Search

Although evidence suggests that racial and ethnic minority (REM) patients receive inadequate pain management in the acute care setting, it remains unclear if these disparities also occur during the prehospital period. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of race and ethnicity on prehospital analgesic utilization by emergency medical services (EMS) in trauma patients.Retrospective chart review of adult trauma patients aged 18-89 years old transported by EMS to our ACS verified Level 1 trauma center from 2014-2020. Patients who identified as Black, Asian, Native American, or Other for race and/or Hispanic or Latino or Unknown for ethnicity were considered REM. Patients who identified as White, non-Hispanic were considered White. Groups were compared in univariate and multivariate analysis. The primary outcome was prehospital analgesic administration.2,476 patients were transported by EMS (47% White and 53% REM). White patients were older (46 vs. 38, p0.001) and had higher rates of blunt trauma (76% vs. 60%, p0.001). There were no differences in injury severity score (ISS) (21 vs. 20, p=0.22). Although REM patients reported higher subjective pain rating (7.2 vs. 6.6, p=0.002), they were less likely to get prehospital pain medication (24% vs. 35%, p0.001) and that difference remained significant after controlling for baseline characteristics, transport method, pain rating, prehospital hypotension, and payor status (Adjusted OR [95% CI] 0.67 [0.47 - 0.96], p=0.03).Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups were less likely to receive prehospital pain medication after traumatic injury than White patients. Forms of conscious and unconscious bias contributing to this inequity need to be identified and addressed.

Failed extubation in critically ill patients is associated with poor outcomes. In critically ill trauma patients who have failed extubation, providers must decide whether to proceed with tracheostomy or attempt extubation again. The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of failed extubation in trauma patients and determine whether tracheostomy or a second attempt at extubation is more appropriate.Trauma patients admitted to our level I trauma center from 2013 to 2019 were identified. Patients who failed extubation, defined as an unplanned reintubation within 48 h of extubation, were included. Patients who immediately underwent tracheostomy were compared with those who had subsequent attempts at extubation. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and hospital LOS.The population included 93 patients who failed extubation and met inclusion criteria. A total of 53 patients were ultimately successfully extubated, whereas 40 patients underwent a tracheostomy. There was no statistically significant difference in demographics or injury patterns. Patients who underwent tracheostomy had a longer ICU LOS and more ventilator days. There was no difference in mortality or hospital LOS between the two groups.In trauma patients, those who underwent subsequent attempts at extubation did not experience higher rates of mortality than those who received a tracheostomy. Tracheostomy was associated with longer ICU LOS and ventilator days. In certain situations, it is appropriate to consider subsequent attempts at extubation in trauma patients who fail extubation rather than proceeding directly to tracheostomy.

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for critically injured trauma patients. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) practice guideline is the most up-to-date classification for AKI. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and risk factors for AKI in critically injured trauma patients using the current KDIGO definitions. Study design A prospective cohort study was performed at our academic, level 1 trauma center, from September 2017 to August 2018. All adult trauma patients admitted to the surgical ICU were included. The primary outcome was the development of AKI, as defined by KDIGO. Secondary outcomes included hospital and ICU length of stay, ventilator days, and mortality. Results There were 466 patients included and 314 (67%) developed AKI. Those who developed AKI were more often hypotensive on admission (7% vs 2%), had higher Injury Severity Scores (ISS) (19 vs 13), were more likely to have severe injuries to the chest (40% vs 24%) and extremities (20% vs 6%), received transfusion (41% vs 21%), sustained crush injuries (8% vs 1%), received radiocontrast (75% vs 47%), nephrotoxic medication (74% vs 60%), or vasopressors (15% vs 3%). After multivariate analysis, risk factors independently associated with AKI include age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), severe extremity injuries, radiocontrast, and vasopressors. Those who developed AKI had higher mortality (9% vs 2%). Conclusions Using current KDIGO criteria, the incidence of AKI in critically injured trauma patients was higher than previously reported. Older patients, with more severe injuries to their extremities and chest and who have suffered crush injuries, appear to be the most a risk. AKI in the critically injured patient results in an almost 5-fold increase in mortality.

