Search

Tumors with an impaired ability to repair DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination, including those with alterations in breast cancer 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) genes, are very sensitive to blocking DNA single-strand repair by inhibition of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzyme. This provides the basis for a synthetic deadly strategy in the treatment of different types of cancer, such as prostate cancer (PCa). The phase 3 PROfound study was the first to lead to olaparib approval in patients with metastatic castration resistant PCa (mCRPC) and BRCA genes mutations. In recent years, the benefit of combination therapy consisted of a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) plus an androgen receptor signalling inhibitor (ARSi), was evaluated as first-line treatment of mCRPC, regardless of the mutational state of genes, participating in the homologous recombination repair (HRR). This review explores the role of PARPi in PCa and analyses the data of latest clinical trials exploring the PARPi—ARSi combinations, and how these results could change our clinical practice.

AbstractBackgroundMethodsResultsConclusionsTo review the literature to outline findings from clinical trials assessing interventions for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients who have progressed on androgen receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) therapies.A systematic literature review was performed to identify trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of interventions used in patients that progressed on prior ARAT therapies. A literature search was conducted using the OVID platform that searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL bibliographic databases.Of the 10,114 citations identified, a total of 36 studies representing 33 unique trials were included in the review. Of the 33 trials, 21 were randomized controlled trials and 12 were single-arm trials. A total of 11 were phase III trials, 13 were phase II trials, and 2 were phase I trials. The majority of included trials were open-label (n = 29) and the remaining were double-blind (n = 4). A total of 16 trials evaluated ARAT based therapies, 7 trials evaluated taxane-based treatments, 10 trials evaluated PARP inhibitors, 8 trials evaluated immunotherapies, and 8 trials evaluated other therapies (i.e. cabozantinib, mitoxantrone, radium-223,177[Lu-177]-PNT2002,177Lu-PSMA-617, samotolisib).This systematic review demonstrated there are limited effective treatment options in this patient population. Unlike other cancer types, immunotherapy agents appear to provide little to no benefit. Conversely, agents such as taxane-based chemotherapy (e.g. cabazitaxel) and radionuclide therapy provide the most value in this patient population. Further research is needed to explore new therapies in this disease area and to optimize existing treatment strategies with more effective combination therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The risk of CRPC-M1 did not significantly vary according to the type of ADT used at progression. The risk of a CRPC-M0 progression increased 3.48 times using continuous ADT when compared to IAD. Introduction: To analyze whether the use of an intermittent (IAD) versus continuous (CAD) androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of biochemical progression after primary treatments in prostate cancer can influence the development of nonmetastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC-M0). Patients: 170 male patients with an histologically confirmed diagnosis of PC, presenting a biochemical progression after primary treatments (82 after radical prostatectomy and 88 after external radiation therapy), nonmetastatic at imaging were considered for continuous (85 cases) or intermittent (85 cases) administration of androgen deprivation therapy. Methods: we retrospectively collect all data regarding histological diagnosis, primary treatment, imaging for M0-M1 staging, PSA at progression, time to biochemical progression from primary therapy, ADT used, IAD cycles, so to compare in 2 groups (IAD vs. CAD) time for progression from the beginning of ADT treatment and type of progression in terms of CRPC-M0 versus CRPC-M1 cases. Results: no significant (P = .4955) difference in the whole CRPC progression was found between IAD (25.8%) and CAD (30.5%) treatment at a mean of 32.7 ± 7.02 months and 35.6 ± 13.1 months respectively (P = .0738). Mean PSA at CRPC development was significantly higher in the IAD group (5.16 ± 0.68 ng/mL) than in the CAD group (3.1 ± 0.7 ng/mL) (P < .001). In all cases, imaging to detect M status at CRPC development was PET TC scan. At univariate analysis CAD administration significantly increases the RR for CRPC-M0 progression (RR 3.48; 95%CI 1.66-7.29; P = .01) when compared to the IAD administration, and this effect at multivariate analysis remained significant and independent to the other variables (RR 2.34, 95%CI 1.52-5.33; P = .03). Conclusions: in our population with biochemical progression after primary treatment for PC, the intermittent administration of ADT significantly reduces the risk to develop CRPC-M0 disease when compared to a continuous administration of ADT, whereas no difference between the 2 strategies in terms of CRPC-M1 progression exists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a primary treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PCa), but resistance often leads to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). CRPC remains androgen receptor (AR)-dependent, and AR overexpression causes vulnerability to high doses of androgen in CRPC. Bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) refers to the periodic administration of testosterone, resulting in oscillation between supraphysiologic and near-castrate serum testosterone levels. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of BAT against CRPC in a preclinical setting. To emulate CRPC characteristics, PCa cell lines (LNCaP, VCaP, and 22Rv1) were cultured in phenol red-free RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% dextran-coated charcoal treated FBS (A− cell line). Cell viability, AR, and AR-V7 expression were evaluated using the Cell Counting Kit-8 and Western blotting. In vivo studies involved 12 castrated NOG mice injected with LNCaP/A− cells, treated with testosterone pellets or controls in 2-week cycles. Tumor sizes were measured post a 6-week treatment cycle. Bicalutamide inhibited PCa cell viability but not in the adapted cell lines. Supraphysiologic androgen levels suppressed AR-expressing PCa cell growth in vitro. In vivo, high AR-expressing LNCaP cells proliferated under castrate conditions, while BAT-treated xenografts exhibited significant growth inhibition with low Ki-67 and mitotic indexes and a high cell death index. This study provides preliminary evidence that BAT is effective for the treatment of CRPC through rapid cycling between supraphysiologic and near-castrate serum testosterone levels, inducing an anti-tumor effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several new systemic treatments for primary metastatic prostate cancer patients (mPCa) were introduced in the last decade for both hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, little is known about the introduction of these treatments in clinical practice. In this national cohort study, we described users and non-users of systemic treatment beyond androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We also explored whether there was a shift in treatment patterns after the introduction of Docetaxel for mHSPC patients. All patients registered in the Cancer Registry of Norway with mPCa diagnosed in 2010-18 were included. Data on systemic therapy (Docetaxel, Abiraterone, Enzalutamide, Cabazitaxel, and Radium-223) were provided from the Norwegian Prescription Database, the Norwegian Patient Registry, and the Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursement Database. Descriptive results about patient and disease characteristics were presented using frequencies and proportions, means and standard deviations, or medians and interquartile ranges. Of the 2770 patients included in this study, 48% received systemic treatment beyond ADT. The proportion of patients receiving systemic treatment increased during the study period. Systemic treatment users were younger, in better general condition, and had more aggressive tumors than non-users. A treatment shift was observed after 2015, with 48% of patients receiving systemic treatment (mainly Docetaxel) in the mHSPC phase compared to 4% of those diagnosed 2010-14. No significant treatment differences were observed across health regions. An increasing proportion of patients received systemic treatment during the period 2010–18. However, less than 50% of patients in our study received systemic treatment. In accordance with updated guidelines, Docetaxel was introduced after 2015 with an increasing proportion of patients receiving systemic treatment as mHSPC. Further studies should address the disease course and treatment given to patients who do not receive systemic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Prostate cancer is currently the second most lethal malignancy in men worldwide due to metastasis and invasion in advanced stages. Studies have revealed that androgen deprivation therapy can induce stable remission in patients with advanced prostate cancer, although most patients will develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in 1–2 years. Docetaxel and enzalutamide improve survival in patients with CRPC, although only for a short time, eventually patients develop primary or secondary resistance, causing disease progression or biochemical relapse. Methods The gene expression profiles of docetaxel-sensitive or -resistant prostate cancer cell lines, namely GSE33455, GSE36135, GSE78201, GSE104935, and GSE143408, were sequentially analyzed for differentially expressed genes and progress-free interval significance. Subsequently, the overall survival significance and clinic-pathological features were analyzed by the R package. The implications of hub genes mutations, methylation in prostate cancer and the relationship with the tumor immune cell infiltration microenvironment were assessed with the help of cBioPortal, UALCAN and TISIDB web resources. Finally, effects of the hub genes on the progression and drug resistance in prostate cancer were explored using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry, cell phenotype, and drug sensitivity. Result Glutamate decarboxylase 1 (GAD1) was tentatively identified by bioinformatic analysis as an hub gene for the development of drug resistance, including docetaxel and enzalutamide, in prostate cancer. Additionally, GAD1 expression, mutation and methylation were significantly correlated with the clinicopathological features and the tumor immune microenvironment. RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, cell phenotype and drug sensitivity experiments further demonstrated that GAD1 promoted prostate cancer progression and decreased the therapeutic effect of docetaxel or enzalutamide. Conclusion This research confirmed that GAD1 was a hub gene in the progression and development of drug resistance in prostate cancer. This helped to explain prostate cancer drug resistance and provides new immune-related therapeutic targets and biomarkers for it.

