1. Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in Rural vs Metropolitan Settings: A Victorian Experience.
- Author
-
Chan K., Dinh D., Hare D., Lockwood S., Neil C., Prior D., Brennan A., Lefkovits J., Carruthers H., Reid C., Driscoll A., Chan K., Dinh D., Hare D., Lockwood S., Neil C., Prior D., Brennan A., Lefkovits J., Carruthers H., Reid C., and Driscoll A.
- Abstract
Background: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is the most common cause of hospital admission in patients over 65, with poorer outcomes demonstrated in rural vs metropolitan areas in previous study. The aim of this study was to compare the in-hospital and post-discharge management of ADHF patients admitted to rural versus metropolitan hospitals in Victoria. Method(s): Data from the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry, Heart Failure (VCOR-HF) project was used. This was a prospective, observational, non-randomised study of consecutive patients admitted to participating hospitals in Victoria, Australia, with ADHF as their primary diagnosis over a 30-day period over 4 consecutive years. All patients were followed up for 30 days post discharge. Result(s): 1,357 patients (1,260 metropolitan, 97 rural) were admitted to study hospitals with ADHF during the study periods. Cohorts were similar in age (average 76.87 +/- 13.12 years) and male sex (56.4%). Metropolitan patients were more likely to have diabetes (44.4% vs 34.0%, p = 0.046), kidney disease (65.8% vs 37.1%, p <0.001) and anaemia (31.9% vs 19.6%, p = 0.011). There was no significant difference in length of stay between metropolitan and rural patients (7.49 vs 6.37 days, p = 0.120). There was a trend towards a higher 30-day re-hospitalisations for metropolitan patients (19.1% vs 11.6%, p = 0.071) and all-cause 30-day mortality (8.2% vs 4.1%, p = 0.154) compared to rural patients. Metropolitan patients were significantly more likely to have seen their GP (68.1% vs 53.2%, p = 0.003) or attend an outpatient clinic (35.9% vs 10.6%, p < 0.001) by 30 days. Referrals to a heart failure home visiting program remained low overall (19.9%). Conclusion(s): Our results highlight geographic differences in post-discharge follow up of patients admitted for ADHF, with rural patients receiving poorer medical follow up. Metropolitan patients have more co-morbidities compared to rural patients. Follow up remains poor overall.Copyr
- Published
- 2022