Search

La sátira se expresó genuinamente como la potencia disruptiva e irritante contra el status quo de la sociedad medieval y renacentista. Un elemento retorico y poético único, cargado de expresiones criticas de talante político, moral y pedagógico, asociados a una visión hedonista e impulsiva de la vitalidad. Por consecuencia, relacionada al sentido común y feliz del vulgo, la plebe "estulta" o "necia" frente a la ascética, la reflexión y la vivencia mortificada y racionalista del sabio o erudito solitario. Una bíblica sentencia lo ilustra: Stultorum infinitus est numerus ("El número de los necios es infinito"). La sátira nos presenta el mundo al revés, la sociedad boca abajo, el mundo revolucionado, la felicidad como necedad. En fin, nos muestra otra perspectiva en la que el placer y la expresión hedonista del cuerpo tienen su lugar privilegiado frente a la regla y la normativa moral monástica y eclesiástica. Los escritos Elogio de la Locura de Erasmo de Rotterdam y Gargantúa y Pantagruel de François Rabelais (siglo XVI), marcan antecedentes importantes de la sátira (y su derivación grotesca) en la filosofía y en la literatura, en donde se expresa en la primera obra una recuperación de la filosofía epicúrea y en la segunda el hedonismo extremo en su carácter grotesco. El fin de nuestro trabajo es indicar la visión carnavalesca- hedonista y la crítica moral que se expresan en tales obras. Satire was genuinely expressed as the disruptive and irritating power against the status quo of medieval and Renaissance society. A unique rhetorical and poetic element, loaded with critical expressions of a political, moral and pedagogical nature, associated with a hedonistic and impulsive vision of vitality. Consequently, related to the common and happy sense of the vulgar, the plebe "estulta" or "foolish" in front of the ascetic, the reflection and the mortified and rationalistic experience of the wise or solitary scholar. A biblical sentence illustrates it: Stultorum infinitus est numerus ("The number of fools is infinite"). Satire presents the world upside down, society upside down, the world revolutionized, happiness as foolishness. Finally, it shows us another perspective in which the pleasure and the hedonistic expression of the body have their privileged place in front of the rule and the monastic and ecclesiastical moral regulations. The writings Praise of the Madness of Erasmus of Rotterdam and Gargantúa and Pantagruel by François Rabelais (sixteenth century), mark important antecedents of satire (and its grotesque derivation) in philosophy and literature, where it is expressed in the first work a recovery of the epicurean philosophy and in the second the extreme hedonism in its grotesque character. The aim of our work is to indicate the carnivalesque-hedonistic vision and moral criticism expressed in such works.

Satire was genuinely expressed as the disruptive and irritating power against the status quo of medieval and Renaissance society. A unique rhetorical and poetic element, loaded with critical expressions of a political, moral and pedagogical nature, associated with a hedonistic and impulsive vision of vitality. Consequently, related to the common and happy sense of the vulgar, the plebe “estulta” or “foolish” in front of the ascetic, the reflection and the mortified and rationalistic experience of the wise or solitary scholar. A biblical sentence illustrates it: Stultorum infinitus est numerus (“The number of fools is infinite”). Satire presents the world upside down, society upside down, the world revolutionized, happiness as foolishness. Finally, it shows us another perspective in which the pleasure and the hedonistic expression of the body have their privileged place in front of the rule and the monastic and ecclesiastical moral regulations. The writings Praise of the Madness of Erasmus of Rotterdam and Gargantúa and Pantagruel by François Rabelais (sixteenth century), mark important antecedents of satire (and its grotesque derivation) in philosophy and literature, where it is expressed in the first work a recovery of the epicurean philosophy and in the second the extreme hedonism in its grotesque character. The aim of our work is to indicate the carnivalesque-hedonistic vision and moral criticism expressed in such works., La sátira se expresó genuinamente como la potencia disruptiva e irritante contra el status quo de la sociedad medieval y renacentista. Un elemento retorico y poético único, cargado de expresiones criticas de talante político, moral y pedagógico, asociados a una visión hedonista e impulsiva de la vitalidad. Por consecuencia, relacionada al sentido común y feliz del vulgo, la plebe “estulta” o “necia” frente a la ascética, la reflexión y la vivencia mortificada y racionalista del sabio o erudito solitario. Una bíblica sentencia lo ilustra: Stultorum infinitus est numerus ("El número de los necios es infinito"). La sátira nos presenta el mundo al revés, la sociedad boca abajo, el mundo revolucionado, la felicidad como necedad. En fin, nos muestra otra perspectiva en la que el placer y la expresión hedonista del cuerpo tienen su lugar privilegiado frente a la regla y la normativa moral monástica y eclesiástica. Los escritos Elogio de la Locura de Erasmo de Rotterdam y Gargantúa y Pantagruel de François Rabelais (siglo XVI), marcan antecedentes importantes de la sátira (y su derivación grotesca) en la filosofía y en la literatura, en donde se expresa en la primera obra una recuperación de la filosofía epicúrea y en la segunda el hedonismo extremo en su carácter grotesco. El fin de nuestro trabajo es indicar la visión carnavalesca- hedonista y la crítica moral que se expresan en tales obras.

U radu se analizira roman Ranka Marinkovića, Kiklop, pri čemu je naglašen psihoanalitički pristup istom. Sam rad podijeljen je u tri dijela, a svaki taj pojedinačni dio sačinjava posebnu zatvorenu strukturu koja sa svakog gledišta čini jedan zasebnu, samostalnu cjelinu. Dok se u prvom dijelu opisuje sama struktura romana i donosi njegovo skriveno značenje, druga dva dijela nadovezuju se na njega, samo kroz psihoanalitičku recepciju i interpretaciju romana. Tako se u drugom dijelu iznosi popis likova, ali kroz prizmu njihove dubinske važnosti za roman kao i kroz njihovu interakciju s glavnim likom Melkiorom Tresićem. Dokazuje se i važnost samih ženskih likova kroz roman, čija je važnost u psihoanalitičkoj interpretaciji neupitna. Sve tvrdnje potkrijepljene su odgovarajućim primjerima iz knjige. Treći dio donosi dublji uvid u psihoanalitički značaj pa se tako izdvajaju tvrdnje Sigmunda Freuda i Carla Gustava Junga, dokazujući pritom što je to što pojedine odrednice romana vezuje uz psihoanalitičke obrasce., The study analyzes the novel by Ranko Marinković, Kiklop, concetrating especially on its psychoanalytic interpretation. The work itself is divided into three different parts, where every part could be isolated in the hermetic structure which, from each point of view, could be easily interpreted as a separate, independent entity. While in the first part is discribed the structure of the novel and its hidden meaning, the other two parts of the study, remaining connected to the first part, bring and add the psychoanalytic reception and interpretation of the novel. Thus in the second part there is a list of all most important characters of the novel, but the accent is on their importance for the novel itself, and on their interactions with the main character, Melkior Tresić. This parts includes also importance of feminine characters, which is unquestionable in the psychoanalytic studies. All the definitions written in the study are supported by corresponding citations from the novel. Third part brings a deeper view of the psychoanalytic perspective, showing it regarding the most important definitions of Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung, proving at the same time the connection of the novel with the psychoanalytic patterns.