Search

Carphoborus minimus (Fabricius, 1798) Records. DON, LUG [Nikulina et al., 2015: 35]., Published as part of Arzanov, Yu. G., Martynov, V. V. & Nikulina, T. V., 2021, A contribution to the fauna of weevil beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) of the Central Donbass, pp. 5-44 in Caucasian Entomological Bulletin 17 (1) on page 42, DOI: 10.23885/181433262021171-544, http://zenodo.org/record/8145644, {"references":["Nikulina T., Mandelshtam M., Petrov A., Nazarenko V., Yunakov N. 2015. A survey of the weevils of Ukraine. Bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Platypodinae and Scolytinae). Zootaxa. 3912 (1): 1 - 61. DOI: 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3912.1.1"]}

** Carphoborus perrisi (Chapuis, 1869) Records. DON [Nikulina et al., 2015: 36]. Localities. Donetsk Region. Shakhtersk Distr.: Donetskiy kryazh RLP, Saur-Mogila, Cotinus coggygria, 6.07.2017. Lugansk Region. Slavyanoserbsk Distr.: Trekhizbenka, light trap, 25.07.2009, 9.08.2010 (S. Konovalov)., Published as part of Arzanov, Yu. G., Martynov, V. V. & Nikulina, T. V., 2021, A contribution to the fauna of weevil beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) of the Central Donbass, pp. 5-44 in Caucasian Entomological Bulletin 17 (1) on page 42, DOI: 10.23885/181433262021171-544, http://zenodo.org/record/8145644, {"references":["Nikulina T., Mandelshtam M., Petrov A., Nazarenko V., Yunakov N. 2015. A survey of the weevils of Ukraine. Bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Platypodinae and Scolytinae). Zootaxa. 3912 (1): 1 - 61. DOI: 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3912.1.1"]}

Our study aims to model the current and future (2041-2060 and 2081-2100) distribution areas of Carphoborus minimus (Fabricius, 1798) according to SSP2 and SSP5 emission scenarios. Current and future potential distribution areas of the species were predicted using the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) method and the MIROC6 climate change model. Finally, change analysis was performed to reveal the distributional changes between the present and future distribution ranges of the species. Our study has made it clear that the most impactful bioclimatic factors on the distribution of the species are temperature seasonality, isothermality, and precipitation of the driest quarter. Model results showed that the suitable distribution range for C. minimus is western and southern Anatolia. Models presented that the species will expand its distribution area through northern Anatolia in the 2050s and 2090s due to the changing ecological environment. In addition to that, the results of the change analysis showed that suitable distribution areas for the species will increase between 7% and 13.5% with time. Therefore, the species can become a new threat to the forests of Northern Anatolia. As a result, state forestry authorities should take precautions against this bark beetle species in the pine stands of northern Turkey in the future. Moreover, land-use plans should be developed to prevent the degradation of forest areas and to plan suitable trees for afforestation.

Carphoborus pini Eichhoff, 1881 Distribution in Iran. West Azarbaijan (Samin et al. 2011). General distribution. Southern Europe, North Africa, Cyprus, Turkey. Biology. This species breeds in pines (Pinus spp.). Recorded in Iran from Pinus pinea (Pinaceae) (Samin et al. 2011)., Published as part of Beaver, Roger A., Ghahari, Hassan & Sanguansub, Sunisa, 2016, An annotated checklist of Platypodinae and Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from Iran, pp. 401-441 in Zootaxa 4098 (3) on page 417, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4098.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/258895, {"references":["Samin, N., Sakenin, H. & Rastegar, J. (2011) A study of the species composition of Scolytidae (Coleoptera) of north and northwestern Iran. Amurian Zoological Journal, 3, 265 - 267."]}

Carphoborus minimus (Fabricius, 1798) Distribution in Iran. East Azarbaijan (Samin et al. 2011). General distribution. Central and Southern Europe, North Africa, Israel, Turkey. Biology. Recorded in Iran from Cedrus libani (Samin et al. 2011). This species usually attacks Pinus spp. (Pfeffer 1995), but has been recorded from Cedrus (Schedl 1959 a)., Published as part of Beaver, Roger A., Ghahari, Hassan & Sanguansub, Sunisa, 2016, An annotated checklist of Platypodinae and Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from Iran, pp. 401-441 in Zootaxa 4098 (3) on page 417, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4098.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/258895, {"references":["Samin, N., Sakenin, H. & Rastegar, J. (2011) A study of the species composition of Scolytidae (Coleoptera) of north and northwestern Iran. Amurian Zoological Journal, 3, 265 - 267.","Pfeffer, A. (1995) Zentral- und Westpalaarktische Borken- und Kernkafer. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Platypodidae). Pro Entomologia, Basel, 310 pp.","Schedl, K. E. (1959 a) Borkenkafer aus der Turkei. Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde, 32, 99 - 100."]}

