Search

Acalabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated greater selectivity and improved safety versus ibrutinib in a head-to-head trial in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. In the R/R marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) cohort (phase 2) of a phase 1b/2 trial (NCT02180711), 43 patients with MZL and at least one prior therapy received acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity [median age 69 years (range 42-84); median one (1-4) prior systemic regimens]. Median follow-up was 13.3 months (range 0.5-45.5). Among 40 patients evaluable for response, investigator-assessed overall response rate was 53% [95% confidence interval (CI) 36%-69%] with five (13%) complete responses. Tumour reduction occurred in 40 (93%) of the treated patients. Median time to response was 2.9 months (median duration of response not estimable). Estimated median progression-free survival (PFS) was 27.4 months (12-month PFS rate, 67%). Five patients died (disease progression, n = 4; septic shock, n = 1). Seventeen patients (40%) had grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (14%), anaemia, dyspnoea (7% each), fatigue and thrombocytopenia (5% each). Hypertension occurred in 5%; atrial fibrillation/flutter and major haemorrhage were not reported. AEs led to treatment discontinuation in three (7%) patients. Acalabrutinib was active and well tolerated in patients with R/R MZL.

The combination of rituximab, bendamustine, and low dose cytarabine (R-BAC) has been studied in a phase 2 prospective multicenter study from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL RBAC500). In 57 previously untreated elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), R-BAC was associated with complete remission rate of 91%, and 2-years progression free survival (PFS) of 81% (95%CI 68-89). Here, we report the long-term survival outcome, late toxicities, and results of minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation. After a median follow-up of 86 months (57-107), the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached. The 7-years PFS and OS rates were 55% (95%CI 41-67), and 63% (95%CI 49-74), respectively. Responding patients (n=53) had a 7-years PFS of 59% (95%CI 44-71), with no relapse or progression registered after the 6th year. At multivariate analysis blastoid/pleomorphic morphology was the strongest adverse predictive factor for PFS (p=0.04). Patients with an end of treatment negative minimal residual disease (MRD) had better, but not significant, outcomes for both PFS and OS than MRD positive patients (p=0,148 and p=0,162, respectively). There was no signal of late toxicity or increase of secondary malignancies during the prolonged follow-up. In conclusion, R-BAC, which was not followed by maintenance therapy, showed sustained efficacy over time in elderly patients with MCL. Survival outcomes compare favorably with other immuno-chemotherapy regimens (with or without maintenance), including combinations of BTK-inhibitors upfront.

PURPOSE We compared 2 years of rituximab maintenance (RM) with a response-adapted postinduction approach in patients with follicular lymphoma who responded to induction immunochemotherapy. METHODS We randomly assigned treatment-naïve, advanced-stage, high-tumor burden follicular lymphoma patients to receive standard RM or a response-adapted postinduction approach on the basis of metabolic response and molecular assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD). The experimental arm used three types of postinduction therapies: for complete metabolic response (CMR) and MRD-negative patients, observation; for CMR and MRD-positive (end of induction or follow-up) patients, four doses of rituximab (one per week, maximum three courses) until MRD-negative; and for non-CMR patients, one dose of ibritumomab tiuxetan followed by standard RM. The study was designed as noninferiority trial with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary end point. RESULTS Overall, 807 patients were randomly assigned. After a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 1-92 months), patients in the standard arm had a significantly better PFS than those in the experimental arm (3-year PFS 86% v 72%; P < .001). The better PFS of the standard versus experimental arm was confirmed in all the study subgroups except non-CMR patients (n = 65; P = .274). The 3-year overall survival was 98% (95% CI, 96 to 99) and 97% (95% CI, 95 to 99) in the reference and experimental arms, respectively ( P = .238). CONCLUSION A metabolic and molecular response-adapted therapy as assessed in the FOLL12 study was associated with significantly inferior PFS compared with 2-year RM. The better efficacy of standard RM was confirmed in the subgroup analysis and particularly for patients achieving both CMR and MRD-negative.

The Lugano classification for response assessment in lymphoma recommends the use of the 5-point-scale Deauville Score (DS) to assess response evaluation of end-of-treatment FDG-PET/CT (eotPET) in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL); nevertheless, there is a paucity of data on its accuracy and reproducibility. We focus here on the cohort of advanced stage IIb-IV HL patients enrolled in the HD0607 clinical trial (NCT identifier 00795613) that having had a negative interim PET performed 6 cycles of ABVD (Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Vincristine and Dacarbazine) and then performed an eotPET. Negative patients were randomized to radiotherapy and no further treatment while positive patients were treated based on local policies. eotPET was re-evaluated independently by two readers evaluated and progression free survival was analysed (PFS). eotPET of 254 patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 43 months. The best receiver operator characteristics cut-off values to distinguish positive and negative patients was 4. The area-under-the-curve was 0.81 (95%CI, 0.70-0.91). Three-years PFS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.97) in eotPET negative and 0.22 (95% CI 0.11-0.43) in eotPET positive. DS demonstrated a good reproducibility of positivity/negativity between the readers consensus and local site evaluation where the agreement occurred on 95.0% of patients. The present study demonstrates that eotPET is an accurate tool to predict treatment outcome in HL and confirms the appropriateness of the Lugano classification for eotPET evaluation.

The standard treatment for young patients with untreated PTCLs is based on anthracycline containing-regimens followed by high-dose-chemotherapy and stem-cell-transplantation (HDT + SCT), but only 40% of them can be cured. Romidepsin, a histone-deacetylase inhibitor, showed promising activity in relapsed PTCLs; in first line, Romidepsin was added with CHOP. We designed a study combining romidepsin and CHOEP as induction before HDT + auto-SCT in untreated PTCLs (PTCL-NOS, AITL/THF, ALK-ALCL), aged 18–65 years. A phase Ib/II trial was conducted to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Ro-CHOEP, and to assess efficacy and safety of 6 Ro-CHOEP as induction before HDT. The study hypothesis was to achieve a 18-month PFS of 70%. Twenty-one patients were enrolled into phase Ib; 7 dose-limiting toxicities were observed, that led to define the MTD at 14 mg/ms. Eighty-six patients were included in the phase II. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the 18-month PFS was 46.2% (95%CI:35.0–56.7), and the 18-month overall survival was 73.1% (95%CI:61.6–81.7). The overall response after induction was 71%, with 62% CRs. No unexpected toxicities were reported. The primary endpoint was not met; therefore, the enrollment was stopped at a planned interim analysis. The addition of romidepsin to CHOEP did not improve the PFS of untreated PTCL patients.

Simple Summary The interest in using Machine-Learning (ML) techniques in clinical research is growing. We applied ML to build up a novel prognostic model from patients affected with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) enrolled in a phase III open-labeled, randomized clinical trial from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL)-MCL0208. This is the first application of ML in a prospective clinical trial on MCL lymphoma. We applied a novel ML pipeline to a large cohort of patients for which several clinical variables have been collected at baseline, and assessed their prognostic value based on overall survival. We validated it on two independent data series provided by European MCL Network. Due to its flexibility, we believe that ML would be of tremendous help in the development of a novel MCL prognostic score aimed at re-defining risk stratification. Background: Multicenter clinical trials are producing growing amounts of clinical data. Machine Learning (ML) might facilitate the discovery of novel tools for prognostication and disease-stratification. Taking advantage of a systematic collection of multiple variables, we developed a model derived from data collected on 300 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi-MCL0208 phase III trial (NCT02354313). Methods: We developed a score with a clustering algorithm applied to clinical variables. The candidate score was correlated to overall survival (OS) and validated in two independent data series from the European MCL Network (NCT00209222, NCT00209209); Results: Three groups of patients were significantly discriminated: Low, Intermediate (Int), and High risk (High). Seven discriminants were identified by a feature reduction approach: albumin, Ki-67, lactate dehydrogenase, lymphocytes, platelets, bone marrow infiltration, and B-symptoms. Accordingly, patients in the Int and High groups had shorter OS rates than those in the Low and Int groups, respectively (Int -> Low, HR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.0-9.6; High -> Int, HR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.5-4.7). Based on the 7 markers, we defined the engineered MCL international prognostic index (eMIPI), which was validated and confirmed in two independent cohorts; Conclusions: We developed and validated a ML-based prognostic model for MCL. Even when currently limited to baseline predictors, our approach has high scalability potential.

