Search

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of delayed invitation on screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers (CRC) within a faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based CRC screening programme.DesignAll individuals that participated in 2017 and 2018 with a negative FIT and were eligible for CRC screening in 2019 and 2020 were included using individual-level data. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between either the different time periods (ie, ‘before’, ‘during’ and ‘after’ the first COVID-19 wave) or the invitation interval on screen-detected and interval CRCs.ResultsPositive predictive value for advanced neoplasia (AN) was slightly lowerduring(OR=0.91) andafter(OR=0.95) the first COVID-19 wave, but no significant difference was observed for the different invitation intervals. Out of all individuals that previously tested negative, 84 (0.004%) had an interval CRC beyond the 24 months since their last invitation. The time period of invitation as well as the extended invitation interval was not associated with detection rates for AN and interval CRC rate.ConclusionThe impact of the first COVID-19 wave on screening yield was modest. A very small proportion of the FIT negatives had an interval CRC possibly due to an extended interval, which potentially could have been prevented if they had received the invitation earlier. Nonetheless, no increase in interval CRC rate was observed, indicating that an extended invitation interval up to 30 months had no negative impact on the performance of the CRC screening programme and a modest extension of the invitation interval seems an appropriate intervention.

Purpose of this study was to determine the rate of contamination, defined as lung cancer screening in the control arm, of the Dutch-Belgian randomized lung cancer screening trial (NELSON) as contamination adversely affects the power of a trial. The NELSON cohort includes 15,822 high-risk current and former smokers, aged 50-75 years, equally randomized to the screen and control arm. Questionnaires were sent to a sample of 1460 male subjects of the control arm, stratified on smoking determinants. The response rate was 73.0%. The participants were asked whether they received a chest X-ray or CT scan in the last 4 years and, if so, when and for what reason it had been performed. Examinations performed after randomization because of "Precaution" or "No examination was offered by NELSON" were regarded as contamination. In the first 24 months after randomization 3.1% (2.3-3.8%) of the respondents received a lung cancer screening examination. Contamination reached a non-significant peak within the first 3 months after randomization, with a lower limit of 2.5 and an upper limit of 3.1 per 1000 person-months. This screening rate did not differ from the background rates in the last 18 months before randomization. No significant differences were observed between current and former smokers. In conclusion, the rate of contamination among male subjects of the control arm of the NELSON trial is low and is not likely to jeopardize the power of the trial. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

in some European countries, female lung cancer mortality and incidence have started to decrease or flatten out, whereas they are still rising in The Netherlands. We present recent mortality and incidence trends of lung cancer and smoking trends in The Netherlands to show the end of the lung cancer epidemic in Dutch women. Lung cancer mortality and incidence rates by gender were analyzed for 4 age groups (20-44, 45-49, 50-54 and 55-59), and smoking prevalence rates were examined for women using joinpoint regression and birth cohort analysis. Data on mortality were collected for the period 1960-2006, incidence for the period 1989-2003 and smoking prevalence for the period 1988-2007. Because of decreasing lung cancer mortality and incidence rates among males and dramatically increasing rates among females,, rates of young males were surpassed by those of females after the mid-1990s. However, although in young women (20-49) mortality increased with 4-5% per year, it flattened out (no significant in-or decreases) since 1999. Among older women, mortality rates were still increasing markedly. Mortality rates and smoking prevalence tended to decrease in women born after the 1950s. This is the first report suggesting that the lung cancer epidemic in Dutch women is coming to an end. Although the increase in lung cancer incidence and mortality among Dutch women has been one of the most dramatic in Europe, the recent decrease in young women is expected to be followed by a future leveling off or a slight decrease in overall female lung cancer rates. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

BACKGROUND. Computed tomography (CT) screening is an important new tool for the early detection of lung cancer. In the current study, the authors assessed the discomfort associated with CT scanning and the subsequent wait for results and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over time. METHODS. A total of 351 participants in the Dutch-Belgian randomized controlled trial for lung cancer screening in high-risk subjects (the NELSON trial) who had an appointment for a baseline CT scan were asked to complete questionnaires regarding their experienced discomfort and HRQoL before, 1 day after, and approximately 6 months after the CT scan. HRQoL was measured as generic HRQoL (12-item Short Form [SF-12] and EuroQol questionnaire [EQ-5D]), generic anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI-6]), and lung cancer-specific distress (Impact of Event Scale [IES]). Approximately 76.9% of the participants completed all 3 questionnaires. RESULTS. Approximately 87% to 99% of participants reported experiencing no discomfort related to the CT scan. The median SF-12, EQ-5D, STAI-6, and IES scores did not appear to change relevantly over time. Approximately 46.0% and 51.3%, respectively, of the participants reported discomfort in connection with having to wait for the results of the CT scan and dreading those results. These patients had relevantly higher STAI-6 and IES scores (P < .01) (unfavorable) at all 3 assessments. CONCLUSIONS. The current evaluation of the potential adverse effects of CT screening for lung cancer on HRQoL demonstrated no negative effects. However, waiting for the CT scan results was reported to be discomforting by approximately half of the participants. Minimizing the waiting time for the test results is therefore recommended. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

