Search

Introduction and objectives: Determinants of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the early stages of its natural history are not well known. Improving our knowledge of these factors will help to design interventions that can modify prognosis. Study objectives are: a) to characterize a COPD population of young adults aged 35-50 years from a multidimensional point of view; b) to compare these patients with smokers with normal lung function: and c) to create a cohort of young adults aged 35-50 years (smokers or former smokers), with and without COPD, who will be followed in the future to improve understanding of the natural history of the disease. Participants and method: This is a case-control multicenter study aimed at establishing a well characterized cohort of young adults, smokers or former-smokers, with and without COPD, for subsequent follow-up. A total of 311 participants (101 cases and 210 controls) were selected from approximately 30 primary care settings and 12 hospitals in 8 Spanish regions. Subjects were smokers or former smokers (> 10 pack-years) aged 35-50 years. Diagnosis of COPD was based on a post-bronchodilator result of FEV1/FVC < 70%. The main study variables were: questionnaires on health, symptoms, exacerbations and daily physical activity, lung function tests, blood and sputum samples, and low-dose computed tomography. In the statistical analysis, COPD patient characteristics will be described and compared with control subjects using a logistic regression analysis. (C) 2018 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Resumen Introduccion y objetivos Los determinantes en fases iniciales de la historia natural de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva cronica (EPOC) son poco conocidos. Entenderlos mejor es de capital importancia para poder disenar intervenciones dirigidas a modificar su pronostico. Los principales objetivos del estudio son: a) caracterizar a una poblacion de adultos jovenes con EPOC de forma multidimensional; b) comparar estos pacientes con sujetos fumadores con funcion pulmonar normal; y c) establecer una cohorte de adultos jovenes con y sin EPOC, que pueda ser seguida a largo plazo para conocer mejor la historia natural de la enfermedad. Participantes y metodo EARLY COPD es un estudio multicentrico de casos y controles que permitira establecer una cohorte de sujetos para su seguimiento posterior. Se seleccionaron 311 (101 casos y 210 controles) participantes reclutados en una treintena de centros de atencion primaria y 12 hospitales de 8 comunidades autonomas espanolas. Los participantes eran fumadores o exfumadores (> 10 paquetes ano) de entre 35-50 anos de edad. Los casos presentaban una espirometria obstructiva con un FEV1/FVC

BackgroundThe respiratory microbiome is altered in COPD patients but its relationship with core components of the disease, such as the severity of airflow limitation, the frequency of exacerbations or the circulating levels of eosinophils, is unclear.MethodsCross-sectional study comprising 72 clinically stable COPD patients (mean age 68 [SD 7.9] years; FEV1 48.7 [SD 20.1]% of reference) who provided spontaneous sputum samples for 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing. The microbiome composition was analysed with QIIME.ResultsWe observed that: (1) more severe airflow limitation was associated with reduced relative abundance (RA) of Treponema and an increase in Pseudomonas; (2) patients with 2 exacerbations the previous year showed a significantly different bacterial community with respect to non-exacerbators (p=0.014), with changes in 13 genera, including an increase of Pseudomonas, and finally, (3) peripheral eosinophils levels 2% were associated with more diverse microbiome [Chao1 224.51 (74.88) vs 277.39 (78.92) p=0.006; Shannon 3.94 (1.05) vs 4.54 (1.06) p=0.020], and a significant increase in the RAs of 20 genera.ConclusionThe respiratory microbiome in clinically stable COPD patients varies significantly according to the severity of airflow limitation, previous history of exacerbations and circulating eosinophils levels., This study was funded by FIS PI15/00167 and PI15/02042 from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), SAF 2014-54371 (FEDER) from Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica (SEPAR), Laboratorios Menarini S. A, Fundacio Pla Armengol and Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES). CIBERES is an initiative of the ISCIII.; This work was also supported by grants from Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca-Generalitat de Catalunya (2017 GRC-716).

The aim of the proposed recommendations is be a tool to facilitate decision-making in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN). For an optimal decision, accessibility to the different diagnostics techniques and patient preferences need to be incorporated. The first assessment, which includes a chest computed tomography scan, separates a group of patients with extrapulmonary neoplasm or a high surgical risk who require individualized management. Another two groups of patients are patients with SPN up to 8mm and those who have a subsolid SPN, for which specific recommendations are established. SPN larger than 8mm are classified according to their probability of malignancy into low (less than 5%), where observation is recommended, high (higher than 65%), which are managed with a presumptive diagnosis of localized stage carcinoma, and intermediate, where positron emission tomography-computed tomography has high yield for reclassifying them into high or low probability. In cases of intermediate or high probability of malignancy, transbronchial needle aspiration or biopsy of the nodule may be an option. Radiologic observation with low radiation computed tomography without contrast is recommended in SPN with low probability of malignancy, and resection with videothoracoscopy in undiagnosed cases with intermediate or high probability of malignancy.

The aim of the proposed recommendations is be a tool to facilitate decision-making in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN). For an optimal decision, accessibility to the different diagnostics techniques and patient preferences need to be incorporated. The first assessment, which includes a chest computed tomography scan, separates a group of patients with extrapulmonary neoplasm or a high surgical risk who require individualized management. Another two groups of patients are patients with SPN up to 8mm and those who have a subsolid SPN, for which specific recommendations are established. SPN larger than 8mm are classified according to their probability of malignancy into low (less than 5%), where observation is recommended, high (higher than 65%), which are managed with a presumptive diagnosis of localized stage carcinoma, and intermediate, where positron emission tomography-computed tomography has high yield for reclassifying them into high or low probability. In cases of intermediate or high probability of malignancy, transbronchial needle aspiration or biopsy of the nodule may be an option. Radiologic observation with low radiation computed tomography without contrast is recommended in SPN with low probability of malignancy, and resection with videothoracoscopy in undiagnosed cases with intermediate or high probability of malignancy.