Search

Susana Sainz de la Maza,1 Jorge Maurino,2 Tamara Castillo-Triviño,3 Mónica Borges,4 Berta Sebastián Torres,5 Javier Sotoca,6 Ana María Alonso Torres,7 Ana B Caminero,8 Laura Borrega,9 José L Sánchez-Menoyo,10 Francisco J Barrero-Hernández,11 Carmen Calles,12 Luis Brieva,13 María Rosario Blasco,14 Julio Dotor García-Soto,4 Ana Rodríguez-Regal,15 Laura Navarro-Cantó,16 Eduardo Agüera-Morales,17 Moisés Garcés,18 Olga Carmona,19 Laura Gabaldón-Torres,20 Lucía Forero,21 Mariona Hervás,22 Rocío Gómez-Ballesteros2 1Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; 2Medical Department, Roche Farma, Madrid, Spain; 3Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain; 4Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain; 5Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; 6Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain; 7Department of Neurology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain; 8Department of Neurology, Complejo Asistencial de Ávila, Ávila, Spain; 9Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain; 10Department of Neurology, Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Spain; 11Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain; 12Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; 13Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; 14Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain; 15Department of Neurology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain; 16Department of Neurology, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain; 17Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain; 18Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain; 19Department of Neurology, Fundació Salut Empordà, Figueres, Spain; 20Department of Neurology, Hospital Francesc de Borja, Gandía, Spain; 21Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain; 22Department of Neurology, Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, SpainCorrespondence: Jorge Maurino, Medical Department, Roche Farma, Ribera del Loira, 50, Madrid, 28042, Spain, Tel +34 913 24 81 00, Email jorge.maurino@roche.comBackground: Hopelessness is a risk factor for depression and suicide. There is little information on this phenomenon among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), one of the most common causes of disability and loss of autonomy in young adults. The aim of this study was to assess state hopelessness and its associated factors in early-stage RRMS.Methods: A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, a disease duration ≤ 3 years, and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0– 5.5 were included. The State-Trait Hopelessness Scale (STHS) was used to measure patients´ hopelessness. A battery of patient-reported and clinician-rated measurements was used to assess clinical status. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association between patients’ characteristics and state hopelessness.Results: A total of 189 patients were included. Mean age (standard deviation-SD) was 36.1 (9.4) years and 71.4% were female. Median disease duration (interquartile range-IQR) was 1.4 (0.7, 2.1) years. Symptom severity and disability were low with a median EDSS (IQR) score of 1.0 (0, 2.0). A proportion of 65.6% (n=124) of patients reported moderate-to-severe hopelessness. Hopelessness was associated with older age (p=0.035), depressive symptoms (p=< 0.001), a threatening illness perception (p=0.001), and psychological and cognitive barriers to workplace performance (p=0.029) in the multivariate analysis after adjustment for confounders.Conclusion: Hopelessness was a common phenomenon in early-stage RRMS, even in a population with low physical disability. Identifying factors associated with hopelessness may be critical for implementing preventive strategies helping patients to adapt to the new situation and cope with the disease in the long term.Keywords: relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, hopelessness, depressive symptoms, workplace difficulties, suicide

Background and Objectives: The impact of viral infections on disease susceptibility and progression has predominantly been studied in patients with relapse-onset MS (RMS). Here, we determined immune responses to ubiquitous viruses in patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS)., Methods: Antibody responses to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), specifically to the latent EBV nuclear antigen 1 and the lytic viral capsid antigen VCA, human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), and measles virus were determined in a cohort of 68 PPMS patients with a mean follow-up of 8 years and compared with 66 healthy controls matched for sex and age., Results: Compared with controls, PPMS patients showed increased humoral immune responses to the EBV-encoded nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA1), but not to the lytic EBV capsid antigen (VCA) or to other viral antigens. Seroprevalence rates for HCMV were significantly higher in PPMS. Antiviral immune responses at baseline did not correlate with disability progression over time., Discussion: Elevated immune responses toward EBNA1 are selectively increased in people with primary progressive disease, indicating a link between EBNA1-targeting immune responses and the development of both RMS and PPMS. Our data also suggest that chronic HCMV infection is associated with progressive MS., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The relationship between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse and disease progression remains unclear. Previous studies are limited by small sample sizes and most lack a propensity-matched control cohort., Objective: To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 infection on MS disease course with a large propensity-matched cohort., Design: This multi-centre cohort study analysed relapse and disability outcomes post-COVID-19 infection after balancing covariates using a propensity score matching method. The study period was from the 11th of September 2019 to the 16th of February 2023. The mean follow-up period was 1.7 years., Methods: Data were retrieved from the MSBase Registry. Propensity scores were obtained based on age, sex, disease duration, baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), MS course, relapses pre-baseline, disease-modifying therapy (DMT) class and country. Primary outcomes were time to first relapse, annualised relapse rate (ARR) and time to confirm EDSS progression. Secondary outcomes were time to EDSS of 3, 4 or 6. Sensitivity analyses with baseline DMT classes were performed., Results: The study included 2253 cases and 6441 controls. After matching, there were 2161 cases and an equal number of matched controls. Cases had a significantly higher ARR (ARR = 0.10 [95% CI 0.09-0.11]) compared to controls (ARR = 0.07 [95% CI 0.06-0.08]). Cases had a significantly greater hazard of time to first relapse compared to controls (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.54 [95% CI 1.29-1.84]). There was no association between COVID-19 infection and 24-week EDSS progression (HR = 1.18 [95% CI 0.92-1.52]), or time to EDSS of 3, 4 or 6. For patients on interferons and glatiramer acetate (BRACE), COVID-19 infection was associated with a greater hazard of time to first relapse (HR = 1.83 [95% CI 1.25-2.68]) and greater hazard of time to EDSS of 3 (HR = 2.04 [95% CI 1.06-3.90]) compared to patients on BRACE therapy without COVID-19 infection., Conclusion: COVID-19 infection was associated with a significantly increased MS relapse rate and a shorter time to first relapse. There was no effect on confirmed EDSS progression over the short term. These results support ongoing COVID-19 risk minimisation strategies to protect patients with MS., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Objective: This study aimed to unravel the single tetraspanin pattern of extracellular vesicles (EVs), L1CAM + and GLAST + EV levels as diagnostic biomarkers to stratify people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), specifically relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and primary progressive (PPMS). Methods: The ExoView platform was used to directly track single EVs using a clinically feasible volume of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum samples. This technology allowed us to examine the patterns of classical tetraspanin and quantify the levels of L1CAM and GLAST proteins, commonly used to immunoisolate putative neuron- and astrocyte-derived EVs. Results: The tetraspanin EV pattern does not allow us to differentiate RRMS, PPMS and non-MS donors neither in CSF nor serum, but this was associated with the type of biofluid. L1CAM + and GLAST + EVs showed a very low presence of tetraspanin proteins. Additionally, a significant decrease in the particle count of L1CAM + EVs was detected in L1CAM-captured spots, and L1CAM + and GLAST + EVs decreased in GLAST-captured spots in the CSF from PPMS subjects compared to RRMS. Interestingly, only GLAST + EVs exhibited a lower quantity in the CSF from PPMS compared to both MS and non-MS samples. Finally, GLAST + EVs demonstrated a medium negative and significative correlation with GFAP levels-a biomarker of MS progression, astrocyte damage and neurodegenerative processes. Conclusions: ExoView technology could track neural EV biomarkers and be potentially useful in the diagnostic evaluation and follow-up of pwMS. GLAST + EVs might provide insights into the etiology of PPMS and could offer small windows to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind its clinical presentation.