Carphoborus perrisi (Chapuis, 1873) Distribution in Iran. Fars, Kerman, Khorasan, Tehran, Yazd, Zanjan (Modarres Awal 1997 as Estenoborus perrisi), Iran (no locality cited) (Kn��žek 2011). General distribution. Southern Europe, North Africa, extending East as far as India and Tajikistan. Schedl (1959 b) also records the species from South of the Sahara in Gabon and Niger. Biology. This species usually breeds in species of Pistacia (Anacardiaceae) (Pfeffer 1995), but is also recorded from Olea (Oleaceae), Cercis (Leguminosae) and Cotinus (Anacardiaceae). Recorded in Iran from Pistacia vera, and probably Cotinus coggygria (Anacardiaceae), Fraxinus excelsior and Olea europea (Oleaceae), Acer sp. (Sapindaceae), (Modarres Awal 1997). Schedl (1959 b) and Negru (1965) briefly describe the biology and gallery system., Published as part of Beaver, Roger A., Ghahari, Hassan & Sanguansub, Sunisa, 2016, An annotated checklist of Platypodinae and Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from Iran, pp. 401-441 in Zootaxa 4098 (3) on page 417, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4098.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/258895, {"references":["Modarres Awal, M. (1997) Platypodidae, Scolytidae. In: Modarres Awal, M. (Ed.), List of agricultural pests and their natural enemies in Iran. Ferdowsi University Press, Mashhad, pp. 185, 192 - 194.","Knizek, M. (2011) Platypodinae and Scolytinae. In: Lobl, I. & Smetana, A. (Eds.), Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol. 7. Curculionoidea I. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, pp. 201 - 251.","Schedl, K. E. (1959 b) Scolytidae und Platypodidae Afrikas. Band I. Scolytidae. Revista Entomologia de Mocambique, 2, 357 - 422.","Pfeffer, A. (1995) Zentral- und Westpalaarktische Borken- und Kernkafer. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Platypodidae). Pro Entomologia, Basel, 310 pp.","Negru, S. (1965) Uber drei fur die Rumanische Fauna neue Borkenkaferarten (Col., Scolytidae). Entomologische Blatter, 61, 113 - 120."]}

Faunistic review of Polish Platypodinae and Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)Based on a survey of the literature and collections, the distributions of the Platypodinae and Scolytinae (Curculionidae) within the present-day borders of Poland are summarized. An updated and annotated checklist is given of Polish pinhole borers (1 genus, 1 species) and bark beetles (35 genera, 110 species).Carphoborus cholodkovskyiSpessivtsev has been removed from the list; the presence ofHylastinus obscurus(Marsham),Pteleobius kraatzii(Eichhoff),Pityophthorus exsculptus(Ratzeburg),Cryphalus saltuariusWeise,Thamnurgus kaltenbachii(Bach),T. varipesEichhoff,Pityogenes irkutensis monacensisFuchs,P. saalasiEggers,Xyleborus eurygraphus(Ratzeburg) andX. pfeilii(Ratzeburg), reported by previous authors, needs to be confirmed by new findings.Pitophthorus carniolicusWichmann,Xylosandrus germanus(Blandford) andCrypturgus subcribrosusEggers were recorded generally from Poland.Hylastes plumbeusBlandford,Phloeosinus aubei(Perris),Gnathotrichus materiarius(Fitch),Orthotomicus erosus(Wollaston),Scolytus sulcifronsRey andTrypodendron laeveEggers (Knížek 2011) were erroneously recorded from Poland.

While making an intensive study of the bark beetles of Western North America, I noticed that two of the species in the genus Carphoborus were new. Since the last key to the species of this genus has been compiled (Swaine, 1918) Dr. Swaine has described five new species which with my two would more than double the number in the genus. I therefore feel that a new key should be made.I am indebted to the Museum of the California Academy of Sciences for the use of its collection of this genus, and to Dr. E. C. Van Dyke of the University of California for his helpful criticisms.