Search

After the identification of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide (NOP) and its cognate receptor, the unique functional profiles of the N/OFQ-NOP receptor system have been uncovered. NOP receptors are distributed in the key regions that regulate pain and reward processing in the central nervous system. In non-human primates (NHPs), activation of the NOP receptor causes antinociception and anti-hypersensitivity via spinal and supraspinal effects. Moreover, activation of the NOP receptor attenuates dopaminergic transmission and potentiates mu-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor-mediated analgesia. Here, we highlight the functional profiles of bifunctional NOP and MOP receptor agonists based on their promising effects for the treatment of pain and drug abuse. Bifunctional NOP/MOP receptor "partial" agonists, such as AT-121, BU08028, and BU10038, exert potent analgesic effects without MOP receptor-related side effects such as abuse liability, respiratory depression, physical dependence, and itching in NHPs. These novel NOP/MOP receptor agonists reduce rewarding and the reinforcing effects of abused drugs. Furthermore, a mixed NOP/opioid receptor "full" agonist, cebranopadol, is undergoing several clinical trials, and the therapeutic advantage of the coactivation of NOP and MOP receptors has also been confirmed in humans. Therefore, this class of drugs that coactivate NOP and MOP receptors proposes a wide therapeutic range with fewer side effects, indicating a greater potential for the development of novel safer opioid analgesics.

Despite similar distribution patterns and intracellular events observed in the nociceptin/ orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptor and other opioid receptors, NOP receptor activation displays unique pharmacological profiles. Several researchers have identified a variety of peptide and nonpeptide ligands to determine the functional roles of NOP receptor activation and observed that NOP receptor- related ligands exhibit pain modality-dependent pain processing. Importantly, NOP receptor activation results in anti-nociception and anti-hypersensitivity at the spinal and supraspinal levels regardless of the experimental settings in non-human primates (NHPs). Given that the NOP receptor agonists synergistically enhance mu-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor agonist-induced anti-nociception, it has been hypothesized that dual NOP and MOP receptor agonists may display promising functional properties as analgesics. Accumulating evidence indicates that the mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonists demonstrate favorable functional profiles. In NHP studies, bifunctional NOP/MOP partial agonists (e.g., AT-121, BU08028, and BU10038) exerted potent anti-nociception via NOP and MOP receptor activation; however, dose-limiting adverse effects associated with the MOP receptor activation, including respiratory depression, itch sensation, physical dependence, and abuse liability, were not observed. Moreover, a mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonist, cebranopadol, presented promising outcomes in clinical trials as a novel analgesic. Collectively, the dual agonistic actions on NOP and MOP receptors, with appropriate binding affinities and efficacies, may be a viable strategy to develop innovative and safe analgesics.

Following the identification of the nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide (NOP) as an endogenous ligand for the NOP receptor, ample evidence has revealed unique functional profiles of the N/OFQ-NOP receptor system. NOP receptors are expressed in key neural substrates involved in pain and reward modulation. In nonhuman primates (NHPs), NOP receptor activation effectively exerts antinociception and anti-hypersensitivity at the spinal and supraspinal levels. Moreover, NOP receptor activation inhibits dopaminergic transmission and synergistically enhances mu-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor-mediated analgesia. In this article, we have discussed the functional profiles of ligands with dual NOP and MOP receptor agonist activities and highlight their optimal functional efficacy for pain relief and drug abuse treatment. Through coactivation of NOP and MOP receptors, bifunctional NOP/MOP receptor "partial" agonists (e.g., AT-121, BU08028, and BU10038) reveal a wider therapeutic window with fewer side effects. These newly developed ligands potently induce antinociception without MOP receptor agonist-associated side effects such as abuse potential, respiratory depression, itching sensation, and physical dependence. In addition, in both rodent and NHP models, bifunctional NOP/MOP receptor agonists can attenuate reward processing and/or the reinforcing effects of opioids and other abused drugs. While a mixed NOP/opioid receptor "full" agonist cebranopadol is undergoing clinical trials, bifunctional NOP/MOP "partial" agonists exhibit promising therapeutic profiles in translational NHP models for the treatment of pain and opioid abuse. This class of drugs demonstrates the therapeutic advantage of NOP and MOP receptor coactivation, indicating a greater potential for future development.

