Search

Abstract: Since 2005, there has been a steady decline in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. To better understand this phenomenon, we studied the risk of cGVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression (cGVHD-IS) as a function of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) date in 3066 survivors from 2005 through 2019. Cox regression models were fit to assess associations of HCT date (as a continuous linear variable) with cause-specific hazards of cGVHD using unadjusted and adjusted models. Median follow-up for study subjects was 7.0 years (range, 1.0-17.2). Two-year probabilities of cGVHD-IS declined among all survivors from 45% to 52% (2005-2007) to ∼40% (2008-2012) and then further to ∼26% by 2017. A decline was also observed when the analysis was restricted to 502 pediatric survivors, with cGVHD-IS probabilities <10% since 2013. Among 305 adult and pediatric survivors who underwent transplantation for nonmalignant diseases, cGVHD rates showed greater fluctuation but remained <20% after 2016. Each 5-year increase in HCT date was associated with a 27% decrease in the cause-specific hazard of cGVHD (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.78; P < .0001); the HR was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.75-0.87; P < .0001) even after adjusting for various factors (age, donor/stem-cell source, race, sex, conditioning intensity, GVHD prophylaxis, among others) that could lead to cGVHD reduction. The decline in cGVHD was not fully explained by demographic shifts and greater use of HCT approaches that are generally associated with lower cGVHD rates. This observation underscores that single-cohort cGVHD prevention studies should use contemporaneous and not historical controls for comparison., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

After allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), a very small number of donor stem cells reconstitute the recipient hematopoietic system, whereas the donor is left with a near-normal pool of stem cells. We hypothesized that the increased replicative stress on transplanted donor cells in the recipient could lead to the disproportionate proliferation of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) variants. We obtained blood samples from 16 related donor-recipient pairs at a median of 33.8 years (range: 6.6 to 45.7) after HCT, including the longest surviving HCT recipients in the world. For 11 of 16 pairs, a donor sample from the time of HCT was available for comparison. We performed ultrasensitive duplex sequencing of genes recurrently mutated in myeloid malignancies and CH, as well as a set of functionally neutral genomic regions representative of human genomic content at large. CH variants were observed in all donors, even those as young as 12 years old. Where donor pre-HCT sample was available, the average mutation rate in donors compared to recipients post-HCT was similar (2.0% versus 2.6% per year, respectively) within genes recurrently mutated in myeloid malignancies. Twenty-two (5.6%) of the 393 variants shared between paired donors and recipients post-HCT showed ≥10-fold higher variant allele frequency (VAF) in the recipient. A longer time since HCT was positively associated with the expansion of shared variant VAFs in the recipient. In conclusion, even decades after HCT, there does not appear to be widespread accelerated clonal expansion in the transplanted cells, highlighting the immense regenerative capacity of the human hematopoietic system.

Revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) is essential risk mitigation in the prevention of infectious morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, revaccination rates have been shown to be insufficient and to what extent vaccine hesitancy contributes to survivors not becoming fully revaccinated is unknown. We performed a cross-sectional, mixed methods survey-based study to explore how vaccine hesitancy influences revaccination among US adult HCT survivors who were 2 to 8 years after transplant. Participants were asked to complete the Vaccination Confidence Scale (VCS) and open-ended survey items regarding vaccine confidence. The survey response rate was 30 %; among 332 respondents, vaccine confidence was high in 69 %, medium in 20 %, and low in 11 %. On multivariable analysis, four factors associated with high vaccine confidence were: predominantly Democrat zip codes (per 2020 election results), ability to pay for revaccination out of pocket, receipt of pre-HCT adult vaccines, and receipt of COVID-19 vaccines. From 189 participants who also answered open-ended items, 14 themes associated with vaccine confidence were identified and collapsed into 4 categories based on the VCS: Benefits, Harms, Trust, and Other. Merged analysis showed congruence between VCS scores and open-ended survey responses and created a narrative about the relative importance of the constructs when approaching revaccination by vaccine confidence level. These findings significantly expand our knowledge of how vaccine hesitancy influences revaccination uptake among US adult HCT survivors. Population-specific interventions to approach vaccine-hesitant survivors should be developed and tested., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Mihkaila Maurine Wickline reports financial support was provided by Oncology Nursing Society Foundation. Mihkaila Maurine Wickline reports financial support was provided by University of Washington. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) survivorship care includes recommendations for post-HCT revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). However, not all survivors agree to be vaccinated. No existing studies have comprehensively reported barriers and facilitators to adult HCT survivors completing revaccination., Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 194 adult HCT survivors was analyzed using convergent mixed methods. The analysis used various statistical methods to determine the prevalence of barriers and facilitators and the association between revaccination and the number and specific type of barriers and facilitators. Content analysis was applied to open-ended item responses. Integrated analysis merged quantitative and qualitative findings., Results: The most frequent barriers included the inability to receive live vaccines because of immunosuppression, identifying a suitable community location for administering childhood vaccines to adults, and delayed immune recovery. The most frequent facilitators were having healthcare insurance and a clear calendar of the revaccination schedule. Complete revaccination rates were lower with each additional reported barrier (OR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.459-0.722) and higher with each additional reported facilitator (OR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.05-1.63). Content analysis suggested that most barriers were practical issues. One significant facilitator highlighted by respondents was for the transplant center to coordinate and serve as the vaccination location for revaccination services. Merged analysis indicated convergence between quantitative and qualitative data., Conclusion: Practical barriers and facilitators played a consequential role in revaccination uptake, and survivors would like to be revaccinated at the transplant center., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: There are limited data on the contemporary epidemiology of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) among hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for recurrent CDI among HCT recipients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of adult HCT recipients between 2012 and 2021 diagnosed with index CDI between HCT day -7 and +100. Recurrent CDI was defined as new symptoms and a positive test within 12 weeks after treatment for index CDI. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate associations between prespecified variables (age, neutropenia, exposure to antibiotics with antianaerobic coverage, cytomegalovirus viremia/disease, and metronidazole monotherapy) and recurrent infection, presented as hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: Of 3479 HCT recipients, 416 (12%) had index CDI and were treated with oral vancomycin (31%), metronidazole (41%), oral vancomycin and metronidazole (29%). Of 381 patients eligible for recurrent CDI analysis, 35 had recurrent infection; cumulative incidence was 10% (95% CI, 7-13) at 12 weeks. In the 14 days after recurrence, 2/25 (8%) patients required hospital admission; none died within 30 days. Metronidazole monotherapy for treatment of index CDI was associated with an increased rate of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-4.0; P = .048)., Conclusions: Recurrent CDI occurred in 10% of HCT recipients in the early posttransplant period and was associated with use of metronidazole. Further study is needed to characterize risk factors for recurrent CDI among HCT recipients to guide use of agents aimed at preventing recurrence., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. S.A.P. receives research support from Global Life Technologies, Inc., and participate in clinical trials with F2G, Cidara and Symbio. C.L. is site investigator for the clinical trial (Pfizer). E.S. and E.A.R. are recipients of the T32 training grant., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Despite significant progress in chronic GVHD therapies, challenges remain in understanding pleomorphic phenotypes and varying response to treatment. The goal of the Predicting the Quality of Response to Specific Treatments (PQRST) in chronic GVHD study is to identify predictors of treatment response. This report describing the study design seeks to raise awareness and invite collaborations with investigators who wish to access clinical data and research samples from this study., Methods: This is a prospective, observational cohort study involving data