Background: Prostate cancer is currently the second most lethal malignancy in men worldwide due to metastasis and invasion in advanced stages. Studies have revealed that androgen deprivation therapy can induce stable remission in patients with advanced prostate cancer, although most patients will develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in 1–2 years. Docetaxel and enzalutamide improve survival in patients with CRPC, although only for a short time, eventually patients develop primary or secondary resistance, causing disease progression or biochemical relapse. Methods: The gene expression profiles of docetaxel-sensitive or -resistant prostate cancer cell lines, namely GSE33455, GSE36135, GSE78201, GSE104935, and GSE143408, were sequentially analyzed for differentially expressed genes and progress-free interval significance. Subsequently, the overall survival significance and clinic-pathological features were analyzed by the R package. The implications of hub genes mutations, methylation in prostate cancer and the relationship with the tumor immune cell infiltration microenvironment were assessed with the help of cBioPortal, UALCAN and TISIDB web resources. Finally, effects of the hub genes on the progression and drug resistance in prostate cancer were explored using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry, cell phenotype, and drug sensitivity. Result: Glutamate decarboxylase 1 (GAD1) was tentatively identified by bioinformatic analysis as an hub gene for the development of drug resistance, including docetaxel and enzalutamide, in prostate cancer. Additionally, GAD1 expression, mutation and methylation were significantly correlated with the clinicopathological features and the tumor immune microenvironment. RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, cell phenotype and drug sensitivity experiments further demonstrated that GAD1 promoted prostate cancer progression and decreased the therapeutic effect of docetaxel or enzalutamide. Conclusion: This research confirmed that GAD1 was a hub gene in the progression and development of drug resistance in prostate cancer. This helped to explain prostate cancer drug resistance and provides new immune-related therapeutic targets and biomarkers for it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Treatment‐emergent small cell/neuroendocrine prostate cancer occurs predominantly in advanced or metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer that arises when prostate adenocarcinoma is transformed after androgen deprivation therapy. The clinical course for the pathogenesis involved or associated genetic information have not been clearly elucidated. Case presentation A Japanese male, 63‐year‐old, underwent a para‐aortic lymph biopsy due to sudden severe bilateral leg edema, with a final diagnosis of stage IV prostate adenocarcinoma. He was initially responsive to upfront abiraterone with androgen deprivation therapy; however, relapse occurred in the liver and bone 10 months after initial treatment, with serum neuron‐specific enolase elevation and without prostate‐specific antigen elevation. Pathological findings of liver tumor revealed treatment‐emergent small cell/neuroendocrine prostate cancer. FoundationOne® CDx was used for cancer‐related gene profiling of liver tumor specimen; a BRCA2 mutation was identified. Conclusion Early detection of this transformation and pathological diagnosis can improve patient survival when genetic mutations, including BRCA 1/2.

The optimal sequence and combination of radium-223 therapy (Ra-223) for castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastasis (mCRPC) remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the prognostic factors after Ra-223 administration and to determine the optimal treatment strategy. We enrolled 64 patients with mCRPC who underwent Ra-223 therapy from June 2016 to July 2022 at a single institution in Japan. Overall survival (OS) and pain progression-free survival (p-PFS), which was proposed as a measure of quality of life (QOL), were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models and log-rank tests, and between-factor analysis was performed with the Mann–Whitney U (MWU) test. Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed prognostic factors; specifically, early treatment (≤third line), completion of six treatment cycles, low bone scan index (BSI) (

Background: The development of conditionally replicative adenoviruses (CRAds) for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), particularly neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), has two major obstacles: choice of control element and poor infectivity. We applied fiber-modification-based infectivity enhancement and an androgen-independent promoter (cyclooxynegase-2, COX-2) to overcome these issues. Methods: The properties of the COX-2 promoter and the effect of fiber modification were tested in two CRPC cell lines (Du-145 and PC3). Fiber-modified COX-2 CRAds were tested in vitro for cytocidal effect as well as in vivo for antitumor effect with subcutaneous CRPC xenografts. Results: In both CRPC cell lines, the COX-2 promoter showed high activity, and Ad5/Ad3 fiber modification significantly enhanced adenoviral infectivity. COX-2 CRAds showed a potent cytocidal effect in CRPC cells with remarkable augmentation by fiber modification. In vivo, COX-2 CRAds showed an antitumor effect in Du-145 while only Ad5/Ad3 CRAd showed the strongest antitumor effect in PC3. Conclusion: COX-2 promoter–based, infectivity-enhanced CRAds showed a potent antitumor effect in CRPC/NEPC cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The suppression of androgen receptor (AR) expression exacerbates the migration potential of prostate cancer. This study identified a previously unrecognized regulation of the AR‐controlled pathway that promotes migration potential in prostate cancer cells. Prostate cancer cells that pass through a transwell membrane (mig cells) have a higher migration potential with a decreased AR expression than parental cells. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the mechanism of migration enhancement associated with the suppression of AR signaling. Expression of C–C motif ligand 20 (CCL20) is upregulated in mig cells, unlike in the parental cells. Knockdown of AR with small interfering RNA (siAR) in LNCaP and C4‐2B cells increased CCL20 secretion and enhanced the migration of cancer cells. Mig cells, CCL20‐treated cells, and siAR cells promoted cell migration with an enhancement of AKT phosphorylation and Snail expression, while the addition of a C–C chemokine receptor 6 (CCR6, the specific receptor of CCL20) inhibitor, anti‐CCL20 antibody, and AKT inhibitor suppressed the activation of AKT and Snail. With 59 samples of prostate cancer tissue, CCL20 secretion was profuse in metastatic cases despite low AR expression levels. Snail expression was associated with the expression of CCL20 and CCR6. A xenograft study showed that the anti‐CCL20 antibody significantly inhibited Snail expression, thereby suggesting a new therapeutic approach for castration‐resistant prostate cancer with the inhibition of the axis between CCL20 and CCR6. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a primary treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PCa), but resistance often leads to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). CRPC remains androgen receptor (AR)-dependent, and AR overexpression causes vulnerability to high doses of androgen in CRPC. Bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) refers to the periodic administration of testosterone, resulting in oscillation between supraphysiologic and near-castrate serum testosterone levels. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of BAT against CRPC in a preclinical setting. To emulate CRPC characteristics, PCa cell lines (LNCaP, VCaP, and 22Rv1) were cultured in phenol red-free RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% dextran-coated charcoal treated FBS (A− cell line). Cell viability, AR, and AR-V7 expression were evaluated using the Cell Counting Kit-8 and Western blotting. In vivo studies involved 12 castrated NOG mice injected with LNCaP/A− cells, treated with testosterone pellets or controls in 2-week cycles. Tumor sizes were measured post a 6-week treatment cycle. Bicalutamide inhibited PCa cell viability but not in the adapted cell lines. Supraphysiologic androgen levels suppressed AR-expressing PCa cell growth in vitro. In vivo, high AR-expressing LNCaP cells proliferated under castrate conditions, while BAT-treated xenografts exhibited significant growth inhibition with low Ki-67 and mitotic indexes and a high cell death index. This study provides preliminary evidence that BAT is effective for the treatment of CRPC through rapid cycling between supraphysiologic and near-castrate serum testosterone levels, inducing an anti-tumor effect.