The upfront treatment of very elderly and frail patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is still a matter of debate. Herein, we report results of the metronomic all-oral DEVEC [prednisolone/deltacortene®, vinorelbine (VNR), etoposide (ETO), cyclophosphamide] combined with i.v. rituximab (R). This schedule was administered as a first line therapy in 22 elderly/frail DLBCL subjects (median age = 84.5 years). In 17/22 (77%) patients, the Elderly-IPI-score was high. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 15 patients had died: seven (50%) for causes unrelated to DLBCL or its treatment, six (40%) for progression, and two (13%) for multiorgan failure. Six treatment-pertinent serious-adverse-events occurred. At the end of induction, 14/22 (64%) achieved complete remission; overall survival and event-free survival at 24 months were both 54% (95% CI = 32–72%), while the time to progression was 74% (95% CI = 48–88%). Furthermore, antiproliferative and proapoptotic assays were performed on DLBCL/OCI-LY3 cell-line using metronomic VNR and ETO and their combination. Both metronomic VNR and ETO had concentration-dependent antiproliferative (IC50 = 0.036 ± 0.01 nM and 7.9 ± 3.6 nM, respectively), and proapoptotic activities in DLBCL cells. Co-administration of the two drugs showed a strong synergism (combination index < 1 and dose reduction index > 1) against cell proliferation and survival. This low-dose schedule seems to compare favourably with intravenous-CHEMO protocols used in the same subset. Indeed, the high synergism shown by metronomic VRN+ETO in in vitro studies, explains the remarkable clinical responses and it allows significant dose reductions.

The phase 2 CAVALLI (NCT02055820) study assessed efficacy and safety of venetoclax, a selective B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) inhibitor, with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in first-line (1L) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including patients demonstrating Bcl-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (Bcl-2 IHC+). Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and had previously untreated DLBCL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and International Prognostic Index 2 to 5. Venetoclax 800 mg (days 4-10, cycle 1; days 1-10, cycles 2-8) was administered with rituximab (8 cycles) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (6-8 cycles) in 21-day cycles. Primary end points were safety, tolerability, and research_plete response (CR) at end of treatment (EOT). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Comparative analyses used covariate-adjusted R-CHOP controls from the GOYA/BO21005 study, an appropriate contemporary benchmark for safety and efficacy. Safety and efficacy analyses included 206 patients. CR rate at EOT was 69% in the overall population and was maintained across Bcl-2 IHC+ subgroups. With a median follow-up of 32.2 months, trends were observed for improved investigator-assessed PFS for venetoclax plus R-CHOP in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.87) and Bcl-2 IHC+ subgroups (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89) vs R-CHOP. Despite a higher incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (86%), related mortality was not increased (2%). Chemotherapy dose intensity was similar in CAVALLI vs GOYA. The addition of venetoclax to R-CHOP in 1L DLBCL demonstrates increased, but manageable, myelosuppression and the potential of improved efficacy, particularly in high-risk Bcl-2 IHC+ patient subgroups. Key Points: • The phase 2 CAVALLI study assessed efficacy and safety of venetoclax + R-CHOP in patients with DLBCL, including Bcl-2+ subpopulations. • Venetoclax + R-CHOP showed potential for improved efficacy vs R-CHOP alone, supporting further investigation of venetoclax in Bcl-2+ DLBCL.

Purpose Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCLs) have an overall poor prognosis. Indeed, registry data in elderly patients show that the median progression-free survival (mPFS) following first- and second-line therapies are only 6.7 and 3.1 months, respectively. The aim of the study is to show the activity of metronomic chemotherapy, a regular administration of low chemotherapeutic drug doses allowing a favourable toxicity profile, on elderly PTCL patients. Methods We report a series of 17 PTCL patients, treated with the all-oral metronomic schedule DEVEC (prednisolone–etoposide–vinorelbine–cyclophosphamide) in four Italian centres. Patients 5/17 (29.4%) were treatment-naïve (naïve) and 12/17 (70.6%) were relapsed-refractory (RR), respectively. The median age was 83 years (range 71–87) and 71.5 years (range 56–85) for naïve and RR, respectively. In vitro activity of metronomic vinorelbine (VNR), etoposide (ETO) and their concomitant combination on HH, a PTCL cell line, was also assessed. Results Histology: PTCL-not-otherwise-specified = 12; angioimmunoblastic = 2; NK/T nasal type = 1; adult-type leukaemia lymphoma = 1, transformed Mycosis Fungoides = 1. The overall response rate was 80 and 58% in naïve and RR, respectively; whereas the PFS was 20 in naïve (95% CI 0–43) and 11 months (95% CI 4.2–17.8) in RR. The occurrence of relevant adverse events was 23.5%, which was managed with ETO dose reduction. In vitro experiments showed that both metronomic VNR and ETO caused a significant inhibitory activity on HH cells and a strong synergism when administered concomitantly. Conclusion All-oral DEVEC showed an encouraging activity and acceptable toxicity. This schedule deserves further studies in elderly PTCL also for assessing combinations with targeted drugs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-020-04172-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose A strong prognostic score that enables a stratification of newly diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) to identify patients at high risk of refractory/relapsed disease is still needed. Our aim was to investigate the potential value of a radiomics analysis pipeline from whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) exams for clinical outcome prediction in patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). Materials and methods Index lesions from baseline WB-MRIs of 40 patients (22 females; mean age 31.7 ± 11.4 years) with newly diagnosed HL treated by ABVD chemotherapy regimen were manually segmented on T1-weighted, STIR, and DWI images for texture analysis feature extraction. A machine learning approach based on the Extra Trees classifier and incorporating clinical variables, 18F-FDG-PET/CT-derived metabolic tumor volume, and WB-MRI radiomics features was tested using cross-validation to predict refractory/relapsed disease. Results Relapsed disease was observed in 10/40 patients (25%), two of whom died due to progression of disease and graft versus host disease, while eight reached the complete remission. In total, 1403 clinical and radiomics features were extracted, of which 11 clinical variables and 171 radiomics parameters from both original and filtered images were selected. The 3 best performing Extra Trees classifier models obtained an equivalent highest mean accuracy of 0.78 and standard deviation of 0.09, with a mean AUC of 0.82 and standard deviation of 0.08. Conclusions Our preliminary results demonstrate that a combined machine learning and texture analysis model to predict refractory/relapsed HL on WB-MRI exams is feasible and may help in the clinical outcome prediction in HL patients.

