Search

Traits often do not evolve in isolation or vary independently of other traits. Instead, they can be affected by covariation, both within and across species. However, the importance of within-species trait covariation and, critically, the degree to which it varies between species has yet to be thoroughly studied. Brain morphology is a trait of great ecological and behavioral importance, with regions that are hypothesized to vary in size based on behavioral and cognitive demands. Sizes of brain regions have also been shown to covary with each other across various taxa. Here, we test the degree to which covariation in brain region sizes within species has been conserved across 10 teleost fish species. These 10 species span five orders, allowing us to examine how phylogenetic proximity influences similarities in intraspecific trait covariation. Our results showed a trend that similar patterns of brain region size covariation occur in more closely related species. Interestingly, there were certain brain region pairs that showed similar levels of covariation across all species regardless of phylogenetic distance, such as the telencephalon and optic tectum, while others, such as the olfactory bulb and the hypothalamus, varied more independently. Ultimately, the patterns of brain region covariation shown here suggest that evolutionary mechanisms or constraints can act on specific brain regions independently, and that these constraints can change over evolutionary time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rhincodon typus, or the whale shark, is the largest extant fish in the world and is classified as endangered on the IUCN's Red List. Due to their enormous size and conservation status, whale sharks are rarely housed in aquaria. Here we present a behavioral analysis culminating from a large effort by 89 observers from 2008-2012 to study four R. typus (ID codes: AL, TA, TR, YU) longitudinally in an aquarium setting. We found that relatively simple behavioral metrics such as swim speed, depth occupation, swimming direction, and lead-follow interactions demonstrated R. typus individual variation and responses to habitat changes. All sharks displayed increased swim speeds 30-minutes before regimented feed times, when there was scent of food being fed to other animals in the habitat. Consistently in the habitat, one male shark (YU) was recorded swimming more at depth, faster, almost exclusively clockwise, and engaged in fewer close proximity interactions with others than expected by chance. In contrast, a larger female shark (AL) was observed swimming the slowest, at the surface more than others, led other sharks more than she followed, and had strong lead-follow interactions with another shark of the opposite sex (TA). TA and TR did not differ from each other in depth profiles or speed, but did differ in their proclivity to lead or follow. Depth preferences and lead-follow interactions suggest some partitioning of the habitat and the possibility of social hierarchy in this species. These results represent the first longitudinal behavioral analysis of aquarium R. typus, offering meaningful similarities and contrasts to field observations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phenotypic plasticity is critical for organismal performance and can evolve in response to natural selection. Brain morphology is often developmentally plastic, affecting animal performance in a variety of contexts. However, the degree to which the plasticity of brain morphology evolves has rarely been explored. Here, we use Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata), which are known for their repeated adaptation to high-predation (HP) and low-predation (LP) environments, to examine the evolution and plasticity of brain morphology. We exposed second-generation offspring of individuals from HP and LP sites to 2 different treatments: predation cues and conspecific social environment. Results show that LP guppies had greater plasticity in brain morphology compared to their ancestral HP population, suggesting that plasticity can evolve in response to environmentally divergent habitats. We also show sexual dimorphism in the plasticity of brain morphology, highlighting the importance of considering sex-specific variation in adaptive diversification. Overall, these results may suggest the evolution of brain morphology plasticity as an important mechanism that allows for ecological diversification and adaptation to divergent habitats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]