Background: People with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwSPMS) experience increasing disability, which impacts negatively on their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our aims were to assess the impact of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) on functional status and HRQoL and describe the clinical profile in this population., Methods: DISCOVER is an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study with retrospective data collection in real-world clinical practice in Spain. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, functional and cognitive scales, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and direct healthcare, and non-healthcare and indirect costs were collected., Results: A total of 297 evaluable pwSPMS with a EDSS score between 3-6.5 participated: 62.3 % were female and 18.9 % had active SPMS. At the study visit, 77 % of them presented an Expanded Disability Scale Score (EDSS) of 6-6.5. Nearly 40 % did not receive any disease-modifying treatment. Regarding the working situation, 61.6 % were inactive due to disability. PROs: 99.3 % showed mobility impairment in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5 Levels, and about 60 % reported physical impact on the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29. Fatigue was present in 76.1 %, and almost 40 % reported anxiety or depression. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test was used to assess cognitive impairment; 80 % of the patients were below the mean score. Participants who presented relapses two years before and had high EDSS scores had a more negative impact on HRQoL. PwSPMS with a negative impact on HRQoL presented a higher cost burden, primarily due to indirect costs., Conclusions: PwSPMS experience a negative impact on their HRQoL, with a high physical impact, fatigue, cognitive impairment, and a high burden of indirect costs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None, (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated and heterogeneous disease characterized by demyelination, axonal damage, and physical and cognitive impairment. Recent studies have highlighted alterations in the microbiota of people with MS (pwMS). However, the intricate nature of the disease and the wide range of treatments available make it challenging to identify specific microbial populations or functions associated with MS symptoms and disease progression. This study aimed to characterize the microbiota of pwMS treated with the oral drug teriflunomide (TF) and compare it with that of pwMS treated with beta interferons (IFNβ), pwMS treated with no previous disease modifying therapies (naïve), and healthy controls. Our findings demonstrate significant alterations in both the composition and function of the gut microbiota in pwMS that are further influenced by disease-modifying therapies. Specifically, oral treatment with TF had a notable impact on the gut microbiota of pwMS. Importantly, the dysregulated microbial environment within the gut was associated with symptoms commonly experienced by pwMS, including fatigue, anxiety, and depression., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they do not have conflicts of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study or the decision to publish the results., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Disability progression is a key milestone in the disease evolution of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Prediction models of the probability of disability progression have not yet reached the level of trust needed to be adopted in the clinic. A common benchmark to assess model development in multiple sclerosis is also currently lacking., Methods: Data of adult PwMS with a follow-up of at least three years from 146 MS centers, spread over 40 countries and collected by the MSBase consortium was used. With basic inclusion criteria for quality requirements, it represents a total of 15, 240 PwMS. External validation was performed and repeated five times to assess the significance of the results. Transparent Reporting for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines were followed. Confirmed disability progression after two years was predicted, with a confirmation window of six months. Only routinely collected variables were used such as the expanded disability status scale, treatment, relapse information, and MS course. To learn the probability of disability progression, state-of-the-art machine learning models were investigated. The discrimination performance of the models is evaluated with the area under the receiver operator curve (ROC-AUC) and under the precision recall curve (AUC-PR), and their calibration via the Brier score and the expected calibration error. All our preprocessing and model code are available at https://gitlab.com/edebrouwer/ms&#95;benchmark, making this task an ideal benchmark for predicting disability progression in MS., Findings: Machine learning models achieved a ROC-AUC of 0⋅71 ± 0⋅01, an AUC-PR of 0⋅26 ± 0⋅02, a Brier score of 0⋅1 ± 0⋅01 and an expected calibration error of 0⋅07 ± 0⋅04. The history of disability progression was identified as being more predictive for future disability progression than the treatment or relapses history., Conclusions: Good discrimination and calibration performance on an external validation set is achieved, using only routinely collected variables. This suggests machine-learning models can reliably inform clinicians about the future occurrence of progression and are mature for a clinical impact study., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing non-financial interests but the following competing financial interests: - Dana Horakova received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Merck, Teva, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Novartis, as well as support for research activities from Biogen and Czech Minsitry of Education [project Progres Q27/LF1]. - Francesco Patti received speaker honoraria and advisory board fees from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and TEVA. He received research funding from Biogen, Merck, FISM (Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla), Reload Onlus Association and University of Catania. - Guillermo Izquierdo received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Roche, Almirall and Teva. - Sara Eichau received speaker honoraria and consultant fees from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck, Bayer, Sanofi Genzyme, Roche and Teva. - Marc Girard received consulting fees from Teva Canada Innovation, Biogen, Novartis and Genzyme Sanofi; lecture payments from Teva Canada Innovation, Novartis and EMD. He has also received a research grant from Canadian Institutes of Health Research. - Alessandra Lugaresi has served as a Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/ Genzyme and Teva Advisory Board Member. She received congress and travel/accommodation expense compensations or speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi/Genzyme, Teva and Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM). Her institutions received research grants from Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme. - Pierre Grammond has served in advisory boards for Novartis, EMD Serono, Roche, Biogen idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Pendopharm and has received grant support from Genzyme and Roche, has received research grants for his institution from Biogen idec, Sanofi Genzyme, EMD Serono. - Tomas Kalincik served on scientific advisory boards for BMS, Roche, Janssen, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Merck and Biogen, steering committee for Brain Atrophy Initiative by Sanofi Genzyme, received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from WebMD Global, Eisai, Novartis, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, BioCSL and Merck and received research or educational event support from Biogen, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche, Celgene and Merck. - Raed Alroughani received honoraria as a speaker and for serving on scientific advisory boards from Bayer, Biogen, GSK, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme. - Francois Grand’Maison received honoraria or research funding from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Teva Neurosciences, Mitsubishi and ONO Pharmaceuticals. - Murat Terzi received travel grants from Novartis, Bayer-Schering, Merck and Teva; has participated in clinical trials by Sanofi Aventis, Roche and Novartis. - Jeannette Lechner-Scott travel compensation from Novartis, Biogen, Roche and Merck. Her institution receives the honoraria for talks and advisory board commitment as well as research grants from Biogen, Merck, Roche, TEVA and Novartis. - Samia J. Khoury received compensation for participation in the Novartis Maestro program. - Vincent van Pesch has received travel grants from Merck, Biogen, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Almirall and Roche; his institution receives honoraria for consultancy and lectures and research grants from Roche, Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Almirall and Novartis Pharma. - Radek Ampapa received conference travel support from Novartis, Teva, Biogen, Bayer and Merck and has participated in a clinical trials by Biogen, Novartis, Teva and Actelion. - Daniele Spitaleri received honoraria as a consultant on scientific advisory boards by Bayer-Schering, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis and compensation for travel from Novartis, Biogen, Sanofi Aventis, Teva and Merck. - Claudio Solaro served on scientific advisory boards for Merck, Genzyme, Almirall, and Biogen; received honoraria and travel grants from Sanofi Aventis, Novartis, Biogen, Merck, Genzyme and Teva. - Davide Maimone served on scientific advisory boards for Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Roche, and Almirall; received honoraria and travel grants from Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Biogen, Merck, and Roche. - Gerardo Iuliano (retired - no PI successor but has approved ongoing use of data) had travel/accommodations/meeting expenses funded by Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, and Teva. - Bart Van Wijmeersch received research and travel grants, honoraria for MS-Expert advisor and Speaker fees from Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. - Tamara Castillo Triviño received speaking/consulting fees and/or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. - Jose Luis Sanchez-Menoyo accepted travel compensation from Novartis, Merck and Biogen, speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Almirall, Bayer and Teva and has participated in clinical trials by Biogen, Merck and Roche - Guy Laureys received travel and/or consultancy compensation from Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Teva, Merck, Novartis, Celgene, Biogen. - Anneke van der Walt served on advisory boards and receives unrestricted research grants from Novartis, Biogen, Merck and Roche She has received speaker’s honoraria and travel support from Novartis, Roche, and Merck. She receives grant support from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and MS Research Australia. - Jiwon Oh has received research funding from the MS Society of Canada, National MS Society, Brain Canada, Biogen, Roche, EMD Serono (an affiliate of Merck KGaA); and personal compensation for consulting or speaking from Alexion, Biogen, Celgene (BMS), EMD Serono (an affiliate of Merck KGaA), Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. - Ayse Altintas received speaker honoraria from Merck, Alexion,; received travel and registration grants from Merck, Biogen - Gen Pharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme. - Yara Fragoso received honoraria as a consultant on scientific advisory boards by Novartis, Teva, Roche and Sanofi-Aventis and compensation for travel from Novartis, Biogen, Sanofi Aventis, Teva, Roche and Merck. - Tunde Csepany received speaker honoraria/ conference travel support from Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and Teva. - Suzanne Hodgkinson received honoraria and consulting fees from Novartis, Bayer Schering and Sanofi, and travel grants from Novartis, Biogen Idec and Bayer Schering. - Norma Deri received funding from Bayer, Merck, Biogen, Genzyme and Novartis. - Bruce Taylor received funding for travel and speaker honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, CSL Australia, Biogen and Novartis, and has served on advisory boards for Biogen, Novartis, Roche and CSL Australia. - Fraser Moore participated in clinical trials sponsored by EMD Serono and Novartis. - Orla Gray received honoraria as consultant on scientific advisory boards for Genzyme, Biogen, Merck, Roche and Novartis; has received travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Roche and Novartis; has participated in clinical trials by Biogen and Merck. - Csilla Rozsa received speaker honoraria from Bayer Schering, Novartis and Biogen, congress and travel expense compensations from Biogen, Teva, Merck and Bayer Schering. - Allan Kermode received speaker honoraria and scientific advisory board fees from Bayer, BioCSL, Biogen, Genzyme, Innate Immunotherapeutics, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Sanofi-Aventis, and Teva. - Magdolna Simo received speaker honoraria from Novartis, Biogen, Bayer Schering; congress/travel compensation from Teva, Biogen, Merck, Bayer Schering. - Todd Hardy has received speaking fees or received honoraria for serving on advisory boards for Biogen, Merck, Teva, Novartis, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Genzyme, is Co-Editor of Advances in Clinical Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, and serves on the editorial board of Journal of Neuroimmunology and Frontiers in Neurology. - Nikolaos Grigoriadis received honoraria, consultancy/lecture fees, travel support and research grants from Biogen Idec, Biologix, Novartis, TEVA, Bayer, Merck Serono, Genesis Pharma, Sanofi – Genzyme, ROCHE, Cellgene, ELPEN and research grants from Hellenic Ministry of Development., (Copyright: © 2024 De Brouwer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) arises from a complex interplay between host genetic factors and environmental components, with the gut microbiota emerging as a key area of investigation. In the current study, we used ion torrent sequencing to delve into the bacteriome (bacterial microbiota) and mycobiome (fungal microbiota) of people with MS (pwMS), and compared them to healthy controls (HC). Through principal coordinate, diversity, and abundance analyses, as well as clustering and cross-kingdom microbial correlation assessments, we uncovered significant differences in the microbial profiles between pwMS and HC. Elevated levels of the fungus Torulaspora and the bacterial family Enterobacteriaceae were observed in pwMS, whereas beneficial bacterial taxa, such as Prevotelladaceae and Dialister , were reduced. Notably, clustering analysis revealed overlapping patterns in the bacteriome and mycobiome data for 74% of the participants, with weakened cross-kingdom interactions evident in the altered microbiota of pwMS. Our findings highlight the dysbiosis of both bacterial and fungal microbiota in MS, characterized by shifts in biodiversity and composition. Furthermore, the distinct disease-associated pattern of fungi-bacteria interactions suggests that fungi, in addition to bacteria, contribute to the pathogenesis of MS. Overall, our study sheds light on the intricate microbial dynamics underlying MS, paving the way for further investigation into the potential therapeutic targeting of the gut microbiota in MS management.

