Search

Predictive testing for BRCA1 or BRCA2 allows at-risk individuals to engage with appropriate screening and treatment services if a pathogenic mutation is identified. Previous studies have shown uptake of predictive testing to most commonly range between 20% and 40% (Table 2). This represents a missed cancer prevention opportunity. Possible explanations for this low uptake include lack of disclosure of at-risk status to relatives, lack of awareness of cancer genetics services, or patient preference. The goal of the current study was to investigate the uptake of BRCA1 or BRCA2 predictive testing in an Irish population.We performed a multicentre, retrospective analysis of 63 pedigrees from two Irish tertiary referral hospitals over a five-year period (2012-2017). Family pedigrees were reviewed to identify at-risk family members eligible for predictive BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation testing as per international guidelines, and testing rates were determined.A total of 1048 eligible individuals were identified, 318 (30.4%) proceeded to BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline testing including [215 (37.5%) females and 99 males (21.5%)]. Women were significantly more likely to test than men (T = 3.7, p .0002). Uptake of testing was significant higher amongst first-degree relatives 45% (150/323) compared to 20% (50/258) amongst second degree relatives, and 10 % (33/317) amongst more distant relatives (F = 25.32, p0.00001).Uptake of BRCA1 OR BRCA2 mutation testing in Ireland is suboptimal, particularly amongst Irish males and distant relatives. Further research is needed to identify strategies which may improve uptake within current legal and ethical frameworks.

In the Republic of Ireland (ROI), BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing has been traditionally undertaken in eligible individuals, after pre-test counselling by a Clinical Geneticist/Genetic Counsellor. Clinical Genetics services in ROI are poorly resourced, with routine waiting times for appointments at the time of this pilot often extending beyond a year. The consequent prolonged waiting times are unacceptable where therapeutic decision-making depends on the patient's BRCA status. "Mainstreaming" BRCA1/BRCA2 testing through routine oncology/surgical clinics has been implemented successfully in other centres in the UK and internationally. We aimed to pilot this pathway in three Irish tertiary centres. A service evaluation project was undertaken over a 6-month period between January and July 2017. Eligible patients, fulfilling pathology and age-based inclusion criteria defined by TGL clinical, were identified, and offered constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 testing after pre-test counselling by treating clinicians. Tests were undertaken by TGL Clinical. Results were returned to clinicians by secure email. Onward referrals of patients with uncertain/pathogenic results, or suspicious family histories, to Clinical Genetics were made by the treating team. Surveys assessing patient and clinician satisfaction were sent to participating clinicians and a sample of participating patients. Data was collected with respect to diagnostic yield, turnaround time, onward referral rates, and patient and clinician feedback. A total of 101 patients underwent diagnostic germline BRCA1/BRCA2 tests through this pathway. Pathogenic variants were identified in 12 patients (12%). All patients in whom variants were identified were appropriately referred to Clinical Genetics. At least 12 additional patients with uninformative BRCA1/BRCA2 tests were also referred for formal assessment by Clinical Geneticist or Genetic Counsellor. Issues were noted in terms of time pressures and communication of results to patients. Results from a representative sample of participants completing the satisfaction survey indicated that the pathway was acceptable to patients and clinicians. Mainstreaming of constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 testing guided by age- and pathology-based criteria is potentially feasible for patients with breast cancer as well as patients with ovarian cancer in Ireland.

Reflex immunohistochemistry (rIHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression can be used as a screening tool to detect Lynch Syndrome (LS). Increasingly the mismatch repair‐deficient (dMMR) phenotype has therapeutic implications. We investigated the pattern and consequence of testing for dMMR in three Irish Cancer Centres (CCs). CRC databases were analyzed from January 2005–December 2013. CC1 performs IHC upon physician request, CC2 implemented rIHC in November 2008, and CC3 has been performing rIHC since 2004. The number of eligible patients referred to clinical genetic services (CGS), and the number of LS patients per center was determined. 3906 patients were included over a 9‐year period. dMMR CRCs were found in 32/153 (21%) of patients at CC1 and 55/536 (10%) at CC2, accounting for 3% and 5% of the CRC population, respectively. At CC3, 182/1737 patients (10%) had dMMR CRCs (P

Pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased lifetime risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and more recently have been associated with increased risk of biliary tract cancers (BTC). This study assessed the prevalence, age and gender distribution of PDAC/BTC cases in families known to carry a BRCA1/2 PV compared to those of the Irish population. A review of all families referred to a national genetics clinic from 09/11/1997 to 01/06/2018 was performed. The BOADICEA algorithm was used to estimate the probability that an untested relative of a known BRCA1/2 PV carrier with PDAC was a carrier. We reviewed 3252 family pedigrees, 1193 contained a proband who underwent testing for BRCA1/2 based on Manchester score ≥ 15. Among 128 BRCA2 PV-positive families, 27 (21%) contained a 1st/2nd/3rd-degree relative with PDAC, while of 116 BRCA1 PV-positive families, 11 (9%) contained a 1st/2nd/3rd-degree relative with PDAC. Within these 38 families, 25 patients with PDAC had ≥ 50% likelihood of being a BRCA1/2 PV carrier. This cohort had a median age at diagnosis of 55 years (range 33–75), with a mean (55 years) lower than 8364 patients with PDAC identified through the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (71 years, p

High-risk breast cancer screening for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with clinical breast exam, mammography and MRI has reported sensitivity of 100 %, but BRCA1/2 mutation carriers still present with interval cancers. We investigated the presentation and screening patterns of an Irish cohort of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer were identified in this retrospective cohort study. Records were reviewed for BRCA1/2 mutation status, demographics, screening regimen, screening modality, stage and histology at diagnosis. Fifty-three cases of breast cancer were diagnosed between 1968 and 2010 among 60 Irish hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) families. In 50 of 53 women, the diagnosis of breast cancer predated the identification of BRCA1/2 mutations. Breast cancer detection method was identified in 47 % of patients (n = 25): 80 % (n = 20) by clinical breast exam (CBE), 12 % by mammography (n = 3), 8 % by MRI (n = 2). Fourteen women (26 %) developed a second breast cancer. Ten of these patients (71 %) were involved in regular screening; 50 % were detected by screening mammography, 20 % by MRI and 30 % by CBE alone. Six patients (43 %) had a change in morphology from first to second breast cancers. There was no change in hormone receptor status between first and second breast cancers. In this cohort of Irish BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, compliance with screening was inconsistent. There was a 30 % incidence of interval cancers occurring in women in high-risk screening. Preventive surgery may be a more effective risk reduction strategy for certain high-risk women.

Assessment of clinical skills is a critical element of undergraduate medical education. We compare a traditional approach to procedural skills assessment – the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) with the Integrated Performance Procedural Instrument (IPPI). In both approaches, students work through ‘stations’ or ‘scenarios’ undertaking defined tasks. In the IPPI, all tasks are contextualised, requiring students to integrate technical, communication and other professional skills. The aim of this study was to explore students’ responses to these two assessments. Third‐year medical students participated in formative OSCE and IPPI sessions on consecutive days. Although performance data were collected in both assessments, quantitative data are not presented here. Group interviews with students were conducted by independent researchers. Data were analysed thematically. The OSCE and the IPPI were both valued, but for different reasons. Preference for the OSCE reflected the format of the summative as...

e13530Background: The diagnosis of a BRCA1/2 mutation has significant implications for both probands and their families, with both screening and prophylactic surgical interventions available. Under...

The use of mobile robotic units for teleconsultation means that the clinician's cognitive and attention skills are divided between tele-operation of the robotic unit and the consultation with the patient. We developed a communication guide based on evidence-based patient-centred interviewing and telephone conferencing skills. The communication guide was tested by five trainee surgeons in a pre- and post-test design. Each surgeon completed three simulated patient consultations. After reading the communication guide, trainees completed three further consultations. The trainees rated authenticity, degree of difficulty, familiarity of clinical presentation and confidence in using telepresence to manage the consultations. Their mean scores were 3.0–4.6, 2.2–4.0, 4.4–4.8 and 3.2–4.2 respectively (maximum possible score 5). The simulated patients rated their satisfaction with communication. Their ratings suggested that there were areas for communication skills development with mean scores ranging from 8.2 to 11.4 (maximum possible score = 15). Although we do not yet know enough about communicating with real patients using mobile robotic units, the communication guide appeared to be useful in our simulated interactions.

Little information is available regarding the management of BRCA-related breast cancer in Ireland. A cancer genetics programme was initiated in 1992 at our institution to provide counselling and expert management for those with cancers resulting from inherited predisposition. We examined a cohort of BRCA mutation-carriers treated at a single institution over 16 years. A total of 107 women from 57 families were found to be carriers of mutations in BRCA1/2. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was the most common prophylactic surgery performed. Overall survival between BRCA-related and sporadic breast cancer was equivalent. This is the first publication on surgical management of BRCA-mutation carriers in Ireland. It is imperative that those considered likely to harbour a mutation are referred early to a dedicated clinic so that appropriate counselling, testing and subsequent management to reduce the risk of dying from cancer can be undertaken.

e12517 Background: Only a small percentage of the heritability of breast cancer is explained by high penetrance genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53. Moderately penetrant genes, such as PALB2 and C...

BACKGROUND The assessment of clinical procedural skills has traditionally focused on technical elements alone. However, in real practice, clinicians are expected to be able to integrate technical with communication and other professional skills. We describe an integrated procedural performance instrument (IPPI), where clinicians are assessed on 12 clinical procedures in a simulated clinical setting which combines simulated patients (SPs) with inanimate models or items of medical equipment. Candidates are observed remotely by assessors whose data are fed back to the clinician within 24 hours of the assessment. This paper describes the feasibility of IPPI. RESULTS A full-scale IPPI and 2 pilot studies with trainee and qualified health care professionals has yielded an extensive data set including 585 scenario evaluations from candidates, 60 from clinical assessors and 31 from simulated patients (SPs). Interview and questionnaire data showed that for the majority of candidates IPPI provided a powerful and valuable learning experience. Realism was rated highly. Remote and real-time assessment worked effectively, although for some procedures limited camera resolution affected observation of fine details. DISCUSSION IPPI offers an innovative approach to assessing clinical procedural skills. Although resource-intensive, it has the potential to provide insight into individual's performance over a spectrum of clinical scenarios and at no risk to the safety of patients. Additional benefits of IPPI include assessment in real time from experts (allowing remote rating by external examiners) as well as provision of feedback from simulated patients.

525 Background: Lynch Syndrome (LS) accounts for approximately 3% of all colorectal cancers (CRC) and is caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Increasing literature supports routine screening for LS using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect loss of MMR protein expression on tumour samples. We evaluated genetic clinic referrals and consequent LS diagnoses at our institution pre and post the adoption of universal screening. Methods: Reflex immunohistochemistry (rIHC) on all colorectal adenocarcinomas was implemented in November 2008. Prior to this IHC was performed at the pathologist’s discretion or upon request. Tumour specimens reviewed from November 2004 to October 2008 (pre rIHC) and from November 2008 to October 2012 (post rIHC) were evaluated and patients with evidence of MMR deficiency (MMR-D) were identified. The number of genetic referrals and number of patients with confirmed LS were determined. Results: During an 8-year period, 1,131 pathology specimens were reviewed in 1,103 patients (Table). Completion of IHC increased from 19% to 75% post implementation of rIHC. Ninety-two percent of incomplete samples in the post rIHC period (133/145) had insufficient tumour material for analysis. In patients with available IHC, 18/96 (20%) in the pre rIHC era were MMR-D of which 44% were referred to genetics, resulting in the diagnosis of LS in 4 patients. In the post rIHC era 30/429 (7%) of patients had evidence of MMR-D of which 20% were referred for genetic testing resulting in the detection of 3 LS patients. Conclusions: Universal testing for MMR protein expression is difficult to achieve, and does not necessarily result in increased genetic testing or Lynch Syndrome diagnosis. Systematic work-up of test results is essential once mismatch repair evaluation is initiated. [Table: see text]

1560 Background: Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy (PSO) is recommended at 35-40 years for BRCA1 mutations carriers and 40-45 years for BRCA2 mutation carrier. The optimal timing of PSO is less ce...

425 Background: IHC for mismatch repair proteins and MSI are commonly used to direct genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome. Abnormal results in the setting of a positive family history often lead to genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. The often cumbersome process of completing IHC/MSI requires obtaining stored tissue +/- blood from a family member affected with cancer. Upfront genetic testing is not favoured due to concerns about identifying variants of uncertain significance. We performed a review of Lynch syndrome work-up in Ireland, and propose a model that is the reverse of the current international standard, and may expedite and simplify work up of these families. Methods: Data was ascertained from three cancer genetics services in Dublin and included the following variables: date of birth, date of request and reporting results for IHC, MSI and genetic tests. Time intervals were determined for LS work-up for all patients who had the process initiated in these 3 centres. Results: Probands from 50 families referred for LS work-up were included.The median time from date of IHC request to date of IHC report (total of 50 patients) was 4 weeks (range: 4 days to 36 weeks). The median time between date of IHC request to date of MSI report (n = 32 patients) was 20 weeks (range: 4 to 56 weeks). The median time from date of genetic test request to date of result (n = 9 patients) was 9 weeks (range: 2 to 26 weeks). The median time for completion of all 3 tests in one individual (n=3 patients) was 14 weeks (range: 10 to 60 weeks). Conclusions: The diagnostic pathway for Lynch syndrome is cumbersome and often lengthy. Appropriate upfront multiplex genetic testing would expedite the identification of mismatch repair gene mutation carriers. IHC/MSI testing could be used to characterise variants of uncertain significance.

1543 Background: Breast cancer is not among the recognised malignant manifestations of Lynch Syndrome which include colorectal, endometrial, gastric, ovarian and upper urinary tract tumours. In this study we report the prevalence of breast cancer in Irish Lynch Syndrome families and determine immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of mismatch repair proteins (MMR) in available breast cancer tissue. Methods: Breast cancer prevalence was determined among Lynch Syndrome kindreds from two institutions in Ireland. One kindred was omitted due to a biallelic MMR and BRCA1 mutation.The clinicopathological data that was collected on breast cancer cases included age of onset, morphology, and hormone receptor status, and a genotype phenotype correlation was investigated. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 on all available breast cancer tissue from affected individuals. Results: The distribution of MMR mutations seen in sixteen pedigrees were as follows; MLH1 (n=5), MSH2 (7), MSH6 (3), PMS2 (1). Sixty cases of colorectal cancer and 14 cases of endometrial cancer were seen. Seven breast cancers (5 invasive ductal and 2 invasive lobular cancers) and 1 case of ductal carcinoma in situ were reported in 7 pedigrees. This compared with 4 cases of prostate cancer. Of the 7 LS kindreds containing breast cancer, 6 MSH2 mutations and 1 MSH6 mutations were identified. Median age of breast cancer diagnosis was 49 years (range 38-57). Hormone receptor status is available on 3 breast cancer cases at time of abstract submission; all were ER positive and HER 2 negative. All cases had grade 2 or 3 tumours. 5 samples were available for IHC evaluation. 3 out of 5 cases showed loss of MMR expression, all showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6 expression. One of the two cases with normal IHC expression in breast tissue belonged to a kindred where 3 siblings with colorectal cancer and documented deleterious mutations demonstrated no IHC loss. Conclusions: Breast cancer occurred at an early age and was more common than prostate cancer in Irish Lynch Syndrome pedigrees. All identified breast cancer were in kindreds with MSH2 or MSH6 mutations. Enhanced breast cancer screening may be warranted in certain Lynch Syndrome kindreds.

59 Background: High-risk breast cancer screening for BRCA1/2 mutations carriers with clinical breast exam, mammography and MRI have sensitivities approaching 100%. Even with intensive screening BRCA mutation carriers can present with self-detected interval cancers. We investigate screening practices and presentation among a cohort of Irish BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Methods: Females with breast cancer belonging to kindreds now known to harbour BRCA1/2 mutations were retrospectively identified. Records were reviewed for BRCA mutation, demographics, breast cancer diagnosis, stage, histology and screening. We assessed screening modalities and whether breast cancers were diagnosed at screening or as interval cancers. Results: 53 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed from 1968-2010 among 53 Irish hereditary breast ovarian cancer kindreds. BRCA mutation status was unknown at time of diagnosis but subsequently confirmed. Detection method was identified in 50% of patients: 84% by clinical breast exam (CBE), 4% mammography, 4% MRI and 8% by a combination of CBE and mammography. Fifteen women (28%) developed second breast cancer; 9(60%) were undergoing screening, 2 were not and 27% were unknown. 22% were detected by CBE alone; 34% mammography; 22% a combination of mammography and CBE and 22% by MRI. In 41%, histology changed between first and second diagnosis. Two women developed a third breast cancer. In one, her second was an interval cancer despite being in a screening programme. Her third was radiologically detected. Conclusions: In this cohort of Irish BRCA1/2 mutation carriers almost 25% of second breast cancers were not detected by screening. 4% of cases were phenocopies and in 41% histology changed between first and second diagnosis. [Table: see text]