Background. The PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib given in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL) has been associated with an objective response in 81% of cases with a median PFS of 20.3 months in a phase-3 clinical trial (Sharman et al, JCO 2019). Because the efficacy of new drugs reported in clinical trials may not translate into similar results in the day-to-day practice, we performed an observational retrospective-prospective study on the efficacy and safety of idelalisib and rituximab (IR) in R/R CLL patients treated outside of clinical trials in Italian centers belonging to the GIMEMA group. Methods. R/R CLL patients treated with IR outside of clinical trials between July 2014 and May 2017 were enrolled. Treatment was initiated at symptomatic progression; treatment response and disease progression were assessed according to the NCI criteria. The data were extracted from the medical files and entered into case record forms (CRF) by each treating physician. Computerized and manual consistency checks were performed by the GIMEMA data center on newly entered forms and queries were issued in case of inconsistencies. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), the percentage of patients on treatment at 12, 24 and 36 months, overall survival (OS) and response to the subsequent anti-leukemic treatment. Results. 149 R/R CLL patients from 35 Italian centers were included in the study. The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. At a median follow-up of 39.4 months, the median PFS was 22.9 months (95% CI 20.5-28.8). In univariate analysis, a shorter PFS was associated with ≥3 lines of therapy (p=0.0175) (Fig. 1a). The ORR (CR + PR) was 72.5%. Age ≤70 yrs (p=0.037) and a PS grade 3 during RI treatment were neutropenia (35% of cases), gastrointestinal disorders (17%), infections (17%) and transaminitis (6%). Conclusions. The results hereby observed show that the efficacy of IR in a cohort in a real-life RR/CLL with a long follow-up is superimposable to those reported in the pivotal clinical trial, suggesting that the patient population who received IR in the day-to-day clinical practice mirrored that enrolled in the trial. Advanced clinical stage and 3 or more previous lines of therapy were associated with shorter PFS and OS. Interestingly, PFS and objective measures of efficacy such as the proportion of patients still on treatment at 12, 24 and 36 months, as well as OS, were not influenced by the TP53 status. Furthermore, the majority of patents responded to the subsequent anti-leukemic treatment and relatively durable responses were observed in patients who discontinued IR due to toxicity. Disclosures Rigolin: Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Visentin:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Coscia:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Farina:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gaidano:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Murru:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Varettoni:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Sportoletti:Janssen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria. Laurenti:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Marasca:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria. Marchetti:Takeda: Other: Sponsored meetings; Gilead: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Other: Sponsored meetings; Pfeizer: Other: Sponsored meetings. Mauro:Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octopharma: Consultancy; Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Molica:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Pane:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Novartis pharma SAS: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Other: Travel Expenses; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Gozzetti:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Galieni:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Krampera:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Trentin:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria. Montillo:AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria. Foà:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cuneo:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

The improvements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology and the concern related to the increased cancer risk in patients with lymphoma, also due to radiation exposure associated with imaging examinations, have led to the introduction of whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) as a radiation-free alternative to standard imaging procedures. WB-MRI seems a less histology-dependent functional imaging test than 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT (18 F-FDG-PET/CT). In patients with FDG-avid lymphomas, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), 18 F-FDG-PET/CT remains the imaging reference standard for staging, with WB-MRI potentially being a complementary modality that could replace CT, especially in young patients. On the other hand, WB-MRI is a valuable imaging procedure for lymphoma surveillance and in lymphomas with variable/low FDG avidity and nonfollicular indolent lymphomas. The aim of this paper is to discuss the current state of the art of WB-MRI in lymphoma by evaluating its diagnostic performance in different lymphoma subtypes: Hodgkin, aggressive, and indolent lymphomas.

60th Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Hematology (ASH) -- DEC 01-04, 2018 -- San Diego, CA Jurczak, Wojciech/0000-0003-1879-8084; Johnson, Peter/0000-0003-2306-4974; ZINZANI, PIER LUIGI/0000-0002-2112-2651; Leppa, Sirpa/0000-0002-8265-511X WOS: 000468868300004 PubMed: 30901302 PURPOSE Ibrutinib has shown activity in non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This double-blind phase III study evaluated ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in untreated non-germinal center B-cell DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to ibrutinib (560 mg per day orally) plus R-CHOP or placebo plus R-CHOP. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL subgroup. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS A total of 838 patients were randomly assigned to ibrutinib plus R-CHOP (n = 419) or placebo plus R-CHOP (n = 419). Median age was 62.0 years; 75.9% of evaluable patients had ABC subtype disease, and baseline characteristics were balanced. Ibrutinib plus R-CHOP did not improve EFS in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.934) or ABC (HR, 0.949) population. A preplanned analysis showed a significant interaction between treatment and age. In patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS (HR, 0.579), PFS (HR, 0.556), and OS (HR, 0.330) and slightly increased serious adverse events (35.7% v 28.6%), but the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP was similar between treatment arms (92.9% v 93.0%). In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP worsened EFS, PFS, and OS, increased serious adverse events (63.4% v 38.2%), and decreased the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP (73.7% v 88.8%). CONCLUSION The study did not meet its primary end point in the ITT or ABC population. However, in patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS, PFS, and OS with manageable safety. In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP was associated with increased toxicity, leading to compromised R-CHOP administration and worse outcomes. Further investigation is warranted. (C) 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology Amer Soc Hematol Janssen Global Services; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748] Supported by Janssen Global Services, which also provided writing and editorial support, and by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant No. P30 CA008748 (A.Y.).

7549 Background: MZL is a rare indolent B-cell malignancy considered incurable at recurrent stage. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have produced durable responses in patients (pts) with R/R MZL. Acalabrutinib (acala) is a potent next-generation BTK inhibitor with high selectivity for BTK. We report data for acala monotherapy from the R/R MZL cohort (phase 2) of a phase 1b/2 clinical trial (NCT02180711). Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed MZL, ECOG performance status ≤2, and ≥1 prior therapy (including ≥1 CD20-directed regimen) received oral acala 100 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity ± R. The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR; Lugano criteria as assessed by the investigator). Secondary objectives were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data were analyzed descriptively (no formal hypothesis testing). Results: Forty-two pts received acala (median age 69 y [range 42–84]; median 2 prior systemic regimens [range 1–4]). MZL subtypes were extranodal (43%), nodal (31%), and splenic (26%). At data cutoff (Oct 15, 2021), median follow-up duration was 10.7 mo (range 0.4–42.8). Sixteen (38%) pts discontinued acala, most commonly due to disease progression (26%). Among pts evaluable for response (n = 37; 3 pts had not reached the first assessment timepoint and 2 pts exited the study without response assessment), ORR was 54% (95% CI 37%–71%) with 6 complete (16%) and 14 partial (38%) responses; 17 (46%) pts had stable disease. ORRs in extranodal, nodal, and splenic subtypes were 65%, 44%, and 45%, respectively. Median time to initial response was 3.0 mo; median DOR was 19.3 mo (95% CI 8.4–not estimable). Median PFS was 27.4 mo with a 12-mo PFS rate of 66%. Four pts died (disease progression, n = 2; transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after stopping treatment, n = 1; adverse event [AE], n = 1 [septic shock unrelated to treatment]); median OS was not reached. Treatment was well tolerated with most AEs being grade 1 or 2. Sixteen pts (38%) had grade ≥3 AEs, most commonly (in ≥2 pts) anemia, dyspnea, neutrophil count decrease (n = 3 each), fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia (n = 2 each). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 2 pts (grade 3 hypotension and grade 1 myalgia). Among AEs of clinical interest, hypertension was reported in 2 pts (both grade 2); no cases of atrial fibrillation/flutter or major hemorrhage were reported. Conclusions: These early results indicate that acala is efficacious and well tolerated in pts with R/R MZL. The AE profile is consistent with the known safety profile of acala. Clinical trial information: NCT02180711.

The standard management for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is salvage therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This strategy allows almost 50% of patients to be cured. Post-ASCT maintenance treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) confers improved progression-free survival (PFS) to cHL patients at high risk of relapse. We investigated the outcome of 105 cHL patients receiving post-ASCT BV maintenance in the real-life setting of 23 Italian hematology centers. This population included naïve patients and those previously exposed to BV. Median follow-up was 20 months. Patients presented a median of two lines of treatment pre-ASCT, with 51% receiving BV. Twenty-nine percent of patients had at least two high-risk factors (refractory disease, complete response [CR] less than 12 months, extranodal disease at relapse), while 16% presented none. At PET-CT, a Deauville score (DS) of 1-3 was reported in 75% and 78% of pre- and post-ASCT evaluations, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), mainly peripheral neuropathy, were observed in 16% of patients. Three-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 62% and 86%, respectively. According to BV exposure, 3-year PFS and OS were 54% and 71%, respectively, for naïve and 77% and 96%, respectively, for previously exposed patients. Refractory disease (hazard ratio [HR] 4.46; p = 0.003) and post-ASCT DS 4-5 (HR 3.14; p = 0.005) were the only two factors significantly associated with PFS reduction in multivariable analysis. Post-ASCT BV maintenance is an effective, safe treatment option for cHL naïve patients and those previously exposed to BV.