Background Cebranopadol, a mixed nociceptin/opioid receptor full agonist, can effectively relieve pain in rodents and humans. However, it is unclear to what degree different opioid receptor subtypes contribute to its antinociception and whether cebranopadol lacks acute opioid-associated side effects in primates. The authors hypothesized that coactivation of nociceptin receptors and μ receptors produces analgesia with reduced side effects in nonhuman primates. Methods The antinociceptive, reinforcing, respiratory-depressant, and pruritic effects of cebranopadol in adult rhesus monkeys (n = 22) were compared with μ receptor agonists fentanyl and morphine using assays, including acute thermal nociception, IV drug self-administration, telemetric measurement of respiratory function, and itch-scratching responses. Results Subcutaneous cebranopadol (ED50, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.8 to 4.6] μg/kg) potently produced antinociception compared to fentanyl (15.8 [14.6 to 17.1] μg/kg). Pretreatment with antagonists selective for nociceptin and μ receptors, but not δ and κ receptor antagonists, caused rightward shifts of the antinociceptive dose–response curve of cebranopadol with dose ratios of 2 and 9, respectively. Cebranopadol produced reinforcing effects comparable to fentanyl, but with decreased reinforcing strength, i.e., cebranopadol (mean ± SD, 7 ± 3 injections) versus fentanyl (12 ± 3 injections) determined by a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement. Unlike fentanyl (8 ± 2 breaths/min), systemic cebranopadol at higher doses did not decrease the respiratory rate (17 ± 2 breaths/min). Intrathecal cebranopadol (1 μg) exerted full antinociception with minimal scratching responses (231 ± 137 scratches) in contrast to intrathecal morphine (30 μg; 3,009 ± 1,474 scratches). Conclusions In nonhuman primates, the μ receptor mainly contributed to cebranopadol-induced antinociception. Similar to nociceptin/μ receptor partial agonists, cebranopadol displayed reduced side effects, such as a lack of respiratory depression and pruritus. Although cebranopadol showed reduced reinforcing strength, its detectable reinforcing effects and strength warrant caution, which is critical for the development and clinical use of cebranopadol. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of cebranopadol in two rodent models of visceral pain. Cebranopadol is a first-in-class analgesic with agonist activity at the nociceptin/orphanin FQ opioid peptide receptor and classical µ-, δ- and κ-opioid peptide receptors. Colitis was induced in Naval Medical Research Institute mice by intra-rectal infusion of mustard oil. The effects of intravenous cebranopadol pretreatment on spontaneous pain behaviours and referred allodynia and hyperalgesia were assessed. Pancreatitis was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats by intravenous administration of dibutyltin dichloride. After 6 days, the effects of intravenous cebranopadol on withdrawal reactions to mechanical abdominal stimulation with von Frey filaments were assessed. In mice with experimental colitis, cebranopadol dose-dependently inhibited spontaneous pain behaviours and allodynic and hyperalgesic withdrawal reactions, with half-maximal effective dose values of 4.6 µg/kg [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9-7.9] for inhibition of spontaneous pain behaviours, 2.2 µg/kg (95% CI: 1.3-3.4) for inhibition of referred allodynia and 2.4 µg/kg (95% CI: 1.4-3.6) for inhibition of referred hyperalgesia in mice with colitis. In rats with experimental pancreatitis, cebranopadol dose-dependently inhibited abdominal tactile allodynia (half-maximal effective dose, 0.13 µg/kg; 95% CI: 0.03-0.49). Behavioural manifestations of visceral pain were almost completely abolished at the highest doses tested in mice (17.2 µg/kg, intravenous) and rats (2.4 µg/kg, intravenous). We conclude that cebranopadol is a potent and effective antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic agent in rodent models of visceral pain.

Cebranopadol (CBP) is a novel analgesic acting as agonist at the nociceptin (NOP) and μ-opioid (MOP) receptors, exhibiting high potency and efficacy as an antinociceptive and antihypersensitive drug. The binding conformation and the dynamical interactions of CBP with the NOP receptor have been investigated by molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) in the microsecond time scale, and hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM). CBP binds to the NOP receptor as a bidentate ligand of the aspartate D1303,32 by means of both its fluoroindole and dimethyl nitrogens. Starting from the known crystal structure of the inactive state of the receptor, in complex with the antagonist compound-24 (NOP-C24) the comparative analysis of 1 μs MD trajectories of the NOP-C24 complex itself and the NOP_free and NOP-CBP complexes provides new insights on the already known microswitches related to receptor activation, in the frame of the extended ternary complex model. The agonist acts by destabilizing the inactive c...

Background Cebranopadol is a nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide/opioid receptor agonist with central antinociceptive activity. We hypothesize that this novel mechanism of action may lead to a lower risk of abuse compared with pure μ-opioid peptide receptor agonists. Methods We conducted a single-dose, nested-randomized, double-blind crossover study in nondependent recreational opioid users to evaluate the abuse potential of single doses of cebranopadol relative to hydromorphone immediate release and placebo. The study consisted of a qualification phase and a 7-period treatment phase (cebranopadol 200, 400, and 800 μg; hydromorphone 8 and 16 mg; and 2 placebos). The primary end point was the peak effect of drug liking at this moment, measured by visual analog scale (VAS). Various secondary end points (eg, VAS rating for good drug effects, high, bad drug effects, take drug again, drug similarity, and pupillometry) were also investigated. Results Forty-two subjects completed the study. Cebranopadol 200 and 400 μg did not differentiate from placebo on the abuse potential assessments and generated smaller responses than hydromorphone. Responses observed with cebranopadol 800 μg were similar to hydromorphone 8 mg and smaller than hydromorphone 16 mg. The maximum effect for VAS drug liking at this moment was delayed compared with hydromorphone (3 and 1.5 hours, respectively). Cebranopadol administration was safe; no serious adverse events or study discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events occurred. Conclusions These results confirm our hypothesis that cebranopadol, a nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide/opioid receptor agonist, has lower abuse potential than hydromorphone immediate release, a pure μ-opioid peptide agonist.