Copyright of Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine is the property of Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer pretreated with multiple regimens including docetaxel and androgen receptor-targeted agents. Methods: Clinical data from patients treated with carboplatin plus paclitaxel were collected retrospectively from a single institution. Results: 43 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were identified. Median number of cycles was ten (range: 1 to 23), prostate-specific antigen response was observed in 18 (42%) patients, median progression-free survival was 115 days and median overall survival was 8.1 months. Conclusion: Combination chemotherapy using taxane with carboplatin is an effective and well-tolerated therapy in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The prognosis of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) refractory to docetaxel is poor, with only limited guidance on the optimal treatment strategy. We reviewed patients with mCRPC treated with weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel in a single institution, analyzing their prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival, treatment duration and overall survival (OS). Potential predictive biomarkers and tolerability were evaluated. 43 patients treated between 2012 and 2020 were identified, including 40 refractory to docetaxel. 19 (44%) had received two prior chemotherapy regimens and 38 (88%) were pretreated with androgen receptor-targeted agents; 18 patients (42%) had bone-only disease and 16 (37%) had visceral disease. Median number of cycles was ten (range: 1 to 23), PSA response (>50% decline) was observed in 18 patients (42%), median progression-free survival was 115 days and median OS was 8.36 months. 11 patients (26%) experienced reversible grade 3 or 4 toxicity, two (5%) had febrile neutropenia, and no lethal adverse events were observed. The prognostic role for OS was confirmed for PSA response, higher line of therapy, pretreatment with enzalutamide, longer response to androgen-deprivation therapy and response to docetaxel. In conclusion, combination chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel is a viable, effective and well-tolerated therapy in heavily pretreated patients with mCRPC, but should be validated in a prospective trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the major cancers affecting men. Localized and loco-regional PCa is usually treated by radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, cryosurgery or with HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound). Advanced or metastatic cancers are most often treated with androgen deprivation therapy, but too often such patients progress to lethal castration-resistant PCa. IL-6 plays a key role in prostate cancer but no data on ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), a member of interleukin-6 cytokine family, are known. We detected CNTF and its receptor CNTFRα in human androgen-responsive and in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) tissues. In addition, we showed that CNTF downregulated MMP-2 and GLUT-1 expression by MAPK/ERK, AKT/PI3K and Jak/STAT pathways in a CRPC in vitro model. This suggests a pivotal role of CNTF as negative modulator of invasion processes in this PCa model. Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the most common diagnosed tumor and is the second-leading cause of cancer-related death in men. If the cancer is organ-confined it can be treated by various ablative therapies such as RP (radical prostatectomy), RT (radiation therapy), brachytherapy, cryosurgery or HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound). However, advanced or metastatic PCa treatment requires systemic therapy involving androgen deprivation, but such patients typically progress to refractory disease designated as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been established as a driver of prostate carcinogenesis and tumor progression while less is known about the role of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), a member of the IL-6 cytokine family in prostate cancer. Moreover, MAPK/ERK, AKT/PI3K and Jak/STAT pathways that regulate proliferative, invasive and glucose-uptake processes in cancer progression are triggered by CNTF. Methods: We investigate CNTF and its receptor CNTFRα expressions in human androgen-responsive and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) by immunohistochemistry. Moreover, we investigated the role of CNTF in proliferative, invasive processes as well as glucose uptake using two cell models mimicking the PCa (LNCaP cell line) and CRPC (22Rv1 cell line). Conclusions: Our results showed that CNTF and CNTFRa were expressed in PCa and CRPC tissues and that CNTF has a pivotal role in prostate cancer environment remodeling and as a negative modulator of invasion processes of CRPC cell models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is now an unprecedented amount of evidence to consider when revising prostate cancer guidelines. We believe that there is a value in publishing summaries of national clinical guidelines in English for others to read and comment on. This is part 2 of a summary of the Swedish prostate cancer guidelines that were published in June 2022. This part covers recurrence after local treatment and management of metastatic and castration resistant disease. Part 1 covers early detection, diagnostics, staging, patient support and management of non-metastatic disease. The 2022 Swedish guidelines include several new recommendations. Among these is a recommendation of a period of observation with repeated PSA tests for patients with approximately 10 years' life expectancy who experience a BCR more than 2–5 years after radical prostatectomy, to allow for estimating the PSA doubling time before deciding whether to give salvage radiotherapy or not. Recent results from the PEACE-1 trial led to the recommendation of triple-treatment with a GnRH agonist, abiraterone plus prednisolone and 6 cycles of docetaxel for patients with high-volume metastatic disease who are fit for chemotherapy. The Swedish guidelines differ from the European ones by having more restrictive recommendations about genetic testing of and high-dose zoledronic acid or denosumab treatment for men with metastatic prostate cancer, and by recommending considering bicalutamide monotherapy for selected patients with low-volume metastatic disease. The 2022 Swedish prostate cancer guidelines include several new recommendations and some that differ from the European guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death and affects millions of men in the world. The American Cancer Society estimated about 34,500 deaths from prostate cancer in the United States in year 2022. The Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is a major pathway that sustains local and metastatic prostate tumor growth. Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer patient and can suppress the tumor growth for a median of 2–3 years. Unfortunately, the malignancy inevitably progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) which is more aggressive and no longer responsive to ADT. Surprisingly, for most of the CPRC patients, cancer growth still depends on androgen receptor signaling. Accumulating evidence suggests that CRPC cells have rewired their transcriptional program to retain AR signaling in the absence of androgens. Besides AR, other transcription factors also contribute to the resistance mechanism through multiple pathways including enhancing AR signaling pathway and activating other complementary signaling pathways for the favor of AR downstream genes expression. More recent studies have shown the role of transcription factors in reconfiguring chromatin 3D structure and regulating topologically associating domains (TADs). Pioneer factors, transcription factors and coactivators form liquid-liquid phase separation compartment that can modulate transcriptional events along with configuring TADs. The role of AR and other transcription factors on chromatin structure change and formation of condensate compartment in prostate cancer cells has only been recently investigated and appreciated. This review intends to provide an overview of transcription factors that contribute to AR signaling through activation of gene expression, governing 3D chromatin structure and establishing phase to phase separation. A more detailed understanding of the spatial role of transcription factors in CRPC might provide novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of CRPC.

Background: The development of conditionally replicative adenoviruses (CRAds) for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), particularly neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), has two major obstacles: choice of control element and poor infectivity. We applied fiber-modification-based infectivity enhancement and an androgen-independent promoter (cyclooxynegase-2, COX-2) to overcome these issues. Methods: The properties of the COX-2 promoter and the effect of fiber modification were tested in two CRPC cell lines (Du-145 and PC3). Fiber-modified COX-2 CRAds were tested in vitro for cytocidal effect as well as in vivo for antitumor effect with subcutaneous CRPC xenografts. Results: In both CRPC cell lines, the COX-2 promoter showed high activity, and Ad5/Ad3 fiber modification significantly enhanced adenoviral infectivity. COX-2 CRAds showed a potent cytocidal effect in CRPC cells with remarkable augmentation by fiber modification. In vivo, COX-2 CRAds showed an antitumor effect in Du-145 while only Ad5/Ad3 CRAd showed the strongest antitumor effect in PC3. Conclusion: COX-2 promoter–based, infectivity-enhanced CRAds showed a potent antitumor effect in CRPC/NEPC cells.

Patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) typically undergo numerous lines of treatment leading to large amounts of information in Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The Patient-overview Prostate Cancer (PPC) presents clinical information in a graphical overview. The aim of this study was to measure time spent on retrieving clinical information in PPC compared to EHRs, to assess if retrieved data was correct and to explore usability of PPC. Oncologists, urologists and nurses in three hospitals in Sweden were timed when filling out questionnaires about patients using PPC and two different EHRs; Melior and COSMIC. Time and number of errors were analysed using linear mixed models (LMMs). Usability of PPC was measured with the System Usability Scale. The LMM showed a significantly shorter time to retrieve information in PPC compared to EHRs. The estimated time to complete one questionnaire was 8 minutes (95% CI = 6–10, p < 0.001) in PPC compared to 25 minutes in Melior and 21 minutes in COSMIC. Compared to PPC, the estimated time difference was 17 minutes longer in Melior (95% CI = 14–20, p < 0.001) and 13 minutes longer in COSMIC (95% CI = 10–17, p < 0.001). The LMM showed significantly fewer errors in PPC compared to Melior. No significant difference in the number of errors was found between PPC and COSMIC. The usability of PPC was rated as excellent by oncologists, urologists and nurses. A graphical overview of a patient's medical history, as in PPC, gives health staff rapid access to relevant information with a high degree of usability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New classification systems based on molecular features have been introduced to improve precision medicine for prostate cancer (PCa). This review covers the increasing risk of PCa and the differences in response to targeted therapy that are related to specific gene variations. We believe that genomic evaluations will be useful for guiding PCa risk stratification, screening, and treatment. We searched the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for articles related to genomic testing for PCa that were published in 2020 or earlier. There is increasing evidence that germline mutations in DNA repair genes, such as BRCA1/2 or ATM, are closely related to the development and aggressiveness of PCa. Targeted prostate-specific antigen screening based on the presence of germline alterations in DNA repair genes is recommend to achieve an early diagnosis of PCa. In cases of localized PCa, even if it has a favorable risk classification, patients under active surveillance with these gene alterations are likely to develop aggressive PCa. Thus, active treatment may be preferable to active surveillance for these patients. In cases of metastatic castration–resistant PCa, BRCA1/2 and DNA mismatch repair genes may be useful biomarkers for predicting the response to androgen receptor–targeting agents, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, platinum chemotherapy, prostate-specific membrane antigen–targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radium-223. Genomic evaluations may allow for risk stratification of patients with PCa based on their molecular features, which may help guide precision medicine for treating PCa.

Prostate cancer is among the most common types of cancer in men. Early detection and proper medical intervention is crucial to ensuring successful treatment. Here we describe a patient clinically presenting with castrate-resistant prostate carcinoma. Comprehensive genomic profiling identified a PTEN inactivating mutation in the patient’s tumor. After being heavily pretreated, the patient showed stable disease on everolimus, a PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway inhibitor.