Background Wilderness activities expose outdoor enthusiasts to austere environments with injury potential, including falls from height. The majority of published data on falls while climbing or hiking are from emergency departments. We sought to more accurately describe the injury pattern of wilderness falls that lead to serious injury requiring trauma center evaluation and to further distinguish climbing as a unique pattern of injury. Methods Data were collected from 17 centers in 11 states on all wilderness falls (fall from cliff: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, e884.1; International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, w15.xx) from 2006 to 2018 as a Western Trauma Association multicenter investigation. Demographics, injury characteristics, and care delivery were analyzed. Comparative analyses were performed for climbing versus nonclimbing mechanisms. Results Over the 13-year study period, 1,176 wilderness fall victims were analyzed (301 climbers, 875 nonclimbers). Fall victims were male (76%), young (33 years), and moderately injured (Injury Severity Score, 12.8). Average fall height was 48 ft, and average rescue/transport time was 4 hours. Nineteen percent were intoxicated. The most common injury regions were soft tissue (57%), lower extremity (47%), head (40%), and spine (36%). Nonclimbers had a higher incidence of severe head and facial injuries despite having equivalent overall Injury Severity Score. On multivariate analysis, climbing remained independently associated with increased need for surgery but lower odds of composite intensive care unit admission/death. Contrary to studies of urban falls, height of fall in wilderness falls was not independently associated with mortality or Injury Severity Score. Conclusion Wilderness falls represent a unique population with distinct patterns of predominantly soft tissue, head, and lower extremity injury. Climbers are younger, usually male, more often discharged home, and require more surgery but less critical care. Level of evidence Epidemiological, Level IV.

Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) in asymptomatic high-risk patients has become routine. To date, the length of this asymptomatic period has not been defined. Determining the time to stroke could impact therapy including earlier initiation of antithrombotics in multiply injured patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the time to stroke in patients with a BCVI-related stroke. We hypothesized that the majority of patients suffer stroke between 24 hours and 72 hours after injury.Patients with a BCVI-related stroke from January 2007 to January 2017 from 37 trauma centers were reviewed.During the 10-year study, 492 patients had a BCVI-related stroke; the majority were men (61%), with a median age of 39 years and ISS of 29. Stroke was present at admission in 182 patients (37%) and occurred during an Interventional Radiology procedure in six patients. In the remaining 304 patients, stroke was identified a median of 48 hours after admission: 53 hours in the 144 patients identified by neurologic symptoms and 42 hours in the 160 patients without a neurologic examination and an incidental stroke identified on imaging. Of those patients with neurologic symptoms, 88 (61%) had a stroke within 72 hours, whereas 56 had a stroke after 72 hours; there was a sequential decline in stroke occurrence over the first week. Of the 304 patients who had a stroke after admission, 64 patients (22%) were being treated with antithrombotics when the stroke occurred.The majority of patients suffer BCVI-related stroke in the first 72 hours after injury. Time to stroke can help inform clinicians about initiation of treatment in the multiply injured patient.Prognostic/Epidemiologic, level III.

Background General surgery residents log operative case experience as “first assist” (FA) or “primary surgeon” (PS). This study will evaluate their quantitative and qualitative case log practices. Methods Modified Delphi technique was used to create a questionnaire and distributed online to institutions via the APDS. Descriptive analyses and example operative scenarios for resident case logging habits were ascertained. Results There were 363 residents from university (60%) and non-university (40%) programs; 94% did not know the definition of primary surgeon. Over 50% stated they had been encouraged to log a case as surgeon that they did not feel was warranted. Only 4% felt the current logging system is “very accurate.” Given an operative scenario, residents varied how they chose to log the case. Conclusion General surgery residents do not know the current definition of PS. Case logging should be an objective measure of resident operative exposure, but may actually be more complex than previously recognized.