Search

Evaluation of eye irritation potential is a routine part of consumer product testing. Increasingly, companies are using in vitro methods to perform these assessments. We have used the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay for the prediction of eye irritation of liquid and granular laundry detergent formulas. The BCOP assay was selected because it can distinguish between moderate and severe irritants as required to evaluate these classes of formulations. Corneas were maintained in short-term culture and the exposure conditions were optimized using marketed product upper-end benchmark formulas for each product class. The primary endpoint was the loss of epithelium as measured by the change in permeability of the cornea to fluorescein and was complemented by histological evaluation of depth of injury. The opacity endpoint was not used, as the surfactants in these products do not induce opacity in proportion to the depth of injury induced. Liquid laundry detergents were diluted to 25% and exposed to the corneas for 20 min while the granular detergents were diluted to 10% and exposed for 30 min. These conditions were selected for each product type to induce OD490 values in the midrange (between 0.5 and 0.6 absorbance units) and so increased or decreased irritation potential in the test formulas could readily be observed. Seventeen liquid and eleven granular laundry detergents were tested and the OD490 values ranged from 0.278 to 2.193 for the liquid detergents and 0.267 to 0.856 for the granular detergents. Histological changes in the epithelium and stroma were consistent with the OD490 values. These data suggest that the OD490 provides an effective measure of epithelial cell loss (degree of cell lysis) and thus irritation potential for these surfactant-based formulas. The upper-end benchmark set a known upper range for acceptable irritation for the product class. Those formulas inducing lower OD490 values may be considered to fall within the acceptable range while those inducing greater OD490 values should receive further evaluation and perhaps reformulation.

Reliable exposure information for cosmetic and other personal care products and ingredients is needed in order to conduct safety assessments. Essential information includes both the amount of product applied, and the frequency of use. To obtain current data, a study to assess consumer use practices was undertaken. Three widely used types of cosmetic products - facial cleanser, hair conditioner, and eye shadow - were included in the study. Three hundred and sixty women, ages 18-69 years, who regularly use the products of interest, were recruited nationwide within the US. Subjects were provided with a new container of the brand of product they normally use and kept diaries and recorded detailed daily usage information over a two week period. Products were weighed at the start and completion of the study in order to determine the total amount of product used. Statistical analyses of the data were conducted to derive summary distributions of use patterns. The mean and median usage per application, respectively, for the three product types were: facial cleanser, 2.57 g and 2.11 g; hair conditioner, 13.13 g and 10.21 g; and eye shadow, 0.03 g and 0.009 g. The mean and median usage per day for the three product types was: facial cleanser, 4.06 g and 3.25 g; hair conditioner, 13.77 g and 10.62 g; and eye shadow, 0.04 g and 0.010 g. The mean number of applications per day for facial cleanser, hair conditioner, and eye shadow was 1.6, 1.1, and 1.2, respectively. This study provides an estimate of current exposure information for commonly used products which will be useful for risk assessment purposes.

The bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay can be used to predict relative eye irritation potential of surfactant-based personal care formulations relative to a corporate benchmark. The human eye sting test is typically used to evaluate product claims of no tears/no stinging for children's bath products. A preliminary investigation was conducted to test a hypothesis that the BCOP assay could be used as a prediction model for relative ranking of human eye irritation responses under conditions of a standard human eye sting test to surfactant-based formulations. BCOP assays and human eye sting tests were conducted on 4 commercial and 1 prototype body wash (BW) developed specifically for children or as mild bath products. In the human eye sting test, 10 mul of a 10% dosing solution is instilled into one eye of each panelist (n = 20), and the contralateral eye is dosed with sterile water as a control. Bulbar conjunctival erythema responses of each eye are graded at 30 seconds by an ophthalmologist. The BCOP assay permeability values (optical density at 490 nm [OD(490)]) for the 5 BWs ranged from 0.438 to 1.252 (i.e., least to most irritating). By comparison, the number of panelists exhibiting erythema responses (mild to moderately pink) ranged from 3 of 20 panelists for the least irritating BW to 10 of 20 panelists for the most irritating BW tested. The relative ranking of eye irritation potential of the 5 BWs in the BCOP assay compares favorably with the relative ranking of the BWs in the human eye sting test. Based on these findings, the permeability endpoint of the BCOP assay, as described for surfactant-based formulations, showed promise as a prediction model for relative ranking of conjunctival erythema responses in the human eye. Consequently, screening of prototype formulations in the BCOP assay would allow for formula optimization of mild bath products prior to investment in a human eye sting test.

Evaluation of eye irritation potential is a routine part of product safety testing. Many companies have elected to use in vitro methods for this evaluation. We used the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay for the prediction of the eye irritation potential of surfactant-based rinse-off personal care formulations in this study because of its positive performance in previous studies (1), and its potential to measure depth of injury through histological evaluation. The BCOP uses isolated corneas maintained in short-term organ culture and measures changes in opacity and epithelial barrier integrity (as determined by fluorescein passage through the cornea). Surfactants (anionic and nonionic) used in personal care formulations induce only small increases in direct opacity but the degree of epithelial damage is reflected in permeability measurement (OD490). The permeability measurement is the primary endpoint for this class of products. Marketed liquid hand soap was selected as the benchmark due to extensive in vivo and market history data. Using the liquid hand soap, a 25% v/v aqueous dilution with a 30-minute exposure produced the optimal resolution. A series of products with known in vivo eye irritation scores were evaluated to establish a prediction model. Histological evaluation was used to compare the degree of tissue damage to the permeability scores. Based on the permeability scores and histological review, the testing protocol for a surfactant-based rinse-off personal care formulation was developed using a 25% v/v aqueous dilution, a 30-minute exposure, concurrent testing of the benchmark control, and use of permeability measurements as the endpoint for the evaluation of eye irritation potential.

Newborn Swiss-Webster mice were given an intraperitoneal injection of 25 micrograms of dimethylnitrosamine. At weaning they began receiving 0.05% phenobarbital in the drinking water to promote the lesions for the term of the study. Preneoplastic foci and hyperplastic nodules were identified histologically by two markers, resistance to exogenous iron accumulation and an increase in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase activity. AT 8, 12, and 16 weeks of age, livers of affected male mice exhibited 12, 18, and 12 iron-resistant foci/cm2 and 13, 9, and 9 gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-positive foci/cm2, respectively (average for median right and right anterior sublobes). Iron-resistant nodules were first observed at 8 weeks; however, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-positive nodules were not noted until 12 weeks. In animals that received dimethylnitrosamine but were not placed on phenobarbital, there was an average of 5 foci/cm2 (iron-resistant or gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-positive) at 12 weeks while no nodules were noted. This model could provide a practical short-term in vivo tool for the detection of early sequential cellular alterations produced by initiators, inhibitors, and promoters of carcinogenesis.