It is unknown whether the currently known risk factors of multiple sclerosis reflect the etiology of progressive-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) as observational studies rarely included analysis by type of onset. We designed a case-control study to examine associations between environmental factors and POMS and compared effect sizes to relapse-onset MS (ROMS), which will offer insights into the etiology of POMS and potentially contribute to prevention and intervention practice. This study utilizes data from the Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS) Study and the Australian Multi-center Study of Environment and Immune Function (the AusImmune Study). This report outlines the conduct of the PPMS Study, whether the POMS sample is representative, and the planned analysis methods. The study includes 155 POMS, 204 ROMS, and 558 controls. The distributions of the POMS were largely similar to Australian POMS patients in the MSBase Study, with 54.8% female, 85.8% POMS born before 1970, mean age of onset of 41.44 ± 8.38 years old, and 67.1% living between 28.9 and 39.4° S. The POMS were representative of the Australian POMS population. There are some differences between POMS and ROMS/controls (mean age at interview: POMS 55 years vs. controls 40 years; sex: POMS 53% female vs. controls 78% female; location of residence: 14.3% of POMS at a latitude ≤ 28.9°S vs. 32.8% in controls), which will be taken into account in the analysis. We discuss the methodological issues considered in the study design, including prevalence-incidence bias, cohort effects, interview bias and recall bias, and present strategies to account for it. Associations between exposures of interest and POMS/ROMS will be presented in subsequent publications., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral immunomodulator approved for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS; depending on the local label), based on extensive evidence from clinical trials and a real-world setting on efficacy, tolerability and patient-reported benefits. The TERICARE study assessed the impact of teriflunomide treatment over 2 years on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and some of the most common and disabling symptoms of MS, such as fatigue and depression., Methods: This prospective observational study in Spain included RRMS patients treated with teriflunomide for ≤ 4 weeks. The following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at baseline and every 6 months for 2 years: the 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale version 2 (MSIS-29), the 21-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS-21), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), the Short Form (SF)-Qualiveen and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication v1.4 (TSQM). Annualised relapse rate (ARR), disability progression according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) were also assessed., Results: A total of 325 patients were analysed. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 43.2 years (10.4), a mean baseline EDSS score of 1.75 (1.5), a mean number of relapses in the past 2 years of 1.5 (0.7), and 64% had received prior disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Patients showed significant improvements in the psychological domain of MSIS-29 from 35.9 (26.6) at baseline to 29.4 (25.5) at 18 months (p = 0.004) and 29.0 (24.6) at 24 months (p = 0.002). Levels of fatigue and depression were also reduced. After 2 years of treatment with teriflunomide, ARR was reduced to 0.17 (95% CI 0.14-0.21) from the baseline of 0.42 (95% CI 0.38-0.48), representing a 60.1% reduction. Mean EDSS scores remained stable during the study, and 79.9% of patients showed no disability progression. 54.7% of patients achieved NEDA-3 in the first 12 months, which increased to 61.4% during months 12-24. Patients reported increased satisfaction with treatment over the course of the study, regardless of whether they were DMT naive or not., Conclusion: Teriflunomide improves psychological aspects of HRQoL and maintains low levels of fatigue and depression. Treatment with teriflunomide over 2 years is effective in reducing ARR and disability progression., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Geographical variations in the incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis have been reported globally. Latitude as a surrogate for exposure to ultraviolet radiation but also other lifestyle and environmental factors are regarded as drivers of this variation. No previous studies evaluated geographical variation in the risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, an advanced form of multiple sclerosis that is characterized by steady accrual of irreversible disability. We evaluated differences in the risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in relation to latitude and country of residence, modified by high-to-moderate efficacy immunotherapy in a geographically diverse cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The study included relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients from the global MSBase registry with at least one recorded assessment of disability. Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis was identified as per clinician diagnosis. Sensitivity analyses used the operationalized definition of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and the Swedish decision tree algorithm. A proportional hazards model was used to estimate the cumulative risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by country of residence (latitude), adjusted for sex, age at disease onset, time from onset to relapsing-remitting phase, disability (Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score) and relapse activity at study inclusion, national multiple sclerosis prevalence, government health expenditure, and proportion of time treated with high-to-moderate efficacy disease-modifying therapy. Geographical variation in time from relapsing-remitting phase to secondary progressive phase of multiple sclerosis was modelled through a proportional hazards model with spatially correlated frailties. We included 51 126 patients (72% female) from 27 countries. The median survival time from relapsing-remitting phase to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis among all patients was 39 (95% confidence interval: 37 to 43) years. Higher latitude [median hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% credible interval (1.16, 1.26)], higher national multiple sclerosis prevalence [1.07 (1.03, 1.11)], male sex [1.30 (1.22, 1.39)], older age at onset [1.35 (1.30, 1.39)], higher disability [2.40 (2.34, 2.47)] and frequent relapses [1.18 (1.15, 1.21)] at inclusion were associated with increased hazard of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Higher proportion of time on high-to-moderate efficacy therapy substantially reduced the hazard of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis [0.76 (0.73, 0.79)] and reduced the effect of latitude [interaction: 0.95 (0.92, 0.99)]. At the country-level, patients in Oman, Tunisia, Iran and Canada had higher risks of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis relative to the other studied regions. Higher latitude of residence is associated with a higher probability of developing secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. High-to-moderate efficacy immunotherapy can mitigate some of this geographically co-determined risk., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Importance: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is available for treatment of highly active multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To compare the effectiveness of AHSCT vs fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting MS by emulating pairwise trials., Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative treatment effectiveness study included 6 specialist MS centers with AHSCT programs and international MSBase registry between 2006 and 2021. The study included patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated with AHSCT, fingolimod, natalizumab, or ocrelizumab with 2 or more years study follow-up including 2 or more disability assessments. Patients were matched on a propensity score derived from clinical and demographic characteristics., Exposure: AHSCT vs fingolimod, natalizumab, or ocrelizumab., Main Outcomes: Pairwise-censored groups were compared on annualized relapse rates (ARR) and freedom from relapses and 6-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score worsening and improvement., Results: Of 4915 individuals, 167 were treated with AHSCT; 2558, fingolimod; 1490, natalizumab; and 700, ocrelizumab. The prematch AHSCT cohort was younger and with greater disability than the fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab cohorts; the matched groups were closely aligned. The proportion of women ranged from 65% to 70%, and the mean (SD) age ranged from 35.3 (9.4) to 37.1 (10.6) years. The mean (SD) disease duration ranged from 7.9 (5.6) to 8.7 (5.4) years, EDSS score ranged from 3.5 (1.6) to 3.9 (1.9), and frequency of relapses ranged from 0.77 (0.94) to 0.86 (0.89) in the preceding year. Compared with the fingolimod group (769 [30.0%]), AHSCT (144 [86.2%]) was associated with fewer relapses (ARR: mean [SD], 0.09 [0.30] vs 0.20 [0.44]), similar risk of disability worsening (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95% CI, 0.91-3.17), and higher chance of disability improvement (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.71-4.26) over 5 years. Compared with natalizumab (730 [49.0%]), AHSCT (146 [87.4%]) was associated with marginally lower ARR (mean [SD], 0.08 [0.31] vs 0.10 [0.34]), similar risk of disability worsening (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.54-2.09), and higher chance of disability improvement (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.72-4.18) over 5 years. AHSCT (110 [65.9%]) and ocrelizumab (343 [49.0%]) were associated with similar ARR (mean [SD], 0.09 [0.34] vs 0.06 [0.32]), disability worsening (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.61-5.08), and disability improvement (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.66-2.82) over 3 years. AHSCT-related mortality occurred in 1 of 159 patients (0.6%)., Conclusion: In this study, the association of AHSCT with preventing relapses and facilitating recovery from disability was considerably superior to fingolimod and marginally superior to natalizumab. This study did not find evidence for difference in the effectiveness of AHSCT and ocrelizumab over a shorter available follow-up time.