Background There is now great interest in using digital health tools to monitor patients' health status in real-world practice. Such tools often include electronic-patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems in which symptoms questions are included into online interfaces for patient self-reporting, with real-time alerts triggered to the treating physician if severe symptoms or problems are reported. However, there is little information about the clinical utility and user perceptions of these systems, and this is particularly true in the area of hematology. Objectives This study investigates physicians' perceptions of usability and clinical utility of using remote ePROs in routine practice of patients with hematologic malignancies and explored implications in the delivery of patient care. Patients and Methods Remote ePROs are being gathered since December 2020 by the ALLIANCE Digital Health Platform, whose details of the development process have been previously described (Efficace F. et al., JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 1;10:e25271). Adult patients diagnosed with any hematologic malignancy are eligible to enter the platform, after having provided written informed consent. Aspects related to health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms and medication adherence are assessed via validated PRO measures. The platform allows for real-time graphical presentation to physicians of individual patient symptoms and HRQoL outcomes. Based on a pre-defined algorithm, which includes the presence of clinically important problems and symptoms, the platform triggers automated alerts to the treating haematologists and medical staff. The definition of clinically important problems and symptoms is based on previously defined evidence-based thresholds (Giesinger J. et al., J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:1-8). We asked treating haematologists a feedback about their experience in using the platform, by an ad hoc web-survey consisting of 27 items covering several domains, including: usability and benefits, current use, evaluation of patient health-status, symptoms and adverse events, as well as physician-patient communication. We summarized characteristics of enrolled patients and treating haematologists by proportions, mean, median and range. We also used logistic regression analysis to check the possible association of characteristics of haematologists with survey results. Results Of the 201 patients invited to participate between December 2020 and June 2021 (cut-off date for current analysis), 180 (90%) accepted to enter the ALLIANCE platform, currently activated in 19 centers. The median age of patients was 57 years (range 21-91) and 58% were males. The majority were diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (n=32, 18%) and multiple myeloma (n=31, 17%) and were in stable disease (n=89, 49%). Twenty-three hematologists (44% males) with a median age of 42 years (range 31-63) and an average 17 years (range 5-34) of experience in clinical practice, completed the survey. The majority of physicians (78%) accessed the platform at least once per month (of whom 39% at least once per week), regardless the alerts sent by the system about patients' clinically relevant problems. The frequency of access on a regular basis was also independent of physician sex (p=0.393) and years of experience in clinical practice (p=0.404). Overall, 57% of hematologists discussed often or very often ePROs with their patients, while 83% and 61% deemed this information helpful to better identify symptomatic adverse events (AEs) of grade 1-2 or of grade 3-4, respectively (see figure). Also, 87% and 91% of hematologists found ePROs useful to improve physician-patient communication and the accuracy of documentation of symptomatic AEs (regardless of severity), respectively. Physicians' responses to selected items of the survey are reported in the figure. Conclusions: Current findings support the clinical utility, from the perspective of the treating physician, of integrating ePROs into routine cancer care of patients with hematologic malignancies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Efficace: Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: Grants (to Institution); Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Grants (to Institution). Breccia: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Fazio: Janseen: Honoraria. Petrucci: Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; GSK: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. Rigacci: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Gilead Science: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tafuri: Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Siragusa: Novartis, CSL, Behring, Amgen, Novonoridsk, SOBI, Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Patriarca: Incyte: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Argenix: Honoraria. Luppi: Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Gilead Science: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria. Vignetti: Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Background: Secondary CNS lymphoma is a rare but potentially lethal event in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We aimed to assess the activity and safety of an intensive, CNS-directed chemoimmunotherapy consolidated by autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with secondary CNS lymphoma. Methods: This international, single-arm, phase 2 trial was done in 24 hospitals in Italy, the UK, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Adults (aged 18–70 years) with histologically diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and CNS involvement at the time of primary diagnosis or at relapse and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 3 or less were enrolled and received three courses of MATRix (rituximab 375 mg/m2, intravenous infusion, day 0; methotrexate 3·5 g/m2, the first 0·5 g/m2 in 15 min followed by 3 g/m2 in a 3 h intravenous infusion, day 1; cytarabine 2 g/m2 every 12 h, in 1 h intravenous infusions, days 2 and 3; thiotepa 30 mg/m2, 30 min intravenous infusion, day 4) followed by three courses of RICE (rituximab 375 mg/m2, day 1; etoposide 100 mg/m2 per day in 500–1000 mL over a 60 min intravenous infusion, days 1, 2, and 3; ifosfamide 5 g/m2 in 1000 mL in a 24 h intravenous infusion with mesna support, day 2; carboplatin area under the curve of 5 in 500 mL in a 1 h intravenous infusion, day 2) and carmustine–thiotepa and autologous HSCT (carmustine 400 mg/m2 in 500 mL glucose 5% solution in a 1–2 h infusion, day −6; thiotepa 5 mg/kg in saline solution in a 2 h infusion every 12 h, days −5 and −4). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 1 year. Overall and complete response rates before autologous HSCT, duration of response, overall survival, and safety were the secondary endpoints. Analyses were in the modified intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02329080. The trial ended after accrual completion; the database lock was Dec 31, 2019. Findings: Between March 30, 2015, and Aug 3, 2018, 79 patients were enrolled. 75 patients were assessable. 319 (71%) of the 450 planned courses were delivered. At 1 year from enrolment the primary endpoint was met, 42 patients were progression free (progression-free survival 58%; 95% CI 55–61). 49 patients (65%; 95% CI 54–76) had an objective response after MATRix–RICE, 29 (39%) of whom had a complete response. 37 patients who responded had autologous HSCT. At the end of the programme, 46 patients (61%; 95% CI 51–71) had an objective response, with a median duration of objective response of 26 months (IQR 16–37). At a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 20–40), 35 patients were progression-free and 33 were alive, with a 2-year overall survival of 46% (95% CI 39–53). Grade 3–4 toxicity was most commonly haematological: neutropenia in 46 (61%) of 75 patients, thrombocytopenia in 45 (60%), and anaemia in 26 (35%). 79 serious adverse events were recorded in 42 (56%) patients; four (5%) of those 79 were lethal due to sepsis caused by Gram-negative bacteria (treatment-related mortality 5%; 95% CI 0·07–9·93). Interpretation: MATRix–RICE plus autologous HSCT was active in this population of patients with very poor prognosis, and had an acceptable toxicity profile. Funding: Stand Up To Cancer Campaign for Cancer Research UK, the Swiss Cancer Research foundation, and the Swiss Cancer League.