There have been significant advances in our understanding of the biology of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) and its response to therapy. Androgen receptor (AR) alterations, including mutations, amplifications, splice variants, and alternative activations, play a significant role in mPCa resistance to treatment. Recent studies indicate that AR alterations detected via genomic testing can be considered predictive biomarkers in men with castration-resistant PCa and can guide treatment strategies. Novel therapeutic approaches, including AR antagonists and inhibitors of ACK1, the AR N-terminal domain, or cytochrome P450 11A1, have shown promise in overcoming treatment resistance. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the efficacy of these treatments in relation to AR mutation status and could potentially transform the treatment landscape for mPCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our mini review highlights advances in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, with a focus on drugs that target genetic alterations affecting a protein called the androgen receptor. Some promising results have been obtained and clinical trials are ongoing., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Retrospective analyses of randomized trials suggest that Black men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have longer survival than White men. The authors conducted a prospective study of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone to explore outcomes by race. Methods: This race‐stratified, multicenter study estimated radiographic progression‐free survival (rPFS) in Black and White men with mCRPC. Secondary end points included prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory analysis included genome‐wide genotyping to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with progression in a model incorporating genetic ancestry. One hundred patients self‐identified as White (n = 50) or Black (n = 50) were enrolled. Eligibility criteria were modified to facilitate the enrollment of individual Black patients. Results: The median rPFS for Black and White patients was 16.6 and 16.8 months, respectively; their times to PSA progression (TTP) were 16.6 and 11.5 months, respectively; and their OS was 35.9 and 35.7 months, respectively. Estimated rates of PSA decline by ≥50% in Black and White patients were 74% and 66%, respectively; and PSA declines to <0.2 ng/mL were 26% and 10%, respectively. Rates of grade 3 and 4 hypertension, hypokalemia, and hyperglycemia were higher in Black men. Conclusions: Multicenter prospective studies by race are feasible in men with mCRPC but require less restrictive eligibility. Despite higher comorbidity rates, Black patients demonstrated rPFS and OS similar to those of White patients and trended toward greater TTP and PSA declines, consistent with retrospective reports. Importantly, Black men may have higher side‐effect rates than White men. This exploratory genome‐wide analysis of TTP identified a possible candidate marker of ancestry‐dependent treatment outcomes. This is the first prospective, race‐stratified study in advanced prostate cancer demonstrating important trends in outcomes previously only observed in retrospective reports. These results demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in a multicenter setting and establish important preliminary data with regard to differences in toxicity profiles and predictive biomarkers by race. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current treatment options for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are noncurative, and median survival upon development of mCRPC is approximately 3 years. The novel hormonal agent enzalutamide has an established role in the mCRPC treatment paradigm, and emerging evidence suggests potential synergism with enzalutamide and the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in men with mCRPC. Here, we describe the design and rationale for the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, Phase III KEYNOTE-641 study, which will be conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide with that of enzalutamide plus placebo in mCRPC. Clinical trial registration: NCT03834493 (ClinicalTrials.gov). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE In this study, we aim to determine which treatment is more appropriate in castration-resistant chemotherapy- naive patients. Therefore, docetaxel and agents active in the androgen pathway (abiraterone and enzalutamide) were compared retrospectively in patients progressing on androgen deprivation therapy. METHODS The study was designed as a retrospective and multicenter study. Patients from five centers in Turkey were included in the study. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival. RESULTS Median OS of the docetaxel group was 18.66 months, it was 16.26 months in the hormonal treatment group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.311). Median progressionfree survival of the chemotherapy group was 5.6 months, while it was 9 months in the hormonal therapy group. There was statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.024). CONCLUSION There was statistical difference in progression-free survival in favor of hormonal therapies in our study. The difference did not reflect on OS and there was no difference between hormonal therapies and docetaxel. Heterogeneity in the selection of patients is considered to lead to this result; however, larger randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the most appropriate treatment in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Hungarian Medical Journal / Orvosi Hetilap is the property of Akademiai Kiado and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Androgen receptor (AR) is a steroid receptor transcriptional factor for testosterone and dihydrotestosterone consisting of four main domains, the N-terminal domain, DNA-binding domain, hinge region, and ligand-binding domain. AR plays pivotal roles in prostate cancer, especially castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Androgen deprivation therapy can suppress hormone-naïve prostate cancer, but prostate cancer changes AR and adapts to survive under castration levels of androgen. These mechanisms include AR point mutations, AR overexpression, changes of androgen biosynthesis, constitutively active AR splice variants without ligand binding, and changes of androgen cofactors. Studies of AR in CRPC revealed that AR was still active in CRPC, and it remains as a potential target to treat CRPC. Enzalutamide is a second-generation antiandrogen effective in patients with CRPC before and after taxane-based chemotherapy. However, CRPC is still incurable and can develop drug resistance. Understanding the mechanisms of this resistance can enable new-generation therapies for CRPC. Several promising new AR-targeted therapies have been developed. Apalutamide is a new Food and Drug Administration-approved androgen agonist binding to the ligand-binding domain, and clinical trials of other new AR-targeted agents binding to the ligand-binding domain or N-terminal domain are underway. This review focuses on the functions of AR in prostate cancer and the development of CRPC and promising new agents against CRPC.

Objectives: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of surveillance11 C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of disease relapse in patients with a history of biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤0.1 ng/ml.Materials and Methods: We included patients who had been treated for BCR PCa and had a surveillance11 C-choline PET/CT at serum PSA ≤0.1 ng/ml. Positive surveillance PET/CT was defined as a study that identified a new tracer-avid lesion or new tracer uptake in a previously treated lesion or both. Findings were confirmed against a composite radiologic-pathologic gold standard. Time to recurrence association analyses were performed for disease relapse risk with the use of Cox proportional hazards regression.Results: In total, 13 (12.1%) of the 107 patients had positive surveillance PET/CT scans, confirmed on pathologic assessment (n = 5) and subsequent imaging (n = 8). Among these 13 patients, ten had distant metastases, two had local recurrence, and one had both. Nine of the ten patients with metastases had oligometastatic disease defined as the presence of ≤3 metastases. Serum PSA became detectable again in only seven patients with positive surveillance PET/CT, after a mean interval from surveillance PET/CT of 292 days (range: 105-543 days). We identified an association of N stage with increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 3.85; P = 0.036) although this was not significant after accounting for multiple testing.Conclusions: Surveillance11 C-choline PET/CT can detect early disease relapse at serum PSA ≤0.1 ng/ml in patients with a history of BCR PCa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to model local long-term cost-benefit data of alternative health technologies for the treatment of patients with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and to make an indirect comparison based on a network meta-analysis. Input data into the model were the measured and evaluated clinical endpoints in the randomized SPARTAN and PROSPER clinical trials. Indirect comparison is possible due to the presence of a common therapeutic alternative in the control groups of the trials. A Markov model was used with two health states and one absorbing state. The time horizon of the model was lifetime. Costs and benefits were discounted by 3.5% per annum. The chosen perspective was the point of view of the third party payer. The modeling was performed using the TreeAge Pro Health Care software product. The results suggest that apalutamide in combination with androgen-suppressing therapy is a therapeutically effective and cost-effective treatment compared to enzalutamide and androgen-suppressing therapy in patients with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed a 75% probability that the value of the cost-benefit ratio would be below the cost-effectiveness threshold of three times the gross domestic product per capita in Bulgaria for previous year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To present a summary of the 2020 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The working panel performed a literature review of the new data (2016–2019). The guidelines were updated, and the levels of evidence and/or grades of recommendation were added based on a systematic review of the literature. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography scanning has developed an increasingly important role in men with biochemical recurrence after local therapy. Early salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy appears as effective as adjuvant radiotherapy and, in a subset of patients, should be combined with androgen deprivation. New treatments have become available for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa), nonmetastatic CRPC, and metastatic CRPC, along with a role for local radiotherapy in men with low-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa. Also included is information on quality of life outcomes in men with PCa. The knowledge in the field of advanced and metastatic PCa and CRPC is changing rapidly. The 2020 EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and advice for use in clinical practice. These PCa guidelines are first endorsed by the EANM and reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. A full version is available from the EAU office or online (http://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/). This article summarises the guidelines for the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. These guidelines are evidence based and guide the clinician in the discussion with the patient on the treatment decisions to be taken. These guidelines are updated every year; this summary spans the 2017–2020 period of new evidence. The knowledge in the field of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and castration-resistant prostate cancer is changing rapidly. The 2020 European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and advice for use in clinical practice. These PCa guidelines are first endorsed by the EANM and reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. A full version is available from the EAU office or online (http://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ALSYMPCA trial of the α-emitter 223Ra in symptomatic bone-predominant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) reported a median overall survival (OS) of 14.9 mo, versus 11.3 mo for placebo. However, subsequently reported real-world experience with 223Ra in smaller mCRPC patient cohorts has appeared less successful. We performed a retrospective observational study to review our own 223Ra experience at West Virginia University (WVU). Methods: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were reviewed in all bone-predominant mCRPC patients treated with 223Ra at WVU from 2014 to 2019. The number of bone metastases per patient at the start of treatment with 223Ra was quantified via nuclear bone scans (12 scans, 5 of which also included SPECT/CT), body CT scans (8 scans), and PET/CT scans (4 scans). Standard descriptive statistics were used to study institutional review board-exempted, deidentified patient data. Median survival in ALSYMPCA and WVU patients was compared using a 2-sided, 1-sample log-rank test based on the exponential distributions. The primary endpoint was patient OS after initiating 223Ra. Results: Twenty-four patients received 98 infusions of 223Ra; 83% of these patients were referred from outside WVU. Before the first infusion, all 24 had received androgen deprivation therapy. In total, 73 sequential combinations of androgen deprivation therapy were used, 68 of which (93%) preceded the first 223Ra infusion. Also, before 223Ra, 19 (79%) patients had received docetaxel and 19 (79%) had received 33 courses of radiation, 24 of which targeted nonprostatic sites. Eleven patients (46%) completed all 6 planned 223Ra infusions; 13 (54%) stopped early because of clinical deterioration. As of August 2020, only 1 patient remained alive after completing 6 cycles of 223Ra. Median OS from the first 223Ra infusion to the last follow-up or death was 8.3 mo (range, 0-44 mo)-nearly 50% less than the ALSYMPCA median survival of 14.9 mo (P = 0.01). Compared with ALSYMPCA, more WVU patients received bisphosphonates and docetaxel, more had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of at least 2, more used opiates for pain, more had a greater bone metastasis burden by imaging, and more had lower hemoglobin, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and prostate-specific antigen levels. Conclusion: Although the science supporting the development and clinical use of 223Ra is compelling, optimal clinical benefit will likely require earlier referral for 223Ra, before patients have exhausted most conventional therapies. At WVU, we found that practically all our referred patients had androgen deprivation therapy, radiation, and cytotoxic therapy before starting 223Ra. We continue to offer 223Ra therapy to patients with symptomatic bone-predominant mCRPC but are encouraging earlier patient referral. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To review current data for the role of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) for patients with advanced prostate cancer. This review provides an update for multidisciplinary teams on the current and potential future applications of theranostics in prostate cancer. Methods: Narrative review focussing on PSMA as a target for RLT, and data using Results: RLT with PSMA is an exciting therapeutic alternative to the existing management options already in use for patients with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To date, most evidence exists regarding small‐molecule PSMA inhibitors bound to beta‐emitting radioisotopes such as 177Lu (Lu‐PSMA). Prospective phase II data supports the safety and efficacy of Lu‐PSMA in men with heavily pre‐treated progressive mCRPC, and several late‐phase randomised trials of Lu‐PSMA are underway, with many more in the pipeline. Early results are encouraging, indicating that the theranostic approach may play a vital role in management of advanced prostate cancer and perhaps even in much earlier disease states. Conclusions: PSMA RLT is a promising new treatment option for men with mCPRC, and may also have utility in less advanced prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We sought to explore the symptomatic experience of men recently told their castration-resistant prostate cancer has metastasized (mCRPC); the impact and emotional response to this; the emotional burden of monitoring development to metastatic status; and the emotional impact on the primary support person (PSP).Methods: Interviews were conducted with 25 men recently diagnosed with mCRPC from the United States (US), France, and Germany. We also interviewed 14 PSPs. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti.Results: The mean age of patients was 72.2 years; mean time since metastasis 7.8 months. The most frequent symptoms were fatigue/tiredness, sexual dysfunction, and pain. Metastasis had a negative emotional impact on the patient and PSP. Some explicitly associated certain symptoms/impacts with metastasis, such as localized pain, diarrhea, blood in stool, and increased impact on activities of daily living. About 72% of patients highlighted the emotional impact of a metastatic diagnosis, reporting worry/anxiety/fear, low mood/depression, shock, increased burden on PSP, and strain on relationships. Monitoring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values was important; ten patients explicitly discussed feeling fear/worry when PSA was rising, and glad/happy/excited when PSA was falling. Most reported that, if a medication had been available to them to delay metastasis, they would have taken it, even if they were asymptomatic.Conclusions: Interviews highlighted the substantial burden of mCRPC to both patient and PSP. Development of metastasis was associated with symptoms worsening rather than the development of new symptoms, with physical and emotional impacts. Most patients were willing to take a medication to delay metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the early twenty-first century, societies around the world are facing the paradoxal epidemic development of PCa as a non-communicable disease. PCa is the most frequently diagnosed cancer for men in several countries such as the USA. Permanently improving diagnostics and treatments in the PCa management causes an impressive divergence between, on one hand, permanently increasing numbers of diagnosed PCa cases and, on the other hand, stable or even slightly decreasing mortality rates. Still, aspects listed below are waiting for innovate solutions in the context of predictive