Cebranopadol is a novel, centrally acting, potent, first-in-class analgesic drug candidate with a unique mode of action that combines nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor and opioid peptide receptor agonism. The present study aimed to develop and validate a novel UHPLC-MS/MS method to quantify cebranopadol in rabbit plasma and to assess its pharmacokinetics in rabbits after subcutaneous (s.c.) administration. Twelve adult females were administered with 200 µg/kg s.c. injection. Blood samples were withdrawn at 15, 30 and 45 min and 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hr after administration. The plasma samples were extracted with a liquid/liquid extraction. The new analytical method complied with the EMA requirements for the bioanalytical method validation. The method was selective, repeatable, accurate, precise and robust with a lower limit of quantification of 0.1 ng/ml. In all the rabbits, cebranopadol was quantifiable from 0.25 to 10 hr. Mean Cmax and Tmax were 871 ng/ml and 0.25 hr, respectively. Further studies including the i.v. administration are necessary to fully evaluate the pharmacokinetic features of this novel active compound.

Opioids are complex drugs that produce profit (most importantly analgesia) as well as a myriad of adverse effects including gastrointestinal motility disturbances, abuse and addiction, sedation and potentially lethal respiratory depression (RD). Consequently, opioid treatment requires careful evaluation in terms of benefit on the one hand and harm on the other. Considering benefit and harm from an economic perspective, opioid treatment should lead to profit maximization with decision theory defining utility as (profit - loss). We here focus on the most devastating opioid adverse effect, RD and define opioid utility U = P(benefit) - P(harm), where P(benefit) is the probability of opioid-induced analgesia and P(harm) the probability of opioid-induced RD. Other utility functions are also discussed including the utility U = P(benefit AND NOT harm), the most wanted opioid effect, i.e., analgesia without RD, and utility surfaces, which depict the continuum of probabilities of presence or absence of analgesia in combination with the presence or absence of RD. Utility functions are constructed from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data sets, although pragmatic utility functions may be constructed when pharmacokinetic data are not available. We here discuss utilities of several opioids including the partial mu-opioid-receptor agonist buprenorphine, the full opioid receptor agonists fentanyl and alfentanil, and the bifunctional opioid cebranopadol, which acts at mu-opioid and nociception/orphanin FQ-receptors. We argue that utility functions give clinicians the opportunity to make an informed decision when opioid analgesics are needed for pain relief, in which opioids with a positive utility function are preferred over opioids with negative functions. Furthermore, utility functions of subpopulations will give an extra insight as a utility functions measured in one subgroup (e.g., patients with postoperative pain, good opioid responders) may not be mirrored in other patient subgroups ( e.g., neuropathic pain patients, poor opioid responders).

Cebranopadol is known as a highly potent analgesic. Recent studies also demonstrated that administration of cebranopadol significantly decreased cocaine self-administration and significantly reduced cue-induced cocaine-seeking behaviors in rats. However, it was unclear whether these interesting behavioral observations are related to any potential effects of cebranopadol on cocaine pharmacokinetics or cocaine-induced hyperactivity. In principle, a promising therapeutic candidate for cocaine dependence treatment may alter the cocaine pharmacokinetics and/or attenuate cocaine-induced reward and hyperactivity and, thus, decrease cocaine self-administration and reduce cue-induced cocaine-seeking behaviors. In this study, we examined possible effects of cebranopadol on cocaine pharmacokinetics and cocaine-induced hyperactivity for the first time. According to our animal data in rats, cebranopadol did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of cocaine. According to our more extensive locomotor activity testing data, cebranopadol itself also dose-dependently induced hyperactivity in rats at doses higher than 50 µg/kg. Cebranopadol at a low dose of 25 µg/kg (p.o.) did not induce significant hyperactivity itself, but significantly potentiated cocaine-induced hyperactivity on Days 4 to 7 after the repeated daily dosing of the drug.

