Search

INTRODUCTION Obesity is a major public health concern worldwide. (1) According to a recent estimate, there are 1.46 billion overweight adults (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/[m.sup.2]) and 503 [...], Epidemiological studies assessing general and abdominal obesity measures or their combination for mortality prediction have shown inconsistent results. We aimed to systematically review the associations of body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) with all-cause mortality in prospective cohort studies. In this systematic review, which includes a meta-regression analysis, we analysed the associations with all-cause mortality of BMI, WHR, WC and WHtR in prospective cohort studies available in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Esbiobase from inception through 7 May 2010. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 689465 participants and 48 421 deaths during 5-24 years of follow-up. The studies were heterogeneous, mainly due to differences in categorization of anthropometric parameters (AP) and different approaches to statistical analysis. Both general and abdominal obesity measures were significantly associated with mortality. In analyses using categorical variables, BMI and WC showed predominantly U- or J-shaped associations with mortality, whereas WHR and WHtR demonstrated positive relationships with mortality. All measures showed similar risk patterns for upper quantiles in comparison to reference quantiles. The parameters of general and abdominal obesity each remained significantly associated with mortality when adjusted for the other. This evidence suggests that abdominal obesity measures such as WC or WHR, show information independent to measures of general obesity and should be used in clinical practice, in addition to BMI, to assess obesity-related mortality in adults. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2013) 67, 573-585; doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.61; published online 20 March 2013 Keywords: body mass index; waist circumference; waist-to-hip ratio; mortality

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between participation in structured diabetes self-management education programs (DSME) and self-management behaviour (SMB) in routine care., Methods: The study included 864 ever- and 515 never-DSME participants from the population-based survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2014/2015. SMB and clinical care variables were: Following a diet plan, keeping a diabetes diary, holding a diabetes pass, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), foot self-examination (FSE), retinopathy screening, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement and examination of the feet by clinicians (FEC). We conducted logistic regression analyses for association of DSME-participation with SMB, adjusting for various variables., Results: DSME-participation was significantly associated with SMB including following a diet plan (OR 1.88 [95% CI 1.21-2.92]), keeping a diabetes journal (OR 3.83 [2.74-5.36]), holding a diabetes health passport (OR 6.11 [4.40-8.48]), SMBG (OR 2.96 [2.20-3.98]) and FSE (OR 2.64 [2.01-3.47]) as well as retinopathy screening (OR 3.30 [2.31-4.70]), HbA1c measurement (OR 2.58 [1.88-3.52]), and FEC (OR 3.68 [2.76-4.89]) after adjusting for confounders., Conclusion: DSME-participation is associated with higher frequencies of various SMB and clinical care variables in routine care. Never-DSME attenders are more likely not to receive retinopathy screening, FEC and HbA1c measurements as recommended., Practice Implications: Clinicians should refer diabetes patients to a DSME and ensure a regular follow up for never-DSME attenders., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Few studies on diabetes self-management considered the patterns and relationships of different self-management behaviours (SMB). The aims of the present study are 1) to identify patterns of SMB among persons with diabetes, 2) to identify sociodemographic and disease-related predictors of SMB among persons with diabetes., Research Design and Methods: The present analysis includes data of 1,466 persons (age 18 to 99 years; 44.0% female; 56.0% male) with diabetes (type I and II) from the population-based study German Health Update 2014/2015 (GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS). We used latent class analysis in order to distinguish different patterns of self-management behaviours among persons with diabetes. The assessment of SMB was based on seven self-reported activities by respondents (dietary plan, diabetes-diary, diabetes health pass, self-assessment of blood glucose, self-examination of feet, retinopathy-screenings and assessment of HbA1c). Subsequent multinomial latent variable regressions identified factors that were associated with self-management behaviour., Results: Latent class analysis suggested a distinction between three patterns of SMB. Based on modal posterior probabilities 42.8% of respondents showed an adherent pattern of diabetes self-management with above-average frequency in all seven indicators of SMB. 32.1% showed a nonadherent pattern with a below-average commitment in all seven forms of SMB. Another 25.1% were assigned to an ambivalent type, which showed to be adherent with regard to retinopathy screenings, foot examinations, and the assessment of HbA1c, yet nonadherent with regard to all other forms of SMB. In multivariable regression analyses, participation in Diabetes Self-Management Education programs (DSME) was the most important predictor of good self-management behaviour (marginal effect = 51.7 percentage points), followed by attentiveness towards one's personal health (31.0 percentage points). Respondents with a duration of illness of less than 10 years (19.5 percentage points), employed respondents (7.5 percentage points), as well as respondents with a high socioeconomic status (24.7 percentage points) were more likely to show suboptimal forms of diabetes self-management., Discussion: In the present nationwide population-based study, a large proportion of persons with diabetes showed suboptimal self-management behaviour. Participation in a DSME program was the strongest predictor of good self-management. Results underline the need for continual and consistent health education for patients with diabetes., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background and Aims: Comprehensive geriatric assessments are established tools for the identification of health problems in the elderly. So far, little is known about tailoring and targeting to facilitate their application. As a starting point for a tailored assessment of patients with diabetes, a highly prevalent health condition, we aimed to assess if the Standardized Assessment of Elderly People (STEP) is able to identify relevant differences in self-reported health problems between diabetic and non-diabetic patients., Patients and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study including 1007 adults (aged 65 and older) from 28 German general practices, evaluating the feasibility and usefulness of the self-administered STEP version. For this exploratory study we re-analysed the data and compared patients with and without diabetes., Results: Out of 940 patients included in the secondary analysis, 248 (26.4%) had diabetes. Compared to non-diabetic patients, geriatric diabetic patients reported more often problems in activities of daily living, physical problems typically associated with diabetes such as urinary incontinence, visual impairment, mood disturbances, as well as the use of medical or social services. Most of our results were stable after adjusting for age, sex and body mass index., Conclusion: We conclude that the self-administered version of the STEP tool may be used to screen for health problems typically associated with diabetes. Our results may guide the development of a tailored STEP-version specifically for diabetic patients. Further research might evaluate the adoption and usefulness of such a tool in every-day general practice., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objective: Whether participation in structured diabetes self-management education programs (DSME) for participants with diabetes mellitus is associated with a healthy lifestyle in routine care apart from randomized-controlled studies remains unclear and is this studies' research question., Research Design and Methods: We identified 1300 persons with diabetes mellitus drawn from the cross-sectional population-based analysis German Health Update 2014/2015 (GEDA 2014/2015), which integrated the modules of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) wave 2. Of those, 816 were ever-DSME participants and 484 never-participants. We conducted multivariable weighted logistic regression analyses for lifestyle differences comparing ever-DSME and never-DSME participants. Lifestyle was defined by physical activity (PA), current smoking, fruit/vegetable consumption and body mass index (BMI). Age, sex, socioeconomic status, living together, limitation due to health problems for at least for 6 months, self-efficacy and attention to one's health were included as confounders in the regression models., Results: Ever-DSME participants engaged significantly more often in cycling at least 1 day per week (OR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.15-2.30) and performed significantly more often aerobic endurance training of 150 min per week (including walking: OR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03-1.94, without walking: OR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.08-2.03) compared with never-DSME participants. Ever-DSME participants were significantly more often ex-smoker compared with never-DSME participants (OR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.03-1.88). DSME attendance was not significantly associated with current smoking, BMI and fruit or vegetable consumption., Conclusion: DSME participation is associated with a moderately healthier lifestyle particularly for PA even in routine healthcare. Study results emphasize the importance of a broadly dissemination of DSME access for nationwide diabetes healthcare. Future studies should adjust for DSME participation when investigating lifestyle in persons with diabetes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has had a wide-ranging impact on healthcare politics. Secondary diseases and complications caused by diabetes are relevant cost and utilisation factors in the healthcare system. For decades, diabetes self-management education (DSME) has played a major role in the treatment of patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). The aim of this training is to empower patients to actively influence their diabetes process by gaining knowledge about health-related behaviours, such as healthy nutrition and exercise, and cardiovascular risks. The aim of the project is to analyse the practice of structured diabetes education and the effects of different learning types of participants. This project focuses on the needs of socioeconomically deprived patients and aims to improve DSME for this group. This patient group has a higher prevalence of T2DM, more complications and worse therapy-relevant parameters., Methods and Analysis: The study will be conducted as a prospective longitudinal study. Patients will be recruited in outpatient physician offices over a period of 12 months. Patients will be included if they are 18 years and older, have T2DM and are scheduled to participate in DSME for the first time. A pseudonymised, written survey with standardised questionnaires will be administered. The data will be analysed using inferential statistical methods, such as correlation analysis, regression models and variance analytical designs., Ethics and Dissemination: The study will be carried out following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and good scientific standards. Ethical approval of the Ethics Review Committee of the Medical Faculty at Martin-Luther-University, Halle-Wittenberg, was obtained. All participants in the study will receive comprehensive information and will be included after written informed consent is obtained. The results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at several congresses., Trial Registration Number: DRKS00016630., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Headache is one of patients' most common reasons to consult their general practitioner and covers about 2 - 5 % of the consultations in primary care. Often, the general practitioner is the first to be contacted by patients with headache. Mostly, headaches are primary and only 2 % of the patients have secondary headaches. The distinction between primary and secondary headache is the most important step in the management of patients with headache in primary care. Therefore, this article shows important elements of anamnesis and examination of headache patients in primary care. Furthermore, this article focuses on identification of red flags and yellow flags in the consultation of patients with headache and suggests recommendations for referral to emergency department, hospital care or specialist treatment., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Many countries are faced with a decrease in physicians in non-urban areas. Especially for regions with decreasing populations, temporary solutions like commuting models might be a suitable option. So far, little is known about the willingness to commute among future physicians., Methods: In this multicenter, cross-sectional survey, five years of medical students (8th to 10th semester) from three German universities (Charité Berlin, Halle, Leipzig) were questioned about their willingness to commute to work, the maximum acceptable commute time, and how several job-related factors might enhance the attractiveness of commuting., Results: Altogether 1108 of 1203 (92.1%) students completed the questionnaire. For 55.9% of the participants it was imaginable to commute to a non-urban area in the future. The most important job-related factors that would increase the attractiveness of such a commuting model were remuneration of the commuting time, higher remuneration in general, working self-employed in a joint practice with 2-3 physicians, existence of a specifically qualified "supply assistant", provision of a home office, good public transport connection, and a driver service. The maximum acceptable commute time was on average 39.0 min (one-way). If the way to work would be a salaried integral part of the normal working time, the participants stated they would accept traveling 51.2 min (one-way)., Conclusions: Most future physicians are open-minded regarding models of commuting. The attractiveness of such models can be increased mainly through higher remuneration, reduction of the physicians' burden, and comfortable modes of transport., Competing Interests: According to the regulations of the ethics committee of the Leipzig Medical Faculty and the Model Professional Code for Physicians an explicit ethical approval was deemed unnecessary for this study. After being informed about the study, all participants completed this anonymous survey on a voluntary basis (informed consent).The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Objective: In many departments of General Practice (GP) in Germany, young doctors who are trainees also work as researchers. Often these trainees work part time at the university and part time as a trainee in clinical practice. However, little is known about the situation of the actors involved. The aim of the study was to investigate the perspectives of GP trainees, heads of departments and GP trainers regarding the combination of research and GP training., Methods: We conducted a web-based survey with the heads of all German departments of General Practice, GP trainees who also conduct research and their GP trainers. The questionnaires consisted of open and closed questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods., Results: 28 heads of GP departments and 20 GP trainees responded. The trainees were mostly very satisfied with their situation as a trainee. However, the trainees considered the combination of research and GP training as difficult. The respondents name as problems the coordination of multiple jobs and the lack of credibility given to research in General Practice. They name as solutions research-enabling training programs and uniform requirements in training regarding research., Conclusion: The combination of GP training and scientific research activity is perceived as difficult. However, well-organized and designed programs can improve the quality of the combination.

Aims: The endocannabinoid system may contribute to the association of visceral fat accumulation with metabolic diseases. Here we investigated the effects of genetic variation in the cannabinoid type 1 receptor gene (CNR1) on its mRNA expression in adipose tissue from visceral and subcutaneous depots and on the development of obesity., Materials & Methods: CNR1 was sequenced in 48 nonrelated German Caucasians to detect genetic variation. Five representative variants including HapMap tagging SNPs (rs12720071, rs806368, rs806370, rs1049353 and rs806369) were genotyped for subsequent association studies in two independent cohorts (total n = 2774) with detailed metabolic testing: subjects from the Leipzig Study (n = 1857) and a self-contained population of Sorbs from Germany (n = 917)., Results: In a case-control study of lean (BMI <25 kg/m(2)) versus obese (BMI >30 kg/m(2)) subjects, rs806368 was found to be nominally associated with obesity in the Sorbian cohort (adjusted p < 0.05), but not in the Leipzig cohort. Also, several SNPs (rs806368, rs806370 and rs12720071) were nominally associated with serum leptin levels (p < 0.05 after adjusting for age, sex and BMI). However, none of these associations remained significant after accounting for multiple testing. Furthermore, none of the SNPs were related to CNR1 mRNA expression in visceral and subcutaneous fat., Conclusion: The data suggest that common genetic variation in the CNR1 gene does not influence mRNA expression in adipose tissue nor does it play a significant role in the pathophysiology of obesity in German and Sorbian populations.