collection from patients who are beginning first-, second-, or third-line systemic therapy for chronic GVHD with defined agents. Evaluable participants will have baseline assessments and research samples prior to starting the index therapy, and 1 month after starting treatment. Response assessments occur at 3 and 6 months after start of treatment, or if a new systemic therapy is started before 6 months. Target enrollment is approximately 200 patients at 8 institutions, with at least 6 months of follow up to determine response to index therapy., Results: Enrollment started in July 2020 and was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic; as of 3/1/2024, 137 evaluable participants have been enrolled., Discussion: The Chronic GVHD Consortium "PQRST" is a large longitudinal cohort study that aims to investigate predictors of treatment response by identifying biologically and clinically defined patient subgroups. We welcome investigators to collaborate in the use of these data., Trial Registration: NCT04431479., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. BKH has been an advisory board member for Nkarta, Sanofi, Incyte, Rigel, Maat; participated in consultancy with ACI Group, received speaker fees from Therakos/Mallinkrodt; and is on the data safety monitoring committee for Angiocrine; and adjudication committee with CSL Behring. JP has been a consultant and advisory board member for Syndax, CTI Biopharma, Amgen, Regeneron, Incyte. He has received clinical trial support from Novartis, Amgen, Takeda, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Pharmacyclics, Abbvie, CTI Biopharma, and Bristol Myers Squibb. NF has served on an Incyte Advisory Board. CLK has served on advisory boards for Horizon Therapeutics and Incyte. CJL received honoraria and/or consultancy and/or research funding from Incyte, Sanofi, Fresenius Kabi, BMS, Kite, and Kadmon. CC has received consulting fees/honoraria from Sanofi, InhibRx, Cellarity, Astellas, Rigel, Novartis, Incyte; and consulting fees/equity from Cimeio, Oxford Immune Algorithmics, OrcaBio; and serves on the data safety monitoring board of Allovir and Angiocrine. SJL has received consulting fees from Mallinckrodt, Equillium, Kadmon, Novartis and Incyte; research funding from AstraZeneca, Incyte, Kadmon, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Syndax, and drug supply from Janssen. She is on Incyte and Sanofi clinical trial steering committees. PC, NEJ, RM, GC: nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is rapidly advancing, offering promising treatments for patients with hematological malignancy. However, associated infectious complications remain a significant concern because of their contribution to patient morbidity and non-relapse mortality. Recent epidemiological insights shed light on risk factors for infections after CAR T-cell therapy. However, the available evidence is predominantly retrospective, highlighting a need for further prospective studies. Institutions are challenged with managing infections after CAR T-cell therapy but variations in the approaches taken underscore the importance of standardizing infection prevention and management protocols across different healthcare settings. Therefore, the Infectious Diseases Special Interest Group of the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy assembled an expert panel to develop best practice considerations. The aim was to guide healthcare professionals in optimizing infection prevention and management for CAR T-cell therapy recipients and advocates for early consultation of Infectious Diseases during treatment planning phases given the complexities involved. By synthesizing current evidence and expert opinion these best practice considerations provide the basis for understanding infection risk after CAR T-cell therapies and propose risk-mitigating strategies in children, adolescents, and adults. Continued research and collaboration will be essential to refining and effectively implementing these recommendations., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Existing guidance about HCT in SAA is primarily derived from expert reviews, registry data and societal guidelines; however, transplant-specific guidelines for SAA are lacking. A panel of SAA experts, both pediatric and adult transplant physicians, developed consensus recommendations using Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology employing a GRADE guideline development tool. The panel agrees with previous recommendations for the preferential use of bone marrow as a graft source and the use of rabbit over horse antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for HCT conditioning. Fludarabine containing regimens are preferred for patients at high risk of graft failure and those receiving matched unrelated or haploidentical donor transplant. Given advancements in HCT, the panel does not endorse the historical 40-year age cut-off for considering upfront HCT in adults, acknowledging that fit older patients may also benefit from HCT. The panel also endorses increased utilization of HCT by prioritizing matched unrelated or haploidentical donor HCT over immunosuppressive therapy in children and adults who lack a matched related donor. Finally, the panel suggests either calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate or post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for matched related or matched unrelated donor recipients. These recommendations reflect a significant advancement in transplant strategies for SAA and highlight the importance of ongoing and further research to revisit current evidence in terms of donor choice, conditioning chemotherapy, GVHD prophylaxis and post-transplant immunosuppression., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)

Comprehensive survivorship care after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) includes revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). There is complexity to revaccination in this setting, and revaccination rates are sub-optimal. HCT survivors are at high-risk for morbidity and mortality from infections including VPDs, underscoring the importance of interventions to improve revaccination rates among survivors. Determining associations between survivor characteristics and revaccination uptake may guide interventions. The overall study objective was to advance our understanding of factors influencing revaccination uptake among adult HCT survivors living in the United States The specific study aims were to: (1) determine the prevalence of adult survivors who are completely, partially, or not revaccinated at 2 to 8 years after HCT and (2) examine associations between demographic variables, social determinants of health, clinical variables, past vaccination behaviors, vaccine hesitancy (Vaccination Confidence Scale), and revaccination status in adult HCT survivors. This study employed a one-time cross-sectional revaccination survey of adults who were surviving 2 to 8 years after HCT and living in the United States. The survey was sent to eligible survivors in the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Long-term Follow-up research cohort. The point prevalence of revaccination outcomes was determined from all the respondents (n = 338), differences in intent to revaccinate for people not yet fully revaccinated were explored using Fisher's exact test (n = 126), and associations were examined between revaccination outcomes and predictors using multivariable logistic regression (n = 292). Survey response rate was 30%. Among respondents, 62% were completely revaccinated, 33% were partially revaccinated, and 4% were not revaccinated. Most respondents (77%) who were not yet fully revaccinated planned to complete the revaccination protocol. However, fewer not-revaccinated respondents than partially revaccinated respondents planned to complete revaccination (50% versus 80%, P = .032). Factors associated with incomplete revaccination were shorter time from HCT, inadequate immune reconstitution, and not having received all childhood vaccines as a child. Our analysis has identified multiple variables associated with revaccination outcomes, indicating the potential for interventions to enhance post-HCT revaccination rates. Since many survivors cannot be revaccinated promptly due to delayed immune recovery, clinicians should iteratively re-evaluate for revaccination readiness as long as it takes to ensure eventual revaccination. Broader efforts by the healthcare community to increase childhood vaccine uptake might eventually support revaccination uptake. Future research that builds on these findings should focus on intervention testing., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at high-risk for morbidity from influenza virus infection. We demonstrated in a primary phase II randomized controlled trial that two post-HCT doses of high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (HD-TIV) given four weeks apart were more immunogenic than two doses of standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (SD-QIV). Herein, we present immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccination in a consecutive season post-HCT using the same dosing regimen., Methods: A subcohort of study participants re-enrolled and had hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) titers measured at baseline and four weeks after each vaccine dose in year two. We estimated geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) in HAI titer from baseline for each group and used linear mixed effects models to estimate adjusted geometric mean ratios (aGMR, comparing HD-TIV to SD-QIV) for each antigen at each time point. We described systemic and injection-site reactions., Results: A total of 65 subcohort patients participated (33 SD-QIV, 32 HD-TIV). Post-vaccine GMFR and aGMR estimates were higher for both groups following a single influenza vaccine dose in year two compared to two doses of the same formulation in year one. Both groups had