A method to obtain the optimal selection criteria, taking into account available resources and capacity and the impact on power, is presented for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer screening trial (NELSON). NELSON investigates whether 16-detector multi-slice computed tomography screening will decrease lung cancer mortality compared to no screening. A questionnaire was sent to 335,441 (mainly) men, aged 50-75. Smoking exposure (years smoked, cigarettes/day, years quit) was determined, and expected lung cancer mortality was estimated for different selection scenarios for the 106,931 respondents, using lung cancer mortality data by level of smoking exposure (US Cancer Prevention Study I and II). Selection criteria were chosen so that the required response among eligible subjects to reach sufficient sample size was minimised and the required sample size was within our capacity. Inviting current and former smokers (quit 15 cigarettes/day during >25 years or >10 cigarettes/day during >30 years was most optimal. With a power of 80%, 17,300-27,900 participants are needed to show a 20-25% lung cancer mortality reduction 10 years after randomisation. Until October 18, 2005 11,103 (first recruitment round) and 4,325 (second recruitment round) (total = 15,428) participants have been randomised. Selecting participants for lung cancer screening trials based on risk estimates is feasible and helpful to minimize sample size and costs. When pooling with Danish trial data (n = +/-4,000) NELSON is the only trial without screening in controls that is expected to have 80% power to show a lung cancer mortality reduction of at least 25% 10 years after randomisation.

BACKGROUNDThe use of multidetector computed tomography (CT) in lung-cancer screening trials involving subjects with an increased risk of lung cancer has highlighted the problem for the clinician of deciding on the best course of action when noncalcified pulmonary nodules are detected by CT.METHODSA total of 7557 participants underwent CT screening in years 1, 2, and 4 of a randomized trial of lung-cancer screening. We used software to evaluate a noncalcified nodule according to its volume or volume-doubling time. Growth was defined as an increase in volume of at least 25% between two scans. The first-round screening test was considered to be negative if the volume of a nodule was less than 50 mm(3), if it was 50 to 500 mm3 but had not grown by the time of the 3-month follow-up CT, or if, in the case of those that had grown, the volume-doubling time was 400 days or more.RESULTSIn the first and second rounds of screening, 2.6% and 1.8% of the participants, respectively, had a positive test result. In round one, the sensitivity of the screen was 94.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.5 to 98.0) and the negative predictive value 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9 to 100.0). In the 7361 subjects with a negative screening result in round one, 20 lung cancers were detected after 2 years of follow-up.CONCLUSIONSAmong subjects at high risk for lung cancer who were screened in three rounds of CT scanning and in whom noncalcified pulmonary nodules were evaluated according to volume and volume-doubling time, the chances of finding lung cancer 1 and 2 years after a negative first-round test were 1 in 1000 and 3 in 1000, respectively. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN63545820.)

A method to obtain the optimal selection criteria, taking into account available resources and capacity and the impact on power, is presented for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer screening trial (NELSON). NELSON investigates whether 16-detector multi-slice computed tomography screening will decrease lung cancer mortality compared to no screening. A questionnaire was sent to 335,441 (mainly) men, aged 50-75. Smoking exposure (years smoked, cigarettes/day, years quit) was determined, and expected lung cancer mortality was estimated for different selection scenarios for the 106,931 respondents, using lung cancer mortality data by level of smoking exposure (US Cancer Prevention Study I and II). Selection criteria were chosen so that the required response among eligible subjects to reach sufficient sample size was minimised and the required sample size was within our capacity. Inviting current and former smokers (quitor= 10 years ago) who smoked15 cigarettes/day during25 years or10 cigarettes/day during30 years was most optimal. With a power of 80%, 17,300-27,900 participants are needed to show a 20-25% lung cancer mortality reduction 10 years after randomisation. Until October 18, 2005 11,103 (first recruitment round) and 4,325 (second recruitment round) (total = 15,428) participants have been randomised. Selecting participants for lung cancer screening trials based on risk estimates is feasible and helpful to minimize sample size and costs. When pooling with Danish trial data (n = +/-4,000) NELSON is the only trial without screening in controls that is expected to have 80% power to show a lung cancer mortality reduction of at least 25% 10 years after randomisation.

Item does not contain fulltext OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between vitamin-dependent homocysteine metabolism and vascular-related pregnancy complications by considering interval between delivery and postpartum investigation and maternal age. METHODS: Case-control study performed at the University Medical Center Nijmegen in the Netherlands. Patients had experienced pregnancy-induced hypertension (n = 37), preeclampsia (n = 144), hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets (HELLP) syndrome (n = 104), recurrent early pregnancy loss (n = 544), abruptio placentae (n = 135), intrauterine growth restriction (n = 144), or intrauterine fetal death (n = 104). Controls comprised 176 women with uncomplicated obstetric histories. Oral methionine loading tests and fasting vitamin profiles were performed more than 6 weeks after delivery. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated after logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Hyperhomocysteinemia was associated with an approximately 2-fold to 3-fold increased risk for pregnancy-induced hypertension, abruptio placentae, and intrauterine growth restriction. Cobalamin deficiency was associated with HELLP syndrome, abruptio placentae, intrauterine growth restriction, and intrauterine fetal death. Pyridoxal 5-phosphate deficiency increased the risk for pregnancy-induced hypertension 4-fold. These associations lost their significance after adjustment for time interval and maternal age. High red cell folate was associated with a decreased risk for abruptio placentae and intrauterine growth restriction. An increased creatinine concentration was associated with pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, and abruptio placentae. CONCLUSION: Hyperhomocysteinemia and vitamin deficiencies are largely determined by the interval between delivery and postpartum investigation and by maternal age. Time interval and maternal age should be considered in the risk estimation for vascular-related pregnancy complications.