Schasfoort, F.C. (Fabiënne), Dallmeijer, A.J. (Annet), Pangalila, R.F. (Robert), Catsman, C. (Coriene), Stam, H.J. (Henk), Becher, J.G. (Jules), Steyerberg, E.W. (Ewout), Polinder, S. (Suzanne), Bussmann, J.B.J. (Hans), Horemans, H.L.D. (Herwin), Sneekes, E.M. (E.), Bolster, E. (Eline), Viola, I. (Irma), Beek, K. (Karlijn) van, Verheijden, J.M.A. (Johannes), Schasfoort, F.C. (Fabiënne), Dallmeijer, A.J. (Annet), Pangalila, R.F. (Robert), Catsman, C. (Coriene), Stam, H.J. (Henk), Becher, J.G. (Jules), Steyerberg, E.W. (Ewout), Polinder, S. (Suzanne), Bussmann, J.B.J. (Hans), Horemans, H.L.D. (Herwin), Sneekes, E.M. (E.), Bolster, E. (Eline), Viola, I. (Irma), Beek, K. (Karlijn) van, and Verheijden, J.M.A. (Johannes)
Objective: Despite the widespread use of botulinum toxin in ambulatory children with spastic cerebral palsy, its value prior to intensive physiotherapy with adjunctive casting/orthoses remains unclear. Design: A pragmatically designed, multi-centre trial, comparing the effectiveness of botulinum toxin + intensive physiotherapy with intensive physiotherapy alone, including economic evaluation. Subjects/patients: Children with spastic cerebral palsy, age range 4-12 years, cerebral palsy-severity Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I- III, received either botulinum toxin type A + intensive physiotherapy or intensive physiotherapy alone and, if necessary, ankle-foot orthoses and/or casting. Methods: Primary outcomes were gross motor function, physical activity levels, and health-related quality-of-life, assessed at baseline, 12 (primary end-point) and 24 weeks (follow-up). Economic outcomes included healthcare and patient costs. Intention- to-treat analyses were performed with linear mixed models. Results: There were 65 participants (37 males), with a mean age of 7.3 years (standard deviation 2.3 years), equally distributed across Gross Motor Function Classification System levels. Forty-one children received botulinum toxin type A plus intensive physiotherapy and 24 received intensive physiotherapy treatment only. At primary end-point, one statistically significant difference was found in favour of intensive physiotherapy alone: objectively measured percentage of sedentary behaviour (-3.42, 95% confidence interval 0.20-6.64, p = 0.0