similar frequencies of injection-site and systemic reactions., Conclusions: A single dose of HD-TIV or SD-QIV was more immunogenic in year two than two doses of the same formulation in year one. Reactogenicity was comparable between groups. One dose of influenza vaccine may be sufficient after a two-dose schedule in the prior year post-HCT., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are an important cause of engraftment failure and may negatively impact survival outcomes of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using an HLA-mismatched allograft. The incidence of DSA varies across studies, depending on individual factors, detection or identification methods and thresholds considered clinically relevant. Although DSA testing by multiplex bead arrays remains semiquantitative, it has been widely adopted as a standard test in most transplant centers. Additional testing to determine risk of allograft rejection may include assays with HLA antigens in natural conformation, such as flow cytometric crossmatch, and/or antibody binding assays, such as C1q testing. Patients with low level of DSA (<2,000 mean fluorescence intensity; MFI) may not require treatment, while others with very high level of DSA (>20,000 MFI) may be at very high-risk for engraftment failure despite current therapies. By contrast, in patients with moderate or high level of DSA, desensitization therapy can successfully mitigate DSA levels and improve donor cell engraftment rate, with comparable outcomes to patients without DSA. Treatment is largely empirical and multimodal, involving the removal, neutralization, and blocking of antibodies, as well as inhibition of antibody production to prevent activation of the complement cascade. Desensitization protocols are based on accumulated multicenter experience, while prospective multicenter studies remain lacking. Most patients require a full intensity protocol that includes plasma exchange, while protocols relying only on rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin may be sufficient for patients with lower DSA levels and negative C1q and/or flow cytometric crossmatch. Monitoring DSA levels before and after HSCT could guide preemptive treatment when high levels persist after stem cell infusion. This paper aims to standardize current evidence-based practice and formulate future directions to improve upon current knowledge and advance treatment for this relatively rare, but potentially serious complication in allogeneic HSCT recipients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest PK - none for this work; other COI - consulting for CareDx and reseach funding from Eurofins Viracor PV - none declared JZ - none declared SS - none declared BS - none declared RMS - none declared AV - none declared JM - none for this work; other COI - honoraria from Kite, AlloVir, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, CRISPR, Nektar Therapeutics, Caribou Bio, Sana Technologies, Legend Biotech and Cargo Therapeutics. BRD - none declared SRM – none declared AED - none for this work; participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from Celgene/BMS, Agios, Regeneron, Sobi, Novartis, Astellas, Gilead. AED served on clinical trial steering committees or DSMB for Novartis, Abbvie, Kura, Geron and Celgene/BMS. NB – none for this work; consulting, advisory role or research funding with Magenta Therapeutics, Medexus Pharmaceuticals, CTI BioPharma, CareDx Pharma, Orca Bio, Allovir and CRISPR Therapeutics. AB – none declared SF – none declared LC – none declared JM – none declared AR - none declared RB - none for this work; travel & accommodation: Pfizer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Sanofi. Research Funding: Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Speaker: Pfizer, Gilead Sciences. TT – none declared XH - none declared CB – none declared FA – none declared KC – none declared PAC – none for this work; consulting or advisory roles and/or research funding with Incyte, AbbVie and Sanofi MH - none for this work; research support/funding from ADC Therapeutics; Spectrum, Pharmaceuticals; Astellas Pharma, consultancy for ADC Therapeutics, Omeros, BMS, Kite, Abbvie, Genmab, Allovir, CRISPR, Caribou, Autolus, Forte Biosciences, and speaker's bureau for ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Kite, Beigene MA – none for this work; director clinical services, Be The Match/National Marro Donor Program (NMDP), Minneapolis, MN MFV – none declared AG – none declared SOC – none for this work; reports participation is advisory board for Hansa Therapeutics, CardDx, Spetrum/Achrotech, Kiadis Pharma, Magenta, Allogene, Cellularity, MolMed, Pharmacyclics and received research funds from Miltenyi and Kiadis Pharma., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Cutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current National Institutes of Health (NIH) response measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs rituximab and a consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 patients were included (training 183 and validation 164). Although multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, patient range of motion (PROM) total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0 to 3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.83 training and 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the human activity profile adjusted activity score (AAS), 36 item short form health survey (SF36) vitality change, Lee symptom scale (LSS) skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC, 0.86 training and 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have the greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment responses, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) has revolutionized the management of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, CAR-T treatment failure is not uncommon and remains a major therapeutic challenge. There is substantial variability across transplantation and cellular therapy programs in assessing and managing post-CAR-T failures in patients with RRMM. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines conducted an online cross-sectional survey between September 2023 and December 2023 to determine myeloma, transplantation, and cellular therapy physicians' practice patterns for the surveillance, diagnosis, and management of CAR-T failure. The intent of this survey was to understand clinical practice patterns and identify areas for further investigation. Email surveys were sent to 1311 ASTCT physician members, of whom 80 (6.1%) completed the survey. The respondents were 58% white and 66% male, and 51% had >10 years of clinical experience. Most (89%) respondents were affiliated with a university/teaching center, and 56% had a myeloma-focused transplantation and/or cellular therapy practice. Post-CAR-T surveillance laboratory studies were commonly done every 4 weeks, and surveillance bone marrow biopsies and/or imaging surveillance were most commonly done at 3 months. Sixty-four percent of the respondents would often or always consider biopsy or imaging to confirm relapse. The most popular post-CAR-T failure rescue regimen was GPRC5D-directed immunotherapy (30%) for relapses occurring ≤3 months and BCMA-directed bispecific therapies (32.5%) for relapse at >3 months. Forty-one percent of the respondents endorsed post-CAR-T prolonged cytopenia as being "often" or "always" a barrier to next-line therapy; 53% had offered stem cell boost as a mitigation approach. Substantial across-center variation in practice patterns raises the need for collaborative studies and expert clinical recommendations to describe best practices for post-CAR-T disease surveillance, optimal workup for treatment failure, and choice of rescue therapies., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Acute encephalopathy, manifesting clinically as delirium, is a common but often unrecognized complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Delirium can occur in patients of any age and is observed after autologous or allogeneic HCT. Although delirium has been studied primarily during initial HCT hospitalizations in recipients of myeloablative conditioning, recent investigations have identified delirium later post-transplantation and in recipients of reduced-intensity conditioning. Acute encephalopathy can be driven by infectious complications, medications, tissue damage, and/or organ dysfunction. Altered consciousness, either mild or profound, is often its only clinical manifestation. Identifying delirium is essential to overall HCT care, because patients who experience delirium have longer hospitalization and recovery times and are at risk for other poor post-HCT outcomes. Given the critical nature of this common complication and the ongoing expansion of HCT for more vulnerable populations, the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) recommends intensifying research into post-HCT cognitive changes and establishing standardized definitions that encompass the full spectrum of altered consciousness for clinical care purposes and to provide benchmark endpoints for future research studies. To capture a range of acute neurocognitive changes specifically found in HCT patients (often referred to as acute encephalopathy), the ASTCT proposes a new diagnosis, transplantation-associated altered mentation and encephalopathy (TAME). The TAME diagnosis includes HCT patients who meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for delirium and those with acute neurocognitive changes who do not meet all the DSM-5 criteria for delirium (subsyndromal delirium). Early TAME is defined as occurring during conditioning or ≤100 days post-HCT, whereas late TAME occurs >100 days post-HCT in patients with additional HCT-related complications. This manuscript establishes clear diagnostic criteria and discusses factors that can potentially impact the development of TAME, as well as the workup and management of