, Shionogi Inc, 400 Campus Drive, Florham Park, NJ, 07932, USA, Email bin.cai@shionogi.comPurpose: The international PROVE retrospective chart-review study aims to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol for treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections.Patients and Methods: US centers selected hospitalized patients receiving their first cefiderocol treatment for ≥ 72 hours for a Gram-negative bacterial infection (November 2020–March 2023). Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, hospitalization, course of infection, antibiotic use, clinical cure (excluding patients with a relapse/reinfection), clinical response at the end of treatment, microbiology, in-hospital all-cause mortality (IH-ACM) at Day 30, and safety were analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results: This interim analysis included 244 patients. The most frequent infection sites were respiratory tract (55.7%), skin and skin structure (16.8%), and blood (9.8%). The median duration of cefiderocol use was 12 days (interquartile range 8– 18.5). Clinical cure was reported for 64.8% (158/244) of patients, clinical response for 74.2% (181/244), and 9.4% (23/244) had relapse/reinfection; 30-day IH-ACM was 18.4% (45/244). Of 82 patients with monomicrobial Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, 64.6% (n = 53) and 74.4% (n = 61) had clinical cure and clinical response, respectively, and 30-day IH-ACM was 25.6%. Among 43 patients with monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii infections, 60.5% (n = 26) and 74.4% (n = 32) had clinical cure and clinical response, respectively, and 30-day IH-ACM was 18.6%. Five patients experienced six adverse drug reactions (one serious event: interstitial nephritis/acute kidney injury), and cefiderocol was discontinued in two cases.Conclusion: Cefiderocol had similar clinical cure and response rates to previous retrospective studies and lower mortality. Cefiderocol was well tolerated in real-world settings in critically ill US patients with problematic Gram-negative pathogens.Keywords: bloodstream infection, carbapenem resistance, cefiderocol, nonfermenters, real-world evidence, respiratory tract infection

Abstract Background There are multiple antibiotic regimens for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) in clinical practice. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections. Methods Two authors independently searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their establishment to April 15, 2024, to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies, and compared the clinical efficacy and safety of cefiderocol-based regimens and colistin-based regimens in the treatment of CRAB infections. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of the site of infection and the risk of bias in the studies. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was then conducted. Results Six observational studies were included, with 251 cases in the cefiderocol-based group and 372 cases in the colistin-based group. Compared to the colistin-based group, the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54–0.92, P = 0.01) and 30-day mortality (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43–0.95, P = 0.03). However, for the 14-day and 28-day mortality rates, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups. According to the subgroup analysis, among patients with bloodstream infection (BSI), the cefiderocol-based group had lower all-cause mortality, but it did not reduce the mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients. The result of TSA showed that our conclusions are reliable. There was no significant statistical difference in the microbiological cure rate, clinical cure rate, or duration of hospitalization. In addition, the cefiderocol-based group did not have an increased incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Conclusions Compared with the colistin-based regimens, the cefiderocol-based regimens were significantly associated with a lower risk of mortality in CRAB-infected patients, especially for patients with BSI. However, they did not show any advantages in terms of the clinical cure rate or microbiological cure rate, nor did they reduce the incidence of AKI. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023487213.

Objectives: Acinetobacter baumannii is classified by the centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as an ''urgent threat'' due to its ability to acquire and develop resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics. As a result, it is one of the most concerning pathogens in healthcare settings, with increasing incidence of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, there are ongoing efforts to find novel treatment options, one of which is cefiderocol. We aim to review available evidence on cefiderocol use for severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Methods: A comprehensive review was conducted from 2017 to 2023, covering articles from databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase, along with conference proceedings from ECCMID 2023. The primary focus was on severe nosocomial pneumonia due A. baumannii and cefiderocol. Discussion: Cefiderocol, targeting periplasmic space Penicillin-Binding Proteins (PBPs) via siderophore transport pathways, exhibits promise against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Its effectiveness in treating CRAB pneumonia remains debated. The CREDIBLE trial reported higher mortality with cefiderocol compared to the best available treatment, while other cohort studies showed contrasting outcomes. Patient variations and pharmacokinetic factors may underlie these discrepancies. The recommended cefiderocol dosage regimen may fall short of desired pharmacokinetic targets, especially in critically ill patients and lung infections. Pulmonary factors hindering cefiderocol's entry into bacteria through iron transporters are overlooked in clinical breakpoints. Optimized dosing or combination regimens may enhance infection site exposure and outcomes. Conclusions: Further research is needed to determine the optimal cefiderocol dosage and administration (mono vs. dual therapy, continuous vs. intermittent infusion), in severe Acinetobacter baumannii nosocomial pneumonia.