PURPOSE To investigate the role of consolidation radiotherapy (cRT) in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) presenting at baseline with a large nodal mass (LNM) in complete metabolic response after doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Advanced-stage (IIB-IVB) HL patients, enrolled in the HD 0607 trial (Clinicaltrial.gov identifier NCT00795613 ), with both a negative PET after two (PET-2) and six (PET-6) ABVD cycles, who presented at baseline with an LNM, defined as a nodal mass with the largest diameter ≥ 5 cm, were prospectively randomly assigned to receive cRT over the LNM or no further treatment (NFT). RESULTS Among 296 randomly assigned patients, the largest diameter of LNM at baseline was 5-7 cm in 101 (34%; subgroup A) and 8-10 cm in 96 (32%; subgroup B), whereas classic bulky (diameter > 10 cm) was detected in 99 (33%; subgroup C). Two hundred eighty patients (88%) showed a postchemotherapy RM. The median dose of cRT was 30.6 Gy (range, 24-36 Gy). After a median follow-up of 5.9 years (range, 0.5-10 years), the 6-year progression-free survival rate of patients who underwent cRT or NFT was, respectively, 91% (95% CI, 84% to 99%) and 95% (95% CI, 89% to 100%; P = .62) in subgroup A; 98% (95% CI, 93% to 100%) and 90% (95% CI, 80% to 100%; P = .24) in subgroup B; 89% (95% CI, 81% to 98%) and 86% (95% CI, 77% to 96%; P = .53) in subgroup C (classic bulky). CONCLUSION cRT could be safely omitted in patients with HL presenting with an LNM and a negative PET-2 and PET-6 scan, irrespective from the LNM size detected at baseline.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent hematological disease, often responsive to the first line of treatment, but characterized by repeated relapses. The therapeutic algorithm for relapsed/refractory FL patients comprises phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors. Idelalisib showed anticancer activity, while inducing a significant rate of toxicities. Since the evidence in the literature on its use in normal clinical practice is scarce, a retrospective multicenter study was conducted to evaluate effectiveness and tolerability in a real-life context. Seventy-two patients with a median age at diagnosis of 57.2 years—mostly with an advanced stage (88.9%) and relapsed to the most recent therapy (79.1%)—were enrolled. The median number of prior therapies was three (20.8% refractory to the last therapy before idelalisib). With a median number of 4 months of treatment, the overall response rate was 41.7% (20.8% complete responses). Median disease-free survival and overall survival were achieved at 8.4 months and at 4 years, respectively. Forty-four percent of patients experienced at least one drug-related toxicity: 6.9% hematological ones and 43% non-hematological. The study confirmed that idelalisib has anticancer effectiveness and an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory FL with unfavorable prognostic characteristics, even in the context of normal clinical practice.

Purpose To evaluate whether imaging features of pathologic lymph nodes on whole-body diffusion-weighted MR have a predictive role before treatment and may assess the response after two courses of chemotherapy in comparison to FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin Lymphoma. Materials and methods We reviewed the whole-body MR and FDG-PET/CT performed on 41 patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma before and after two Doxorubicin-Bleomycin-Vinblastine-Dacarbazine (ABVD). Responder and non-responder lesions were identified on interim-FDG-PET/CT performed after two ABVD. We used Multivariate Generalized Estimating Equations model to assess statistical association between being-responder and baseline-Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax), baseline and interim-Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and size, ADC and size changes during chemotherapy, site of disease, bulky, and stage. Results 10/41 (24%) patients were positive on interim-FDG-PET/CT. The interim-FDG-PET/CT positivity was associated with worse cumulative survival rate at 24 months in comparison to interim-FDG-PET/CT negativity (P Conclusions Interim-ADC is helpful for identifying non-responder lesions, while size changes are not useful. Baseline-SUVmax and ADC have no predictive role. Bulky is the most useful imaging parameter to predict suboptimal response to chemotherapy.

Introduction. The administration of immuno-chemotherapy (ICT) followed by rituximab maintenance (RM) is the recommended approach for the front-line therapy of high tumor burden follicular lymphoma (HTB-FL) patients. Among available ICT regimens, RB (Rituximab-bendamustine) and R-CHOP regimen, are preferred options with high, similar efficacy. Regarding RM, its use is strongly supported after R-CHOP by the results of the PRIMA randomized trial; conversely, no prospective data are available to confirm the efficacy of RM in patients initially treated with RB. The FOLL12 trial was conducted to try to demonstrate that a response adapted post induction management of patients with HTB-FL could be as effective as standard RM in terms of Progression Free Survival (PFS). The trial actually showed the better efficacy of standard RM compared to the experimental approach thus providing indirect confirmation of the efficacy of RM after ICT, 10 years after the PRIMA trial. We here analyse the impact of initial ICT in the FOLL12 study that left treatment choice between RB and R-CHOP at physician discretion and on an individual patient basis. Methods. FOLL12 is a multicenter, randomized, phase III trial that compared standard RM vs. a response adapted post induction management in treatment naïve adult patients with grade 1-3a, stage II-IV and a HTB-FL. All patients received induction immunochemotherapy with 6 cycles of either R-CHOP or R-Bendamustine both followed by two additional doses of rituximab. Choice of ICT was at the physicians' discretion. After ICT, patients in the standard arm received bimonthly rituximab for up to two years. Patients in the experimental arm were managed according to centrally reviewed metabolic and molecular response. Patients achieving complete metabolic (CMR) and molecular response were managed with observation only, those in CMR with molecular persistence received 4 weekly rituximab doses. Patients not achieving CMR were treated with radioimmunotherapy with ibritumomab tiuxetan followed by standard RM. Primary study endpoint was 3 years progression free survival (PFS). Results. A total of 786 eligible patients were enrolled and 1:1 randomized either to standard or experimental arm. By backbone therapy, 341 patients received RB and 445 received RCHOP induction immunochemotherapy. RB was more frequently prescribed in older and female patients (OR 1.6, p=0.001) whereas RCHOP was preferred in patients with bulky disease (>6cm) and grade 3a histology (OR 0.65, p=0.013). The median follow-up of the analysis was 56 months (range 1-71). In the non-randomized comparison between RB and RCHOP, no difference in terms of PFS was observed between the two regimens (HR for RB 1.07, 95%CI 0.83-1.38, p=0.597, Figure 1). Standard maintenance arm was more effective than experimental arm both in patients initially treated with RCHOP and in those treated with RB (HR RCHOP 1.61, 95% CI 1.16-2.25; HR RB 1.89, 95% CI 1.27-2.82). An unequal interaction between RB and RCHOP and post-induction therapy was observed for sex and for bone marrow involvement. Considering grade 3 to 5 adverse events (AEs), neutropenia was less frequently observed in RB (35.7%) compared to RCHOP (46.2%). Among extra-hematological AEs, higher frequency of grade 3-4 infections and of cutaneous toxicity were observed in RB treated patients (3.8% vs. 1.2% and 2.4% vs. 0.2%). Overall, 54 second malignancies (SM) have been observed including 23 hematologic malignancies and 31 solid cancers. Cumulative incidence of secondary cancer (excluding non melanoma skin cancers) at 3 and 5 years was 3.7% (95%CI 2.4-5.3%) and 8.1% (95%CI 5.8-10.9%). Conclusion. The current update of the FOLL12 trial demonstrated superiority of standard RM compared to the response adapted post induction management irrespective of prescribed regimen thus proving a first prospective non-randomized evidence of RM efficacy in patients with high tumor burden follicular lymphoma patients treated with RB. Both R-CHOP and RB were associated with a similar efficacy profile. Figure 1. Progression free survival for the standard maintenance arm (A) versus response oriented experimental arm (B) of the FOLL12 trial in patients treated with R-CHOP or R-Bendamustine (RB). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Luminari: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Consultancy; GENELAB SRL: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tucci: janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentili: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ferrero: Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Clinigen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau. Arcaini: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Bayer, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Sandoz, Janssen-Cilag, VERASTEM: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Celgene, Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead: Other: Travel expenses. Pulsoni: Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Pfizer, Sandoz, Merk: Consultancy; Gilead, Bristol: Speakers Bureau. Musuraca: Janssen, Roche, Incyte: Honoraria; Janssen, Roche, Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen, Incyte, Roche: Consultancy.