approaches, targeted prevention and personalisation of medical care (PPPM / 3PM). PCa belongs to the cancer types with the highest incidence worldwide. Corresponding economic burden is enormous. Moreover, the costs of treating PCa are currently increasing more quickly than those of any other cancer. Implementing individualised patient profiles and adapted treatment algorithms would make currently too heterogeneous landscape of PCa treatment costs more transparent providing clear "road map" for the cost saving. PCa is a systemic multi-factorial disease. Consequently, predictive diagnostics by liquid biopsy analysis is instrumental for the disease prediction, targeted prevention and curative treatments at early stages. The incidence of metastasising PCa is rapidly increasing particularly in younger populations. Exemplified by trends observed in the USA, prognosis is that the annual burden will increase by over 40% in 2025. To this end, one of the evident deficits is the reactive character of medical services currently provided to populations. Innovative screening programmes might be useful to identify persons in suboptimal health conditions before the clinical onset of metastasising PCa. Strong predisposition to systemic hypoxic conditions and ischemic lesions (e.g. characteristic for individuals with Flammer syndrome phenotype) and low-grade inflammation might be indicative for specific phenotyping and genotyping in metastasising PCa screening and disease management. Predictive liquid biopsy tests for CTC enumeration and their molecular characterisation are considered to be useful for secondary prevention of metastatic disease in PCa patients. Particular rapidly increasing PCa incidence rates are characteristic for adolescents and young adults aged 15–40 years. Patients with early onset prostate cancer pose unique challenges; multi-factorial risks for these trends are proposed. Consequently, multi-level diagnostics including phenotyping and multi-omics are considered to be the most appropriate tool for the risk assessment, prediction and prognosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that early onset prostate cancer is a distinct phenotype from both aetiological and clinical perspectives deserving particular attention from view point of 3P medical approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Novel drugs have been shown to prolong life in men with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and castration resistant Pca (CRPC). The aim of Patient-overview Prostate cancer (PPC) is to register and report these treatments and their effect. Material and methods: In PPC, a new part of the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden data on start and stop of treatments, imaging, prostate specific antigen, clinical assessment of progression and patient reported outcome measures (PROM) are registered from initiation of hormonal treatment. Data are displayed in a graph to inform clinical decisions for individual patients. For research, data in PPC are linked to PCBaSe with information from NPCR and a number of health care registers. Results: In December 2019, 7 882 men had been registered in PPC out of whom 3 912 had reached the CRPC state. Median time to start of androgen receptor targeted drugs (ART) from start of ADT was 4 years (interquartile range IQR 6) for men with primary ADT, and 9 years (IQR 6) and for men with secondary ADT. Out of all men in PCBaSe with a prescription for ART in 2016-2017, PPC captured 1 480/4 055 (36%). There were small differences between men registered/not registered in PPC for cancer characteristics, primary treatment, comorbidity, and time on ADT before start of ART. Conclusion: In PPC, use and effects of novel therapies for advanced Pca are assessed in a real-life setting. PPC data are used as a decision aid, for quality assurance, and in research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can be initiated early at the time of diagnosis in asymptomatic castration-sensitive advanced prostate cancer. This definition has recently been expanded to also include an early combined treatment with standard ADT and new antihormonal drugs. We aimed to present the best available evidence for the timing of initiation of ADT monotherapy and combined treatments in castration-sensitive/-resistant prostate cancer. Methods: For this narrative review, we searched Cochrane reviews in the Cochrane Library, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE, phase III and ongoing trials in ClinicalTrials.gov and screened the reference lists to extract articles of interest. One author screened the references which were finally included after assessing their relevance through discussion with other experts in the field. Results: The identified references were grouped by medication (standard ADT, androgen biosynthesis inhibitor, androgen receptor antagonists or combined therapies) and tumor stage (castration sensitive or resistant). The evidence was narratively summarized and discussed in the context of the current therapeutic landscape. Conclusions: Early standard ADT can reduce symptoms of disease progression and may extend progression-free and overall survival. The patient should be well informed about the higher rates of treatment-related side effects. Deferring standard ADT might be indicated only for well-informed or unfit patients. Early standard ADT is increasingly combined with new antihormonal drugs in castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer to gain additional survival and quality of life benefits. Combined treatment at the time of development of castration-resistant disease is well established. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite early diagnosis and established protocols, a subset of prostate cancer patients will eventually be categorized as castration-resistant prostate cancer. Recently, it has been reported that these multi-modal therapy cases may harbor a special subset of cancer cells termed as polypoidal giant cancer cells (PGCC). These cells are phenotypically described either as possessing highly irregular polylobated nuclei or multiple pleomorphic nuclei. To identify and characterize the distribution of these cells, we created a cohort of 5 randomly selected cases of multi-modal therapy failure prostate cancer (16 selected non-osseous and osseous tumor sites) enrolled in Michigan Legacy Tissue Program. In all cases, specific "regions of interest" or "hot spots" within tumor areas showing an increased proportion of these multi-nucleated/polylobated cells under light microscopy were labeled as PGCC-rich area. On microscopic evaluation, overall mean count of PGCC was 42.4 ± 3.91 with case 2 in the study cohort with the highest number of average PGCC count of 17 ± 4.04. Site wise analysis showed retroperitoneal lymph node as the tissue with highest number of average PGCC number/site (5.0 ± 0.32). On correlating the average number of PGCC recorded with the time elapsed from last dose of chemotherapy administered to autopsy, the spearman correlation value (R) was 0.67, but the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.22). A systematic assessment of PGCC in a large stratified cohort of prostate cancer patients integrated with various histopathological and clinical parameters along with discovery of specific biomarkers for PGCC are the future studies suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostate cancer is among the most common types of cancer in men. Early detection and proper medical intervention is crucial to ensuring successful treatment. Here we describe a patient clinically presenting with castrate-resistant prostate carcinoma. Comprehensive genomic profiling identified a PTEN inactivating mutation in the patient's tumor. After being heavily pretreated, the patient showed stable disease on everolimus, a PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway inhibitor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the phase 3 ARAMIS study (NCT02200614), darolutamide significantly improved metastasis-free survival in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Following the primary analysis, the study was unblinded, and placebo recipients were permitted to cross over to open-label darolutamide. Despite crossover, darolutamide significantly improved overall survival (OS). We conducted sensitivity analyses to estimate the effect of placebo–darolutamide crossover on OS. Patients with nmCRPC were randomised to oral darolutamide 600 mg twice daily (n = 955) or placebo (n = 554). Prespecified (rank-preserving structural failure time [RPSFT] and iterative parameter estimation [IPE]) and post hoc (OS-adjusted censoring and inverse probability of censoring weighting [IPCW], with weightings for baseline testosterone and prostate-specific antigen) sensitivity analyses were conducted. After unblinding, 170 of 554 placebo recipients (30.7%) crossed over to darolutamide. At the final OS intention-to-treat analysis (median 11.2 months after unblinding), darolutamide significantly improved OS by 31% versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.88; P = 0.003). The benefit increased in the analyses adjusting for crossover is as follows: RPSFT HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51–0.90; P = 0.007; IPE HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51–0.84; P < 0.001; OS-adjusted censoring HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45–0.76; IPCW HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48–0.81. The favourable safety profile of darolutamide