Objectives: The treatment options available for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens are often limited. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a novel siderophore cephalosporin that exhibits activity against these pathogens. Several studies have reported the in vitro activity of CFDC against isolates from Europe, the United States, and China, but the activity against carbapenem-resistant bacteria with IMP-type carbapenemase has not been extensively studied. We, therefore, studied the in vitro activities of CFDC against carbapenem-resistant bacteria with available genomic backgrounds based on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in Japan, where the IMP-type is the predominant carbapenemase produced by Gram-negative rods. Methods: We selected 603 isolates (528 Enterobacterales, 18 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 57 Acinetobacter spp.) from a collection of Gram-negative clinical isolates collected during a Japan Antimicrobial Resistance Bacterial Surveillance program and evaluated the antimicrobial activities of CFDC, ceftolozane/tazobactam (CTLZ/TAZ), imipenem-relebactam (IPM/REL), and ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, carbapenemase-non-producing meropenem-non-susceptible Enterobacterales, and carbapenemase-producing nonfermentative bacteria. Results: Among these, 97.7% of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (99.2% of IMP-type carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales), 100% of carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa, and 91.2% of carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter spp. were susceptible to CFDC, showing better antimicrobial activity than the other antimicrobial agents evaluated in this study. CFDC was highly effective against class A-, B-, and D β-lactamase-harbouring isolates when compared to the other antimicrobial agents. In addition, the relationship between CFDC resistance and three genetic factors involved in resistance was discussed. Conclusions: This is the first large-scale study to systematically demonstrate the efficacy of CFDC against IMP-type carbapenemase-producing strains with known genomic backgrounds.

Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) are a significant public health threat globally, particularly in countries like India with high antibiotic resistance rates. The current study investigates the prevalence of CROs, detects resistance mechanisms using phenotypic methods and assesses the efficacy of newer antibiotics against CROs. A prospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India during 2021–23. Clinical specimens were processed and bacterial identification was performed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry followed by antimicrobial susceptibility testing using CLSI guidelines against a plethora of newer antibiotics for CROs. Carbapenemase production was detected using phenotypic methods, and the presence of the mcr-1 gene was assessed by real-time PCR. During the study period, predominantly (70 %) Gram-negative bacteria were isolated; amongst which 5692 strains were carbapenem-resistant, wherein resistance to different carbapenems ranged from 34.1% to 79 %. Majority of the carbapenemase producers were metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) producers (75 %). Colistin resistance was noted in 5.4 % of selected carbapenem-resistant isolates. Among newer antibiotics, cefiderocol demonstrated the lowest resistance rates (0–14 %), while resistance to newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations was very high in carbapenem-resistant isolates. Fosfomycin, minocycline and tigecycline, each showing variable efficacy depending on the site of infection. Moreover, newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations offer restricted benefits due to widespread prevalence of MBL in the region. The escalating prevalence of CROs in India underscores the urgency for alternative treatment options beyond colistin. Hence, highlighting the critical importance of developing effective strategies to combat carbapenem resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs) is linked with high morbidity and mortality in patients. In this study, we estimated the therapeutic coverage of various antibiotics, focusing on cefiderocol and comparators, administered empirically against an infection of unknown origin in the ICU. Methods In the ARTEMIS surveillance study, susceptibilities of 624 Italian Gram-negative isolates to amikacin, aztreonam-avibactam, cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, colistin, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, and meropenem-vaborbactam were tested by broth microdilution, and results were interpreted by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. The susceptibility rates from the ARTEMIS study were extrapolated to Gram-negative isolates obtained from 5,774 patients in Italian ICUs in 2021. The sum of the predicted susceptibilities of individual pathogens represented the overall likelihood of in vitro activity of each antibiotic as early targeted therapy for ICU patients. Results A total of 624 Italian Gram-negative isolates included 206 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 138 Acinetobacter baumannii, 187 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 93 Escherichia coli. Against A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli, the overall susceptibility rates for cefiderocol were 87.7%, 96.8%, 99%, and 100%, respectively; and for comparator agents, 8.7–96.4%, 25.7–100%, 73.3–100%, and 89.2–100%, respectively. Among the subset of meropenem-resistant isolates, susceptibility rates of A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa to cefiderocol were 86.4%, 96.2% and 100%, respectively. Corresponding susceptibility rates to comparator agents were 0–96.8%, 0–100%, and 6.4–100%, respectively. There were no meropenem-resistant isolates of E. coli. The extrapolation of data to isolates from Italian ICUs showed that the highest likelihood of therapeutic coverage, both overall and among meropenem-resistant isolates, was reported for colistin (96.8% and 72.2%, respectively) and cefiderocol (95.7% and 71.4%, respectively). All other antibiotics were associated with a likelihood below 73% overall and between 0% and 41.4% for meropenem-resistant isolates. Conclusions Based on confirmed susceptibility rates and reported ICU prevalence of multiple Gram-negative species, cefiderocol showed a higher predicted therapeutic coverage and utility in ICUs compared with comparator beta-lactam–beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotics. Cefiderocol may be a promising early treatment option for patients at high risk of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in the ICU.