The R-BAC regimen is considered among standard first-line treatment for elderly fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In the previous R-BAC500 FIL trial, patients with the blastoid variant and/or high Ki67 proliferative index (High Risk - HR-) had a significantly higher risk of progression (2-years PFS of 40%), as compared to classical histologies and low proliferative index (Low Risk -LR-). When treated with R-BAC, LR patients had excellent outcome (median PFS not reached after 7 years), although no maintenance therapy was delivered. For this reason we designed a phase 2 trial that enrolled patients from 35 centers of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL). At study entry, patients were centrally reviewed and stratified as "low risk (LR)", or "high risk (HR)", depending on morphology (blastoid versus others), Ki67 expression (≥30% versus others), TP53 mutation/TP53 deletions (present versus not). Patients with any of the three risk factors were classified as HR. The primary endpoint was 2-years progression-free survival (PFS) for the HR patients. Patients had to be aged ≥65 years and fit according to the geriatric CGA assessment, or age ≤64 years if not eliglible to high-dose chemotherapy plus transplantation. Asymptomatic patients with non-nodal disease were excluded. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles of R-BAC (rituximab 375 mg/m2 d 1; bendamustine 70 mg/m2 d 1,2; cytarabine 500 mg/m2 d 1,2,3) for LR patients. HR patients received abbreviated induction with a maximum of 4 R-BAC followed by consolidation (4 months, 800 mg/d), and maintenance (20 months, 400 mg/d) with venetoclax. First patient was included on the 3rd of september, 2018, and last patient on the 20th of july, 2021. Overall, 140 patients were enrolled, of whom 52 were HR (37%). Median age was 72 (range 57-79), and 75% were males. The prevalence of TP53 mutations and deletions in the whole series was 21%, and 13%, respectively; Ki67 was ≥30% in 24%, and the blastoid variant was diagnosed in 9%. Demographic characteristics of HR versus LR patients (127 patients with available data at the present time) are reported in Table 1A. Median follow-up was 9 months (range 0-34). The two groups (HR and LR) had similar age, gender, and MIPI, but differed for LDH, and SUVmax at diagnosis, both being significantly more elevated in the HR group. The VR-BAC trial represents the first prospective study that stratified patients with MCL to different frontline treatments according to centralized on-time evaluation of the risk profile. We have shown that almost 40% of elderly patients with MCL in need of treatment have HR features. Data on tolerance, and tumor response will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tisi: GILEAD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BWS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zilioli: Roche, Italfarmaco: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD, Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations; Takeda: Other: travel expenses, accommodation; Gentili, Takeda, Gilead, Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Corradini: AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Other: Travel and accommodation; Novartis; Gilead; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel and accommodations; Amgen; Takeda; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations; KiowaKirin; Incyte; Daiichi Sankyo; Janssen; F. Hoffman-La Roche; Kite; Servier: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Gilead/Kite, Amgen, AbbVie: Other: travel and accomodations. Musuraca: janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Puccini: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavallo: Servier: Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Merli: EUSA Pharma: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Science: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Celgene: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses. Ferreri: PletixaPharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Hutchison Medipharma: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Adienne: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genmab: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; x Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ospedale San Raffaele srl: Patents & Royalties; Pfizer: Research Funding. Santoro: AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Eli-Lilly: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Arqule: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zinzani: KYOWA KIRIN: Other, Speakers Bureau; SERVIER: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; SANDOZ: Other: Advisory board; TG Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Other, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; TAKEDA: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Other, Speakers Bureau; EUSAPHARMA: Consultancy, Other, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Other, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therap.: Other; Incyte: Other, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN-CILAG: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; GILEAD: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; CELLTRION: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; VERASTEM: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax is off-label in Italy in mantle cell lymphoma

The activity of the combination of rituximab, bendamustine, and low dose cytarabine (R-BAC) was evaluated in a phase 2 multicentre trial from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL RBAC500) in previously untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who were not eligible to stem cell transplant. Maintenance treatment was not planned after induction therapy, and no patient in the study received rituximab maintenance. Fifty-seven patients (median age 71 years, range 61-79) were recruited and treated with 4 to 6 cycles between 2012 and 2014. Despite some concern in terms of hematological toxicity, the R-BAC regimen was associated with high complete remission (CR) rate (91%), 2-years overall survival (OS) of 86% (74-93), and 2-years progression free survival (PFS) of 81% (68-89). Here, we present long-term survival outcomes. After 7 years of median follow-up (86 months, range 57-107), the median OS and PFS for all patients were not reached (Figure 1A and 1B). The 7-years PFS and OS rates were 56% (95%CI 41-67) and 63% (95%CI 46-72), respectively. Patients who achieved CR (n=53) had a 7 years PFS of 59% (95% CI 44-71), with the curve that appears to plateau after 6 years. Adverse predictive factors affecting PFS were blastoid morphology (p 30% (p Eight patients (14%) developed a secondary neoplasia: 1 parotid heteroplasia, 1 parotid nodular hyperplasia, 1 prostate cancer, 1 bladder cancer, 1 larynx, 1 thyroid cancer, 1 lung cancer and 1 secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Among the 25 relapsed patients, 8 did not receive any other treatment. Six had Ibrutinib monotherapy as second line, of whom 4 responded (3 are still in CR), 4 had CHOP or CHOP-like regimens with only partial responses. As per protocol, 31 patients with molecular marker at diagnosis and available samples were followed-up for minimal residual disease (MRD) with ASO-droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (D-PCR). Patients with MRD persistence at the end of induction, either in peripheral blood or bone marrow, had significantly worse 7 years-PFS (p In conclusion, in elderly patients with newly diagnosed MCL, R-BAC showed sustained efficacy over time, which compared favorably with any other reported immuno-chemotherapy regimen (with or without maintenance) in similar populations. With a median OS exceeding 60% after 7-years this regimen has significantly impacted on the life-expectancy of elderly patients with MCL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tisi: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BWS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nassi: Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Ferrero: Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Clinigen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zilioli: Takeda: Other: travel expenses, accommodation; MSD, Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations; Roche, Italfarmaco: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gentili, Takeda, Gilead, Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Merli: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Gilead Science: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; EUSA Pharma: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Celgene: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses.