was maintained, including in crossover patients. After adjusting for crossover, darolutamide reduced the risk of death by up to 41% in patients with nmCRPC. The effect of darolutamide on OS may have been underestimated in the original intention-to-treat analysis. • Darolutamide significantly improved metastasis-free survival (MFS) versus placebo in men with nmCRPC. • After the MFS analysis, 170 placebo recipients (31%) crossed over to open-label darolutamide. • In the final analysis, darolutamide reduced the risk of death by 31% (HR 0.69) versus placebo. • Sensitivity analyses indicate a risk reduction for death of up to 41% if crossover had not occurred. • These analyses confirm darolutamide as an effective early treatment option in nmCRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tumors with an impaired ability to repair DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination, including those with alterations in breast cancer 1 and 2 ( BRCA1 and BRCA2 ) genes, are very sensitive to blocking DNA single-strand repair by inhibition of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzyme. This provides the basis for a synthetic deadly strategy in the treatment of different types of cancer, such as prostate cancer (PCa). The phase 3 PROfound study was the first to lead to olaparib approval in patients with metastatic castration resistant PCa (mCRPC) and BRCA genes mutations. In recent years, the benefit of combination therapy consisted of a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) plus an androgen receptor signalling inhibitor (ARSi), was evaluated as first-line treatment of mCRPC, regardless of the mutational state of genes, participating in the homologous recombination repair (HRR). This review explores the role of PARPi in PCa and analyses the data of latest clinical trials exploring the PARPi-ARSi combinations, and how these results could change our clinical practice., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Purpose: To investigate the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for the selection of the optimal sequencing strategy using docetaxel and androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents in patients with M0 or M1 castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Currently, there is a need to identify biomarkers to guide optimal sequential treatment in CRPC. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective analysis included 303 consecutive patients initially diagnosed with M0 or M1 CRPC between September 2009 and March 2017. Of these, 52 (17.2%) patients received pre-docetaxel ARAT agents and 189 (62.4%) patients received post-docetaxel ARAT agents. The prognostic ability of NLR at CRPC diagnosis regarding radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were investigated. For the analysis, the NLR level was dichotomized at 2.5, and evaluated according to sequencing strategy. Results: Multivariate analysis revealed NLR ≥ 2.5 as an independent predictor of a lower risk for CSS. During the median follow-up of 18.5 months, patients with NLR ≥ 2.5 exhibited significantly lower 1-year rPFS (p = 0.011) and 2-year CSS rates (p = 0.005) compared to patients with NLR < 2.5. Among patients with NLR < 2.5, the post-docetaxel ARAT agent sequencing group exhibited higher 1-year rPFS (p = 0.031) and 2-year CSS (p = 0.026) rates compared to the pre-docetaxel ARAT agent sequencing group. Among patients with NLR ≥ 2.5, rPFS and CSS rates were comparable regardless of ARAT agent sequencing. Conclusion: NLR ≥ 2.5 at CRPC diagnosis is associated with a lower risk for CSS. Patients with NLR < 2.5 should primarily be offered docetaxel considering the survival benefit of docetaxel-to-ARAT agent sequencing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Because cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis facilitates the noninvasive genomic profiling of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), the authors evaluated the association between cfDNA alterations and outcomes and evolution with therapy.Methods: Patients with mCRPC underwent cfDNA genomic profiling using Guardant360, which examines major cancer-associated genes. Clinical factors, therapy information, failure-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were obtained for select patients. The association between genomic alterations and outcomes was investigated.Results: Of 514 men with mCRPC, 482 (94%) had ≥1 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) alteration. The most common recurrent somatic mutations were in TP53 (36%), androgen receptor (AR) (22%), adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) (10%), neurofibromin 1 (NF1) (9%), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), catenin beta-1 (CTNNB1), and AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (ARID1A) (6% each); and BRCA1, BRCA2, and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) (5% each) The most common genes with increased copy numbers were AR (30%), MYC (20%), and BRAF (18%). Clinical outcomes were available for 163 patients, 46 of whom (28.8%) were untreated for mCRPC. A higher number of ctDNA alterations, AR alterations, and amplifications of MYC and BRAF were associated with worse failure-free survival and/or OS. On multivariable analysis, MYC amplification remained significantly associated with OS. Prior therapy and serial profiling demonstrated the evolution of alterations in AR and other genes.Conclusions: ctDNA frequently was detected in this large cohort of "real-world" patients with mCRPC, and the alterations appeared to be similar to previously reported tumor tissue alterations. A higher number of alterations, and AR and MYC alterations, appear to compromise clinical outcomes, suggesting a role for immune checkpoint inhibitors and novel AR and BET inhibitors in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Potent androgen receptor pathway inhibition (ARPI) therapies have given rise to a lethal, aggressive subtype of castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) called treatment‐induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer (t‐NEPC). Now, t‐NEPC poses a major clinical problem as approximately 20% of CRPC cases bear this subtype—a rate of occurrence that is predicted to rise with the widespread use of ARPI therapies. Unfortunately, there are no targeted therapies currently available to treat t‐NEPC as the origin and molecular underpinnings of t‐NEPC development remain unclear. In the present study, we identify that RNA splicing of the G protein‐coupled receptor kinase‐interacting protein 1 (GIT1) gene is a unique event in t‐NEPC patients. Specifically, upregulation of the GIT1‐A splice variant and downregulation of the GIT1‐C variant expressions are associated with t‐NEPC patient tumors, patient‐derived xenografts, and cell models. RNA‐binding assays show that RNA splicing of GIT1 is directly driven by SRRM4 and is associated with the neuroendocrine phenotype in CRPC cohorts. We show that GIT1‐A and GIT1‐C regulate differential transcriptomes in prostate cancer cells, where GIT1‐A regulates genes associated with morphogenesis, neural function, environmental sensing via cell‐adhesion processes, and epigenetic regulation. Consistent with our transcriptomic analyses, we report opposing functions of GIT1‐A and GIT1‐C in the stability of focal adhesions, whereby GIT1‐A promotes focal adhesion stability. In summary, our study is the first to report that alternative RNA splicing of the GIT1 gene is associated with t‐NEPC and reprograms its function involving FA‐mediated signaling and cell processes, which may contribute to t‐NEPC development. We report that the alternative RNA splicing of the GIT1 gene is associated with t‐NEPC progression using patient tumor samples, PDX models, and cell models. We demonstrate that GIT1‐A expression is upregulated in NEPC models, whereas expression of GIT1‐C is downregulated when compared to AdPC models, a mechanism regulated by SRRM4‐mediated RNA alternative splicing. Comprehensive transcriptomic data reveal distinct molecular changes in GIT1‐A and GIT1‐C, whereby bioinformatic analyses predict that the GIT1‐A transcriptome is enriched with gene sets implicated in t‐NEPC progression, such as morphogenesis, neural function, environmental sensing via cell‐adhesion processes, and epigenetic regulation. Consistent with our transcriptomic analyses, we report opposing functions of GIT1‐A and GIT1‐C in the stability of focal adhesions, whereby GIT1‐A promotes focal adhesion stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The standard primary treatment for advanced prostate cancer has been hormonal therapy since the 1940s. However, prostate cancer inevitably progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after a median duration of 18 months of androgen deprivation therapy. In patients with CRPC, docetaxel has been regarded as the standard treatment. However, survival advantages of docetaxel over other treatments are slim, and the need for new agents persists. In recent years, novel agents, including abiraterone, enzalutamide, cabazitaxel, radium-223, and sipuleucel-T, have been approved for the treatment of CRPC, and more such agents based on diverse mechanisms are under investigation or evaluation. In this article, the authors reviewed the current literature on recent advances in medical treatment of prostate cancer, especially CRPC. In addition, the authors elaborated on novel drugs for prostate cancer currently undergoing investigation and their mechanisms.