Search

BackgroundResearching the murine epigenome in disease models has been hampered by the lack of an appropriate and cost-effective DNA methylation array. Until recently, investigators have been limited to the relatively expensive and analysis intensive bisulphite sequencing methods. Here, we performed a comprehensive, comparative analysis between the new Mouse Methylation BeadChip (MMB) and reduced representation bisulphite sequencing (RRBS) in two murine models of colorectal carcinogenesis, providing insight into the utility to each platforms in a real world environment.ResultsWe captured 1.47×106 CpGs by RRBS and 2.64×105 CpGs by MMB, mapping to 13,778 and 13,365 CpG islands, respectively. RRBS captured significantly more CpGs per island (median 41 for RRBS versus 2 for MMB). We found that 64.4% of intra-island CpG methylation variability can be captured by measuring approximately one quarter of CpG island (CGI) CpGs. MMB was more precise in measuring DNA methylation, especially at sites that had low RRBS coverage. This impacted differential methylation analysis, with more statistically significantly differentially methylated CpG sites identified by MMB in all experimental conditions, however the difference was minute when appropriate thresholding for the magnitude of methylation change (0.2 beta value difference) was applied, providing confidence that both techniques can identify similar differential DNA methylation. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of differentially hypermethylated gene promoters identified similar biological processes and pathways by both RRBS and MMB across two murine model systems.ConclusionMMB is an effective tool for profiling the murine methylome that performs comparably to RRBS, identifying similar differentially methylated pathways. Although MMB captures a similar proportion of CpG islands, it does so with fewer CpGs per island. We show that subsampling informative CpGs from CpG islands is an appropriate strategy to capture whole island variation. Choice of technology is experiment dependent and will be predicated on the underlying biology being probed.

PurposeRegorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Previous studies have suggested that combining kinase inhibitors with aspirin may improve patient outcomes. We aimed to determine the effects of aspirin and regorafenib combination treatment in preclinical models of colorectal cancer.Experimental DesignSW480, RKO and LIM1215 colorectal cancer cell lines were treated with aspirin and regorafenib to determine effects on proliferation and cytotoxicity. RNA sequencing and Western blotting were performed to explore underlying molecular effects. Aspirin and regorafenib combination treatment was also tested using organoids derived from three human colorectal cancer tissue specimens. For the in vivo study, SW480-derived tumors were established in athymic mice. Tumor volume was measured during treatment with aspirin and regorafenib, followed by immunohistochemical staining for markers of proliferation and apoptosis.ResultsAspirin and regorafenib synergistically inhibited proliferation of colorectal cancer cell lines and patient-derived organoids, irrespective of KRAS or BRAF mutation status. This was associated with inhibition of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway and activation of the AMPK pathway. Aspirin and regorafenib effectively inhibited growth of microsatellite stable KRAS-mutant SW480-derived tumors in vivo. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki67 and cleaved caspase 3 showed that combination treatment elicited a synergistic anti-proliferative effect, in addition to a pro-apoptotic effect that was driven by regorafenib.ConclusionsAspirin and regorafenib demonstrate synergistic anti-proliferative effects in preclinical models of colorectal cancer. This suggests that combining regorafenib with aspirin may be an improved treatment strategy for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The current treatment landscape includes chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. A key challenge to improving patient outcomes is the significant inter-patient heterogeneity in treatment response. Tumour organoids derived from the patients’ tumours via surgically resected or endoscopically biopsied tissue, have emerged as promising models for personalised medicine. This review synthesises the findings, to date, of studies which have explored the efficacy of ex vivo organoid sensitivity testing for predicting treatment response. Most studies have focused on predicting the response to standard-of-care radiotherapy and chemotherapy options. There is strong evidence to support organoid sensitivity testing of ionising radiation, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan, and to a lesser extent, oxaliplatin and TAS-102. Fewer studies have used organoids to identify patients who are likely to benefit from novel treatment options that otherwise remain in clinical trials. This review also summarises recent advancements in organoid culture to include non-epithelial components of the tumour microenvironment, to allow testing of immunotherapy and certain targeted therapy options. Overall, further prospective trials will support the implementation of organoid-based personalised medicine for colorectal cancer patients in the future.

Researching the murine epigenome in disease models has been hampered by the lack of appropriate and cost-effective DNA methylation arrays. Here we perform a comprehensive, comparative analysis between the Mouse Methylation BeadChip (MMB) and reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) in two murine models of colorectal carcinogenesis. We evaluate the coverage, variability, and ability to identify differential DNA methylation of RRBS and MMB. We show that MMB is an effective tool for profiling the murine methylome that performs comparably with RRBS, identifying similar differentially methylated pathways. Although choice of technology is experiment dependent and will be predicated on the underlying biology being probed, these analyses provide insights into the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

The BRAF oncogene is an integral component of the MAP kinase pathway, and an activating V600E mutation occurs in 15% of sporadic colorectal cancer. This is an early event in serrated pathway tumourigenesis, and the BRAF V600E has been commonly associated with the CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability (MSI), and a consistent clinical presentation including a proximal location and predilection for elderly females. A proportion of the BRAF mutant lesions remain as microsatellite stable (MSS), and in contrast to the MSI cancers, they have an aggressive phenotype and correlate with poor patient outcomes. Recent studies have found that they have clinical and molecular features of both the BRAF mutant/MSI and the conventional BRAF wild-type cancers and comprise a distinct colorectal cancer subgroup. This review highlights the importance of the BRAF mutation occurring in colorectal cancer stratified for molecular background and discusses its prognostic and clinical significance.