Search

Purpose To investigate the prevalence, incidence and characteristics of bacterial infections and their impact on outcome in critically ill patients infected with COVID-19. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study in eight Italian ICUs from February to May 2020; data were collected through an interactive electronic database. Kaplan–Meier analysis (limit product method) was used to identify the occurrence of infections and risk of acquisition. Results During the study period 248 patients were recruited in the eight participating ICUs. Ninety (36.3%) patients developed at least one episode of secondary infection. An ICU length of stay between 7 and 14 days was characterized by a higher occurrence of infectious complications, with ventilator-associated pneumonia being the most frequent. At least one course of antibiotic therapy was given to 161 (64.9%) patients. Overall ICU and hospital mortality were 33.9% and 42.9%, respectively. Patients developing bacteremia had a higher risk of ICU mortality [45.9% vs. 31.6%, odds ratio 1.8 (95% CI 0.9–3.7), p = 0.069] and hospital mortality [56.8% vs. 40.3%, odds ratio 1.9 (95% CI 1.1–3.9), p = 0.04]. Conclusion In critically ill patients infected with COVID-19 the incidence of bacterial infections is high and associated with worse outcomes. Regular microbiological surveillance and strict infection control measures are mandated. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s15010-021-01661-2.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess safety and effectiveness of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in patients with refractory bleeding undergoing acute aortic dissection surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Design: Propensity score-matched analysis. Setting: University hospital. Patients: Twenty-three cardiac surgery patients receiving rF-VIIa compared with 23 matched controls. Interventions: An intravenous bolus of rFVIIa (70 mu g/kg) was administered at the end of a complete transfusion protocol. Five patients received rFVIIa in the operating room, and 18 patients received rFVIIa in the intensive care unit. Four of the intensive care unit patients required a second dose. Measurements and Main Results: Blood loss and transfusion requirements were significantly reduced in the period after rFVIIa administration. A highly significant reduction in hourly blood loss was found at -1 hr vs. 0 hrs and 0 hrs vs. 1 hr (-194 and -77.5 mL, respectively; both adjusted p < .001). In addition, significant improvements of international normalized ratio (p < .001), partial thromboplastin time (p < .001), platelet count (p < .001), fibrinogen (p < .001), and antithrombin (p < .001) were detected after rFVIIa administration. The two groups did not differ regarding adverse events. Conclusions: rFVIIa was successfully used as an additional therapy both during and after acute aortic dissection surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, when bleeding was refractory to conventional methods. Randomized studies are necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of rFVIIa in this setting.

Despite the mounting importance of granulocytapheresis (GCAP) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment, its effectiveness in steroid-dependent (SD) and steroid-resistant (SR) patients has not been clearly evaluated. This prospective observational study describes the use of GCAP in SD and SR patients with either Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or Crohn's Disease (CD).118 patients, 83 affected by UC (55 SD and 28 SR) and 35 by CD (22 SD and 13 SR), were treated with GCAP, using Adacolumn™, for 5 consecutive weeks, 1 session/week. All patients were followed for 12 months after the end of GCAP. Clinical remission was defined as Clinical Activity Index (CAI) ≤6 for UC patients and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)150 for CD patients.All patients completed the study; no major complications were reported. At the end of GCAP 71% of UC and 63% of CD patients showed clinical remission. At 6 months the remission was maintained by 66% and 54% of UC and CD patients respectively, while at 12 months the percentages were 48% and 43%, respectively. No differences between SD and SR subgroups were reported at any timepoint. CAI and CDAI values significantly dropped after GCAP treatment and at 6 and 12 months' follow-up (p0.05 vs baseline for both timepoints). No differences were measured in CAI and CDAI between SD and SR patients.GCAP therapy is safe and effective in inducing and maintaining clinical remission both in SD and in SR patients affected by either UC or CD.

It has been extensively demonstrated that an elevated heart rate is a modifiable, independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. A high heart rate increases myocardial oxygen consumption and reduces diastolic perfusion time. It can also increase ventricular diastolic pressures and induce ventricular arrhythmias. Critical care patients are prone to develop a stress induced cardiac impairment and consequently an increase in sympathetic tone. This in turn increases heart rate. In this setting, however, heart rate lowering might be difficult because the effects of inotropic drugs could be hindered by heart rate reducing drugs like beta-blockers. Ivabradine is a new selective antagonist of funny channels. It lowers heart rate, reducing the diastolic depolarization slope. Moreover, ivabradine is not active on sympathetic pathways, thus avoiding any interference with inotropic amines. We reviewed the literature available regarding heart rate control in critical care patients, focusing our interest on the use of ivabradine to assess the potential benefits of the drug in this particular setting.