Abstract Background Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections. Testing for cefiderocol susceptibility is challenging with distinct recommendations depending on the pathogens. Objectives We evaluated the performance of commercial tests for testing cefiderocol susceptibility in the Achromobacter genus and reviewed the literature. Methods Diffusion (disks, MIC gradient test strips [MTS], Liofilchem) and broth microdilution (BMD) methods (ComASP™, Liofilchem; UMIC®, Bruker) were compared with the BMD reference method according to the EUCAST guidelines on 143 Achromobacter strains from 14 species with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L. A literature search was conducted regardless of method or species. Results None of the methods tested fulfilled an acceptable essential agreement (EA). MTS displayed the lowest EA (30.8%) after UMIC® (49%) and ComASP™ (76.9%). All methods achieved an acceptable bias, with MICs either underestimated using MTS (-1.3%) and ComASP™ (-14.2%) or overestimated with UMIC® (+ 9.1%). Inhibition zone diameters ranged from 6 to 38 mm (IZD50/90=33/30 mm). UMIC® and ComASP™ failed to categorize one or the two cefiderocol-resistant strains of this study as resistant unlike the diffusion-based methods. The literature review highlighted distinct performance of the available methods according to pathogens and testing conditions. Conclusions The use of MTS is discouraged for Achromobacter spp. Disk diffusion can be used to screen for susceptible strains by setting a threshold diameter of 30 mm. UMIC® and ComASP™ should not be used as the sole method but have to be systematically associated with disk diffusion to detect the yet rarely described cefiderocol-resistant Achromobacter sp. strains.

Abstract Introduction Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics. Methods In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics. Results Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01–6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05–72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16–0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively. Conclusions Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.

Abstract Background Achromobacter spp. are opportunistic pathogens, mostly infecting immunocompromised patients and patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and considered as difficult-to-treat pathogens due to both intrinsic resistance and the possibility of acquired antimicrobial resistance. Species identification remains challenging leading to imprecise descriptions of resistance in each taxon. Cefiderocol is a broad-spectrum siderophore cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections for which susceptibility data remain scarce. We aimed to describe the susceptibility to cefiderocol of a collection of Achromobacter strains encompassing different species and isolation sources from CF or non-CF (NCF) patients. Methods We studied 230 Achromobacter strains (67 from CF, 163 from NCF patients) identified by nrdA gene-based analysis, with available susceptibility data for piperacillin–tazobactam, meropenem and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of cefiderocol were determined using the broth microdilution reference method according to EUCAST guidelines. Results Strains belonged to 15 species. A. xylosoxidans represented the main species (71.3%). MICs ranged from ≤ 0.015 to 16 mg/L with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L overall and 0.125/2 mg/L against 27 (11.7%) meropenem-non-susceptible strains. Cefiderocol MICs were not related to CF/NCF origin or species although A. xylosoxidans MICs were statistically lower than those of other species considered as a whole. Considering the EUCAST non-species related breakpoint (2 mg/L), 228 strains (99.1%) were susceptible to cefiderocol. The two cefiderocol-resistant strains (A. xylosoxidans from CF patients) represented 3.7% of meropenem-non-susceptible strains and 12.5% of MDR strains. Conclusions Cefiderocol exhibited excellent in vitro activity against a large collection of accurately identified Achromobacter strains, irrespective of species and origin.

ABSTRACT: Objectives: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the antibiofilm activity of cefiderocol alone and in combination with imipenem vs. sessile cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, assessing a potential synergistic bactericidal effect. Methods: Ten P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from infected implants and bloodstream were included in the study. Cefiderocol was tested alone and in combination with imipenem on 24-h-old P. aeruginosa biofilm formed on porous glass beads. For each antibiotic formulation, minimum bactericidal biofilm concentration (MBBC), defined as the lowest concentration that determined a reduction of at least 3 log10 CFU/mL compared with the untreated control, was evaluated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to investigate the biofilm of P. aeruginosa treated with cefiderocol, imipenem, or their combination. Results: Cefiderocol and imipenem were tested alone on P. aeruginosa biofilm and a reasonable reduction in the number of viable cells was observed, especially at high drug concentrations tested. The synergistic effect of cefiderocol in combination with imipenem was evaluated for five selected isolates. Cotreatment with the two drugs led to a remarkable reduction of cell viability by resulting in synergistic bactericidal activity in all tested strains and in synergistic eradicating activity in only one isolate. SEM analysis revealed that, in cefiderocol-treated biofilm, bacterial cells became more elongated than in the untreated control, forming filaments in which bacterial division seems to be inhibited. Conclusions: Cefiderocol exhibited an encouraging antibiofilm activity against tested strains, representing a valid option for the treatment of P. aeruginosa biofilm-associated infections, especially when administered in combination with imipenem.

Background: Antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs) is linked with high morbidity and mortality in patients. In this study, we estimated the therapeutic coverage of various antibiotics, focusing on cefiderocol and comparators, administered empirically against an infection of unknown origin in the ICU. Methods: In the ARTEMIS surveillance study, susceptibilities of 624 Italian Gram-negative isolates to amikacin, aztreonam-avibactam, cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, colistin, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, and meropenem-vaborbactam were tested by broth microdilution, and results were interpreted by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. The susceptibility rates from the ARTEMIS study were extrapolated to Gram-negative isolates obtained from 5,774 patients in Italian ICUs in 2021. The sum of the predicted susceptibilities of individual pathogens represented the overall likelihood of in vitro activity of each antibiotic as early targeted therapy for ICU patients. Results: A total of 624 Italian Gram-negative isolates included 206 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 138 Acinetobacter baumannii, 187 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 93 Escherichia coli. Against A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli, the overall susceptibility rates for cefiderocol were 87.7%, 96.8%, 99%, and 100%, respectively; and for comparator agents, 8.7–96.4%, 25.7–100%, 73.3–100%, and 89.2–100%, respectively. Among the subset of meropenem-resistant isolates, susceptibility rates of A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa to cefiderocol were 86.4%, 96.2% and 100%, respectively. Corresponding susceptibility rates to comparator agents were 0–96.8%, 0–100%, and 6.4–100%, respectively. There were no meropenem-resistant isolates of E. coli. The extrapolation of data to isolates from Italian ICUs showed that the highest likelihood of therapeutic coverage, both overall and among meropenem-resistant isolates, was reported for colistin (96.8% and 72.2%, respectively) and cefiderocol (95.7% and 71.4%, respectively). All other antibiotics were associated with a likelihood below 73% overall and between 0% and 41.4% for meropenem-resistant isolates. Conclusions: Based on confirmed susceptibility rates and reported ICU prevalence of multiple Gram-negative species, cefiderocol showed a higher predicted therapeutic coverage and utility in ICUs compared with comparator beta-lactam–beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotics. Cefiderocol may be a promising early treatment option for patients at high risk of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in the ICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections. Testing for cefiderocol susceptibility is challenging with distinct recommendations depending on the pathogens. Objectives: We evaluated the performance of commercial tests for testing cefiderocol susceptibility in the Achromobacter genus and reviewed the literature. Methods: Diffusion (disks, MIC gradient test strips [MTS], Liofilchem) and broth microdilution (BMD) methods (ComASP™, Liofilchem; UMIC®, Bruker) were compared with the BMD reference method according to the EUCAST guidelines on 143 Achromobacter strains from 14 species with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L. A literature search was conducted regardless of method or species. Results: None of the methods tested fulfilled an acceptable essential agreement (EA). MTS displayed the lowest EA (30.8%) after UMIC® (49%) and ComASP™ (76.9%). All methods achieved an acceptable bias, with MICs either underestimated using MTS (-1.3%) and ComASP™ (-14.2%) or overestimated with UMIC® (+ 9.1%). Inhibition zone diameters ranged from 6 to 38 mm (IZD50/90=33/30 mm). UMIC® and ComASP™ failed to categorize one or the two cefiderocol-resistant strains of this study as resistant unlike the diffusion-based methods. The literature review highlighted