1. Ecosystem services and social perception
- Author
-
Jorda-Capdevila, Dídac, Brummer, Mathias, Bruno, Daniel, Alexandre, Rui, Castanho, Antonio J. Castro, Fortuño, Pau, Jakubínský, Jiri, Kaletová, Tatiana, Kelemen, Estzer, Koundouri, Phoebe, Logar, Ivana, Loures, Louis, Mendez, Joana, Mendoza-Lera, Clara, Quintas-Soriano, Cristina, Rodríguez-Lozano, Pablo, von Schiller, Daniel, Stubbington, Rachel, Sykes, Tim, Tizzoni, Elisa, Truchy, Amélie, Tsani, Stella, Magand, C., Alves, M.H., Calleja, E., Datry, T., Dörflinger, G., England, J., Gallart, F., Gómez, R., Jorda-Capdevila, D., Marti, E., Munne, A., Pastor, V.A., Stubbington, R., Tziortzis, I., and Von Schiller, D.
- Abstract
In a nutshell:▪ There is a variety of benefits that IRES provide to our societies, from the provision of materials such as water and timber, to iconic species, the regulation of biogeochemical cycles, and space for cultural manifestation and as a corridor for both wild and herded animals.▪ Drying and rewetting processes, timing and duration of different aquatic phases, have an effect on the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, as well as on the provision of ecosystem services and on the social perception of them.▪ There are intrinsic and relational values associated to IRES that are not usually recognised, including sense of place, cultural identity, social cohesion or nature stewardship.▪ There is a long list of indicators that can be used to assess the provision of ecosystem services, and different techniques of monetary and non-monetary methods can be applied to assess their value.▪ Public participation is also necessary to understand the multiple values of IRES and to improve social perception. Participatory mapping, citizen science, and scenario planning are some of the methodologies can be employed.
- Published
- 2020