TAME., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) may be on therapy for years, which can lead to financial toxicity (FinTox) or time toxicity (TimeTox). The prevalence, predictors, and quality of life (QOL) impacts of FinTox and TimeTox during different phases of MM treatment have not been characterized., Patients and Methods: We conducted a single-center cross-sectional survey of patients with MM who had undergone transplantation. FinTox+ was defined as a COST-FACIT score <23, TimeTox+ as MM-related interactions (including phone calls) ≥1x weekly or ≥1x monthly in-person among far-residing patients, QOL using PROMIS Global Health, and functional status using patient-reported Karnofsky performance status (KPS)., Results: Of 252 patients, 22% and 40% met FinTox+ and TimeTox+ criteria respectively. Respective FinTox+ and TimeTox+ proportions were 22%/37% for patients on maintenance, 22%/82% with active therapy, and 20%/14% with observation. FinTox+ predictors included annual income (P < .01) and out-of-pocket costs (P < .01). TimeTox+ predictors included disease status (P < .001), caregiver status (P = .01), far-residing status (P < .001), and out-of-pocket costs (P = .03). FinTox+ was associated with a clinically meaningful decrease in mental QOL, while TimeTox+ patients were more likely to have KPS ≤ 80., Conclusions: In our large study, monetary status but not disease status predicted FinTox. Over a third of patients on maintenance reported TimeTox. FinTox+ was associated with decreased mental health, while TimeTox+ was associated with worse performance status. These two toxicities may negatively impact patient wellbeing, and studies of strategies to mitigate their impact are in development., Competing Interests: Disclosure COI: R.B.: Consulting: BMS, Caribou Biosciences, Genentech, Janssen, Karyopharm, Pfizer, Sanofi, SparkCures; Research: Novartis, Pack Health. AJC: Consulting: BMS, Adaptive; Research: Adaptive Biotechnologies, Harpoon, Nektar, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi, AbbVie. PAC: Research: Incyte, Janssen, AbbVie, and Sanofi. CJL: Consulting: Incyte, Sanofi, Frenesius; Honoraria: Sanofi, Kite, BMS, Kadmon; Research: Incyte. RSM: Research: Incyte, Kadmon, CSL Behring. NMK: Consulting: Astra Zeneca, Janssen, Pfizer, BMS, Beyond Springs, G1 Therapeutics, Sandoz, Seattle Genetics, Fresenius. SJL: Consulting: Equillium, Kadmon, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, Incyte.; Research funding: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Kadmon, Pfizer, Sanofi, Syndax., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapy expand to new indications and international access improves, the volume of HCT performed annually continues to rise. Parallel improvements in HCT techniques and supportive care entails more patients surviving long-term, creating further emphasis on survivorship needs. Survivors are at risk for developing late complications secondary to pre-, peri- and post-transplant exposures and other underlying risk-factors. Guidelines for screening and preventive practices for HCT survivors were originally published in 2006 and updated in 2012. To review contemporary literature and update the recommendations while considering the changing practice of HCT and cellular therapy, an international group of experts was again convened. This review provides updated pediatric and adult survivorship guidelines for HCT and cellular therapy. The contributory role of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) to the development of late effects is discussed but cGVHD management is not covered in detail. These guidelines emphasize special needs of patients with distinct underlying HCT indications or comorbidities (e.g., hemoglobinopathies, older adults) but do not replace more detailed group, disease, or condition specific guidelines. Although these recommendations should be applicable to the vast majority of HCT recipients, resource constraints may limit their implementation in some settings., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Despite emergence of novel therapies to treat hematologic malignancies, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains an essential treatment modality capable of curing these diseases. Allo-HCT has been also shown to be curative in benign hematologic disorders such as aplastic anemia, sickle cell disease, and thalassemia, among others. Recently, the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) published standardized definitions for hematopoietic recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism. To attempt broader international consensus, a panel of adult and pediatric physician transplant experts was assembled from European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), ASTCT, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), and Asia-Pacific Blood and Marrow Transplantation (APBMT). Consensus was defined as ≥70% of voting members strongly agreeing or somewhat agreeing with a definition. With few exceptions, there was a consensus to endorse the prior ASTCT definitions. Importantly, we revised existing EBMT and CIBMTR data collection forms to align with these harmonized definitions that will facilitate research and international collaboration among transplant researchers and across transplant registries., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

While curing a patient's underlying disease is the primary goal of physicians performing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the ultimate objective is to provide patients with optimal post-HCT quality of life. For many survivors, this includes returning to work (RTW). We conducted a survey of 1- to 5-yr post-HCT survivors at our center to evaluate their perspective on facilitators and barriers to RTW as well as to gauge interest in potentially useful RTW support interventions. Survivors aged 18 to 65 yrs (n = 994) were sent an annual survey that included 36 supplementary questions about post-HCT RTW. Survey questions were selected from published national cancer survivor surveys and then modified specifically for HCT survivors. Three hundred forty-four (35%) survivors with a mean age of 53 yrs completed the survey, of whom 272 (79%) had worked prior to their diagnosis. Of those 272 patients, 145 (53%) were working currently and another 22 (8%) had attempted to go back to work following HCT but were not presently working. We found that having had an allogeneic versus autologous HCT (P = .006) was associated with a decreased likelihood of currently working, whereas frequent employer communication (>once a month) (P = .070) and having a more supportive employer (P = .036) were associated with a greater chance of currently working. Of survivors currently working, 45% reported that they had made one or more changes to their work schedule (e.g., flexible schedule or part-time work) or environment (e.g., work from home) upon RTW. Ninety-five percent of responders reported that they could have benefited from RTW support provided by the transplant center, but only 13% indicated that they had received it. Education on RTW challenges, information on disability benefits, and access to physical therapy were among the most requested support interventions. To improve post-HCT quality of life for survivors open to assistance, providers should address work status and goals, recognize barriers to successful return, and offer RTW support including working directly with employers. Allogeneic HCT survivors are particularly vulnerable to failing attempts to RTW and should be the target of retention interventions. A previously published manuscript on RTW guidance for providers of stem cell transplant patients endorsed by the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy is available in Open Access and can be used as a tool to counsel and support these patients., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an immune-mediated disorder that causes significant late morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The "Close Assessment and Testing for Chronic GVHD (CATCH)" study is a multi-center Chronic GVHD Consortium prospective, longitudinal cohort study designed to enroll patients before hematopoietic cell transplantation and follow them closely to capture the development of chronic GVHD and to identify clinical and biologic biomarkers of chronic GVHD onset. Data are collected pre-transplant and every two months through one-year post-transplant with chart review thereafter. Evaluations include clinician assessment of chronic GVHD and its manifestations, patient-reported outcomes, multiple biospecimens (blood, saliva, tears, buccal mucosa and fecal samples, biopsies of skin and mouth), laboratory testing, and medical record abstraction. This report describes the rationale, design, and methods of the CATCH study, and invites collaboration with other investigators to leverage this resource. trial registration: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04188912., Competing Interests: JP has been a consultant and advisory board member for Syndax, CTI Biopharma, Amgen, Regeneron, Incyte. He has received clinical trial support from Novartis, Amgen, Takeda, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Pharmacyclics, Abbvie, CTI Biopharma, and Bristol Myers Squibb. SZP received research support from the Center for Cancer Research at the National Cancer Institute through the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program, which includes Clinical Research Development Agreements with Celgene, Actelion, Eli Lilly, Pharmacyclics and Kadmon Corporation. NF Incyte Advisory Board SJL has received consulting fees from Mallinckrodt, Equillium, Kadmon, Novartis and Incyte; research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Kadmon, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Syndax and Takeda, and drug supply from Janssen. She is on Incyte and Sanofi clinical trial steering committees. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.)