distinct performance of the available methods according to pathogens and testing conditions. Conclusions: The use of MTS is discouraged for Achromobacter spp. Disk diffusion can be used to screen for susceptible strains by setting a threshold diameter of 30 mm. UMIC® and ComASP™ should not be used as the sole method but have to be systematically associated with disk diffusion to detect the yet rarely described cefiderocol-resistant Achromobacter sp. strains. Highlights: Performance of commercial methods are highly diverse and species-dependent. The use of MTS is discouraged due to low essential agreement. UMIC® and ComASP™ failed to detect one or the two cefiderocol-resistant strains. UMIC® or ComASP™ should not be used as the sole method for Achromobacter cefiderocol susceptibility testing. A threshold diameter of 30 mm is proposed for susceptible strain screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review strives to assemble a set of molecular design principles that enables the delivery of antibiotic warheads to Gram-negative bacterial targets (ESKAPE pathogens) using iron-chelating siderophores, known as the Trojan Horse strategy for antibiotic development. Principles are derived along two main lines. First, archetypical siderophores and their conjugates are used as case studies for native iron transport. They enable the consideration of the correspondence of iron transport and antibacterial target location. The second line of study charts the rationale behind the clinical antibiotic cefiderocol. It illustrates the potential versatility for the design of new Trojan Horse-based antibiotics. Themes such as matching the warhead to a location where the siderophore delivers its cargo (i.e., periplasm vs. cytoplasm), whether or not a cleavable linker is required, and the relevance of cheaters to the effectiveness and selectivity of new conjugates will be explored. The effort to articulate rules has identified gaps in the current understanding of iron transport pathways and suggests directions for new investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Multidrug‐resistant organisms are increasing and are a significant cause of mortality among lung transplant recipients (LTRs). To assist with this issue, novel pharmacotherapies are being developed. This study describes the utilization of a novel antibiotic, cefiderocol (FDC), in LTRs where limited data exists in the current literature. We primarily assessed the clinical indications, duration of therapy, resistance, and adverse effects. Methods: Conducted as a single‐center retrospective review, this study included adult LTRs who received FDC for at least 24 h. Data, extracted from electronic medical records, encompassed patient demographics, transplant history, antimicrobial dosing, adverse effects, bacterial cultures, and outcomes. The research protocol received institutional review board approval. Results: FDC exhibited effectiveness against multidrug‐resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with 26% 30‐day mortality and microbiological clearance observed in nine out of 13 cases. Notably, FDC was used in diverse clinical settings, including for prophylaxis, empiric, and targeted treatment. Conclusion: Further studies are needed to evaluate optimal clinical indications for FDC use in LTRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections are associated with poor outcomes depending on patient's conditions, clinical severity and type of infection, and treatment is challenging given the limited therapeutic options available. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of two outbreaks caused by CRAB in an intensive care unit (ICU). In addition, the mechanisms of resistance detected in these strains and the treatment chosen according to the available therapeutic options were analyzed. Overall, 28 patients were included. Ten patients (35.71%) had ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ten (35.71%) had a bloodstream infection (BSI), and eight (28.57%) were only colonized. Recurrent infection occurred in 25% (5/20) of infected patients. Two different strains of A. baumannii were isolated from the index patient of the first outbreak. The first strain belonged to the ST85 and carried the blaNDM-1 carbapenemase gene, while the second belonged to the ST2 and carried blaOXA-23, and blaOXA-66 carbapenemase genes. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that the ST2 strain was the cause of the major outbreak, and mutations in the AmpC gene were related to progressive increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and finally, cefiderocol-resistance in one strain. The CRAB isolates from the second outbreak were also identified as ST2. Cefiderocol-resistant strains tests identified by the disc diffusion method were involved in 24% (6/25) of nosocomial infections. Using broth microdilution (BMD) ComASP® only, 33.3% (2/6) of these strains were cefiderocol-resistant. All-cause ICU mortality was 21.4%. Conclusions: Cefiderocol is the first approved siderophore cephalosporin for the treatment of CRAB infections. Cefiderocol-resistant strains were related with blaNDM-1 carbapenemase and mutations in the AmpC gene. Cefiderocol-resistant strains or that cannot be properly interpreted by disk diffusion, should be retested using BMD for definitive categorization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Variable outcomes have been reported with cefiderocol in infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Nonetheless, it may be the only option for metallo-beta-lactamase-producing strains. We describe an outbreak of NDM-CRAB infections treated with cefiderocol. Thirty-eight patients were colonized and/or infected. Thirteen patients developed a systemic infection. A clinical cure was achieved in 10 (83%) patients, one VAP and 9 BSIs, at day 7. In vitro, the