Search

This article describes a focus group study exploring university students' perspectives of sexual violence prevention campaigns with the goal of developing a social marketing campaign that would resonate with university students. Seventy-one students at one university in Aotearoa/New Zealand provided feedback in 15 focus groups. Findings of an inductive thematic analysis indicate that students think sexual violence prevention campaigns should depict diversity in perpetrator and victim identity and focus on more subtle contexts of sexual violence. These findings have implications for the development of sexual violence prevention campaigns. In particular we discuss how universities must balance tensions between designing palatable and relatable prevention campaigns while also reflecting and addressing the underlying gendered nature of sexual violence.

A recent project involving Year 3 (seven-eight year-old) pupils and their teachers revealed that "gender matters" differently to boys and girls, and teachers. The study sought to elicit whether pupils and their teachers felt the gender of a teacher mattered to their experiences of schooling. Pupils were concerned about how effective teachers were in carrying out their professional functions and a teacher's gender was subsumed within this. For these pupils, "gender mattered" in terms of the construction of their own gender identities. In contrast, teachers were aware of and attentive to the gender of pupils in managing and organising classroom interactions. The variety of differing views expressed and positions adopted towards the place of gender in teacher-pupil interactions demonstrates the complexity of developing "one size fits all" approaches to tackling gender equity in the classroom. (Contains 5 tables and 6 notes.)

Background: There is a need for simple imaging parameters capable of predicting therapeutic outcome.Methods: This retrospective study analysed 50 patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI before receiving potentially curative radiotherapy. The proportion of enhancing pixels (E(F)) in the whole-tumour volume post-contrast agent injection was calculated and assessed in relation to disease-free survival (DFS).Results: Tumours with high E(F) had a significantly poorer probability of DFS than those with low E(F) (P=0.011).Interpretation: E(F) is a simple imaging biomarker that should be studied further in a multi-centre setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Between 1 and 2 per cent of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients will reveal no evidence of a primary malignancy. The management of this group poses many problems, including the morbidity associated with wide field irradiation as well as the difficulty in treatment when a primary does emerge. The aim of this study was to assess the use of fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging in patients presenting with an unknown head and neck primary and to consider its routine use in such patients.Methods: We enrolled 25 patients into our study over a four year period. They all presented with a histologically proven, metastatic, squamous cell carcinoma of the neck for which no primary could be found despite full clinical, endoscopic and radiological evaluation with computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, all the patients underwent imaging using FDG-PET. The images were interpreted by two radiologists experienced in PET imaging.Results: A primary was identified in nine of the 25 patients (42 per cent); however, of these patients, six had false positive results and only three patients were true positives with supportive histology. In the remaining 16 patients, no abnormality was identified on CT, MRI or PET. Of these 16 patients, two eventually displayed a primary carcinoma, the other 14 patients remaining without evidence of any primary.Conclusion: Despite the high number of positive PET scans, the actual true positive rate was 3/9 (33 per cent); conversely, the true negative rate was 14/16 (88 per cent). We conclude from this study that there is a role for FDG-PET in the patient with an unknown head and neck primary, particularly in the context of a negative PET scan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]