Background: The prognostic significance of non-disabling relapses in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is unclear., Objective: To determine whether early non-disabling relapses predict disability accumulation in RRMS., Methods: We redefined mild relapses in MSBase as 'non-disabling', and moderate or severe relapses as 'disabling'. We used mixed-effects Cox models to compare 90-day confirmed disability accumulation events in people with exclusively non-disabling relapses within 2 years of RRMS diagnosis to those with no early relapses; and any early disabling relapses. Analyses were stratified by disease-modifying therapy (DMT) efficacy during follow-up., Results: People who experienced non-disabling relapses within 2 years of RRMS diagnosis accumulated more disability than those with no early relapses if they were untreated ( n  = 285 vs 4717; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.00-1.68) or given platform DMTs ( n  = 1074 vs 7262; HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.15-1.54), but not if given high-efficacy DMTs ( n  = 572 vs 3534; HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.71-1.13) during follow-up. Differences in disability accumulation between those with early non-disabling relapses and those with early disabling relapses were not confirmed statistically., Conclusion: This study suggests that early non-disabling relapses are associated with a higher risk of disability accumulation than no early relapses in RRMS. This risk may be mitigated by high-efficacy DMTs. Therefore, non-disabling relapses should be considered when making treatment decisions.

Disability accrual is mainly driven by progression independent of relapse activity, which is present even in early stages of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and sometimes overlooked. This multicenter, non-interventional study evaluated whether patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) could capture disability in 189 early-stage RRMS patients (mean age: 36.1 ± 9.4 years, 71.4% female, mean disease duration: 1.4 ± 0.8 years, median EDSS: 1.0). The 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT), NeuroQoL Upper Extremity (NeuroQoL-UE), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25-FW), Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ-5) were used to assess hand function, gait, and cognition, respectively. These functions were at least mildly affected in this early-stage population, finding significant correlations between PROMs and clinical assessments. PROMs could enable early-stage RRMS patients to communicate their perceived disability in different domains, assisting clinicians in disease monitoring and decision making., Competing Interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JM, NM, and RGB are employees of Roche Pharma Spain. SSM received payment for lecturing or travel expenses from Merck-Serono, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Novartis. JMM has served on scientific advisory boards and/or has received speaking honoraria, research funding, and support to attend scientific meetings from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. JS has received speaking honoraria, compensation for consulting services and support to attend scientific meetings from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche, and Teva. AA has received compensation for consulting services from Biogen, BMS, Sanofi, Roche, Janssen, and Novartis; and speaking honoraria from Biogen, BMS, Sanofi, Roche, Janssen, Merck, Almirall, and Novartis. ABC has received courses and honoraria for her participation as speaker/meeting moderator/symposia organizer from Alter, Almirall, Bayer, Bial, Biogen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Lilly, Merck-Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and UCB; and support to attend scientific meetings from Biogen, Bial, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. JLSM has received support to attend scientific meetings from Novartis, Merck, and Biogen; speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Almirall, Bayer, and Teva; and has participated in clinical trials from Biogen, Merck, and Roche. FJBH has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva. CC has received compensation for consulting services, speaking honoraria and support to attend scientific meetings and courses from Merck, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, and Bristol-Myers-Squibb. LB has received compensation for consulting services, speaking honoraria and support to attend scientific meetings from Bayer, Celgene, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Almirall, and Teva. JDGS has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, UCB, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Almirall, and Teva. MCA has received compensation for consulting services from Genzyme, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, and Biogen. LNC has received compensations from Sanofi-Genzyme, Merk, Biogen, and Roche. EA has received speaking honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, and Biogen. MGR has received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Sanofi, Almirall, and Novartis. OC has participated in studies and has received speaking honoraria from Roche, Merck, Biogen, and Novartis. LGT has received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Almirall, Roche, and Teva. MH has participated in observational studies and has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Roche, Merck, Sanofi, Biogen, Novartis, and Bayer. The rest of the authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Background and Purpose: This study assessed the effect of patient characteristics on the response to disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: We extracted data from 61,810 patients from 135 centers across 35 countries from the MSBase registry. The selection criteria were: clinically isolated syndrome or definite MS, follow-up ≥ 1 year, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥ 3, with ≥1 score recorded per year. Marginal structural models with interaction terms were used to compare the hazards of 12-month confirmed worsening and improvement of disability, and the incidence of relapses between treated and untreated patients stratified by their characteristics., Results: Among 24,344 patients with relapsing MS, those on DMTs experienced 48% reduction in relapse incidence (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45-0.60), 46% lower risk of disability worsening (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41-0.71), and 32% greater chance of disability improvement (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.09-1.59). The effect of DMTs on EDSS worsening and improvement and the risk of relapses was attenuated with more severe disability. The magnitude of the effect of DMT on suppressing relapses declined with higher prior relapse rate and prior cerebral magnetic resonance imaging activity. We did not find any evidence for the effect of age on the effectiveness of DMT. After inclusion of 1985 participants with progressive MS, the effect of DMT on disability mostly depended on MS phenotype, whereas its effect on relapses was driven mainly by prior relapse activity., Conclusions: DMT is generally most effective among patients with lower disability and in relapsing MS phenotypes. There is no evidence of attenuation of the effect of DMT with age., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: In the absence of evidence from randomised controlled trials, observational data can be used to emulate clinical trials and guide clinical decisions. Observational studies are, however, susceptible to confounding and bias. Among the used techniques to reduce indication bias are propensity score matching and marginal structural models., Objective: To use the comparative effectiveness of fingolimod vs natalizumab to compare the results obtained with propensity score matching and marginal structural models., Methods: Patients with clinically isolated syndrome or relapsing remitting MS who were treated with either fingolimod or natalizumab were identified in the MSBase registry. Patients were propensity score matched, and inverse probability of treatment weighted at six monthly intervals, using the following variables: age, sex, disability, MS duration, MS course, prior relapses, and prior therapies. Studied outcomes were cumulative hazard of relapse, disability accumulation, and disability improvement., Results: 4608 patients (1659 natalizumab, 2949 fingolimod) fulfilled inclusion criteria, and were propensity score matched or repeatedly reweighed with marginal structural models. Natalizumab treatment was associated with a lower probability of relapse (PS matching: HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.62-0.80]; marginal structural model: 0.71 [0.62-0.80]), and higher probability of disability improvement (PS matching: 1.21 [1.02 -1.43]; marginal structural model 1.43 1.19 -1.72]). There was no evidence of a difference in the magnitude of effect between the two methods., Conclusions: The relative effectiveness of two therapies can be efficiently compared by either marginal structural models or propensity score matching when applied in clearly defined clinical contexts and in sufficiently powered cohorts.