Background: Cebranopadol is a potent, first-in-class analgesic with a novel mechanistic approach combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) and opioid peptide receptor agonism. Objective: We aim to evaluate, for the first time, the analgesic efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cebranopadol in patients suffering from moderate to severe acute pain following bunionectomy. Study Design: We conducted a phase IIa, randomized, multi-center, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel group clinical trial. Methods: A total of 258 patients who underwent a primary bunionectomy were randomly assigned to receive a single oral administration of cebranopadol 200 μg, 400 μg, or 600 μg, morphine controlledrelease (CR) 60 mg, or placebo. The primary efficacy end-point was the sum of pain intensity (SPI) 2 to 10 hours (SPI2–10) after the first investigational medicinal product (IMP) intake time-point. Results: Cebranopadol doses of 400 µg and 600 µg were more effective in reducing postoperative acute pain compared to placebo, from 2 hours until approximately 22 hours after the first IMP intake time-point. No difference was observed between cebranopadol 200 μg and placebo. Per the subject global impression of the IMP assessment, patients who received cebranopadol 400 μg and 600 μg were more satisfied with the ability of the medication to treat their pain compared to those who received morphine CR 60 mg. On the primary end-point, the effect of morphine CR 60 mg was smaller than that of cebranopadol 400 μg and 600 μg. However, the analgesic effect of morphine CR 60 mg emerged later relative to IMP intake, as shown by the fact that similar SPI results as seen for cebranopadol 400 μg and 600 μg were obtained for later time windows. Cebranopadol treatment was safe, and single-dose administrations of 400 µg were better tolerated than morphine CR 60 mg. The relative frequency of patients with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) increased with increasing cebranopadol doses and was highest in the morphine CR 60 mg group. Limitation: Although a double-dummy design was used to ensure blinding, a limitation of this trial was that cebranopadol and morphine CR were administered at 2 different time-points post-surgery, given the anticipated difference in the time to reach the maximum plasma concentration between the 2 treatments. Conclusion: Administration of single cebranopadol doses of 400 µg and 600 µg induced more effective analgesia following bunionectomy surgery compared to the traditional opioid morphine on the primary end-point (SPI2–10), while both cebranopadol doses and morphine ensured adequate 24- hour pain relief. Moreover, cebranopadol was better tolerated and received a better overall rating by the patients. Key words: Opioids, morphine, µ-opioid receptor, nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor, analgesic, bunionectomy, surgery, post-operative pain, single hallux valgus repair

The novel potent analgesic cebranopadol is an agonist at nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) and classical opioid receptors, with the highest in-vitro activity at NOP and mu-opioid peptide (MOP) receptors, and somewhat lower activity at kappa-opioid peptide (KOP) and delta-opioid peptide (DOP) receptors. We addressed the question of which of these pharmacological activities contribute to the stimulus properties of cebranopadol using a rat drug discrimination procedure. First, cebranopadol was tested in generalization tests against a morphine cue, including receptor-specific antagonism. Second, cebranopadol was established as a cue, and MOP, NOP, KOP and DOP receptor-selective agonists were tested in generalization tests. Third, cebranopadol in combination with receptor-selective antagonists was tested against the cebranopadol cue. Cebranopadol generalized to the morphine cue. Full generalization was only seen at clearly supra-analgesic doses. The effect of cebranopadol was reduced by naloxone, but was enhanced by the NOP receptor antagonist J-113397. In cebranopadol-trained rats, cebranopadol as well as morphine produced generalization. A NOP receptor agonist did not, while a DOP receptor agonist and a KOP receptor agonist weakly generalized to the cebranopadol cue. Conversely, generalization of cebranopadol was reduced by naloxone and J-113397, but not by a DOP or a KOP receptor antagonist. These results suggest a contribution of MOP receptor activity and a relative lack of contribution of DOP and KOP receptor activity to cebranopadol's stimulus properties. The findings regarding the contribution of NOP receptor activity were equivocal, but interestingly, the morphine-like stimulus property of cebranopadol appears to be reduced by its intrinsic NOP receptor activity.

Background Cebranopadol (a.k.a. GRT-6005) is a dually acting nociceptin/orphanin FQ and opioid receptor agonist that has been recently developed in Phase 2 clinical trials for painful diabetic neuropathy or cancer pain. It also showed analgesic properties in various rat models of pain and had a better safety profile as compared to equi-analgesic doses of morphine. Since antinociceptive properties of cebranopadol have been studied mainly in rat models, in the present study, we assessed analgesic activity of subcutaneous cebranopadol (10 mg/kg) in various mouse pain models. Methods We used models of acute, tonic, and chronic pain induced by thermal and chemical stimuli, with a particular emphasis on pharmacoresistant chronic neuropathic pain evoked by oxaliplatin in which cebranopadol was used alone or in combination with simvastatin. Key results As shown in the hot plate test, the analgesic activity of cebranopadol developed more slowly as compared to morphine (90–120 min vs. 60 min). Cebranopadol displayed a significant antinociceptive activity in acute pain models, i.e., the hot plate, writhing, and capsaicin tests. It attenuated nocifensive responses in both phases of the formalin test and reduced cold allodynia in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain model. Its efficacy was similar to that of morphine. Used in combination and administered simultaneously, 4 or 6 h after simvastatin, cebranopadol did not potentiate antiallodynic activity of this cholesterol-lowering drug. Cebranopadol did not induce any motor deficits in the rotarod test. Conclusion Cebranopadol may have significant potential for the treatment of various pain types, including inflammatory and chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.

Cebranopadol is a novel potent analgesic agonist at the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) and classical opioid receptors. As NOP receptor activation has been shown to reduce side effects related to the activation of μ-opioid peptide (MOP) receptors, the present study evaluated opioid-type physical dependence produced by cebranopadol in mice and rats. In a naloxone-precipitated withdrawal assay in mice, a regimen of seven escalating doses of cebranopadol over 2 days produced only very limited physical dependence as evidenced by very little withdrawal symptoms (jumping) even at cebranopadol doses clearly exceeding the analgesic dose range. In contrast, mice showed clear withdrawal symptoms when treated with morphine within the analgesic dose range. In the rat, spontaneous withdrawal (by cessation of drug treatment; in terms of weight loss and behavioral score) was studied after 4-week subacute administration. Naloxone-precipitated withdrawal (in terms of weight loss and behavioral score) was studied in the same groups of rats after 1-week re-administration following the spontaneous withdrawal period. In both tests, cebranopadol-treated rats showed only few signs of withdrawal, while withdrawal effects in rats treated with morphine were clearly evident. These findings demonstrate a low potential of cebranopadol to produce opioid-type physical dependence in rodents. The prospect of this promising finding into the clinical setting remains to be established.

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) modulates several biological functions, including pain transmission via selective activation of a specific receptor named NOP. The aim of this study was the investigation of the antinociceptive properties of NOP agonists and their interaction with opioids in the trigeminal territory. The orofacial formalin (OFF) test in mice was used to investigate the antinociceptive potential associated to the activation of NOP and opioid receptors. Mice subjected to OFF test displayed the typical biphasic nociceptive response and sensitivity to opioid and NSAID drugs. Mice knockout for the NOP gene displayed a robust pronociceptive phenotype. The NOP selective agonist Ro 65-6570 (0.1-1mgkg-1) and morphine (0.1-10mgkg-1) elicited dose dependent antinociceptive effects in the OFF with the alkaloid showing larger effects; the isobologram analysis of their actions demonstrated an additive type of interaction. The mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonist cebranopadol elicited potent (0.01-0.1mgkg-1) and robust antinociceptive effects. In the investigated dose range, all drugs did not modify the motor performance of the mice in the rotarod test. Collectively the results of this study demonstrated that selective NOP agonists and particularly mixed NOP/opioid agonists are worthy of development as innovative drugs to treat painful conditions of the trigeminal territory.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Cebranopadol, a novel first-in-class combination of nociceptin/orphanin FQ and opioid peptide receptor agonism, as a potential treatment for moderate to severe chronic low back pain., Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common condition, usually with the involvement of nociceptive and neuropathic pain components, high economic burden and impact on quality of life. Cebranopadol is a potent, first-in-class drug candidate with a novel mechanistic approach, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. We conducted the first phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial, evaluating the analgesic efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cebranopadol in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic LBP with and without neuropathic pain component. Patients were treated for 14 weeks with cebranopadol 200, 400, or 600 μg once daily, tapentadol 200 mg twice daily, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline pain to the weekly average 24-hour pain during the entire 12 weeks and during week 12 of the maintenance phase. Cebranopadol demonstrated analgesic efficacy, with statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements over placebo for all doses as did tapentadol. The responder analysis (≥30% or ≥50% pain reduction) confirmed these results. Cebranopadol and tapentadol displayed beneficial effects on sleep and functionality. Cebranopadol treatment was safe, with higher doses leading to higher treatment discontinuations because of treatment–emergent adverse events occurring mostly during titration. Those patients reaching the target doses had an acceptable tolerability profile. The incidence rate of most frequently reported treatment–emergent adverse events during maintenance phase was ≤10%. Although further optimizing the titration scheme to the optimal dose for individual patients is essential, cebranopadol is a new drug candidate with a novel mechanistic approach for potential chronic LBP treatment.

Cebranopadol is a novel first-in-class analgesic acting as a nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonist with central analgesic activity. It is currently in clinical development for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. This trial focuses on the clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of cebranopadol after oral single- and multiple-dose administration. The basic PK properties of cebranopadol were assessed by means of noncompartmental methods in six phase I clinical trials in healthy subjects and patients. A population PK analysis included two further phase I and six phase II clinical trials. After oral administration of the immediate-release (IR) formulation, cebranopadol is characterized by a late time to reach maximum plasma concentration [C max] (4–6 h), a long half-value duration [HVD] (14–15 h), and a terminal phase half-life in the range of 62–96 h. After multiple once-daily dosing in patients, an operational half-life (the dosing interval resulting in an accumulation factor [AF] of 2) of 24 h was found to be the relevant factor to describe the multiple-dose PKs of cebranopadol. The time to reach steady state was approximately 2 weeks, the AF was approximately 2, and peak-trough fluctuation (PTF) was low (70–80%). Dose proportionality at steady state was shown for a broad dose range of cebranopadol 200–1600 µg. A two-compartment disposition model with two lagged transition compartments and a first-order elimination process best describes cebranopadol data in healthy subjects and patients after single- and multiple-dose administration. Cebranopadol formulated as an IR product can be used as a once-daily formulation; it reaches C max after only 4–6 h, and has a long HVD and a low PTF. Therefore, from a PK perspective, cebranopadol is an attractive treatment option for patients with chronic pain.

Classical opioid analgesics, including morphine, mediate all of their desired and undesired effects by specific activation of the μ‐opioid receptor (μ receptor). The use of morphine for treating chronic pain, however, is limited by the development of constipation, respiratory depression, tolerance and dependence. Analgesic effects can also be mediated through other members of the opioid receptor family such as the κ‐opioid receptor (κ receptor), δ‐opioid receptor (δ receptor) and the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor (NOP receptor). Currently, a new generation of opioid analgesics is being developed that can simultaneously bind with high affinity to multiple opioid receptors. With this new action profile, it is hoped that additional analgesic effects and fewer side effects can be achieved. Recent research is mainly focused on the development of bifunctional μ/NOP receptor agonists, which has already led to novel lead structures such as the spiroindole‐based cebranopadol and a compound class with a piperidin‐4‐yl‐1,3‐dihydroindol‐2‐one backbone (SR16835/AT‐202 and SR14150/AT‐200). In addition, the ornivol BU08028 is an analogue of the clinically well‐established buprenorphine. Moreover, the morphinan‐based nalfurafine exerts its effect with a dominant κ receptor‐component and is therefore utilized in the treatment of pruritus. The very potent dihydroetorphine is a true multi‐receptor opioid ligand in that it binds to μ, κ and δ receptors. The main focus of this review is to assess the paradigm of opioid ligands targeting multiple receptors with a single chemical entity. We reflect on this rationale by discussing the biological actions of particular multi‐opioid receptor ligands, but not on their medicinal chemistry and design. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Emerging Areas of Opioid Pharmacology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.14/issuetoc

Background Cebranopadol is a first-in-class analgesic with agonist activity at classic opioid peptide receptors and the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor. The authors compared the antinociceptive and respiratory depressant effects of cebranopadol and the classic opioid fentanyl and used selective antagonists to provide the first mechanistic evidence of the contributions of the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and μ-opioid peptide receptors to cebranopadol’s respiratory side-effect profile. Methods Antinociception was assessed in male Sprague–Dawley rats using the low-intensity tail-flick model (n = 10 per group). Arterial blood gas tensions (Paco2 and Pao2) were measured over time in samples from unrestrained, conscious rats after intravenous administration of cebranopadol or fentanyl (n = 6 per group). Results The ED50 for peak antinociceptive effect in the tail-flick model was 7.4 μg/kg for cebranopadol (95% CI, 6.6 to 8.2 μg/kg) and 10.7 μg/kg for fentanyl citrate (9 to 12.7 μg/kg). Fentanyl citrate increased Paco2 levels to 45 mmHg (upper limit of normal range) at 17.6 μg/kg (95% CI, 7.6 to 40.8 μg/kg) and to greater than 50 mmHg at doses producing maximal antinociception. In contrast, with cebranopadol, Paco2 levels remained less than 35 mmHg up to doses producing maximal antinociception. The nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor antagonist J-113397 potentiated the respiratory depressant effects of cebranopadol; these changes in Paco2 and Pao2 were fully reversible with the μ-opioid peptide receptor antagonist naloxone. Conclusions The therapeutic window between antinociception and respiratory depression in rats is larger for cebranopadol than that for fentanyl because the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor agonist action of cebranopadol counteracts side effects resulting from its μ-opioid peptide receptor agonist action.

Context Pain is one of the most prevalent symptoms associated with cancer. Strong opioids are commonly used in the analgesic management of the disease, but carry the risk of severe side effects. Cebranopadol is a first-in-class drug candidate, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. For cancer patients, frequently experiencing multimorbidities and often exposed to polypharmacy, cebranopadol is easy to handle given its once-daily dosing, the small tablet size that enables swallowing, and the option to flexibly titrate to an effective dose. Objectives We assessed the safety and tolerability of prolonged treatment with oral cebranopadol for up to 26 weeks in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. Methods This was a non-randomized, multi-site, open-label, single-arm clinical trial with patients who had completed a double-blind trial comparing morphine prolonged release with cebranopadol. In this extension trial, patients were treated with oral cebranopadol for up to 26 weeks. Results Cebranopadol was safe and well tolerated in patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain related to cancer in the dose range tested (200–1000 μg once daily). The median and mean pain levels remained in the range of mild pain during the treatment period. Conclusion Our data suggest that cebranopadol was safe and well tolerated when administered for up to 26 weeks in patients with chronic cancer-related pain who were previously treated with cebranopadol or morphine prolonged release.

Cebranopadol is a mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonist currently under development as innovative analgesic. In this study the liability of cebranopadol to produce opioid-type physical dependence has been evaluated in comparison with morphine in wild type mice and in mice knockout for the NOP receptor gene (NOP(-/-)). Mice were treated twice a day for 5 days with increasing doses of cebranopadol or morphine (cumulative doses 10.2 and 255 mg/kg, respectively) and the number of jumping in response to naloxone 10 mg/kg were measured after 2 h from the last injection. In wild type mice naloxone evoked a similar withdrawal jumping behavior in animal pretreated with morphine or cebranopadol. In NOP(-/-) mice morphine treatment produced the same signs of withdrawal as in NOP(+/+) animals, while cebranopadol treatment elicited a stronger withdrawal syndrome in NOP(-/-) than of NOP(+/+) mice. These results demonstrated that the activation of the NOP receptor reduces the liability of cebranopadol to produce opioid-like physical dependence. Thus, the simultaneous activation of NOP and opioid receptors can be an effective pharmacological strategy to counteract physical dependence to opioid drugs.

Cebranopadol is a novel first-in-class analgesic with highly potent agonistic activity at nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) and opioid receptors. It is highly potent and efficacious across a broad range of preclinical pain models. Its side effect profile is better compared to typical opioids. Mechanistic studies have shown that cebranopadol's activity at NOP receptors contributes to its anti-hyperalgesic effects while ameliorating some of its opioid-type side effects, including respiratory depression and abuse potential. Phase II of clinical development has been completed, demonstrating efficacy and good tolerability in acute and chronic pain conditions.This article focusses on reviewing data on the preclinical in vitro and in vivo pharmacology, safety, and tolerability, as well as clinical trials with cebranopadol.

SummaryWhat is known and objective Chronic pain presents a difficult clinical challenge because of the limited efficacy, the limiting adverse-effect profile or the abuse potential of current analgesic options. Cebranopadol is a novel new agent in clinical trials that combines dual agonist action at opioid and nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptors. It is the first truly unique, centrally acting analgesic in several years. We here review the basic and clinical pharmacology of cebranopadol. Methods Published literature and Internet sources were searched to identify information related to the basic science (pharmacology and medicinal chemistry) and development (clinical trial) information on the mechanism of dual opioid and NOP receptor pharmacologic action in general, and for cebranopadol in particular. The identified sources were reviewed and the information synthesized. Results The preclinical testing of cebranopadol has characterized it as a dual opioid and NOP receptor agonist that displays antinociceptive and antihyperalgesic action in a variety of acute and chronic pain models in animals. Unlike most current traditional opioids, it is generally more potent against neuropathic than nociceptive pain. Several phase 2 clinical trials have been completed. What is new and conclusion Despite the medical need, a truly novel centrally acting analgesic has not been developed in many years. Cebranopadol represents a truly novel mechanistic approach. Its actual place in pain pharmacotherapy awaits the results of phase 3 clinical trials.

As a novel first-in-class potent analgesic acting as an agonist of multiple opioid receptors, cebranopadol showed high efficacy and good tolerability in a broad range of preclinical models and clinical trials related to pain. In the present study, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cebranopadol as a potential treatment of cocaine dependence, we tested the effects of cebranopadol with single and repeated doses (25, 50, 75, or 100 μg/kg, oral gavage) using rat models of cocaine fixed-ratio (FR) self-administration (SA), cocaine progressive-ratio (PR) SA, and sucrose pellet SA. In single-dosing treatment paradigm, cebranopadol significantly and dose-dependently reduced cocaine SA under FR and PR schedules and suppressed food intake under FR schedule without causing apparent side effects. In repeated-dosing treatment scheme, i.e. daily administration of 25, 50, 75, or 100 μg/kg cebranopadol for a week, the similar reduction in cocaine intake was detected, while non-negligible complications/side effects were observed at repeated high doses (75 and 100 μg/kg). The observed side effects were similar to the common toxic signs elicited by heroin at high doses, although cebranopadol did not fully substitute heroin's discriminative stimulant effects in our drug discriminative tests. These results demonstrated that the most appropriate oral dose of cebranopadol to balance the efficacy and safety is 50 μg/kg. Collectively, although cebranopadol may serve as a new treatment for cocaine dependence, more consideration, cautiousness, and a clear optimal dose window to dissociate its therapeutic effects from opioid side effects/complications in male and female subjects will be necessary to increase its practical clinical utility.

Summary Analgesic design and evaluation have been driven by the desire to create high-affinity high-selectivity mu (μ)-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor agonists. Such ligands are the mainstay of current clinical practice, and include morphine and fentanyl. Advances in this sphere have come from designing pharmacokinetic advantage, as in rapid metabolism for remifentanil. These produce analgesia, but also the adverse-effect profile that currently defines this drug class: ventilatory depression, tolerance, and abuse liability. The MOP receptor is part of a family, and there are significant functional interactions between other members of the family (delta [δ]-opioid peptide [DOP], kappa [κ]-opioid peptide [KOP], and nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor [NOP]). Experimentally, MOP agonism and DOP antagonism produce anti-nociception (animals) with no tolerance, and low doses of MOP and NOP ligands synergise to antinociceptive advantage. In this latter context, the lack of effect of NOP agonists on ventilation is an additional advantage. Recent development has been to move towards low-selectivity multifunctional ‘mixed ligands', such as cebranopadol, or ligand mixtures, such as Targinact®. Moreover, the observation that β-arrestin coupling underlies the side-effect profile for MOP ligands (from knockout animal studies) led to the discovery of biased (to G-protein and away from β-arrestin intracellular signalling) MOP ligands, such as oliceridine. There is sufficient excitement in the opioid field to suggest that opioid analgesics without significant side-effects may be on the horizon, and the ‘opioid Holy Grail' might be in reach.

Cebranopadol (trans‐6′‐fluoro‐4′,9′‐dihydro‐N,N‐dimethyl‐4‐phenyl‐spiro[cyclohexane‐1,1′(3′H)‐pyrano[3,4‐b]indol]‐4‐amine) is a novel analgesic nociceptin/orphanin FQ opioid peptide (NOP) and classical opioid receptor (MOP, DOP, and KOP) agonist with highly efficacious and potent activity in a broad range of rodent models of nociceptive, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain as well as limited opioid‐type side effects such as respiratory depression. This study was designed to explore contribution and interaction of NOP and classical opioid receptor agonist components to cebranopadol analgesia in the rat spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model. Assessing antihypersensitive activity in SNL rats intraperitoneal (IP) administration of cebranopadol resulted in ED 50 values of 3.3 and 3.58 μg/kg in two independent experiments. Pretreatment (IP) with J‐113397 (4.64 mg/kg) a selective antagonist for the NOP receptor or naloxone (1 mg/kg), naltrindole (10 mg/kg), or nor‐BNI (10 mg/kg), selective antagonists for MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors, yielded ED 50 values of 14.1, 16.9, 17.3, and 15 μg/kg, respectively. This 4‐5 fold rightward shift of the dose‐response curves suggested agonistic contribution of all four receptors to the analgesic activity of cebranopadol. Combined pretreatment with a mixture of the antagonists for the three classical opioid receptors resulted in an 18‐fold potency shift with an ED 50 of 65.5 μg/kg. The concept of dose equivalence was used to calculate the expected additive effects of the parent compound for NOP and opioid receptor contribution and to compare them with the observed effects, respectively. This analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the expected additive and the observed effects suggesting intrinsic synergistic analgesic interaction of the NOP and the classical opioid receptor components of cebranopadol. Together with the observation of limited respiratory depression in rats and humans the synergistic interaction of NOP and classical opioid receptor components in analgesia described in the current study may contribute to the favorable therapeutic index of cebranopadol observed in clinical trials.

The recent dramatic increase in intentional and unintentional deaths attributed to opioids has refocused attention on the therapeutic ratio (risk-benefit ratio) of opioid analgesics. Almost all traditional opioid analgesics produce their effects (therapeutic and adverse) via the activation of μ-opioid receptor (MOR) pathways. It is therefore important to examine the question of whether this natural endogenous pathway can still be activated, but with greater safety. Areas covered: Other comprehensive reviews have focused on pharmacokinetic (e.g. peripheral restriction) and pharmacodynamic (e.g. functional selectivity, biased ligand) approaches. Herein, the authors focus on a different approach, specifically, multi-mechanistic 'atypical opioids' that synergistically combines MOR activation plus one or more non-opioid mechanism of analgesic action. Expert opinion: Four 'atypical opioid' analgesics on the market act as μ-opioid receptor pathway agonists but have a non-opioid mechanism of action that significantly contributes to the analgesic effect. The multi-mechanistic action of these products confers particular clinical utility in that they provide effective analgesia with relatively lower opioid load, and they are generally associated with fewer or less severe opioid-related adverse effects and less abuse compared to traditional opioid analgesics.