Search

We describe the epidemiology of cancer after kidney transplantation (KTx), investigating its risk factors and impact on therapeutic management and survival in KTx recipients (KTRs). The association between modification of immunosuppressive (IS) therapy after cancer and survival outcomes was analyzed. We collected data from 930 KTRs followed for 7 [1--19] years. The majority of KTRs received KTx from a deceased donor (84%). In total, 74% of patients received induction therapy with basiliximab and 26% with ATG. Maintenance therapy included steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and mycophenolate. Patients with at least one cancer (CA+) amounted to 19%. NMSC was the most common tumor (55%). CA+ were older and had a higher BMI. Vasculitis and ADPKD were more prevalent in CA+. ATG was independently associated with CA+ and was related to earlier cancer development in survival and competing risk analyses (p = 0.01 and <0.0001; basiliximab 89 ± 4 vs. ATG 40 ± 4 months). After cancer diagnosis, a significant prognostic impact was derived from the shift to mTOR inhibitors compared to a definitive IS drug suspension (p = 0.004). Our data confirm the relevance of cancer as a complication in KTRs with ATG as an independent risk factor. An individualized choice of IS to be proposed at the time of KTx is crucial in the prevention of neoplastic risk. Finally, switching to mTORi could represent an important strategy to improve patient survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) are generally considered to be frailer than those with preserved renal function. We cross-sectionally evaluated the associations between frailty, malnutrition–inflammation syndrome and circulating inflammatory cytokines in 115 older individuals with advanced CKD. As for frailty definition, we adopted Fried's frailty phenotype (FP), while malnutrition–inflammation syndrome was assessed using the Malnutrition–Inflammation Score (MIS) and circulating inflammatory cytokines (IL-6; TNFα; MCP-1). A total of 48 patients were frail, and mean eGFR was comparable in both frail and non-frail patients (24 ± 10 vs. 25 ± 11 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.63). Frail patients had higher MIS (6 [4–11] vs. 4 [3–5]; p < 0.0001) but cytokine concentrations were comparable in both groups. At multivariate regression, FP was independently associated with MIS, age, gender and pre-albumin but not with cytokines. However, we found some associations between inflammatory cytokines and some specific frailty criteria: weight loss and slowness were associated with MCP-1 (respectively p = 0.049 and p < 0.0001) and weakness with IL-6 (p = 0.005); in conclusion, in older patients with advanced CKD, frailty is strictly associated with malnutrition–inflammation syndrome but not with circulating inflammatory cytokines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization is associated with increased complications and mortality. Despite efforts to standardize AKI management, its recognition in clinical practice is limited. Methods To assess and characterize different patterns of AKI diagnosis, we collected clinical data, serum creatinine (sCr) levels, comorbidities and outcomes from adult patients using the Hospital Discharge Form (HDF). AKI diagnosis was based on administrative data and according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria by evaluating sCr variations during hospitalization. Additionally, patients were categorized based on the timing of AKI onset. Results Among 56 820 patients, 42 900 (75.5%) had no AKI, 1893 (3.3%) had AKI diagnosed by sCr changes and coded in the HDF (full-AKI), 2529 (4.4%) had AKI reported on the HDF but not meeting sCr-based criteria (HDF-AKI) and 9498 (16.7%) had undetected AKI diagnosed by sCr changes but not coded in the HDF (KDIGO-AKI). Overall, AKI incidence was 24.5%, with a 68% undetection rate. Patients with KDIGO-AKI were younger and had a higher proportion of females, lower comorbidity burden, milder AKI stages, more frequent admissions to surgical wards and lower mortality compared with full-AKI patients. All AKI groups had worse outcomes than those without AKI, and AKI, even if undetected, was independently associated with mortality risk. Patients with AKI at admission had different profiles and better outcomes than those developing AKI later. Conclusions AKI recognition in hospitalized patients is highly heterogeneous, with a significant prevalence of undetection. This variability may be affected by patients' characteristics, AKI-related factors, diagnostic approaches and in-hospital patient management. AKI remains a major risk factor, emphasizing the importance of ensuring proper diagnosis for all patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly impacts renal and hepatic function, necessitating comprehensive understanding and management strategies. Renal involvement, namely diabetic kidney disease (DKD), presents a global challenge, with increasing prevalence paralleling DM rates. Lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy targeting hypertension and glycemic control have pivotal roles in DKD management. Concurrently, hepatic involvement in DM, characterized by metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), presents a bidirectional relationship. DM exacerbates MASLD progression, while MASLD predisposes to DM development and worsens glycemic control. Screening for MASLD in DM patients is of high importance, utilizing non-invasive methods like ultrasound and fibrosis scores. Lifestyle modifications, such as weight loss and a Mediterranean diet, mitigate MASLD progression. Promising pharmacotherapies, like SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists, demonstrate efficacy in both DM and MASLD management. Special populations, such as diabetic individuals undergoing hemodialysis or kidney transplant recipients, demand special care due to unique clinical features. Similarly, DM exacerbates complications in MASLD patients, elevating the risks of hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recognizing the interconnectedness of DM, renal, and hepatic diseases underscores the need for multidisciplinary approaches for optimal patient outcomes. The present review aims to present the main characteristics and crucial points not to be overlooked regarding the renal and hepatic involvement in DM patients focusing on the inter-relationships between the renal and the hepatic involvements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was isolated in January 2020 and, on March, the WHO declared the status of a pandemic. It causes a cytokine release syndrome, called “cytokine storm,” characterized by systemic inflammation involving elevated levels of cytokines and hyperactivation of immune cell; this profound alteration in the immune system led to an overshooting inflammatory response contributing to morbidity and mortality. Solid organ transplant recipients are at particularly higher risk of developing critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to chronic immunosuppression; in fact, establishing the balance between infection and rejection in any transplant recipient is the principal aim when prescribing immunosuppression. Tocilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor widely adopted in adult rheumatoid arthritis, is used as rescue therapy for chronic antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation. Data about the use of tocilizumab for treating acute kidney graft dysfunction in a setting of kidney-transplanted patients affected by COVID-19 are lacking. In this case study, we discuss the case of kidney transplant recipient with proven SARS-CoV-2 infection that develops acute graft dysfunction and the management of immunosuppression with concomitant tocilizumab administration.