Background: The evolving therapeutic landscape requires more participation of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to assess the association between patient's self-perception, cognitive impairment and behavioral factors in treatment choices in a cohort of patients at an early stage of RRMS., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, non-interventional study including adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, a disease duration ≤18 months and receiving care at one of the 21 participating MS centers from across Spain. We used patient-reported measures to gather information on fatigue, mood, quality of life, and perception of severity of their MS. Functional metrics (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS], cognitive function by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [SDMT], 25-foot walk test) and clinical and radiological data were provided by the treating neurologist. The primary outcome of the study was status quo (SQ) bias, defined as participant's tendency to continue taking a previously selected but inferior treatment when intensification was warranted. SQ bias was assessed based on participants treatment preference in six simulated RRMS case scenarios with evidence of clinical relapses and radiological disease progression., Results: Of 189 participants who met the inclusion criteria, 188 (99.5%) fully completed the study. The mean age was 36.6 ± 9.5 years, 70.7% female, mean disease duration: 1.2 ± 0.8 years, median EDSS score: 1.0 [IQR=0.0-2.0]). Overall, 43.1% patients (n = 81/188) had an abnormal SDMT (≤49 correct answers). SQ bias was observed in at least one case scenario in 72.3% (137/188). Participant's perception of their MS severity was associated with higher SQ bias (β coeff 0.042; 95% CI 0.0074-0.076) among those with delayed cognitive processing. Higher baseline EDSS and number of T2 lesions were predictors of delayed processing speed (OR EDSS=1.57, 95% CI: 1.11-2.21, p = 0.011; OR T2 lesions=1.50, 95% CI: 1.11-2.03, p<0.01). Bayesian multilevel model accounting for clustering showed that delayed cognitive processing (exp coeff 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.09) and MS symptoms severity (exp coeff 1.28; 95% CI 1.22-1.33) were associated with SQ bias., Conclusion: Over 40% of patients in earlier stages of RRMS experience delays in cognitive processing that might affect their decision-making ability. Our findings suggest that patients' self-perception of disease severity combined with a delay in cognitive processing would affect treatment choices leading to status quo bias early in the course of their disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest G.S was supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Scientist Award following a peer-reviewed competition and reported receiving unrestricted grants and personal fees from Hoffman La Roche (Canada) and Roche Farma (Spain). S.S.M received payment for lecturing or travel expenses from Merck-Serono, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Novartis. B.P.B. has received honoraria as speaker/advisor from Biogen, Sanofi and Bial. J.S. has received speaking honoraria, compensation for consulting services and support to attend scientific meetings from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche and Teva. A.A. has received compensation for consulting services from Biogen, BMS, Sanofi, Roche, Janssen and Novartis; and speaking honoraria from Biogen, BMS, Sanofi, Roche, Janssen, Merck, Almirall and Novartis. A.B.C. has received courses and honoraria for her participation as speaker/meeting moderator/symposia organizer from Alter, Almirall, Bayer, Bial, Biogen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Lilly, Merck-Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and UCB; and support to attend scientific meetings from Biogen, Bial, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. J.L.S-M. has received support to attend scientific meetings from Novartis, Merck, and Biogen; speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Almirall, Bayer and Teva; and has participated in clinical trials from Biogen, Merck and Roche. F.J.B-H. has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva. C.C. has received compensation for consulting services, speaking honoraria and support to attend scientific meetings and courses from Merck, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, and Bristol-Myers-Squibb. L.B. has received compensation for consulting services, speaking honoraria and support to attend scientific meetings from Bayer, Celgene, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Almirall and Teva. J.D.G-S. has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, UCB, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Almirall and Teva. M.C-A. has received compensation for consulting services from Genzyme, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi and Biogen. L.NC. has received compensations from Sanofi-Genzyme, Merk, Biogen and Roche. E.A. has received speaking honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi and Biogen. M.G. has received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Sanofi, Almirall and Novartis. L.G-T. has received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Almirall, Roche and Teva. M.H. has participated in observational studies and has received compensation for consulting services and speaking honoraria from Roche, Merck, Sanofi, Biogen, Novartis and Bayer. J.M., R.G-B., and E.G-A. are employees of Roche Farma Spain. The rest of the authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, demyelinating, and immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system caused by a combination of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. The incidence of MS has increased in the past several decades, suggesting changes in the environmental risk factors. Much effort has been made in the description of the gut microbiota in MS; however, little is known about the dysbiosis on its function. The microbiota produces thousands of biologically active substances among which are notable the short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) excretion., Objectives: Analyze the interaction between microbiota, SCFAs, diet, and MS., Methods: 16S, nutritional questionnaires, and SCFAS quantification have been recovered from MS patients and controls., Results: Our results revealed an increment in the phylum Proteobacteria, especially the family Enterobacteriaceae, a lack in total SCFA excretion, and an altered profile of SCFAs in a Spanish cohort of MS patients. These alterations are more evident in patients with higher disability., Conclusions: The abundance of Proteobacteria and acetate and the low excretion of total SCFAs, especially butyrate, are common characteristics of MS patients, and besides, both are associated with a worse prognosis of the disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Moles, Delgado, Gorostidi-Aicua, Sepúlveda, Alberro, Iparraguirre, Suárez, Romarate, Arruti, Muñoz-Culla, Castillo-Triviño, Otaegui and The international Multiple Sclerosis Microbiome Study Consortium.)

Background and Purpose: The prevention of disability over the long term is the main treatment goal in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, randomized clinical trials evaluate only short-term treatment effects on disability. This study aimed to define criteria for 6-month confirmed disability progression events of MS with a high probability of resulting in sustained long-term disability worsening., Methods: In total, 14,802 6-month confirmed disability progression events were identified in 8741 patients from the global MSBase registry. For each 6-month confirmed progression event (13,321 in the development and 1481 in the validation cohort), a sustained progression score was calculated based on the demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of progression that were predictive of long-term disability worsening. The score was externally validated in the Cladribine Tablets Treating Multiple Sclerosis Orally (CLARITY) trial., Results: The score was based on age, sex, MS phenotype, relapse activity, disability score and its change from baseline, number of affected functional system domains and worsening in six of the domains. In the internal validation cohort, a 61% lower chance of improvement was estimated with each unit increase in the score (hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.52; discriminatory index 0.89). The proportions of progression events sustained at 5 years stratified by the score were 1: 72%; 2: 88%; 3: 94%; 4: 100%. The results of the CLARITY trial were confirmed for reduction of disability progression that was &gt;88% likely to be sustained (events with score ˃1.5)., Conclusions: Clinicodemographic characteristics of 6-month confirmed disability progression events identify those at high risk of sustained long-term disability. This knowledge will allow future trials to better assess the effect of therapy on long-term disability accrual., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Multiple sclerosis is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young adults with major consequences for their future lives. Improving communication strategies on prognosis may help patients deal with the disease and adjust their long-term life goals. However, there is limited information on patients' preferences of long-term prognosis (LTP) communication and associated factors., Objective: The aim of this study was to describe patients' preferences and assess the factors associated with LTP communication preferences in early-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients., Methods: A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, a disease duration from first attack ≤ 3 years, and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-5.5 were included. The Prognosis in MS questionnaire was used to assess how much patients want to know about their LTP. Different patient-reported measures were administered to gather information on symptom severity, pain, fatigue, mood/anxiety, quality of life, stigma, illness perception, feeling of hopelessness, self-efficacy, information avoidance and coping strategies. Cognition was assessed using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between LTP information preference and demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as patients' perspectives., Results: A total of 189 patients were included (mean age: 36.1  ±  9.4 years, 71.4% female, mean disease duration: 1.2  ±  0.8 years). Median EDSS score was 1.0 (IQR = 0.0-2.0). A proportion of 68.5% (n  =  126) of patients had never discussed LTP with their neurologists, whereas 69.2% (n = 126) reported interest in knowing it (73.5% at diagnosis). Bivariate analyses suggested that patients were significantly more likely to have higher LTP information preferences if they were male and had a lower SDMT score. Male gender and a lower SDMT score were predictors of LTP information preferences., Conclusions: Patients with early-stage RRMS want to discuss their LTP shortly after diagnosis. Understanding the factors involved may be useful to design individualized communication strategies., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The increase in available disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis has led to greater emphasis on improving treatment sequencing paradigms. This article summarises the opinions from a panel of 25 experts on treatment switching approaches in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)., Methods: A modified Delphi consensus process was carried out to develop clinically relevant statements for aiding treatment decisions in patients with RMS between the 16 th January and the 9 th October 2019. A sub-group of two experts (core group) carried out an extensive review of the literature and formulated 106 statements for the expert panel to evaluate., Results: From a total number of 106 statements that were submitted to the expert panel for critical evaluation, consensus (at least 80% of the panelists agreed) was reached on 99 of them. These statements cover treatment objectives, reasons for DMT switching, suboptimal response criteria, strategies for treatment change and washout periods., Conclusion: The agreed statements provide up-to-date guidance on DMT sequencing for optimal patient management., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Multiple sclerosis is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young adults with major consequences for their autonomy and capacity to maintain employment., Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact on work productivity in early-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)., Methods: A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, a disease duration ≤ 3 years, and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-5.5 were included. Absenteeism, presenteeism, and unpaid work loss due to RRMS were measured using the Valuation of Lost Productivity (VOLP) questionnaire. The EDSS, SymptoMScreen, 5-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, and Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire were used to gather information on disability, patients' perception of symptom severity, fatigue, mood/anxiety, cognition, and problems in the workplace, respectively. Associations between the VOLP and clinical and work outcomes were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlations., Results: A total of 189 patients were included. Mean age (SD) was 36.1 ± 9.4 years and 71.4% were female. Mean disease duration was 1.2 ± 0.8 years. Median EDSS score was 1.0 (IQR 0, 2.0). One hundred thirty patients (68.8%) were working for pay or self-employed. Fifty-three patients (40.8%) reported absence from work in the past 3 months with an average of 14.3 absent workdays. Their health problems resulted in the loss of 3.4% of their actual work time in the past 7 days. Thirty patients got help (11.8 h) with their unpaid work activities in the past 7 days. Absenteeism was significantly correlated with anxiety and depression (rho=0.298 and 0.291, p<0.001), fatigue (rho=0.214, p = 0.014), and symptom severity (rho=0.213, p = 0.015). Presenteeism was significantly correlated with fatigue (rho=0.375, p<0.001), symptom severity (rho=0.373, p<0.001), depression (rho=0.263, p = 0.008), and disability (rho=0.215, p = 0.031)., Conclusions: Productivity loss even in a RRMS population with short disease duration stresses the need for more efficient treatment control of disease activity from earlier stages., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

(1) Background: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are released by most cell types and are implicated in several biological and pathological processes, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Differences in the number and cargo of plasma-derived EVs have been described in MS. In this work, we have characterised the EV RNA cargo of MS patients, with particular attention to circular RNAs (circRNAs), which have attracted increasing attention for their roles in physiology and disease and their biomarker potential. (2) Methods: Plasma-derived EVs were isolated by differential centrifugation (20 patients, 8 controls), and RNA-Sequencing was used to identify differentially expressed linear and circRNAs. (3) Results: We found differences in the RNA type distribution, circRNAs being enriched in EVs vs. leucocytes. We found a number of (corrected p -value < 0.05) circRNA significantly DE between the groups. Nevertheless, highly structured circRNAs are preferentially retained in leukocytes. Differential expression analysis reports significant differences in circRNA and linear RNA expression between MS patients and controls, as well as between different MS types. (4) Conclusions: Plasma derived EV RNA cargo is not a representation of leukocytes' cytoplasm but a message worth studying. Moreover, our results reveal the interest of circRNAs as part of this message, highlighting the importance of further understanding RNA regulation in MS.

The autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy has been associated with meningoencephalomyelitis that usually responds to glucocorticoids. We report a 20-year-old man that developed an acute and severe meningoencephalomyelitis with remarkable CNS hyperexcitability and oculogyric crises. CSF analysis showed hypoglycorrhachia, pleocytosis, elevated ADA, and CSF-immunofluorescence characteristic of autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy. MRI showed lesions at thalamus, corpus-callosum, dorsal pons and dentate nucleus with associated myelitis. Immunotherapy led to a full recovery, although MRI activity was observed at follow-up. CNS hyperexcitability, typically seen in other immune-mediated syndromes, represents a novel presenting form to be included as part of the clinical spectrum of this entity., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: A delayed onset of treatment effect, termed therapeutic lag, may influence the assessment of treatment response in some patient subgroups., Objectives: The objective of this study is to explore the associations of patient and disease characteristics with therapeutic lag on relapses and disability accumulation., Methods: Data from MSBase, a multinational multiple sclerosis (MS) registry, and OFSEP, the French MS registry, were used. Patients diagnosed with MS, minimum 1 year of exposure to MS treatment and 3 years of pre-treatment follow-up, were included in the analysis. Studied outcomes were incidence of relapses and disability accumulation. Therapeutic lag was calculated using an objective, validated method in subgroups stratified by patient and disease characteristics. Therapeutic lag under specific circumstances was then estimated in subgroups defined by combinations of clinical and demographic determinants., Results: High baseline disability scores, annualised relapse rate (ARR) ⩾ 1 and male sex were associated with longer therapeutic lag on disability progression in sufficiently populated groups: females with expanded disability status scale (EDSS) < 6 and ARR < 1 had mean lag of 26.6 weeks (95% CI = 18.2-34.9), males with EDSS < 6 and ARR < 1 31.0 weeks (95% CI = 25.3-36.8), females with EDSS < 6 and ARR ⩾ 1 44.8 weeks (95% CI = 24.5-65.1), and females with EDSS ⩾ 6 and ARR < 1 54.3 weeks (95% CI = 47.2-61.5)., Conclusions: Pre-treatment EDSS and ARR are the most important determinants of therapeutic lag.

Background: Prolonged-release fampridine (PR-FAM) 10-mg tablet twice daily is the only approved pharmacological treatment for improvement of walking ability in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS). LIBERATE assessed the safety/effectiveness of PR-FAM in the real-world., Objectives: The aim of this study was to collect additional safety data, including the incidence rate of seizures and other adverse events (AEs) of interest, from patients with MS taking PR-FAM in routine clinical practice (including patients aged ≥ 65 years and those with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors). Other objectives included change over time in patient-reported evaluation of physical and psychological impact of MS while taking PR-FAM, and change over time in physician-reported assessment of walking ability in MS patients taking PR-FAM., Methods: Patients with MS newly prescribed PR-FAM were recruited (201 sites, 13 countries). Demographic/safety data were collected at enrolment through 12 months. Physician-rated Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scores for walking ability, and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) were assessed., Results: Safety analysis included 4646 patients with 3534.8 patient-years of exposure; median (range) age, 52.6 (21-85) years, 87.3% < 65 years, and 65.7% women. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 2448 (52.7%) patients, and serious TEAEs were reported in 279 (6.0%) patients, of whom 37 (< 1%) experienced treatment-emergent serious AEs (TESAEs) considered related to PR-FAM. AEs of special interest (AESI) occurred in 1799 (38.7%) patients, and serious AESI in 128 (2.8%) patients. Seventeen (< 1%) patients experienced actual events of seizure. Overall, 1158 (24.9%) patients discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy. At 12 months, a greater proportion of patients on-treatment had improvement from baseline in CGI-I for walking ability versus those who discontinued (61% vs. 11%; p <  0.001). MSIS-29 physical impact score improved significantly for patients on-treatment for 12 months versus those who discontinued (mean change, baseline to 12 months: - 9.99 vs. - 0.34 points; p <  0.001). Results were similar for MSIS-29 psychological impact., Conclusion: No new safety concerns were identified in this real-world study, suggesting that routine risk-minimization measures are effective. CGI-I and MSIS-29 scores after 12 months treatment with PR-FAM treatment show clinical benefits consistent with those previously reported., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01480063., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objective: To understand COVID-19 characteristics in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and identify high-risk individuals due to their immunocompromised state resulting from the use of disease-modifying treatments., Methods: Retrospective and multicenter registry in patients with MS with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and available disease course (mild = ambulatory; severe = hospitalization; and critical = intensive care unit/death). Cases were analyzed for associations between MS characteristics and COVID-19 course and for identifying risk factors for a fatal outcome., Results: Of the 326 patients analyzed, 120 were cases confirmed by real-time PCR, 34 by a serologic test, and 205 were suspected. Sixty-nine patients (21.3%) developed severe infection, 10 (3%) critical, and 7 (2.1%) died. Ambulatory patients were higher in relapsing MS forms, treated with injectables and oral first-line agents, whereas more severe cases were observed in patients on pulsed immunosuppressors and critical cases among patients with no therapy. Severe and critical infections were more likely to affect older males with comorbidities, with progressive MS forms, a longer disease course, and higher disability. Fifteen of 33 patients treated with rituximab were hospitalized. Four deceased patients have progressive MS, 5 were not receiving MS therapy, and 2 were treated (natalizumab and rituximab). Multivariate analysis showed age (OR 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04-1.17) as the only independent risk factor for a fatal outcome., Conclusions: This study has not demonstrated the presumed critical role of MS therapy in the course of COVID-19 but evidenced that people with MS with advanced age and disease, in progressive course, and those who are more disabled have a higher probability of severe and even fatal disease., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

The extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab has been suggested to be associated with a reduced risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and short-term preservation of efficacy but its long-term effectiveness remain unknown. We aimed to determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in an EID setting in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated for more than 7 years. We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study, including 39 (34 female, 5 male) patients with clinically definite relapsing-MS, initially treated with standard interval dosing (SID) of natalizumab (mean time 54 months [SD29]) who were then switched to EID, every 8 weeks (mean time 76 months [SD13]). The main outcome measures included the following: i) annualized relapse rate (ARR), ii) radiological activity, iii) disability progression, and iv) NEDA-3 no evidence of disease activity index. EID preserved ARR, radiological activity, and prevented disability worsening during follow-up. The proportion of patients maintaining their NEDA-3 status after 24, 48, and 72 months of natalizumab administration in EID was 94%, 73%, and 70%, respectively. Stratified analysis according to history of drug therapy showed that the EID of natalizumab was slightly more effective in naïve patients than in those previously treated with other immunosuppressive drugs. No cases of PML or other severe adverse reactions were reported. In conclusion, long-term therapy with natalizumab in an EID setting following an SID regimen maintained its disease-modifying activity, and was safe and well tolerated for over 7 years. These encouraging observational results need to be confirmed in controlled clinical trials., Competing Interests: JR has received travel grants or speaking fees from Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Biogen, and Novartis. JS has received travel grants from Merck. MM has received travel grants or speaking fees from Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Biogen. TC-T has received speaking/consulting fees and/or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. MD-A has received travel grants or speaking fees from Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Riancho, Setien, Sánchez de la Torre, Torres-Barquin, Misiego, Pérez, Castillo-Triviño, Menéndez-García and Delgado-Alvarado.)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by the immune mediated attack on axons and the subsequent demyelination. There is growing evidence that the gut microbiota of MS patients is altered; however, the connection between demyelination events and changes in the gut microbiota has not been determined. The objective of the current work was to characterize the microbial dysbiosis in two murine demyelinating models and to study the correlation between them. Concurrently, their suitability as predictors of microbial changes in MS patients was assessed. To this purpose, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and cuprizone (CPZ) models were induced in C57BL/6 mice that were monitored for 4 and 9 weeks, respectively. Fecal samples were collected during disease progression. Motor skill performance was evaluated by EAE scale measurement in EAE mice and demyelination by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in CPZ ones. EAE and CPZ mice revealed drastic microbial changes according to disease progression, adding a new layer of complexity to the understanding of demyelination and remyelination processes. Besides, the reported microbial changes replicate most of the characteristics that define the potential dysbiosis in MS patients. The controlled environment and stable diet that animals have in research centers offer an exceptional scenario to modify animal's microbiota and provide opportunities to study host microbiota interplay with restrained conditions not achievable in human studies. Nevertheless the slight differences from murine model's and patient's microbiota should be considered in the design of studies aiming to modulate the microbiota.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, with higher prevalence in women, that leads to neurological disability. The disease course and clinical phenotype are highly variable, and therefore, biomarkers for the diagnosis, classification, monitoring of the disease and treatment assessment are needed. Studies have shown a dysregulation in the coding and non-coding RNAs and proposed some as biomarkers. However, still none of them have reached the clinical practice. Recently, circular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as new players in the transcriptome that hold a great potential as biomarkers in several diseases. Leukocytes from 30 MS patients and 20 healthy controls (HCs) were RNA-sequenced to study the linear and circular transcriptome. Differential expression analysis was performed by DESeq, and circRNA candidates were studied in a second cohort (70 MS and 46 HC) by RT-qPCR and in paired samples drawn during the relapse and remission phases (20 patients). Among the differentially expressed circRNAs, 96.1% are upregulated in patients compared with controls, but similar circRNA profiles are found between MS types. The same upregulation trend was observed in females but not in males or in the linear transcriptome. The upregulation of 6 circRNAs was validated, and a change in their expression was found between relapse and remission. The 6 circRNAs showed a good performance to discriminate patients from HC with a combined area under the curve of 0.852. There is global, specific and sex-dependent increase of circRNA expression in MS, and 6 circRNAs are proposed as potential biomarkers., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The presence of anti-myelin lipid-specific oligoclonal IgM bands (LS-OCMBs) has been defined as an accurate predictor of an aggressive evolution of multiple sclerosis. However, the detection of this biomarker is performed in cerebrospinal fluid, a quite invasive liquid biopsy. In the present study we aimed at studying the expression profile of miRNA, snoRNA, circRNA and linearRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with lipid-specific oligoclonal IgM band characterization. We included a total of 89 MS patients, 47 with negative LS-OCMB status and 42 with positive status. Microarray (miRNA and snoRNA) and RNA-seq (circular and linear RNAs) were used to perform the profiling study in the discovery cohort and candidates were validated by RT-qPCR in the whole cohort. The biomarker potential of the candidates was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. RNA-seq and RT-qPCR validation revealed that two circular (hsa&#95;circ&#95;0000478 and hsa&#95;circ&#95;0116639) and two linear RNAs ( IRF5 and MTRNR2L8 ) are downregulated in PBMCs from patients with positive LS-OCMBs. Finally, those RNAs show a performance of a 70% accuracy in some of the combinations. The expression of hsa&#95;circ&#95;0000478, hsa&#95;circ&#95;0116639, IRF5 and MTRNR2L8 might serve as minimally invasive biomarkers of highly active disease.

Genome-wide association studies and meta-analysis have contributed to the identification of more than 200 loci associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, a proportion of MS heritability remains unknown. We aimed to uncover new genetic variants associated with MS and determine their functional effects. For this, we resequenced the exons and regulatory sequences of 14 MS risk genes in a cohort of MS patients and healthy individuals ( n = 1,070) and attempted to validate a selection of signals through genotyping in an independent cohort ( n = 5,138). We identified three new MS-associated variants at C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 5 ( CXCR5) , Ts translation elongation factor, mitochondrial ( TSFM) and cytochrome P450 family 24 subfamily A member 1 ( CYP24A1) . Rs10892307 resulted in a new signal at the CXCR5 region that explains one of the associations with MS within the locus . This polymorphism and three others in high linkage disequilibrium mapped within regulatory regions. Of them, rs11602393 showed allele-dependent enhancer activity in the forward orientation as determined by luciferase reporter assays. Immunophenotyping using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from MS patients associated the minor allele of rs10892307 with increased percentage of regulatory T cells expressing CXCR5. This work reports a new signal for the CXCR5 MS risk locus and points to rs11602393 as the causal variant. The expansion of CXCR5+ circulating regulatory T cells induced by this variant could cause its MS association.

The IL22RA2 locus is associated with risk for multiple sclerosis (MS) but causative variants are yet to be determined. In a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) screen of this locus in a Basque population, rs28385692, a rare coding variant substituting Leu for Pro at position 16 emerged significantly ( p = 0.02). This variant is located in the signal peptide (SP) shared by the three secreted protein isoforms produced by IL22RA2 (IL-22 binding protein-1(IL-22BPi1), IL-22BPi2 and IL-22BPi3). Genotyping was extended to a Europe-wide case-control dataset and yielded high significance in the full dataset ( p = 3.17 × 10 -4 ). Importantly, logistic regression analyses conditioning on the main known MS-associated SNP at this locus, rs17066096, revealed that this association was independent from the primary association signal in the full case-control dataset. In silico analysis predicted both disruption of the alpha helix of the H-region of the SP and decreased hydrophobicity of this region, ultimately affecting the SP cleavage site. We tested the effect of the p.Leu16Pro variant on the secretion of IL-22BPi1, IL-22BPi2 and IL-22BPi3 and observed that the Pro16 risk allele significantly lowers secretion levels of each of the isoforms to around 50%-60% in comparison to the Leu16 reference allele. Thus, our study suggests that genetically coded decreased levels of IL-22BP isoforms are associated with augmented risk for MS.

Background: The relation between ABO/Rh groups and multiple sclerosis (MS) has been proposed in several studies, however there is a controversy about the role of these groups in the disease. Although it has been reported that some groups can be protective or risk factors, there is no consensus and discordant reports can be found in the literature., Objectives and Methodology: In this short report, we analyze the ABO/Rh distribution in a MS cohort of 265 patients and compare these frequencies with the results obtained from the Basque Blood Donors bank (17,796 individuals) of the same region., Results and Conclusions: From our data, the absence of immune antigens (A, B or Rhesus +) defined by the group O- seems to be protective in the MS group with an odds ratio of 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.309-0.796), while the presence of Rh+ plus A or B seems to be a risk in developing multiple sclerosis., (© The Author(s) 2019.)