Introduction: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) have a 40-50% cure rate when treated with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide-vincristine-prednisone (CHOEP) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Romidepsin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, showed promising activity in relapsed or refractory PTCLs. Methods: On these premises, we designed a phase I/II trial (PTCL13 NCT02223208) to evaluate whether the addition of romidepsin to CHOEP improves the outcome of newly diagnosed PTCLs. In the phase Ib part of the study, we defined 14 mg/ms as the maximum tolerated dose of romidepsin when administered in combination with CHOEP (Ro-CHOEP). Thus, in the phase II part of the study we evaluated the efficacy of Ro-CHOEP followed by HSCT in young patients. The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate a 15% increase in 18-months progression-free survival (PFS) for the combination Ro-CHOEP plus HSCT (from 55% to 70%, planned sample size=110), compared to the previous Italian trial (Corradini P et al, Leukemia 2014). Patients aged 18-65 years with stage II-IV PTCL-NOS, angioimmunoblastic/T follicular helper (AITL/THF) and ALK negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma, were eligible. Treatment plan consisted of 6 courses of Ro-CHOEP every 21 days (14 mg/ms Ro day 1 and 8), followed by cisplatin-cytarabine-dexamethasone (DHAP) with stem cell harvest and HSCT. Patients in complete response (CR) after induction proceeded to autoHSCT, while those in partial response (PR), with an available HLA-matched donor, proceeded to alloHSCT upfront. Results: From September 2017 to October 2020, 86 patients were enrolled into the phase II part of the study; median age was 55 years (IQR 49;60); 78 (91%) had stage III-IV and 31 (36%) IPI score >2. Pathological materials were collected at the time of diagnosis, and centrally reviewed by expert hemo-pathologists; subgroups were: 33 PTCL-NOS, 21 ALK negative, 31 AITL/THF, and one case not classified due to inadequate material. According to the statistical plan, an interim analysis was performed on the first 75 patients. At a median follow-up of 26 months, the 18-months PFS was 48% (95% CI: 0.36-0.58) and the OS was 75% (95% CI: 0.64-0.83). The 18-months PFS for PTCL-NOS versus ALK negative vs AITL/THF was 37% (95% CI: 0.20-0.54) vs. 51% (95% CI: 0.28-0.70) vs. 58% (95% CI: 0.36-0.74), p 0.118; the 18-months OS for PTCL-NOS vs. ALK negative vs. AITL/THF was 72% (95% CI: 0.51-0.85) vs. 76% (95% CI: 0.51-0.89) vs. 81% (95% CI: 0.60-0.92), p 0.957. All 86 patients completed the induction phase and were evaluable for response after 6 Ro-CHOEP: the overall response rate (ORR) was 71% (61 patients), with 62% (53 patients) CR. Four patients with ongoing treatment are not evaluable for response at the end of therapy, at the time of the analysis. Only 39 of 82 patients (48%) underwent HSCT and 43 did not: 28 due to progressive disease, 8 for poor mobilization, 7 for adverse events (1 sepsis, 2 cardiological events, 4 others). Among the 82 patients evaluable for response at the end of treatment, the final ORR after HSCT was 40% (33 patients), with 39% CR (32 patents). The most frequent toxicities during Ro-CHOEP treatment were hematological, with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 33% and 34% of all the 459 cycles, respectively; severe febrile neutropenia was reported in only 4% of Ro-CHOEP courses. Severe non-hematological toxicities were observed in 35 (41%) of patients: cardiological in 5 patients (6%), gastrointestinal in 9 (10%), infections in 10 (12%), others in 11 (13%). Twenty-four deaths were recorded: 22 due to lymphoma progression, 1 due to transplant related mortality for a septic shock after alloSCT, 1 due to secondary malignancy. Conclusions: In the PTCL13 phase I part of the study we demonstrated the feasibility of the combination Ro 14 mg/ms plus CHOEP followed by high-dose chemotherapy and HSCT; in the phase 2 part of the study, the primary objective was not achieved, with a 18-months PFS of 48%. Based on these results, the enrollment of the trial was stopped due to inefficacy of the experimental combination. The benefit of adding romidepsin to chemotherapy was not observed neither in PTCL-NOS nor in AITL/THF. In conclusion, the addition of romidepsin to CHOEP did not ameliorate prognosis in newly diagnosis PTCLs eligible to HSCT. Disclosures Chiappella: Roche: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Incyte: Other: lecture fee; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Celgene Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Clinigen: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Novartis: Other: lecture fee; Janssen: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Gilead Sciences: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Astrazeneca: Other: lecture fee; Servier: Other: lecture fee. Flenghi: Roche: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses. Zilioli: Gentilli: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Other, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Consultancy. Cavallo: Servier: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Musuraca: roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Varettoni: janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Corradini: Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Gilead/Kite, Amgen, AbbVie: Other: travel and accomodations; BMS: Other: Travel and accommodation; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis; Gilead; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel and accommodations; Amgen; Takeda; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations; KiowaKirin; Incyte; Daiichi Sankyo; Janssen; F. Hoffman-La Roche; Kite; Servier: Consultancy; AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Romidepsin is not registered in first line treatment. Romidepsin was provided free for the clinical trial.