To understand transplant center recommendations on return-to-school timing and related support for hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) survivors, we conducted a two-phase, cross-sectional, web-based survey: In Phase I, medical directors of pediatric HCT centers from the National Marrow Donor Program/ Be The Match Registry were asked regarding the availability of a return to school standardized operating procedure (SOP). In Phase II, HCT physician members of the Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium were approached to study inter-physician practice variability regarding return to school post-HCT, factors affecting their decision-making, and support provided by HCT centers for return to school. Out of 46 respondents in Phase I (55% response rate), 28 (61%) reported having a SOP. Wide variations in recommendations were noted in 12 received SOPs. In Phase II, 122 physicians (60 centers) responded (30.6% response rate). The majority (60%) recommended autologous HCT recipients return to school within 6 months post-HCT but 65% recommended allogeneic HCT recipients return to school after 6 months or once off immunosuppression. Our findings indicate a lack of consensus within and across HCT centers regarding recommended return to school timing and underscore need for a guideline to standardize this process to ensure patient safety and re-integration into school., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Abstract: Pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients exhibit poor serologic responses to influenza vaccination early after transplant. To facilitate the optimization of influenza vaccination timing, we sought to identify B- and T-cell subpopulations associated with influenza vaccine immunogenicity in this population. We used mass cytometry to phenotype peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from pediatric HCT recipients enrolled in a multicenter influenza vaccine trial comparing high- and standard-dose formulations over 3 influenza seasons (2016-2019). We fit linear regression models to estimate relationships between immune cell subpopulation numbers before vaccination and prevaccination to postvaccination geometric mean fold rises in antigen-specific (A/H3N2, A/H1N1, and B/Victoria) serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers (28-42 days, and ∼6 months after 2 doses). For cell subpopulations identified as predictive of a response to all 3 antigens, we conducted a sensitivity analysis including time after transplant as an additional covariate. Among 156 HCT recipients, we identified 33 distinct immune cell subpopulations; 7 significantly predicted responses to all 3 antigens 28 to 42 days after a 2-dose vaccine series, irrespective of vaccine dose. We also found evidence that baseline absolute numbers of naïve B cells, naïve CD4+ T cells, and circulating T follicular helper cells predicted peak and sustained vaccine-induced titers irrespective of dose or timing of posttransplant vaccine administration. In conclusion, several B- and T-cell subpopulations predicted influenza vaccine immunogenicity in pediatric HCT recipients. This study provides insights into the immune determinants of vaccine responses and may help guide the development of tailored vaccination strategies for this vulnerable population., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Post-transplantation revaccination uptake of childhood vaccines in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors is suboptimal, increasing the risk of infectious morbidity and mortality within this population. We systematically reviewed the literature for factors related to revaccination uptake, as well as the barriers and facilitators that affect successful revaccination. We conducted a scoping review searching PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science in March 2023. Two independent reviewers performed study selection using the complete dual review process. Data were extracted using a standard form. Factors were characterized as demographic, clinical, or social determinants of health that affected revaccination uptake. Barriers and facilitators were categorized using the constructs from the World Health Organization Behavioural and Social Drivers Framework. Our searches yielded 914 sources, from which 15 publications were selected (5 original research and 10 quality improvement initiatives). More than one-half of the reports listed factors associated with poorer uptake, predominately clinical factors, followed by social determinants of health, then demographic factors. Nearly all the reports described barriers to successful revaccination uptake, with most of these falling into the "practical issues" construct. Most of the reports described facilitators, nearly all related to health care system improvements associated with improved revaccination uptake. Although this review provides a good starting point for understanding impediments to successful revaccination after HSCT, this review reveals that we lack sufficient evidence to drive targeted interventions to improve uptake. More research is needed, focusing on survivors' voices to inform our knowledge of barriers and facilitators to complete revaccination after HSCT, exploring behavioral and social drivers within this population, and examining the care delivery models that may complicate vaccine delivery in this population., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)

Background: Our previous study established a 2-dose regimen of high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (HD-TIV) to be immunogenically superior compared to a 2-dose regimen of standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (SD-QIV) in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. However, the durability of immunogenicity and the role of time post-HCT at immunization as an effect modifier are unknown., Methods: This phase II, multi-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial compared HD-TIV to SD-QIV in children 3-17 years old who were 3-35 months post-allogeneic HCT, with each formulation administered twice, 28-42 days apart. Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers were measured at baseline, 28-42 days following each dose, and 138-222 days after the second dose. Using linear mixed effects models, we estimated adjusted geometric mean HAI titer ratios (aGMR: HD-TIV/SD-QIV) to influenza antigens. Early and late periods were defined as 3-5 and 6-35 months post-HCT, respectively., Results: During 3 influenza seasons (2016-2019), 170 participants were randomized to receive HD-TIV (n = 85) or SD-QIV (n = 85). HAI titers maintained significant elevations above baseline for both vaccine formulations, although the relative immunogenic benefit of HD-TIV to SD-QIV waned during the study. A 2-dose series of HD-TIV administered late post-HCT was associated with higher GMTs compared to the early post-HCT period (late group: A/H1N1 aGMR = 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.14-4.08]; A/H3N2 aGMR = 3.20, 95% CI = [1.60-6.39]; B/Victoria aGMR = 1.91, 95% CI = [1.01-3.60]; early group: A/H1N1 aGMR = 1.03, 95% CI = [0.59-1.80]; A/H3N2 aGMR = 1.23, 95% CI = [0.68-2.25]; B/Victoria aGMR = 1.06, 95% CI = [0.56-2.03])., Conclusions: Two doses of HD-TIV were more immunogenic than SD-QIV, especially when administered ≥6 months post-HCT. Both groups maintained higher titers compared to baseline throughout the season., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02860039., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . N. B. H. received grant support from Sanofi and Quidel and a current grant from Merck. C. E. B. receives grant support from Pfizer and Merck. J. A. E. reports grant support from AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) (all paid to institution); consultant fees for Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Meissa Vaccines, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Shinogi, and Ark Biopharma. G. M. reports Research support from Astellas Inc and SymBio Pharmaceuticals. C. L. K. reports payment for partipcation on an advisory board for Horizon Therapeutics; payment for educational lectures from Medscape, i3Health, Physicians Education Resource, and Dava Oncology; travel support for global summit on Hematologic Malignancies from Dava Oncology; and payment from CSL Behring for providing graft versus host disease (GVHD) adjudication for a clinical trial. M. I. A. reports institutional research grants from Miravista Dianostics and Merck; consulting fees from Karius; travel support for meeting attendance from Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and American Academy of Pediatrics; and an unpaid position on Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society Board of Directors. C. J. H. reports grants or contracts from GSK, Pfizer, Merck, and Astellas; royalties from UpToDate; payment or honoraria for educational material from Pediatric News; and non-financial interests in the American Board of Pediatrics. J. L. F. reports consulting fees and stock options from Massive Bio, Inc. J. E. S. reports institutional grants or contracts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and Food and Drug Administration (FDA); personal consulting fees from Association of Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology and Association of American Medical Colleges; and honoraria for speaking engagements from Missouri American Academy of Pediatrics. E. A. M. reports institutional grants or contracts for clinical trials of pediatric coronavirus disease (COVID) vaccines and therapeutics from Pfizer. G. C. P. reports institutional grants or contracts for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) clinical trials from Pfizer and Moderna, Inc. F. M. M. reports grants or contracts paid to institution from Gilead for antiviral research and from Pfizer for vaccine research, and grant support from NIH and CDC; participation as DSMB member, payments to author, for Pfizer and Moderna. A. J. S. reports grant support from NIH. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Providers must balance effective empiric therapy against toxicity risks and collateral damage when selecting antibiotic therapy for patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Antimicrobial stewardship interventions during HCT are often challenging due to concern for undertreating potential infections., Methods: In an effort to decrease unnecessary carbapenem exposure for patients undergoing HCT at our pediatric center, we implemented individualized antibiotic plans (IAPs) to provide recommendations for preengraftment neutropenia prophylaxis, empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia, and empiric treatment for hemodynamic instability. We compared monthly antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) adjusted per 1000 patient-days for carbapenems, antipseudomonal cephalosporins, and all antibiotics during two 3-year periods immediately before and after the implementation of IAPs to measure the impact of IAP on prescribing behavior. Bloodstream infection (BSIs) and Clostridioides difficile (CD) positivity test rates were also compared between cohorts. Last, providers were surveyed to assess their experience of using IAPs in antibiotic decision making., Results: Overall antibiotic use decreased after the implementation of IAPs (monthly reduction of 19.6 DOT/1000 patient-days; P = .004), with carbapenems showing a continuing decline after IAP implementation. BSI and CD positivity rates were unchanged. More than 90% of providers found IAPs to be either extremely or very valuable for their practice., Conclusions: Implementation of IAPs in this high-risk HCT population led to reduction in overall antibiotic use without increase in rate of BSI or CD test positivity. The program was well received by providers., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. J. J. W. reports a leadership or fiduciary role on the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Practice Committee. J. A. E. reports research payments to institution from Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and Merck; and consulting fees to author from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Meissa Vaccines, Moderna, Pfizer, and Sanofi Pasteur. M. P. K. reports a role as board member of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and 1 night of stay covered for attendance at a board meeting at the national IDWeek conference; and the following grants or contracts: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) grant number 1R01 HS027428-01 (principal investigator [PI]: J. Gerber; the goal of this project is to develop, locally adapt, and implement an antibiotic stewardship intervention at hospital discharge and measure the impact of this intervention on optimal antibiotic use and postdischarge adverse effects, unrelated to the present work) and National Institutes of Health grant number 1R01 NS101029-01A1 (PI: T. Simon; the goal of this project is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of intrathecal antibiotics vs antibiotic-impregnated ventricular catheters for prevention of ventricular shunt infections, unrelated to the present work). S. J. W. reports a subcontract from Washington University to institution for a multicenter study funded by AHRQ to study antimicrobial stewardship in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis; consulting fees and equity as stock in the privately held company Tend Health for serving as a scientific advisor; payment from Jane Clark, attorney, for expert testimony as a medicolegal consultant on a case of pediatric infection; funding for faculty travel to professional meetings from Seattle Children's Hospital; and patent holder on device to encapsulate stool specimens for fecal microbiota transplant with Tend Health. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) partnered with its Transplant Infectious Disease Special Interest Group (TID-SIG) to update the 2009 compendium-style infectious disease guidelines for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A new approach was adopted to better serve clinical providers by publishing each standalone topic in the infectious disease series in a concise format of frequently asked questions (FAQ), tables, and figures. Experts in HCT and infectious diseases identified FAQs and then provided answers based on the strength of the recommendation and the level of supporting evidence. In the seventh guideline in the series, we focus on the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) with FAQs addressing epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment. Special consideration was given to RSV in pediatric, cord blood, haploidentical, and T cell-depleted HCT and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy recipients, as well as to identify future research directions., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has long been the standard approach for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chemosensitive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has caused a paradigm shift in the management of R/R DLBCL patients, especially with the recent approval of CD19-directed CAR-T therapy in the second-line setting in high-risk groups (primary refractory and early relapse [≤12 months]). Consensus on the contemporary role, optimal timing, and sequencing of HCT and cellular therapies in DLBCL is lacking; therefore, the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines undertook this project to formulate consensus recommendations to address this unmet need. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate 20 consensus statements with a few key statements as follows: (1) in the first-line setting, there is no role for auto-HCT consolidation for patients achieving complete remission (CR) following R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone) or similar therapy in non-double-hit/triple-hit cases (DHL/THL) and in DHL/THL cases receiving intensive induction therapies, but auto-HCT may be considered in eligible patients receiving R-CHOP or similar therapies in DHL/THL cases; (2) auto-HCT consolidation with thiotepa-based conditioning is standard of care for eligible patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma achieving CR with first-line therapy; and (3) in the primary refractory and early relapse setting, the preferred option is CAR-T therapy, whereas in late relapse (>12 months), consolidation with auto-HCT is recommended for patients achieving chemosensitivity to salvage therapy (complete or partial response), and CAR-T therapy is recommended for those not achieving remission. These clinical practice recommendations will serve as a tool to guide clinicians managing patients with newly diagnosed and R/R DLBCL., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Evaluation of a candidate for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a complex process with substantial intercenter variability. Although literature providing guidance for evaluating the eligibility of adults is well established, similar guidance for children is lacking. To address gaps between adult recommendations and the specific needs of children, we convened a panel of pediatric HCT experts from a wide geographic range of American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) member institutions to offer recommendations for pediatric-focused pre-HCT evaluation. In this report from the ASTCT Committee on Practice Guidelines, we present a practical framework for evaluating children with malignancies who are candidates for HCT. We also highlight key differences from adults and emphasize areas of unmet need that require additional research to delineate best practices., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) partnered with its Transplant Infectious Disease Special Interest Group (TID-SIG) to update its 2009 compendium-style infectious disease guidelines for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A completely new approach was taken with the goal of better serving clinical providers by publishing each standalone topic in the infectious disease series as a concise format of frequently asked questions (FAQ), tables, and figures. Adult and pediatric infectious disease and HCT content experts developed and then answered FAQs and finalized topics with harmonized recommendations made by assigning an A through E strength of recommendation paired with a level of supporting evidence graded I through III. This sixth guideline in the series focuses on invasive candidiasis (IC) with FAQs to address epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of IC, plus special considerations for pediatric, cord blood, haploidentical, and T cell-depleted HCT recipients and chimeric antigen receptor T cell recipients, as well as future research directions., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With improved survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the number of individuals at risk for persistent or late effects is increasing. The importance of optimizing HCT survivor health and well-being is mounting. Fatigue is a common post-transplantation symptom that impairs quality of life, yet it remains poorly understood and inadequately addressed. Multiple challenges to addressing fatigue exist, including its multidimensional presentation, multiple (often concomitant) causes, patient-clinician communication barriers, and few highly effective, evidence-based interventions that can be readily implemented. To address these challenges, we sought to better describe the impact and potential causes of fatigue in the post-transplantation setting, fatigue-related communication with clinicians, and the most effective patient-identified mitigation strategies (PIMS) for fatigue. A total of 1703 adult HCT recipients from a single center completed a survey including the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36), PROMIS Fatigue, and other fatigue-related items between July 2017-June 2018. The survey was offered to recipients at their post-transplantation anniversary occurring during this interval. Two independent raters categorized free-text responses about fatigue PIMS. PROMIS Fatigue scores were dichotomized into low (≤55) or high (>55). Associations between high fatigue and participant characteristics and health outcomes were evaluated using the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Student 2-sample t test for continuous variables. Among the 1660 respondents with evaluable fatigue scores, 67% underwent allogeneic HCT. The majority of these (n = 1588; 96%) had a malignancy, with hematologic malignancy the most common diagnostic category (n = 1555; 94%). The median time post-transplantation was 11 years (interquartile range, 4 to 20 years). PROMIS item responses indicate that 44% of patients were at least somewhat fatigued and 37% were at least somewhat bothered by it. The mean fatigue score was 50.2 ± 11; 591 patients (36%) had high fatigue, which was associated with worse SF-36 scores across all domains (General Health, Physical Functioning, Emotional Well-being/Mental Health, Social Functioning, Role Limitation due to Physical Health, Role Limitation due to Emotional Health, Vitality [eg, energy], and Bodily Pain). High fatigue also was associated with self-reported chronic graft-versus-host disease, anxiety, depression and sleep problems. Diagnosis of plasma cell disorder and receipt of an autologous transplant were associated with high fatigue (P = .001). Among the 553 individuals who received an autologous transplant, 226 (41%) had multiple myeloma. Compared with the autologous transplant recipients without myeloma group, those with multiple myeloma were significantly more likely to have high fatigue (109 of 226 [48%] versus 118 of 325 [36%]; P < .01). Twenty percent of the patients with high fatigue did not discuss it with their care team. Among the 89 different reasons provided for not discussing it, the most common was "thought they already knew the answer" (n = 21). The 370 survivors with high fatigue who identified at least 1 most effective PIMS generated a total of 639 PIMS. Although the PIMS for fatigue spanned a wide array of strategies, most PIMS were related to sleep/rest (n = 192; 30%) or exercise (n = 139; 22%). Although fatigue is associated with worse HCT survivor-reported outcomes, it is only sometimes discussed with care teams. Survivors identify specific strategies that are most effective. Given its prevalence and impact, clinicians should promote communication about fatigue, treat underlying causes, and recommend sleep/rest and exercise, recognizing that individualized approaches also may be beneficial., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) health care providers report a desire to improve long-term outcomes and quality of life for their patients. One of the items frequently cited by patients in terms of transitioning from being a patient back to pre-HCT life is return to work (RTW). However, these patients report little support from their health care providers in facilitating this process, and only 50% to 60% achieve RTW, at a median of 3 years post-HCT. Barriers are physical, psychological, and logistical, as well as poor communication between the patient and their employer. We convened a group of experts in survivorship, rehabilitation, social work, and psychology to draft an evidence-based document to assist health care providers in guiding their patients' RTW journey. Guidance is drawn from the existing literature for HCT and general cancer patients and is divided into pre-HCT, peri-HCT, and post-HCT categories. Collaboration among health care providers, patients, and their employers is key to this transition. Suggested referrals and evaluations also are provided. The goal is for this guidance to be continually updated as we advance the field with more HCT-specific literature., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a potentially life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clinical data surrounding cGVHD therapies in younger children are limited and critically needed. Primary endpoints were to determine the recommended pediatric equivalent dose (RPED) and assess pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR; comprising complete response and partial response) according to the 2014 National Institutes of Health criteria at 24 weeks, overall survival, and duration of response (DOR). Here we present the primary results from the open-label, multicenter, international phase 1/2 iMAGINE study (PCYC-1146-IM), which evaluated the PK, safety, and efficacy of ibrutinib in patients age ≥1 to <22 years with treatment-naive (TN) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) moderate/severe cGVHD. Patients age <12 years received once-daily ibrutinib starting at 120 mg/m 2 and escalating to 240 mg/m 2 (full adult dose equivalent) after 14 days if free from ibrutinib-related grade ≥3 toxicity; patients age ≥12 years received once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg. Fifty-nine patients (12 TN and 47 with R/R cGVHD; median age, 13 years; range, 1 to 19 years) were enrolled. Plasma concentration-time profiles for ibrutinib 240 mg/m 2 (the RPED) were comparable to those observed in adults with cGVHD at a dose of 420 mg/day. Safety was consistent with the known profile of ibrutinib in cGVHD. ORR by 24 weeks was 64% (38 of 59), including 83% (10 of 12) for the TN subgroup and 60% (28 of 47) for R/R. Among 46 responders (median follow-up, 20 months; range, 2 to 32 months), 12-month DOR for each subgroup was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 83%) in TN patients and 58% (95% CI, 35% to 75%) in R/R patients. Responses were durable, with numerically higher rates than those previously observed with ibrutinib in adults, demonstrating that ibrutinib provides clinically meaningful activity with acceptable safety in children with moderate/severe cGVHD., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and its management with immunosuppressive therapies increase the susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, as well as progression to severe Coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19). Vaccination against COVID-19 is strongly recommended, but efficacy data are limited in this patient population. In this study, responses to COVID-19 vaccination were measured at 3 time points-after the initial vaccine series, before the third dose, and after the third dose-in adults with cGVHD receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Humoral response was measured by quantitative anti-spike antibody and neutralizing antibody levels. Anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels were measured to detect natural infection. T cell response was evaluated by a novel immunosequencing technique combined with immune repertoire profiling from cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples. Present or absent T cell responses were determined by the relative proportion of unique SARS-CoV-2-associated T cell receptor sequences ("breadth") plus clonal expansion of the response ("depth") compared with those in a reference population. Based on both neutralizing antibody and T cell responses, patients were categorized as vaccine responders (both detected), nonresponders (neither detected), or mixed (one but not both detected). Thirty-two patients were enrolled for the initial series, including 17 (53%) positive responders, 7 (22%) mixed responders, and 8 (25%) nonresponders. All but one patient categorized as mixed responders had humoral responses while lacking T cell responses. No statistical differences were observed in patient characteristics among the 3 groups of patients categorized by immune response, although sample sizes were limited. Significant positive correlations were observed between the robustness of cellular and humoral responses after the initial series. Among the 20 patients with paired samples (pre- and post-third dose), a third vaccination resulted in increased neutralizing antibody titers. cGVHD worsened in 10 patients (26%; 6 after the initial series and 4 after the third dose), necessitating escalation of immunosuppressive doses in 5 patients, although 4 had been tapering immunosuppression and 5 had already worsening cGVHD at the time of vaccination, and a clear association between COVID-19 vaccination and cGVHD could not be drawn. Among the patients with cGVHD on immunosuppressive therapy, 72% demonstrated a neutralizing antibody response after a 2-dose primary COVID-19 vaccination, two-thirds of whom also developed a T cell response; 25% had neither a humoral nor a T cell response. A third dose further amplified the antibody response., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) is a major advance in managing aggressive relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas; however, relapses are frequent and pose a major therapeutic challenge. There is substantial variability across transplantation and cellular therapy programs in assessing and managing post-CAR-T failures. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines conducted an online cross-sectional survey between August 2021 and October 2021 to determine the U.S. lymphoma and transplantation and cellular therapy physicians' practice patterns for the detection and diagnosis of CAR-T failure, as well as management strategies for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in this particular setting. E-mail surveys were sent to 901 potential participants, of which 174 (19%) completed the survey. Responders were mainly White (51.2%), male (70.7%), and with >10 years of practice experience (51.2%). Overall, 87% of the responders were affiliated with university/teaching centers; 54.6% had general oncology practices, and 45.4% had lymphoma-focused transplantation/cellular therapy practices. The most common periods to perform surveillance scans were at 3 months and 12 months after CAR-T infusion. Overall, 88.5% of responders would often or always consider a biopsy to confirm relapse and 89% would routinely check for the persistence of the antigen targeted by the CAR (e.g., CD19 in the case of CD19 CAR-T). The most popular first salvage regimen for relapse or progression was an alternate CAR-T therapy (dual or alternate target) regardless of CD19 positivity. Twenty-seven percent of responders chose this regimen for CD19 positive relapse, whereas 31% of responders did so for CD19 negative relapse. Overall, 88.5% of responders favored consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after response to salvage, whereas 51.2% of physicians would consider autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in transplantation-naïve patients. There is substantial cross-center variation in surveillance, diagnosis, and management of CAR-T failure. Prospective clinical trials evaluating novel agents in this setting are urgently needed to identify best management strategies., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation are used to treat hematologic diseases, they are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to describe the incidence, characteristics, severity and clinical correlates of neuropathy and muscle cramps, as self-reported by hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors. We included all respondents to a survey conducted July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Surveys were completed online or on-paper according to participants' preferences; they received one reminder if no survey was received 1 month after distribution. Statistics are primarily descriptive comparing subgroups of patients. Of 4641 potentially eligible patients, 1745 responded and are included in the analysis. Participants (615 [35%] autologous, 1130 [65%] allogeneic) were a median age of 64.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55.2-70.8) and surveyed at a median of 11 years (IQR 4-21) after their most recent transplantation. Neuropathy symptoms were reported by 65% of autologous recipients, 66% of allogeneic transplant recipients with current chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD), and 45% of allogeneic recipients who never developed chronic GVHD. Muscle cramps were reported by 56% of autologous recipients, and 52% of allogeneic recipients and were rated as "very painful" by nearly half of patients who experienced them. These results suggest that neuropathy symptoms and muscle cramps are much more prevalent among survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation than previously recognized. Better approaches for prevention and treatment of these bothersome complications are needed., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.)

Survivors of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) are at risk for neurocognitive impairments, which can negatively affect quality of life. Given limited studies, we aimed to describe the neurocognitive outcomes in a cohort of long-term adult HCT survivors. Eligible survivors (age ≥21 years at HCT and alive ≥2 years following HCT) completed a 60-question survey of neurocognitive function and quality of life, which included the Neuro-Quality of Life Cognitive Function Short Form (Neuro-QoL) and the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Neurocognitive Questionnaire (NCQ). Analyses of risk factors included univariate comparisons and multivariable logistic regression. Survivors (n = 1861, 47.7% female, 65.6% allogeneic HCT) were surveyed at a median age of 64.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56.8-70.5) and a median 12.0 years (IQR, 6.0-21.0) from HCT. Survivors reported average Neuro-QoL scores (50.0 allogeneic; 49.2 autologous survivors) compared with an expected mean of 50 in the general population. On the NCQ, 17.4% to 31.2% of survivors reported impairments (Z-score >1.28) in task efficiency, memory, emotional regulation, or organization, compared with an expected 10% in the general population (all P < .01). In multivariable regression analyses, impaired Neuro-QoL (T-score <40) was independently associated with hearing issues (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-3.10) and sleep impairment (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.80-6.94) among allogeneic survivors, with comparable associations in autologous survivors. Overall, long-term adult HCT survivors reported average cognitive quality of life compared with the general population. Subsets of survivors with hearing issues and sleep impairments were more likely to report lower quality of life and impaired neurocognitive function, which may facilitate targeted monitoring or interventions following HCT., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) requiring second-line treatment represents a highly morbid complication of allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Recent studies have defined short-term outcomes after second-line treatment for acute GVHD, but longer-term outcomes have not been well defined. We examined overall survival (OS) and failure-free-survival (FFS) of 216 patient who had HCT who received second-line treatment for acute GVHD. Failure time for FFS was defined as the earliest of death, relapse, or implementation of third-line treatment. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify risk factors for mortality and failure, and predictive models were derived for 6- and 12-month mortality. Point estimates of OS at 6 and 12 months were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52-65) and 52% (95% CI, 45-68), respectively. Point estimates of FFS at 6 and 12 months were 42% (95% CI, 35-48) and 37% (95% CI, 31-43), respectively. Predictive models for both end points included serum albumin and total bilirubin concentrations at the onset of second-line treatment, patient age at onset of second-line therapy, and a combination of abdominal pain/stage 4 gut involvement. Optimism-corrected areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curve and Brier scores were 77.4 and 0.169 for 6-month mortality, respectively, and 80.0 and 0.169 for 12-month mortality. We identify risk factors associated with mortality and failure after second-line treatment of acute GVHD, provide historical benchmarks for assessment of FFS and OS in other studies, and propose predictive models for 6- and 12-month mortality that could be used to generate population-specific benchmarks., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI GVHD) is a complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplant with high morbidity and mortality. In particular, steroid-refractory GI GVHD can be difficult to treat. Recent investigations have revealed that patients after transplant can experience intestinal dysbiosis contributing to the progression of GVHD. Modulation of the gut microbiome through dietary intake could potentially improve the intestinal dysbiosis in GI GVHD. In this case series, we present 3 patients where dietary therapy was used in conjunction with immunosuppression to achieve clinical remission of GI GVHD., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

The Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy partnered with its Transplant Infectious Disease Special Interest Group to update its 2009 compendium-style infectious disease guidelines for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A completely new approach was taken with the goal of better serving clinical providers by publishing each standalone topic in the infectious disease series as a concise format of frequently asked questions (FAQ), tables, and figures. Adult and pediatric infectious disease and HCT content experts developed and then answered FAQs and finalized topics with harmonized recommendations that were made by assigning an A through E strength of recommendation paired with a level of supporting evidence graded I through III. This fifth guideline in the series focuses on Clostridioides difficile infection with FAQs that address the prevalence, incidence, clinical features, colonization versus infection, clinical complications, diagnostic considerations, pharmacological therapies for episodic or recurrent infection, and the roles of prophylactic antibiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)