activity of cefiderocol does not appear to match in vivo effectiveness using currently available commercial tests. Despite high clinical cures, overall mortality remains high in severely ill patients. Cefiderocol may be considered in this specific setting, though the implementation of susceptibility tests and infection control measures is mandatory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with severe carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections currently face significant treatment challenges. When patients display signs of infection and the clinical suspicion of CRAB infections is high, appropriate treatment should be immediately provided. However, current treatment plans and clinical data for CRAB are limited. Inherent and acquired resistance mechanisms, as well as host factors, significantly restrict options for empirical medication. Moreover, inappropriate drug coverage can have detrimental effects on patients. Most existing studies have limitations, such as a restricted sample size, and are predominantly observational or non-randomized, which report significant variability in patient infection severity and comorbidities. Therefore, a gold-standard therapy remains lacking. Current and future treatment options of infections due to CRAB were described in this review. The dose and considerable side effects restrict treatment options for polymyxins, and high doses of ampicillin-sulbactam or tigecycline appear to be the best option at the time of initial treatment. Moreover, new drugs such as durlobactam and cefiderocol have substantial therapeutic capabilities and may be effective salvage treatments. Bacteriophages and antimicrobial peptides may serve as alternative treatment options in the near future. The advantages of a combination antimicrobial regimen appear to predominate those of a single regimen. Despite its significant nephrotoxicity, colistin is considered a primary treatment and is often used in combination with antimicrobials, such as tigecycline, ampicillinsulbactam, meropenem, or fosfomycin. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has deemed high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam, which is typically combined with high-dose tigecycline, polymyxin, and other antibacterial agents, the best option for treating serious CRAB infections. A rational combination of drug use and the exploration of new therapeutic drugs can alleviate or prevent the effects of CRAB infections, shorten hospital stays, and reduce patient mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: We present our findings on interpatient transmission, epidemic control measures, and the outcomes of a series of ten critically ill burn patients who were either colonized or infected with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). None of the five infected patients achieved clinical cure, and all experienced relapses. Microbiological failure was observed in 40% of the infected patients. The isolated CRAB strains were found to carry blaOXA−23 and armA resistance genes. Despite the lack of clinical cure, all five infected patients survived and were discharged from the Burn Intensive Care Unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novel β-lactams have in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), but their clinical performances and the selection criteria for practical use are still not clear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of novel β-lactams for PA infection in various sites and to compare the efficacy of each agent. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that used novel β-lactams to treat PA infection. The primary outcomes were clinical cure and favorable microbiological response. Subgroup analyses were performed based on drug type, drug resistance of pathogens, and site of infection. Network meta-analysis was carried out within a Bayesian framework. In all studies combined (16 randomized controlled trials), novel β-lactams indicated comparable performance to other treatment regimens in both outcome measures (relative risk = 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.15; P =.43) (relative risk = 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.17; P =.76). Subgroup analyses showed that the efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam (TOL-TAZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol had no apparent differences compared to control groups among different infection sites, drug types and drug resistance of PA. In network meta-analysis, the results showed no statistically significant differences between TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and cefiderocol. TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol are not inferior to other agents in the treatment of PA infection. Their efficacy is also comparable between TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and cefiderocol. • To our knowledge, this study is the first meta-analysis of the efficacy of novel β-lactams in treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infection. • This is the latest and most comprehensive evidence of novel β-lactams for PA infection. • Novel β-lactams have comparable efficacy for PA infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections represent a critical public health concern, highlighting the need for the development of effective antibiotics. Cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, particularly in strains that are resistant to other drugs. However, concerns regarding the emergence of drug-resistant strains persist. This study, conducted with 109 carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from the Spanish Hospital (Dr. Balmis, Alicante). The study evaluated susceptibility to cefiderocol in comparison to alternative antibiotics and including their susceptibility to bacterial inoculum, while assessing various testing methods. Our findings revealed high susceptibility to cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant strains, with only 2 of 109 strains exhibiting resistance. Comparative analysis demonstrated superiority of cefiderocol towards alternative antibiotics. Both the E-test and disk-diffusion methods showed 100% concordance with the microdilution method in classifying strains as susceptible or resistant. However, 4.6% (5/109) of disc zone diameters fell within the technical uncertainty zone, so the E-test technique was found to be more useful in routine clinical practice. Additionally, escalating bacterial inoculum correlated with decreases in vitro activity, so this parameter should be adjusted very carefully in in vivo studies. This study underscores cefiderocol's potential as a therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. However, the emergence of drug-resistant strains emphasizes the critical need for a wise use of antibiotics and a continuous monitoring of resistance to antibiotics. Based on our in vitro data, further investigation concerning the impact of bacterial inoculum on drug efficacy is warranted in order to detect resistance mechanisms and optimize treatment strategies, thereby mitigating the risk of resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nosocomial pneumonia, including hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia, is the leading cause of death related to hospital-acquired infections among critically ill patients. A growing proportion of these cases are attributed to multi-drug-resistant (MDR-) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). MDR-GNB pneumonia often leads to delayed appropriate treatment, prolonged hospital stays, and increased morbidity and mortality. This issue is compounded by the increased toxicity profiles of the conventional antibiotics required to treat MDR-GNB infections. In recent years, several novel antibiotics have been licensed for the treatment of GNB nosocomial pneumonia. These novel antibiotics are promising therapeutic options for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia by MDR pathogens with certain mechanisms of resistance. Still, antibiotic resistance remains an evolving global crisis, and resistance to novel antibiotics has started emerging, making their judicious use crucial to prolong their shelf-life. This article presents an up-to-date review of these novel antibiotics and their current role in the antimicrobial armamentarium. We critically present data for the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, the in vitro spectrum of antimicrobial activity and resistance, and in vivo data for their clinical and microbiological efficacy in trials. Where possible, available data are summarized specifically in patients with nosocomial pneumonia, as this cohort may exhibit 'critical illness' physiology that affects drug efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Achromobacter spp. are opportunistic pathogens, mostly infecting immunocompromised patients and patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and considered as difficult-to-treat pathogens due to both intrinsic resistance and the possibility of acquired antimicrobial resistance. Species identification remains challenging leading to imprecise descriptions of resistance in each taxon. Cefiderocol is a broad-spectrum siderophore cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections for which susceptibility data remain scarce. We aimed to describe the susceptibility to cefiderocol of a collection of Achromobacter strains encompassing different species and isolation sources from CF or non-CF (NCF) patients. Methods: We studied 230 Achromobacter strains (67 from CF, 163 from NCF patients) identified by nrdA gene-based analysis, with available susceptibility data for piperacillin–tazobactam, meropenem and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of cefiderocol were determined using the broth microdilution reference method according to EUCAST guidelines. Results: Strains belonged to 15 species. A. xylosoxidans represented the main species (71.3%). MICs ranged from ≤ 0.015 to 16 mg/L with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L overall and 0.125/2 mg/L against 27 (11.7%) meropenem-non-susceptible strains. Cefiderocol MICs were not related to CF/NCF origin or species although A. xylosoxidans MICs were statistically lower than those of other species considered as a whole. Considering the EUCAST non-species related breakpoint (2 mg/L), 228 strains (99.1%) were susceptible to cefiderocol. The two cefiderocol-resistant strains (A. xylosoxidans from CF patients) represented 3.7% of meropenem-non-susceptible strains and 12.5% of MDR strains. Conclusions: Cefiderocol exhibited excellent in vitro activity against a large collection of accurately identified Achromobacter strains, irrespective of species and origin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a fatal case of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)–producing Escherichia coli in a bacteremic patient with sequential failure of aztreonam plus ceftazidime-avibactam followed by cefiderocol. Acquired resistance was documented phenotypically and mediated through preexisting and acquired mutations. This case highlights the need to rethink optimal treatment for NDM-producing organisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We assessed the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol (CFDC) in comparison with colistin (COL) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infections (BSI). Materials/methods: Retrospective cohort study including adults with CRAB-BSI. Outcomes were mortality, clinical cure and adverse events during therapy. The average treatment effect of CFDC compared to COL was weighted with the inverse-probability treatment weight (IPTW). Results: Overall, 104 patients were included (50 CFDC, 54 COL), median age 66.5 years, median Charlson Comorbidity Index 5, septic shock in 33.6% of patients. Primary BSI accounted for 43.3% of cases, followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (26%), catheter-related BSI (20.2%) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (9.6%). Although not significantly, mortality at all time points was lower for CFDC than COL, while clinical cure was higher in CFDC than COL (66% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.027). Adverse events were more frequent in COL than CFDC-group (38.8% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), primarily attributed to acute kidney injury (AKI) in the COL group. Patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP treated with CFDC had a significant lower 30-d mortality and higher clinical cure than COL (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0008, respectively). Increment of CCI (p = 0.005), ICU (p = 0.025), SARS-CoV2 (p = 0.006) and ECMO (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with 30-d mortality, while receiving CFDC was not associated with survival. Conclusions: CFDC could represent an effective and safe treatment option for CRAB BSI, especially in patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP and frail patients where the risk of acute renal failure during therapy should be avoided. Key summary points: Increasing real-life data support the clinical effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol (CFDC) for carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections. We investigated CFDC in comparison with colistin (COL) for the treatment of CRAB bloodstream infections (BSI). Clinical cure was higher in CFDC than COL group. Patients with hospital acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with CFDC had a statistically significant lower 30-d mortality and higher clinical cure than those treated with COL. Adverse events were more frequent in COL than in CFDC-group. CFDC could be an effective and safe treatment option for CRAB BSI, especially in patients with HAP/VAP and frail patients where the risk of acute renal failure during therapy should be avoided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the in vitro efficacy of cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) isolates and evaluate the disk-diffusion (DD) method as an alternative method to broth-microdilution (BMD). Methods: Totally 89 CRAB isolates were included. Cluster analysis was determined by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE). Resistance genes; blaOXA−51, blaOXA−23, blaOXA−24, blaOXA−58,blaPER−1, blaNDM, blaIMP and mcr-1 were screened. Cefiderocol susceptibility testing was performed by both DD and BMD. Interpretation was made according to EUCAST and CLSI. Categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (mEs), major errors (MEs), and very major errors (VMEs) were determined. Results: PFGE revealed 5 distinct pulsotypes; 86 of the isolates were extensively drug-resistant (XDR). All the isolates were negative for blaNDM, blaIMP, mcr-1, while positive for blaOXA−58 and blaOXA51. blaPER−1 was positive for 33.7%; blaOXA−23 for 74.2%; blaOXA−24 for 12.3%. According to CLSI, the MEs rate was 1.85%, mEs was 7.86% and there were no VMEs. According to EUCAST, MEs rate was 3.70%, there were no mEs and VMEs. CA was 91% for CLSI and 97.8% for EUCAST. MICs of cefiderocol against A. baumannii isolates ranged from 0.06 to > 128 mg/L, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.5 and > 128 mg/L, respectively. Conclusions: Cefiderocol susceptibility was 60.7% in CRAB isolates. MIC50, MIC90 of blaPER−1 positive and blaPER−1 negative groups were > 128/>128 and 0.25/>128 mg/L. A correlation between the presence of blaPER−1 and cefiderocol resistance was observed (p < 0.0001). Among colistin-resistant isolates, the presence of blaPER−1 was 47.1% and 75% of them were resistant to cefiderocol respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Despite the introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is still a major pathogen in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). We determine the activity of cefiderocol and comparators in a collection of 154 P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from pwCF during three multicentre studies performed in 17 Spanish hospitals in 2013, 2017 and 2021. Methods ISO broth microdilution was performed and MICs were interpreted with CLSI and EUCAST criteria. Mutation frequency and WGS were also performed. Results Overall, 21.4% were MDR, 20.8% XDR and 1.3% pandrug-resistant (PDR). Up to 17% of the isolates showed a hypermutator phenotype. Cefiderocol demonstrated excellent activity; only 13 isolates (8.4%) were cefiderocol resistant by EUCAST (none using CLSI). A high proportion of the isolates resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam (71.4%), meropenem/vaborbactam (70.0%), imipenem/relebactam (68.0%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (55.6%) were susceptible to cefiderocol. Nine out of 13 cefiderocol-resistant isolates were hypermutators (P  < 0.001). Eighty-three STs were detected, with ST98 being the most frequent. Only one isolate belonging to the ST175 high-risk clone carried bla VIM-2. Exclusive mutations affecting genes involved in membrane permeability, AmpC overexpression (L320P-AmpC) and efflux pump up-regulation were found in cefiderocol-resistant isolates (MIC = 4–8 mg/L). Cefiderocol resistance could also be associated with mutations in genes related to iron uptake (tonB -dependent receptors and pyochelin/pyoverdine biosynthesis). Conclusions Our results position cefiderocol as a therapeutic option in pwCF infected with P. aeruginosa resistant to most recent β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]