Introduction Ibrutinib is the only once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor with significant survival benefit vs chemo- and /or immunotherapy in multiple phase 3 studies of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). It has profoundly changed the treatment landscape of CLL with the longest follow-up. However, seven years (yrs) after ibrutinib was approved in Italy by regulatory agencies for CLL treatment, available data on the patterns of care of such pts in the setting of clinical practice is limited. Herein we present the first interim analysis (IA) of EVIdeNCE (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03720561), a multicenter, observational clinical study designed to describe the current management of pts receiving ibrutinib in real-world setting in Italy in terms of retention rate: the study's primary end point. Methods EVIDENCE 312 treatment-naïve (TN) 38% and relapsed/refractory (R/R) 62% pts with CLL according to the iwCLL diagnosis criteria observed at 39 Italian hematological institutions in the period between November 2018 and October 2019. Inclusion criteria were treatment with ibrutinib according to the European Summary of Product Characteristics as per routine clinical practice started within the previous 3 months. The purpose of this IA is to provide demographics and disease characteristics at baseline and a preliminary evaluation of ibrutinib retention rate after one year of follow-up, along with its safety profile. Results The median age of pts at the time of ibrutinib initiation was 71.0 yrs (range 41.0-89.0), with 60% ≥70 yrs, 63.2% male, and 90% with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance 0-1. Baseline Rai stage 0-I, II, and III-IV accounted for 18.3%, 29.7% and 52.1% pts, respectively. Patients in stage IV were observed in 40% of the R/R and 27% in TN subgroup. Considering 120 pts with known mutational status, del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation were present in 50.0% of pts (TN=52.1%, R/R=48.6%), while IGHV was unmutated in 35.0% (TN=33.3% and R/R=36.15) and mutated in 15.0% (TN=14.6%, R/R=15.3%). At baseline, 62.9% of pts had comorbidities and 30.6% presented with a history of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). A CIRS score ≥6 was observed in 28.5% of pts. The median time from CLL diagnosis to the start of ibrutinib was 5.1 yrs (TN 1.75 yrs vs R/R 7.27 yrs). At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of any grade was experienced by 70.7% of pts. Frequencies were as follows: infections (30.8%; COVID-19 infections 3.2%), arthralgia (10.8%), neutropenia (9.3%), fatigue (8.4%), diarrhea (7.7%), atrial fibrillation (7.4%; grade 3-4, 4.2%), fever (7.1%), rash (6.4%), anemia (6.1%) and hypertension (4.2%). Mild bleeding TEAEs were reported in 16.1% of pts with no major bleeding event. TEAEs were more frequent in the elderly (≥65 yrs) while no significant differences in the rate of TEAEs were recorded in TN and R/R pts (69.7% vs 71.4%, respectively). Serious TEAEs were reported in 21.9% of pts. Overall in intention to treat (ITT), 32 deaths (10%) were observed (TN=8, R/R=24). The most common causes of death were infections (3.5%) and progressive disease (PD) (1.9%). Permanent discontinuation was observed in 56 (18%) of the pts (TN=17.2%, R/R=18.7%) and it mostly occurred within the first 6 months. Main causes of discontinuation were toxicity (6.1%), PD (3.8%) or death (3.5%). Temporary interruptions (≤ 3 months without therapy and/or dose modifications) during the whole observation period occurred in 30.3% (TN=35.3%, R/R=27.2%) and 37.7% (TN=37.5%, R/R=37.8%) of pts, respectively, mainly determined by toxicity and clinical judgment. Finally, in this first IA after 17.3 months (range 1.1 - 27.0) median follow-up, the ibrutinib retention rate (calculated as the ratio between the number of patients who retained ibrutinib treatment over the total number of patients at risk) at 1-year was 81.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 77.2% - 86.1%] with no difference between TN 83.2% (95% CI, 75.2% - 89.4%) and R/R 81.2% pts (95% CI, 74.9% - 86.4%). Conclusions EVIDENCE is the first real-world study of ibrutinib use in CLL clinical practice in Italy. Ibrutinib retention rate at one-year suggests a better knowledge and expertise of hematologists in the management of ibrutinib-related toxicities that may result in an improved long-term outcome of pts with CLL. Disclosures Molica: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Honoraria. Scarfo: Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants. Murru: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel and accommodation; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sportoletti: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Frigeri: Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Sanna: Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Coscia: Janssen: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Reda: Abbvie: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Tafuri: Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Grugnetti: Janssen: Current Employment. Magarotto: Janssen: Current Employment. Mauro: Tskeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Background: Despite its high overall accuracy in predicting ABVD outcome in advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), interim PET performed after 2 chemotherapy cycles (PET-2) showed a sub-optimal negative predictive value (PV) on treatment response. In fact, PET-2 negative patients (p.) treated with six ABVD cycles in four prospective trials (RATHL, GITIL/FIL HD 0607, SWOG 0816 and Echelon-1), showed a 3-Y PFS ranging between 79% to 87%, even declining to 74% after a 5-year follow-up (Stephens 2019). A high Total Metabolic Tumor Volume (TMTV) calculated in baseline PET (cutoff value 471 ml.) , along with a high IPS (≥2) proved able to identify a small p. subset (7%) of PET-2 neg. p. with a 3-Y PFS of only 56% (Gallamini 16° ICML, 2021). A new TMTV-derived parameter aimed to image tumor spread, the tumor distance (DMAX), proved able to predict ABVD outcome in a retrospective series of HL p. from a single center (Durmo, 16° ICML 2021). We report here the PV on ABVD outcome of DMAX combined with IPS in a large cohort of PET-2 negative p. prospectively enrolled in the HD0607 clinical trial. Methods: Out of 783 p. with advanced HL (IIB-IVB) included in the HD0607 clinical trial (NCT00795613), 630 (81%) of them with both negative PET-2 and end-of therapy PET, were randomly assigned to no further therapy or consolidation radiotherapy over the area of a large nodal mass detected at baseline. A single experienced nuclear medicine physician calculated DMAX and TMTV in 331 out of 630 (52%) PET-2 negative p. in which the baseline PET images were available for review. Three different tumor segmentation methods for TMTV computing were chosen, with (1) a relative threshold of 41% of SUVmax in each lesion, (2) a fixed threshold of SUV=2.5 or (3) of SUV=4. DMAX was calculated as the maximum distance among any pixel of the tumor belonging to any lesions in the body. Results: The demographics of the 331 p. included in the present study and of the overall cohort of 630 PET-2 negative p. were: median age 31 (14-60) Vs. 31 (14-60), M/F ratio 0.86 Vs. 0.89; WHO Performance Status 0-1 91.5% Vs. 91.4%; B-symptoms 81.8 Vs. 81.1%; Stage IIB, III and IV 35.0, 35.0, 29.9, Vs.36.3, 33.0 and 30.0%; IPS 0-1 39.3 Vs. 39.8%, IPS 2-3 48.3 Vs. 49.4%, IPS >3 12.4 Vs. 10.6%, Bulky 18.1 Vs. 17.9%. No difference in 6-y PFS was found for p. randomized to NFT or cRT (p=.48; Gallamini JCO 2020). After a median follow-up of 40.6 (4.8-87.2) months, the 3-Y PFS for the 331 p. included in the present analysis and for all the 630 PET-2 negative p. was 84% (95% CI 81% to 87%) and 87% (95% CI, 84% to 89%), respectively. Treatment failure was recorded in 51/331 (15.4%) and 81/627 (12.9%), respectively. Based on a ROC analysis the three different segmentation methods for MTV computing proved to be equivalent (AUC values 0.620-0.525) and hence the 41% threshold was chosen for consistency with previous works. Median and average DMAX values were 12.5 cm. and 15.3 cm. The most accurate cutoff value for DMAX to predict treatment outcome (3-Y PFS) was 16.2 cm., with an AUC of 0.62 (95% CI 0.53-0.70). With this cutoff value DMAX was able to identify two cohorts of patients with a statistically different 3y-PFS: 90% (CI 85-93%) and 76% (95% CI 69-85%), p < 0.001. In multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) including all the above demographics and clinical parameters, as well as TMTV and DMX, only DMAX turned out significant in predicting relapse, with a HR of 1.46 (95% CI1.06-2.01), p=0.02. Upon combining DMAX (higher or lower than 16.2 cm.) and IPS (0-1 Vs. ≥2) in a two-factor predictive model, three categories of p. with a statistically different treatment outcome (P < 0.0001) have been identified: (1) both low DMAX and low IPS, N =30 (9%), 3-Y PFS 100% (95% CI 96-100); (2) either high DMAX and low IPS or high IPS and low DMAX, N= 198 (60%); 3-Y PFS 88% (95% CI 83-93), and (3) both high DMAX and IPS, N= 103 (31%); 3-Y PFS 72% (95% CI 65-82), p Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Venetoclax is the first BCL-2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) alone or in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). Initial studies have shown high efficacy of venetoclax monotherapy or in combination with rituximab with an overall response rate of 79-92% in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL. To investigate the use of venetoclax combinations in a real-world population, we designed this observational retrospective and prospective study aimed at defining the outcome of patients with R/R CLL treated with venetoclax-based regimens outside clinical trials in Italy. Efficacy (progression-free survival -PFS-, overall response rate -ORR-, complete response -CR-, measurable residual disease -MRD-) and safety (most frequent adverse events -AE-, grade 3-4 AE, laboratory and clinical tumor lysis syndrome -TLS-) data were collected within the study through a web-based platform after patients signed written informed consent. As of July 8 th, 2021 124 subjects (85 males, 39 females) were enrolled into the study (Table 1). Median age at venetoclax initiation was 70 years (44-91), median CIRS score 4 (0-14), median creatinine clearance 70 ml/min (22-123). A relevant proportion of patients presented adverse prognostic features, including TP53 aberrations [32% TP53 mutation and/or del(17p)], unmutated IGHV (77%). At the time of venetoclax initiation, patients had received a median of 2 previous therapies (1-8), with 57% previously exposed to BTK and/or PI3K inhibitors. 67/117 (57%) patients received venetoclax alone, while 50 were treated with a combination of venetoclax + rituximab (VenR), information on treatment plan was missing in 7 patients. Patients on venetoclax monotherapy compared to those receiving VenR showed a higher percentage of elevated LDH at baseline (64% vs 38%), were more heavily pretreated (median lines of therapy 3 vs 1), and had more frequently received treatment with ibrutinib (66% vs 27%) and/or idelalisib + rituximab (29% vs 4%). After a median follow-up of 13.7 months (0-41.9), the estimated 12m-PFS was 82% (CI 74-90%) (Figure 1), and the estimated 12m-overall survival (OS) was 83% (CI 76-91%). The best ORR in the whole cohort was 85% (CI 95% 76-91%) with a CR rate of 40%; best response was reached after a median of 3.9 months of treatment (range 0.6-30.5). The best ORR was not different in patients receiving VenR vs venetoclax alone (83% vs 88% respectively, p = n.s.), while the CR rate was significantly higher in those receiving VenR vs venetoclax alone (57% vs 30%, p=0.011). The ORR and CR rate in patients previously exposed to BTK and/or PI3K inhibitors were significantly lower (77% and 29% respectively), and the 12m-PFS was shorter in patients previously treated with ibrutinib compared to ibrutinib-naïve (75% vs 89%, p=0.005). Twenty subjects discontinued venetoclax (median time to discontinuation 4.1 months, range 0.4-10.8), 8 due to disease progression, 3 Richter's transformation, 7 AEs, 1 was lost to follow-up and 1 underwent planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Venetoclax-based regimens were well tolerated, with the most frequent AE of any grade related to venetoclax being neutropenia (79.6%), grade 3-4 in 61.9% (Table 2). In the whole cohort one grade 3 clinical TLS occurred and resolved without sequelae, and only 2/124 patients experienced laboratory TLS during ramp-up phase (both grade 1). No treatment-related death was reported. In conclusion, this analysis presents the results of one of the largest cohort of patients with R/R CLL treated with venetoclax-based regimens outside clinical trials and confirms the favourable efficacy and safety profile of the drug. In this patient population highly enriched for unfavorable disease features (1 out of 3 carrying TP53 aberrations, almost 80% with unmutated IGHV) venetoclax-based regimens were able to obtain a response in a high proportion of cases, with a very short time to best response (less than 4 months). As expected, response duration was shorter in patients previously exposed to BTKi/PI3Ki. When we compared the outcome of patients treated with venetoclax monotherapy vs VenR, the addition of anti-CD20 MoAb allowed to reach deeper responses by significantly increasing the CR rate. As the study and its data collection are still ongoing, the updated analysis of an expanded cohort with longer follow-up will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Scarfo: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Quaglia: Roche: Other: Travel grants; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Marasca: AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants. Sanna: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Murru: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel and accommodation; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Laurenti: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria. Gaidano: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Reda: Beigene: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Molica: Astrazeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sportoletti: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Galimberti: AbbVie, Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Mauro: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Cuneo: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Ghia: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Juno/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; ArQule/MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding.