Search

PURPOSE To verify whether the intensification of the upfront chemotherapy backbone with a modified schedule of modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (mFOLFOXIRI) increases the activity of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin when both regimens are combined with panitumumab as initial treatment for RAS and BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS TRIPLETE was a prospective, open-label, phase III trial in which previously untreated patients with unresectable RAS and BRAF wt mCRC were randomly assigned 1:1 to modified FOLFOX/panitumumab (control group) or mFOLFOXIRI/panitumumab (experimental group) up to 12 cycles, followed by fluorouracil/-leucovorin/panitumumab until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1. Hypothesizing an ORR of 60% in the control group, 432 cases provided 90% power to a two-sided chi-square test for heterogeneity with a two-sided alpha error of .05 to detect ≥ 15% differences between arms (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03231722 ). RESULTS From September 2017 to September 2021, 435 patients were enrolled (control group/experimental group: 217/218) in 57 Italian sites. One hundred sixty (73%) patients treated with mFOLFOXIRI plus panitumumab and 165 (76%) patients treated with modified FOLFOX plus panitumumab achieved RECIST response (odds ratio 0.87, 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.34, P = .526). No differences in early tumor shrinkage rate (57%/58%, P = .878) and deepness of response (median: 48%/47%, P = .845) were reported, nor in R0 resection rate (25%/29%, P = .317). No significant difference between arms was reported in terms of progression-free survival (median progression-free survival: 12.7 in the experimental group v 12.3 months in the control group, hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.11, P = .277). CONCLUSION The intensification of the upfront chemotherapy backbone in combination with panitumumab does not provide additional benefit in terms of treatment activity at the price of increased gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with RAS and BRAF wt mCRC.

Lung cancer (LC) represents the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm worldwide for both sexes and is the leading cause of cancer mortality. Malnutrition is a comorbidity frequently found in neoplastic patients, but it remains often underestimated and thus undertreated. In this review, we aimed to investigate the incidence of malnutrition among LC patients according to different screening and assessment tools, to evaluate the impact of weight loss and body composition on survival, and to analyze the efficacy of different nutritional interventions in this setting. Although malnutrition, weight loss, and body composition changes can affect survival and other clinical outcomes in LC patients, the role of nutritional interventions is not yet strongly proven, and further studies are recommended. Nevertheless, screening, assessing, and eventually treating malnutrition in LC patients are strongly recommended, according to the most recent nutritional intervention guidelines for oncology patients.

The combination of perioperative chemotherapy plus complete surgical resection is currently accounted as the first-choice strategy in patients with locally advanced Gastric Cancer (LAGC). Nevertheless, the partial response rate makes it necessary to search biological parameters useful to select patients who would benefit most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAD-CT). We performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of 65 LAGC cases, EBV negative and without MMR defect, submitted to perioperative chemotherapy plus surgical resection. We evaluated the neutrophil-lymphocytes ratio (NLR) in peripheral blood, the TILs density (reported as CD4/CD8 tissue ratio) and PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry on bioptic tissues before the treatment. Results were correlated with the biological features, histological response (TRG) and clinical outcome (PFS and OS). We found that NLR, TILs and PD-L1 expression showed a significant correlation with TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion and response to NAD-CT (TRG). Correlating the NLR, TILs and PD-L1 expression with PFS and OS, we found that patients with lower NLR levels (

Surgery still represents the mainstay of treatment of all stages of gastric cancer (GC). Surgical resections represent potentially curative options in the case of early GC with a low risk of node metastasis. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and indocyanine green fluorescence are novel techniques which may improve the employment of stomach-sparing procedures, ameliorating quality of life without compromising oncological radicality. Nonetheless, the diffusion of these techniques is limited in Western countries. Conversely, radical gastrectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy and multimodal treatment represents a valid option in the case of advanced GC. Differences between Eastern and Western recommendations still exist, and the optimal multimodal strategy is still a matter of investigation. Recent chemotherapy protocols have made surgery available for patients with oligometastatic disease. In this context, intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy via HIPEC or PIPAC has emerged as an alternative weapon for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. In conclusion, the surgical management of GC is still evolving together with the multimodal strategy. It is mandatory for surgeons to be conscious of the current evolution of the surgical management of GC in the era of multidisciplinary and tailored medicine.

The significant advances that have been reached, in the last decades, in the treatment of gastric cancer, contributed to the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with the aim to reduce the surgical stress, accelerate postoperative recovery, and reduce the length of hospital stay. The most important items included in the ERAS protocols are the pre-operative patient education, early mobilization and immediate oral intake from the first postoperative day. The aim of this narrative review is to focus the attention on the possible advantages of ERAS program on perioperative functional recovery outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Patients affected by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently present with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis, limiting an upfront surgical approach. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has become the standard of care to downstage non-metastatic locally advanced PDAC. However, this treatment increases the risk of a nutritional status decline, which in turn, may impact therapeutic tolerance, postoperative outcomes, or even prevent the possibility of surgery. Literature on prehabilitation programs on surgical PDAC patients show a reduction of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate, while data on prehabilitation in NAT patients are scarce and randomized controlled trials are still missing. Particularly, appropriate nutritional management represents an important therapeutic strategy to promote tissue healing and to enhance patient recovery after surgical trauma. In this regard, NAT may represent a new interesting window of opportunity to implement a nutritional prehabilitation program, aiming to increase the PDAC patient’s capacity to complete the planned therapy and potentially improve clinical and survival outcomes. Given these perspectives, this review attempts to provide an in-depth view of the nutritional derangements during NAT and nutritional prehabilitation program as well as their impact on PDAC patient outcomes.

Background: The impact of the new chemotherapy, fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) on body composition in gastric cancer (GC) patients remains unknown. We assessed body composition changes of GC patients receiving the FLOT regimen and their impact on treatment outcomes. Methods: Preoperative pre- and post-FLOT computed tomography (CT) scans of advanced GC patients were studied. Lumbar skeletal muscle index (SMI) and adipose indices were calculated before and after FLOT. Results: A total of 26 patients were identified between April 2019 and January 2020. Nineteen patients were sarcopenic at diagnosis. The mean BMI decreased (from 24.4 ± 3.7 to 22.6 ± 3.1; p < 0.0001) as well as the SMI (from 48.74 ± 9.76 to 46.52 ± 9.98; p = 0.009) and visceral adipose index (VAI) (from 49.04 ± 31.06 to 41.99 ± 23.91; p = 0.004) during preoperative FLOT therapy. BMI, SMI, and VAI variations were not associated with toxicity, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), response, delay and completion of perioperative FLOT chemotherapy, and the execution of gastrectomy; a decrease of SMI ≥ 5% was associated with a higher Mandard tumor regression grade (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Almost three-quarters (73.1%) of GC patients were sarcopenic at diagnosis. Preoperative FLOT was associated with a further reduction in SMI, BMI, and VAI. These changes were not associated with short-term outcomes.

LBA3505 Background: The association of a chemotherapy doublet (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) with an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or panitumumab) is an upfront option for the treatment of RAS and BRAF wt mCRC patients. Phase II studies investigating the combination of the triplet FOLFOXIRI with an anti-EGFR reported promising activity results and an acceptable safety profile when lower doses of 5FU and irinotecan were adopted. The added value of intensifying the upfront chemotherapy when combined with a targeted agent in a molecularly selected population is not established. Methods: TRIPLETE is a prospective, open label, phase III trial in which previously untreated patients with unresectable RAS and BRAF wt mCRC were randomized to receive mFOLFOX6/pan (arm A) or mFOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 150 mg/sqm, oxaliplatin 85 mg/sqm, L-leucovorin 200 mg/sqm, 5-fluoruracil 2400 mg/sqm 48 h infusion)/pan (arm B) up to 12 cycles, followed by 5FU/LV/pan until disease progression. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety profile, R0 resection rate, PFS and OS. Under the assumption of an ORR of 60% in arm A, to detect an increase of at least 15% in arm B, a sample size of 432 cases provided approximately 90% power to a two-sided chi square test for heterogeneity at the 0.05 significance level. Results: From September 2017 to September 2021, 435 pts were enrolled (arm A/B: 217/218) in 67 Italian sites. Main pts’ characteristics were (arm A/B): median age 59/59, ECOG PS 0 80%/84%, left-sided 88%/88%, synchronous metastases 88%/87%, prior adjuvant 2%/6%, resected primary 43%/51%, liver-only 37%/39%. Main grade > 2 adverse events were diarrhoea 7%/23%, stomatitis 7%/7%, neutropenia 20%/32%, febrile neutropenia 3%/6%, fatigue 2%/7%, skin rash 29%/19%. 160 (73%) out of 218 patients in arm B and 165 (76%) out of 217 patients in arm A achieved RECIST response (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.56-1.34, p=0.526). No interaction effect between treatment arm and disease spread (liver-limited vs not-liver limited) was evident. No differences in early tumor shrinkage (arm A/B 58%/57%, p=0.878) and deepness of response (median arm A/B: 47%/48%, p=0.845) were reported, nor in R0 resection rate (arm A/B 29%/25%, p=0.317). At a median follow up of 26.5 mos, 305 (arm A/B: 157/148) PFS events were collected, with no significant difference between arms (median PFS: 12.7 vs 12.3 months, HR: 0.88, 95%CI 0.70-1.11, p=0.277). Conclusions: The intensification of the upfront chemotherapy backbone in combination with panitumumab in molecularly selected and mostly (88%) left-sided mCRC patients does not provide any benefit in terms of treatment activity at the price of a non-negligible increase in gastrointestinal toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT03231722.

Clinical Practice Points • Standard chemotherapy plus surgery yields to unsatisfying results in BRAF-mutated colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Combination of targeted agents (encorafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, and cetuximab, an anti-EGFR) is the new standard of care for BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC refractory to a first-line standard chemotherapy. Up to now no evidence is available concerning the activity of this novel treatment as conversion therapy in CLM setting. • Our case provides evidence, for the first time to our knowledge, of the activity of encorafenib plus cetuximab as conversion regimen for BRAF V600E-mutated CLM. Additional observations in this case report concern mechanisms underlying rapid occurrence of acquired resistance and the role of CEA serum levels as biomarker to monitor treatment activity and occurrence of resistance, allowing to optimize the timing of surgery. • Further evidence on the role of doublet targeted regimen (encorafenib plus cetuximab) as conversion treatment in the setting of BRAF-mutant CLM is warranted.

Background Perioperative FLOT (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) has recently become the gold standard treatment for fit patients with operable gastric (GC) or gastroesophageal (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, getting a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 45%, over 23% with surgery alone. Methods RealFLOT is an Italian, multicentric, observational trial, collecting data from patients with resectable GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative FLOT. Aim of the study was to describe feasibility and safety of FLOT, pathological complete response rate (pCR), surgical outcomes and overall response rate (ORR) in an unselected real-world population. Additional analyses evaluated the correlation between pCR and survival and the prognostic role of microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Results Of 206 patients enrolled that received perioperative FLOT at 15 Italian centers, 124 (60.2%) received at least 4 full-dose cycles, 190 (92.2%) underwent surgery, and 142 (68.9%) started the postoperative phase. Among patients who started the postoperative phase, 105 (51.0%) received FLOT, while 37 (18%) received de-intensified regimens, depending on clinical condition or previous toxicities. pCR was achieved in 7.3% of cases. Safety profile was consistent with literature. Neutropenia was the most common G 3–4 adverse event (AE): 19.9% in the preoperative phase and 16.9% in the postoperative phase. No toxic death was observed and 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.0%. ORR was 45.6% and disease control rate (DCR) was 94.2%. Disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were significantly longer in case of pCR (p = 0.009 and p = 0.023, respectively). A trend towards better DFS was observed among MSI-H patients. Conclusions These real-world data confirm the feasibility of FLOT in an unselected population, representative of the clinical practice. pCR rate was lower than expected, nevertheless we confirm pCR as a predictive parameter of survival. In addition, MSI-H status seems to be a positive prognostic marker also in patients treated with taxane-containing triplets.

Low muscle mass has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in various cancers. This work investigated whether, during tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) therapy, low muscle mass was associated with treatment toxicity and survival outcomes. A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to June 2020, based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Effect sizes were estimated with hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and heterogeneity was assessed by measuring inconsistency (I2) based on the Chi squared test. A total of 24 retrospective studies were identified, enrolling patients treated with sorafenib (n = 12), sunitinib (n = 6), lenvatinib (n = 3), regorafenib (n = 2), gefitinib (n = 1), imatinib (n = 1), and pazopanib (n = 1). Thirteen studies were deemed eligible for pooled analyses. Meta-analyses found a significant effect of low muscle mass on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.26–4.58, p = 0.008, I2 = 51%) in patients treated with TKI therapy. A subgroup analysis by treatment showed an association between DLT and low muscle during sorafenib or sunitinib, although not significant. A significant association between low skeletal muscle index and poorer overall survival was observed in HCC patients treated with sorafenib (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.07–1.96, p = 0.02). For other TKIs, although some results showed an association between low muscle mass and worse outcomes, the number of studies for each TKI therapy was too small to reach conclusions. Skeletal muscle mass could influence the prognosis of some TKI-treated patients. This effect is demonstrated in sorafenib-treated HCC patients but remains almost unexplored in other cancer patients undergoing TKI therapy. Further prospective studies with large sample size and sufficient follow-up are needed to clarify the role of muscle mass in the metabolism of TKI-based cancer treatment, and its association with toxicity and survival.

Background: Guidelines recommend a perioperative approach in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer, but in real-life many patients receive immediate surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT). Although histologic subtypes may have different response to CT, no study has explored the influence of histotype on the efficacy of perioperative CT (pCT) or aCT. Materials and methods: The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of clinicopathological features and histology (intestinal or diffuse) on survival according to strategy (pCT vs. aCT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Results: Out of 203 patients affected by LAGC, 83 received pCT and 120 aCT. At multivariate, histology and LVI in pCT cohort and positive resection margin in the aCT influenced both OS and EFS. No difference in EFS and OS was observed in relation to strategy. However, in the intestinal-type of pCT cohort survival outcomes were significantly higher compared to the aCT cohort, whereas in the diffuse-type were significantly worse in patients receiving pCT compared to those receiving aCT. Conclusions: Although retrospective and small-sized, this study suggests that the benefit of pCT might be limited to the intestinal-type. This hypothesis needs to be confirmed in prospective series.

Background and objectives The aim of this study was to determine whether the administration of neoadjuvant therapy (NAD) affects the incidence, timing, and pattern of recurrence in patients treated by curative gastrectomy. Methods Sixty-nine patients undergoing NAD and R0 gastrectomy were compared with 198 patients undergoing upfront surgery using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. Disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) analyses were conducted with a log-rank test and Cox regression. Risk factors for recurrence were assessed by logistic regression. Results Among 69 patients with NAD, 28 (40.6%) experienced recurrence, and signet-ring cell (SRC) carcinoma was the only factor independently associated with recurrence. In the whole sample, NAD did not influence DFS, DSS, rate of recurrence, or PFS. After PSM, the variables associated with DFS were cN1, type of gastrectomy, the presence of SRCs, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion. Variables independently associated with recurrence were cN1, type of gastrectomy, and the presence of SRCs. Conclusions NAD had no impact on DFS, DSS, or the pattern of recurrence in any patients with gastric cancer. To define a better treatment strategy, future studies should focus on subtypes that do not respond to the current neoadjuvant regimens.

Summary Background & aims Nutritional interventions may improve quality of life, morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer (GC) patients. A growing number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated different nutritional strategies - oral nutritional supplements (ONS), enteral nutrition (EN), enteral immunonutrition (EIN), parenteral nutrition (PN) and nutritional counselling - in GC patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the effects of these nutritional interventions on nutritional status of GC patients undergoing gastrectomy and/or chemotherapy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus databases from inception to March 2020, based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Effect sizes were estimated with mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and heterogeneity was assessed by measuring inconsistency (I2) based on chi-squared test. Pooled analyses and quality assessment were performed with Review Manager 5.3. Results A total of 25 RCTs were identified, including ONS (n = 7), EN (n = 6), PN (n = 4), EIN (n = 5) and nutrition counselling (n = 3) interventions. Ten RCTs with 1838 patients were deemed eligible for pooled analyses. Body weight loss was found lower in ONS group versus control group (MD 0.77; 95% CI −0.02–1.56; p = 0.05). PN and EIN studies did not assess body weight, while all nutrition counselling studies did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). Twenty-three out of 25 studies evaluated serum protein levels - albumin (ALB) and/or prealbumin (PA) and/or transferrin (TF). ALB levels did not significantly differ (p > 0.05) in 4 ONS studies. Significant improvements of PA levels from baseline to postoperative day (POD) ≥ 7 were shown in EN compared with PN groups (MD 19.90; 95% CI 10.09–29.70; p 0.05) from baseline to POD ≥ 7. Amino-acid enriched PN showed no significant improvements of ALB, PA and TF levels (p > 0.05) while the effect of omega-3 enriched PN was debated. Only three studies out of 25 evaluated total fat mass and skeletal muscle mass and no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between ONS versus control groups. Conclusions Whereas our meta-analysis showed promising results from ONS and EN interventions the optimal delivery of GC nutritional support and nutritional status assessment are still unclear. Moreover, the majority of studies did not consider muscle mass and strength as nutritional parameters. This review highlights the crucial need to close this research gap, with high-quality, large RCTs, adopting effective nutritional assessment tools to evaluate the appropriateness of nutrition strategies.

Nutritional guidelines suggest specific energy and protein requirements for patients with cancer. However, cancer patients, often malnourished, use self-made or web-based diets to ameliorate the prognosis of their disease. This review aimed to investigate the associations between post-diagnostic diet and prognostic outcomes in cancer patients. A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed and Web of Science databases from inception to 30 October 2019, based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed. A total of 29 prospective studies was identified. Breast (n = 11), colorectal (n = 9), prostate (n = 8) cancers are the most studied. Low- fat diet, healthy quality diet, regular consumption of fiber such as vegetables and high-quality protein intake are beneficial while Western diet (WD) and high consumption of saturated fats could be associated with a higher risk of mortality. Bladder (n = 1), gynecological (n = 1), lung, stomach, and pancreatic cancers still remain almost unexplored. This systematic review suggested that detrimental dietary patterns such as WD should be avoided but none of the food categories (meat, dairy products) should be eliminated in cancer patients’ diet. Further large prospective studies are needed to assess the role of post-diagnostic diet in patients with cancer.

Summary Background & aims Computed tomographic (CT) imaging at third lumbar vertebra (L3), routinely used by oncologists, represents a reliable tool to quantify muscle mass. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of CT scan to define muscle mass as a prognostic marker in gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing gastrectomy and/or chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the secondary outcomes included postoperative length of hospital stay (P-LOS), total and severe complications in GC patients undergoing gastrectomy. Methods Three electronic bibliographic databases — MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - were used to conduct a systematic literature search based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria, until April 2019. The adjusted and unadjusted hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to analyse the dichotomous variables (OS, RFS, total and severe complications) and continuous variables (P-LOS). Random- and fixed effects models were used according to the heterogeneity. Results A total of 5610 GC patients from 20 studies were identified. Low muscle mass at diagnosis was found in 32.7% of GC patients and was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.71–2.38, p Conclusions Low muscle mass, assessed by L3 CT-scan, affects almost 1/3 of GC patients at diagnosis and acts as a negative prognostic marker on many clinical outcomes. Therefore, identifying GC patients with low muscle mass at diagnosis or at follow-up visit should be recommendable. Clinical nutritionists should be part of tumor boards meetings to screen low muscle mass in order to prompt personalized nutritional support.

Recently, retrospective analysis began to shed light on metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) harboring rare BRAF non-V600 mutations, documenting a distinct phenotype and a favorable prognosis. This study aimed to confirm features and prognosis of rare BRAF non-V600 mCRCs compared to BRAF V600E and BRAF wild-type mCRCs treated at two Italian Institutions. Overall, 537 cases were retrospectively evaluated: 221 RAS/BRAF wild-type, 261 RAS mutated, 46 BRAF V600E and 9 BRAF non-V600. Compared to BRAF V600E mCRC, BRAF non-V600 mCRC were more frequently left-sided, had a lower tumor burden and displayed a lower grade and an MMR proficient/MSS status. In addition, non-V600 mCRC patients underwent more frequently to resection of metastases with radical intent. Median overall survival (mOS) was significantly longer in the non-V600 compared to the V600E group. At multivariate analysis, only age &lt, 65 years and ECOG PS 0 were identified as independent predictors of better OS. BRAF V600E mCRCs showed a statistically significant worse mOS when compared to BRAF wild-type mCRCs, whereas no significant difference was observed between BRAF non-V600 and BRAF wild-type mCRCs. Our study corroborates available evidence concerning incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of BRAF-mutated mCRCs.

In cancer patients, loss of muscle mass is significantly associated with low tolerability of chemotherapy and poor survival. Despite the great strides in the treatment of cancer, targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) could exacerbate muscle wasting. Over recent years, the impact of skeletal muscle loss during TKI therapy on clinical outcomes has been in the spotlight. In this review, we focus on the different molecular pathways of TKIs potentially involved in muscle wasting. Then, we report the results of the studies assessing the effects of different TKI therapies—such as sorafenib, regorafenib, sunitinib, and lenvatinib—on muscle mass, and highlight their potential clinical implications. Finally, we discuss an integrative nutritional approach to be adopted during TKI treatment. The assessment of muscle mass from computerized tomography imaging could be helpful in predicting toxicity and prognosis in patients treated with TKI such as sorafenib. Early recognition of low muscle mass and effective personalized nutritional support could prevent or attenuate muscle mass wasting. However, the role of nutrition is still overlooked, and future clinical trials are needed to find the optimal nutritional support to countermeasure muscle mass depletion during TKI therapy.

e15589 Background: R is an emerging field of research based on the extraction of a large amount of F from biomedical images and on computed analysis algorithms of tumour architecture. Few data regarding mCRC are available, in particular no correlation of baseline RF both with m sites and clinical-pathological characteristics was so far investigated. Methods: Baseline chest-abdomen CT scans of mCRC patients (pts) were retrospectively analysed. RF were extracted from Regions of Interest (ROI) delineated on CT scan from each m sites, including primary tumor, when on site. The association of specific F and disease site (liver, lung, nodes, peritoneum and on-site primary tumor) was investigated. Sites similarity was assessed with Principal Component Analysis, an unsupervised learning technique to identify patterns and clusters. Then RFs were tested individually for correlation with clinical-pathological covariates of interest (gender, CEA level, synchronous disease, RAS/BRAF status, mucinous histology, grading, number of m site, primary tumor site). Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used for this purpose (significance level set at 0.05). Results: After RF extraction from the different ROIs, the dataset was composed of 433 observations of 236 variables. Observations referred to the number (N) of pts = 89 and the N of ROIs = 18. RF classes were divided in statistical F (grey-level histogram) (N of F = 10); morphological F (N = 14); texture F GLCM (grey level co-occurrence matrix) (N = 100); texture F GLRLM (grey level run length matrix) (N = 66); texture F GLSZM (grey level size zone matrix) (N = 32). Regarding the association of RF with m sites, an homogenous distribution with liver, nodes, peritoneum and primary tumor was detected, while lung metastases showed a different pattern for all the RF classes. A significant correlation of specific RF with clinical-pathologic characteristics was shown, in particular with gender, CEA level, synchronous disease, mucinous histology, RAS/BRAF status. Conclusions: Despite its retrospective nature and the limited number of pts, this is the first experience demonstrating I) a different pattern of RF for lung m versus an homogeneous RF distribution for the other m sites; and II) a significant association of specific RF with few clinical-pathologic characteristics. Our results, if confirmed in a prospective validation set, may represent an hypothesis generator regarding the different behaviour of lung metastases and a possible R signature able to identify different prognostic subgroups of pts.

4548 Background: The treatment strategy for patients with resectable gastric cancer changed in the last few years with perioperative treatments. FLOT regimen (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) turned out to be feasible and effective, offering significant improvement in survival outcomes. However, the safety profile of triplet therapies for elderly patients deserves a special attention and, consequently, the best treatment strategy for these patients is still debated. Methods: Focusing on the elderly patient population (age ≥65 years), real-world data from patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma (T≥2 and/or N+) enrolled in the observational RealFLOT study were collected. Results: A total of 206 patients with resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma received perioperative FLOT at 15 Italian centers in routine clinical practice, between September 2016 and September 2019. The median age was 63 years (range 36-77) and 43% of patients enrolled (n = 89) were ≥65 years. Among elderly patients, 46 (52%) received FLOT for at least 4 full-dose cycles in the preoperative phase, 82 (92%) underwent surgery, and 56 (62%) started the postoperative phase. The primary end point of the study, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, was similar among patients aged ≥65 and < 65 (6.7% vs 7.7%, respectively). The distribution of pathological stages did not differ according to age (p = 0.473), and disease-free survival (DFS) is unrelated to the age of patients (log-rank 0.57; p = 0.89). The incidence of grade (G) 3-4 adverse events (AEs) was similar in the two age groups (Table) and the 30-day mortality rates after surgery did not differ according to age. Conclusions: FLOT regimen demonstrated to be feasible and safe in elderly patients since no differences were observed in terms of pCR, DFS and safety profile according to age. [Table: see text]

4082 Background: Right- (R) and left-sided (L) mCRCs exhibit different clinical and molecular features. Several retrospective analyses showed that the survival benefit of anti-EGFR-based tx is limited to RAS/BRAF wt L-sided mCRC pts, which a larger effect in the first-line setting. Few data are available concerning the anti-EGFR efficacy according to primary tumor site in third line. Methods: Pts affected by RAS/BRAF wt mCRC treated with third-line anti-EGFR-based tx or R/T were retrospectively collected. The objective of the analysis was to compare tx activity and efficacy according to tumor site. Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were OS and RR. PFS and OS analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. RR was evaluated according to RECIST criteria and it was compared in the two groups using Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was set at p = 0.05 for a bilateral test. Univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS were performed. Results: A total of 76 RAS/BRAF wt mCRC pts, treated with third-line anti-EGFR-based tx or R/T, were enrolled. Of those, 19 (25%) pts had R-sided tumor (9 pts received anti-EGFR tx and 10 pts received R/T) and 57 (75%) pts had L-sided tumor (30 pts received anti-EGFR tx and 27 pts received R/T). As shown in the table, a significant PFS and OS benefit in favor of anti-EGFR tx vs R/T was observed in L-sided pts, while no difference both in PFS and OS was observed in R-sided pts. RR was significantly higher in L-sided pts treated with anti-EGFR vs R/T, no difference was shown in R-sided pts. At the multivariate analysis, tx regimen was indipendently associated with PFS in L-sided pts, but not in R-sided pts. Conclusions: Our study confirmed the results deriving from the retrospective analysis of the phase III study 20020408. Our results demonstrated a different benefit from third-line anti-EGFR tx according to primary tumor site, confirming the role of L-sided tumor in predicting benefit from third-line anti-EGFR vs R/T, while no difference was observed in R-sided tumors. [Table: see text]

300 Background: Perioperative treatments have significantly improved survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer, increasing 5-year overall survival from 23% with surgery alone to 45% with FLOT (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel). Pathological regression is a prognostic marker of better survival. Methods: In this observational, retro- and prospective study we collected data from patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma treated, as clinical practice, with perioperative FLOT. All patients had clinical T2 or higher and/or nodal involvement, according to FLOT4-AIO trial. Results: A total of 206 patients received perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT at 15 Italian centres, between September 2016 and September 2019. Overall, 186 (90.3%) patients completed the preoperative phase, 190 (92%) underwent surgery, and 142 (68.9%) started the postoperative phase. Among patients who started the postoperative phase, 105 (51.0%) received FLOT, while 37 (18%) received less intensive regimens (e.g. FOLFOX or De Gramont), depending on performance status after surgery or toxicity in the preoperative phase. Pathological complete response (pCR) was obtained in 7.3% of cases. In the preoperative phase, grade (G) 3-4 hematological and gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) were reported in 42 (20.4%) and 13 (6.3%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: These real data confirmed the feasibility of perioperative FLOT in a less-selected population, representative of the clinical practice. The pCR rate was lower than in the FLOT4-AIO trial. The survival outcomes, potential predictive or prognostic factors and comprehensive safety data will be included in the final analysis. [Table: see text]

The number of elderly patients diagnosed with rectal cancer (RC) is very high and, considering colon and rectal cancer (CRC), is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the elderly [1]. However, the number of older patients enrolled in clinical trials is underrepresented and in most cases elderly population undertreated. Although, with the introduction of new treatments and better diagnostic techniques and surgical procedures, a better outcome is achievable today also in elderly patients diagnosed with resectable or metastatic rectal cancer, overall survival rate remains low. This is probably due to less aggressive diagnostic evaluation; less intensive chemotherapy, including anticipatory drug dose reduction or empiric schedule alteration; less aggressive surgery; and, finally yet importantly, also social conditions and limited access to healthcare system of elderly population with cancer.

3558 Background: Target therapies and new surgical strategies deeply modify the history of CCLM patients (pts). Several prognostic scoring systems have been developed but no one is able to identify pts who should be excluded from a potentially useless surgery. Currently research is committed in identifying early biomarkers able to discern pts who could benefit from an aggressive approach. Exosomes are arising as promising biomarkers in cancer. The aim of this pivotal study was to analyze the association among exosome levels during CCLM-pts treatment, clinical outcomes and the KRAS status. Methods: We enrolled 22 pts with CCLM candidate to preoperative chemotherapy (pCT) and subsequent liver surgery. A blood sample was collected before pCT, after surgery, monthly during follow-up and at progression (PD). Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifugation and characterized by standard methods. Exosomes concentration was assessed by Bradford assay. We adopted ddPCR™ KRAS G12/G13 Screening Kit to evaluate the KRAS status in exosomal DNA (e-DNA). Results: 22 CCLM pts received pCT and underwent liver surgery: 5 major hepatectomies and 17 multiple liver resections. Changes in exosomes plasma levels were found to correlate with each treatment step,resulting reduced after pCT and surgery and increased at PD, respectively (p = 0.0026). Pts with higher baseline exosome levels experimented shorter PFS than those with lower levels (p = 0.0033 HR 0.2). No association was found between exosome levels after liver surgery and disease free interval nor overall survival. KRAS status on e-DNA was evaluated on 10 pts in baseline, in pCT, after surgery, and in PD samples. In 8 out of 10 pts e-DNA displayed the same mutational status than the one detected on tumor DNA. Changes in e-DNA KRAS copies were found statistically significant in pCT vs surgery and pCT vs PD (p = 0.039; p = 0.04). Conclusions: Our study suggests a prognostic role of exosome levels in CCLM pts. Moreover, we showed that KRAS mutational status could be monitored during the post-surgery follow up by analyzing e-DNA. Overall, our data confirm the potential role of exosomes in liquid biopsy tool to monitor molecular changes during the treatment of CCLM pts.

3556 Background: The optimal treatment for mCRC beyond 2nd line is still questioned. Recently, REG and TAS-102 showed to improve survival compared to BSC. While in real-world practice CTr/r is often considered in this setting, supporting evidences are limited. In absence of studies comparing all these strategies, we aimed to compare the prognostic performance of CTr/r, REG and TAS-102 in mCRC treated beyond 2nd line. Methods: mCRC pts progressing after at least 2 lines of CT, treated with CTr/r, REG or TAS-102 between Jan-10 and Jan-19 were considered eligible. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints were PFS and RR. Cox’s proportional hazard models for survivals were estimated. A propensity score (PS) adjustment for baseline characteristics was further accomplished for survival analysis. Results: The clinical data of 341 pts (CTr/r 133, REG 150, TAS-102 58) were retrospectively collected. At multivariate analysis type of treatment, ECOG PS, number of metastatic sites and treatment line independently correlated with OS ( p < .001, p .001, p < .001 and p .029, respectively). The mOS was 18.5 (95% CI, 14.3–22.7), 6 (95% CI, 5.6–9.5) and 7.6 months (95%CI, 5.6–9.5), for CTr/r, REG and TAS-102 group, respectively (log-rank p < .0001). mOS was significantly longer for pts receiving CTr/r than for those treated with REG/TAS-102 (15.8 vs 7.1 months; adjusted HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.44-2.66; p < .0001) at the PS analysis, adjusted for ECOG PS, number of metastatic sites and treatment line; 2-yrs OS was 34% and 11.6% for CTr/r and REG/TAS-102, respectively. PFS was significantly longer for pts receiving CTr/r than for those treated with REG/TAS-102 (5.5 vs 3.9 months; HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.91; p .006) at the PS analysis. Accordingly, RR was higher in pts receiving CTr/r compared to REG/TAS-102 (29.0 vs 1.5%; Chi-square p < .00001). Conclusions: Our analysis, although underpowered, generates the hypothesis of a superiority of CTr/r in comparison to REG or TAS-102, in both efficacy and activity. Given the retrospective nature of our analysis, and the potential role of selection bias in treatment assignment, a prospective validation is mandatory.

e15038 Background: Right- (R) and left-sided (L) mCRCs exhibit different clinical and molecular features. Several retrospective analyses showed that the survival benefit of anti-EGFR-based tx is limited to RAS/BRAF wt L-sided mCRC pts, with a larger effect in the first-line setting. Few data are available concerning the anti-EGFR efficacy according to TL in 2nd and following lines. Methods: Pts affected by RAS/BRAF wt mCRC treated at our Institution with anti-EGFR-based tx in 2nd and following lines were retrospectively collected. The objective of the analysis was to compare tx activity and efficacy according to TL. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). Results: A total of 47 RAS/BRAF wt mCRC pts treated with an anti-EGFR-based tx in 2nd and following lines were identified. Of those, 32 (68%) were L-sided and 15 (32%) R-sided, respectively. Pts (age, gender, PS ECOG) and tumor (number of metastatic sites) characteristics and number of tx lines were well balanced between the two 21 pts received anti-EGFR alone, 26 pts anti-EGFR plus CT. mOS was 22.3 in L-sided and 7.3 months in R-sided group (HR 2.3, 95%CI 1.02-5.14, p = 0.04). At multivariate analysis TL and PS ECOG independently correlated with OS ( p = 0.02 and p =0.0089). mPFS was 8.4 and 3.9 months in pts with L-sided and R-sided tumor, respectively (HR 1.3; 95%CI 0.64-2.80, p =0.43). RR was higher in L-sided compared to R-sided tumor (37.5 vs 13.3) ( p= 0.09). Conclusions: Our analysis, although limited by the small sample and by its retrospective nature, indicates a better OS in L-sided compared to R-sided tumors treated with anti-EGFR-based tx in 2nd and following lines. A prospective validation is warranted.

e15039 Background: Unlike liver metastases surgery, the resection of colorectal cancer lung metastasis (CCLM) is not standardized and data are still poor. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the management of CCLM at our Centre. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients (pts) with CCLM treated at our Institution from Jan-2007 to Jan-2017. Aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of clinical and pathological features with survival outcomes (DFS and OS). Differences were compared with the use of log-rank test and parameters considered statistically significant ( p value < 0.5) at univariate were compared at multivariate analysis. Results: 141 pts were included in the analysis. 87 pts received a preoperative chemotherapy (pCT) and 54 an adjuvant (a)CT. In the whole population median DFS (mDFS) was 24 m (20-24) and median OS (mOS) 54 m (46-82), while 21 m (20-34) and 65 m (45-108) for pts undergoing pCT and 15 m (20-28) and 53 m (38 – 76) for those receiving aCT respectively, without statistically significant differences (p=0.4). Age, gender, PS, disease-free interval (DFI) (> or 2), metastasis location (uni vs bilateral) and liver resection were evaluated at univariate and multivariate analysis. DFS was correlated with DFI > 24m (p=0.02), timing (p=0.03), number (p

3554 Background: Recently, 3 classes of BRAF MTs have been described. BRAF V600 MTs, which identify mCRC with poor prognosis and not benefitting from anti-EGFR drugs, belong to class 1. Class 2 and 3 include BRAF non-V600 MTs, which occur in about 1-2% mCRC and are associated to favourable prognosis and specific clinicopathologic features. Class 2 and 3 differ in kinase activity and sensitivity to anti-EGFR: class 2 are activated and RAS-independent MTs; class 3 are kinase-dead and sensitive to inhibition of This study aims to retrospectively evaluate features and prognostic role of rare BRAF non-V600 compared to BRAF V600E MTs in mCRC pts treated at 2 Italian Institutions. Methods: mCRC pts harboring BRAF MTs, assessed by means of NGS, pyrosequencing or RT-PCR, treated between Jan-13 and Dec-18 at 2 Italian Institutions, were retrospectively analyzed. Clinico-pathological and treatment characteristics and survival data were collected. Results: 55 pts bearing BRAF MTs were identified. Of those, 46 (84%) harbored a V600E and 9 (16%) a non-V600 MT. Within the non-V600 group, 3 MTs (K601E, G469A, G469R) belonged to class 2, while 5 MTs (G466E, G466A, 2 D594G, D594N), belonged to class 3. One pt harboured a T599I MT, whose kinase activity is unknown. Compared to BRAF V600E mCRC, BRAF non-V600 mCRC were more frequently left-sided ( p .017) and displayed a lower grade ( p .045). In addition, non-V600 mCRC pts had a lower tumor burden (involving one metastatic site) ( p .026) and underwent more frequently to resection of metastases with radical intent (77.7 vs 18%; p .000175). mOS was significantly longer in the non-V600 compared to the V600E group (61.3 vs 20.4 m; HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.18-0.93; p .05). No difference in activity and efficacy of anti-EGFR agents was observed between class 2 and 3. Conclusions: Despite the small size of our retrospective analysis, the results were consistent with previous evidences. BRAF non-V600 MTs identified a subgroup of mCRC, differing both in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis from BRAF V600 mCRC. Interestingly, the better prognostic features allowed more frequently radical resection of metastases, positively impacting on survival.

44 Background: The emerging role of immunotherapy (IT) in cancer treatments has increased the research about tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) function and their TME regulation. Nowadays ongoing trial are showing conflicting preliminary data about the efficacy of IT in advanced gastric cancer (GC). Therefore, we performed this exploratory analysis to evaluate the correlation between histology, TILs density (reported as CD4/CD8 tissue ratio), neutrophil-lymphocytes ratio (NLR) and response outcome in GC patients who underwent cytotoxic neoadjuvant treatment (NAD). Methods: CD4+ and CD8+ expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in pre-NAD biopsies. NLR was calculated on baseline complete blood count. A cut-off value to define low or high NLR has been selected on 3.0, based on literature data. X2 test was used to explore the correlation between histology, CD4/CD8 ratio, NLR and response. Results: We analyzed 10 diffuse and 10 intestinal GC histotypes. In the intestinal-type CD4/CD8 ratio was lower (ratio range 1:15 - 1:20) with a predominant count of CD8+ suggesting a hot and inflamed TME compared to the diffuse cohort (ratio range 1:3 -1:5) where both CD8+ and CD4+ density was lower (p=0.03). Baseline NLR was calculated in 18 out of 20 pts. All intestinal GCs showed a low NLR (

97 Background: Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for LAGC. Evidences suggest that perioperative CT (pCT) plus surgery is superior to surgery alone, whereas studies on adjuvant CT (aCT) are controversial. Guidelines recommend a pCT approach in pts with stage II/III, nevertheless in real-life many pts receive immediate surgery followed by aCT. Histology influences both survival and pathological response with worse prognosis among diffuse LAGC. No trial has compared pCT and aCT or investigated the impact of histology on the outcome of these different approaches. We hypothesized that histology may predict a different benefit from CT administered in the two settings, allowing to define the optimal strategy. We performed a study comparing the two approaches according to histology. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed pts with stage II/III LAGCs treated at our Institution between Jan-09 and Jan-17. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of histology (intestinal and diffuse) on survival according to strategy approach (pCT vs aCT). Primary endpoints were DFS and OS. Results: 81 pts had diffuse LAGC (29 received pCT, 52 aCT) and 60 had intestinal LAGC (32 received pCT, 29 aCT). In the intestinal cohort both DFS and OS were significantly higher in pts treated with pCT compared to aCT (DFS: HR 0.3, p = 0.02; OS: HR 0.3, p = 0.03). On the contrary in the diffuse cohort both DFS and OS were significantly lower in pts receiving pCT compared to those receiving aCT (DFS: HR 2.4, p = 0.0014; OS: HR 2.6, p = 0.0012). Conclusions: Our study, although retrospective and small-sized, shows that the survival benefit of pCT is limited to intestinal LAGC, whereas in diffuse LAGC the administration of pCT appears detrimental. Indeed, diffuse LAGC is known to be chemoresistant and pCT might delay surgery allowing metastasization. Despite the arising of recent molecular classification, still far from modifying clinical practice, histotype might represent an easy factor to discriminate pts benefitting from pCT (intestinal) to those in whom upfront surgery might be recommended (diffuse). Our hypothesis needs to be confirmed in prospective trials.

671 Background: Hepatic resection is the gold standard treatment for pts with liver-limited mCRC with 5- and 10-yrs survival rates reaching up to 60% and 20%. Although multidisciplinary team (MDT) management might ensure a more accurate assessment of pts and a faster referral to surgeons, reports discussing the impact of MDTs on survival are controversial and to date there are no strong evidences supporting routinely MDT discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of MDT management in pts with liver-limited mCRC in our single institution experience. Methods: Clinical records of pts with liver-limited mCRC who underwent radical surgery at Fondazione Policlinico “A. Gemelli” - IRCCS from Jan-2006 to Dec-2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The objective of the analysis was to compare survivals of pts managed within our MDT (MDT cohort) to those of pts referred to surgery from other hospitals without MDT discussion (non-MDT cohort). Primary endpoints were DFS and OS. Differences in baseline characteristics and in post-operative morbidity were evaluated. Results: Of the 619 pts analyzed, 230 were included in the MDT cohort and 389 in the non-MDT cohort. No significant difference between the two groups was found in terms of DFS (12vs11 m; p 0.09) and OS (55vs51 m; p 0.68). Concerning baseline characteristics, in the MDT cohort compared to non-MDT cohort there was a statistically higher number of median metastases (4.5vs2.6; p < 0.0001) and a higher rate of synchronous metastases (61.7vs39.3%; p < 0.001). Despite pre-operative CT rate was higher in the MDT group (75.8vs70.7%), the median duration of CT before surgery was significantly lower in MDT pts (7 vs 8 cycle; p < 0.001). Moreover, post-operative morbidity was significantly lower in the MDT cohort (6.2vs19.2%; p < 0.00001). Conclusions: Our study does not demonstrate a survival benefit from MDT management of pts with liver limited mCRC. However, the analysis shows that MDT assessment allows to consider eligible for surgery pts with a more advanced disease. Moreover, MDT discussion seems to reduce the median duration of pre-operative CT with a consequent lower rate of post-operative morbidities. Our data warrant prospective validation.

Although antiangiogenic treatments have produced milestone advances in the treatment of several diseases, and have significantly extended the median survival of cancer patients, these agents share some weaknesses, including a limited impact on the overall cure rate, a fleeting effect because of redundant pathways or early appearance of resistance mechanisms, and the lack of predictive factors for treatment selection. Recent data suggest that antibodies targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor axis exert their activity through the inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 phosphorylation, which has a pivotal role in the neoangiogenic process. Ramucirumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody specifically directed against the extracellular domain of the receptor, administered intravenously every 2 or 3 weeks, is emerging as a novel antiangiogenic opportunity. Starting with preclinical data and early clinical results, this concise review focuses on the development of the novel compound across multiple cancers (including gastrointestinal malignancies, breast cancer, lung carcinoma, and genitourinary tumors), and presents available data from randomized phase II and phase III trials. REGARD was the first phase III study to report on the efficacy of single-agent ramucirumab in patients with advanced cancer. Many other ongoing phase III trials are testing the efficacy of this interesting antiangiogenic compound as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy in different cancer types.

Survival with long-term follow-up following liver resection for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) downsized by chemotherapy has rarely been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the chance of cure following liver resection for initially unresectable CRLM. Between January 2000 and December 2009, 61 patients underwent hepatectomy for unresectable liver-only CRLM downsized after chemotherapy. Cure was defined as a recurrence-free interval of at least 5 years after primary hepatectomy. Resectability of CRLM was achieved after a mean number of 11 courses, and 42.6 % of patients underwent liver resection after a parts per thousand yen10 courses. Postoperative mortality was nil, and morbidity rate was 19.7 %. The 5- and 10-year actuarial overall survival rates were 42.6 and 16.0 %. Of 30 patients with a follow-up a parts per thousand yen5 years, 11 were alive, yielding a 5-year actual overall survival rate of 36.7 %, and 7 (23.3 %) were considered cured because they are alive without recurrence. On multivariate analysis, response to chemotherapy was the only independent predictor of both overall and disease-free survival. Cure can be achieved in about 23 % of patients resected for initially unresectable CRLM downsized by chemotherapy. Liver resection can be safely performed in selected patients even after multiple courses of chemotherapy.

Globally, gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death. The majority of gastric cancer patients will have at presentation or will ultimately develop overt metastatic disease. Meta-analysis has demonstrated not only that systemic chemotherapy can improve survival in patients with advanced disease but also that the best survival results in earlier randomized studies have been achieved with three-drug regimens containing a fluoropyrimidine, an anthracycline, and cisplatin. Although there has been little progress historically in improving median overall survival times beyond the 9-month plateau achievable with the standard epirubicin–cisplatin–infusional 5-fluoropyrimidine (ECF) combination, the availability of newer cytotoxic anticancer agents has provided some measure of optimism that current outcomes can be improved. A number of new triplet and doublet combinations incorporating docetaxel, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, capecitabine, and S-1 have been explored in randomized trials. Although some combinations, such as epirubicin–oxaliplatin–capecitabine, have been shown to be as effective as (or perhaps more effective than) ECF, and although promising early data have been derived for S-1 in combination with cisplatin, a lack of studies in which direct comparisons have been made currently hinders the identification of the optimal regimen in this setting. One factor that might contribute to the lack of clear progress is the absence of consensus on the utility of second-line cytotoxic treatments. It can therefore be concluded that, although there is no first-line regimen that is clearly the most appropriate platform for the investigation of biological agents, there are a number of combinations that have been shown to be effective and therefore good candidates.